Why is "globalist" an insult?

why is "globalist" an insult?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Because Sup Forums, desperately trying to cling to an identity, will cling to nationalism or anything contrarion to help soother their worthless lives

Because fuck caring about what happens to your own culture or trying to solve your own problems before others

but why would being active around the globe be detrimental to trying to solve your own problems? this sounds like a strawman to me

>Imlying you are at pol as well

Don't lie to yourself, it's not like you could do anything to 'save' your culture.

Why should we be active around the globe? We have our own problems.

Globalism isn't that bad except the government would be ridiculously fucking powerful and inescapable or else weak enough to slit into smaller nations again.
Also currently globalism seems to be all about controlling people and jewing them as hard as possible

Also globalizing white nations just makes them worse for whites and better for brownies

Besides that its ok

yea but you don't activate abroad to get more problems. you do it because there's opportunity.

I think the issue the americans have with it is that they see big business only looking after themself and leaving the little guy to rot. but that leads to another question- is Trump a socialist? is the right now the left?

because local autonomy empowers the individual voter to affect the government they are ruled by.

It can also properly legislate in consideration to the differences in social, cultural, geographical, economic factors.

The opposite of globalism and nation-building isn't nationalism it's sovereignty and non-interventionism

the only reason you think "globalism" is a good thing is because you directly benefit from being, or being the ally of, a super power in a unipolar world(usa)

but.. how is any of that at risk? is this one of those "if we let this development go on then" situations?

It's not, it's a description.

However if you are one, I think you're a cunt.

so.. by being against globalism, what is it that you are being against?

centralized government and one-size-fits-all is not the best way to effectively govern.

If things are decided by the federal government it affects all of the united states. If things are decided by the EU it affects all EU members.

Why is california having a hand in decided what is right for Vermont?
Why does hawaii have a say in what kind of school system Florida should have?

And again, local autonomy increases the weight of the voter.
Federally decided: 1 vote in 320 million
State decided (PA example): 1 vote in 13 million
Increased voter impact by 25%
(yes I know voter turnout is lower than total population but the principle is the same)

>25%
I mean 25x

it's a product of jewish propaganda.

why is shit disgusting? because it's the product of the worst animals have to offer.

OK, seems you just ignorant.

You know how government policy always seems to favour big business at the expense of the "little guy"?

That's globalism. Those megacorps have no allegiance no anyone but money, and governments swear allegiance to them.

well wouldn't that be a matter of being or not being federalist, rather than globalist?

yea ok I figured it might be that, but the question then is- is Donald Trump a left wing politician? the core central tenet of socialism is to prioritize workers over the wealthy

1 vote in 7 billion then, if you even get to.

...

globalism has the same problems. It centralizes authority and applies large blanket conditions on diverse lands which require unique tailored laws to be most effective.

Also this allows a marketplace of legislation and experimentation in policies so people can find out what works and will copy the good ideas and avoid ideas that failed for others.

One-posts are not legitimate content. They are an attempt to disrupt the board by constantly interrupting normal discussion with brainless questions that the questioner is not interested in. Do not reply to one-posts.

also, if a law is passed and it does fail, it doesn't take the whole world down with it and has limited impact.

If Romneycare works for Massachusetts, that is fine and people can try a version in their state. Some states it can work well and other states it cant.

Applying Obamacare on the federal level fucked up healthcare nationwide.

I simply do not believe that this is true. for all the big blanket organisations that exists there is not one that can really enforce its rules and regulations, at least not against the united states. they are intentionally toothless to avoid sparking real conflict. I think this is a false world view and that you all are worrying too much.

No, Trump is slightly right of centre.

>the core central tenet of socialism is to prioritize workers over the wealthy
So a socialist will tell you (and that they are the superheros and everyone against them are evil, immoral, bad people).

In reality, both sides are trying to do what they think is best for their people and country (in theory).

I see that too.
How do liberalism and socialism/communism are linked together goes beyond my understanding

>In reality, both sides are trying to do what they think is best for their people and country (in theory).
yea but in theory the socialist would argue that the best thing is putting in regulations to protect the little guy, whereas the liberal would argue that it's better to not impose on the population and allow those who know how to become very rich, regardless of consequences

Yes they would. Their opponents have their own arguments to achieve similar objectives.

One of the biggest differences between the left and right (today at least), is that the left's arguments SOUND good (not as arguments, but they sound appealing to people), but don't tend to work in practice. The right SOUNDS harsh and strict, but does actually work in practice.

It's not an insult it's a label, label of the enemy.

ISN'T IT FUCKING OBVIOUS??

well you can believe it or not, but the implementation of the single currency of the euro, without taking the many diverse factors of european nation in mind is what is directly leading to the economic hardships of the Mediterranean countries.

UN resolutions is a big reason why the drug war continues and why industry is choked due to "muh carbon"

International trade agreements are causing near slave labor in developing nations who are not protected by developed nation labor laws. And it is costing developed nations their middle class.

The "free movement" of people's meme is causing brain drain in developing nations where first world nations draw in all skilled professionals and all highly ambitions people from developing nations leaving only the poorest and most vulnerable behind in squalor, ruin, and with no one to improve their nation. A high achieving Haitian becomes a doctor, do they stay in Haiti to help their country? fuck no, they go to a developed nation, depriving Haiti of doctors.

youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE
watch this.