He ranks his political beliefs using an archaic two dimensional system

>he ranks his political beliefs using an archaic two dimensional system
>not using the superior 3d dimensional politi-cube

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/m2VxpTMAbas?t=12
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>Not being a bogpilled tesseract

it would be even better, if it would be able to animate personal progress with age

can I get a quick rundown pls?

If you are not collectivist and nationalist at the same time you can freely kill yourself.

... while if you are, you can wait to the national state to do it.

>Implying syndicalism isn't the ultimate redpill

>his political spectrum isn't a 1488-manifold with non-trivial curvature and homotopy groups

> Not using finite variable n-dimensional topological political mappings based on orthogonal psychological-political mental characteristics
How can you not be both collectivist and nationalist at the same time, the nation as a concept is inherently collective(ist)

Avoiding to this I'm somewhere between a classical liberal and an ancap

This is fucking trash desu

>Not knowing about nature's simultaneous time cube

>Collectivist
Why not just be another fucking mindless working drone

We're not bugs

Global collectivists can exist, presumably

5D is even better

t. someone who doesn't know what classic liberalism is

Finally someone actually puts nationlism on the political spectrum. If you made up like 30 questions for this on website and spammed on facebook you could probably make some good money off ads.

>not being on outside edge where the vertices of Syndicalism and National Populism meet

>Uses a 3d politi-cube
>Not using a 9d chess set

How does the test plot you? Is there a test? If not, it's just a neat graphic.

Fuck off commie.

It's just something I drew up. I lack the computer skills to make an actual test.

>calls him a commie
>when he's nowhere near the socialist end of the spectrum
???

If you're a collectivist, might as well be a filthy commie.

t. monkey who doesn't understand what a community is

Well yes, but what I was asking specifically is how you can identify first as a nationalist and then identify as anything other than a collectivist.

The idea of libertarian nationalism. I'm free to do what I want, and other people in my country are as well, but it is OUR country and not anyone else's.

Closed border isolationists to the outside, and free trade muh freedoms people inside. America's policy before WWII.

> mfw she says she is collectivist-transnationalist

youtu.be/m2VxpTMAbas?t=12

>marxism
>individualism

>The world operates under patterns of association and disassociation. Shared values are often implemented politically.
>I as an individual believe that I have the right to associate and disassociate with whomever I wish.
>The Nation is one such entity that I choose to associate with, where a morality of individualism can be implemented politically.

Marxism actually is pretty individualist though, especially in relative social terms, why do you think they're generally so open with 'individual expression' and so socially liberal an individualistic in terms of personal behaviors as opposed to traditionalists who believe in and seek to impose a type of collectivist morality of family, society, authority, etc.?

In relative social terms, I would agree with you. The ethics aren't individualist though. Every political decision that Marxists make, or want to make is done under the pretense that it liberates, or helps a group collectively.

Compare this to libertarian ethics for example, which doesn't have very many qualms with hierarchy, especially when it is the result of individuals making decisions that aren't violent (i.e. starting a family, joining any group which excludes others, acquiring resources, etc...)

...

isn't that a 4D cube?

...