Who is this man? Can someone redpill me on him?

Who is this man? Can someone redpill me on him?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=YnEFt20qe0o
youtube.com/watch?v=BR8tVB7sNxc
youtube.com/watch?v=04wyGK6k6HE
youtube.com/watch?v=HcEJr8h_yGM&list=PL5_JO52HSEhEXjLunVishwnZl4k6KbIUS&index=69&t=4776s
youtube.com/watch?v=5n8zn-R10qM&t=1s
youtube.com/watch?v=07Ys4tQPRis&list=PL5_JO52HSEhEXjLunVishwnZl4k6KbIUS&index=58
youtube.com/watch?v=8ABa4RdNPxU
youtu.be/DAncrmE6YV0
youtube.com/watch?v=VHJeqPVGTUY
youtube.com/watch?v=aDRgMUoEvcg
youtube.com/watch?v=MLp7vWB0TeY
youtube.com/watch?v=Ixc9i1G7eew
youtube.com/watch?v=I8Xc2_FtpHI
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I keep seeing him everywhere. Is he sort of like Molyneux?

Bump

Dr. Jordan Peterson, a professor from Canada. Argues in favor of religious values & strongly against slut/hookup culture. Also went on Sam harris' podcast. He's basically proto-Sup Forums.

Jeremy Irons

Le enlightened centrist man

#livinggod

Hmm. So is he /ourguy/ then?

He's pic related.

most definitely.

he reveres the frog

He is a true intellectual god among us humans. Like no joke.

Just watch his new year's message for an idea. He very much is.

youtube.com/watch?v=YnEFt20qe0o

He did a video of pepe.

just THINK ABOUT IT

metaphysics of pepe

SORT

He is a centrist because he is able to see the whole picture, and not because he is afraid to pick a side.

Just watch his YouTubes. SORT YOURSELF OUT.

youtube.com/watch?v=BR8tVB7sNxc

SLAY

Here's some must watch Peterson interviews

On Joe Rogan's podcast
youtube.com/watch?v=04wyGK6k6HE

Stefan Molyneux
youtube.com/watch?v=HcEJr8h_yGM&list=PL5_JO52HSEhEXjLunVishwnZl4k6KbIUS&index=69&t=4776s

Dave Rubin
youtube.com/watch?v=5n8zn-R10qM&t=1s

Best one
youtube.com/watch?v=07Ys4tQPRis&list=PL5_JO52HSEhEXjLunVishwnZl4k6KbIUS&index=58

Kys senpai

...

DELET

And what is wrong with centrism exactly?

centrists=cucks that fall in with what ever their current strongest media tells

You think a strong mind like him wouldn't be able to independently form his own opinions?

His only problem is that he's bluepilled on racerealism, and he will stop being a centrist after he has looked into the biological facts of races. This will be a huge problem for him, since he wants to always speak the truth. He will learn there are things he can't speak about no matter how true they are.

Yeah, niggers have lowest IQ, asians highest..
What u propose to do?

Africa for Africans. Europe for Europeans... and so forth. IQ is by no means our only difference, our other charachteristics are different as well.

Only by being publicly honest about the differences, and accept that true biodiversity on the planet is by keeping us separate and not intermixing too much, can we keep the biodiversity.

youtube.com/watch?v=8ABa4RdNPxU

34:30 - 36:10

his wheels are turning

A transexual in denial. He makes videos making fun of trans people and yells at them. Hes pretty obsessed with them.

...

Not really. I'm a centrist almost entirely, with a small leaning towards libertarianism. All of my political opinions are balanced - I don't go hard left, or hard right. I'd reckon that atually makes me superior to the right-left stuck hindbrains in the dominant political sphere.

...

Professor of psychology at the University of Toronto. Has taken some heat for his positions on Canadian laws and non-profits, most notably his views on transsexuality. He has tenure, which is important. He is also a practicing clinical psychologist, I believe.

I'm not sure exactly what his research is on.

He's well aware of the facts, but he is not ready for forceful solutions to the problems multiculturalism poses. At least that's my perception of what he thinks.

He doesn't make fun of trans people. He even tries to reason with them. And he is more obsessed with free speech, that trannies want to take from him.

Yea yea and your favorite porn is cuckold we fucking get it

Most certainly.

Someone should at some point probably compile a redpill of racerealism and the issue of (((them))) and send it to Peterson. He will probably be more receptive to racerealism, because the proofs are way more undeniable. With the Jews, yeah their whole history in Europe could absolutely be nothing but a chain of ''coincidences'' and all persecution simply irrational hate for the poor good jews, but that comes up to how much one is willing to believe in stuff.

he's way smarter

That's like 1% of what he talks about.

I honestly have never seen a person who knows the human condition as well. And he is incredibly articulate and interesting as well.

HE WON'T SAY YOUR WORDS !

He may be the most important intellectual of our time. Race realism is a considerable blind spot for him though. watch this lecture for a good summation of what he's about youtu.be/DAncrmE6YV0

praying this is non-ironic lmao

This, also he was a leftist, but he can't handle his university being a cesspool of SJW

Agreed! I'm sure he'd be extremely receptive if the information was logical, true, and well-presented

I've got a contrary perception. I think I can remember him saying something along the lines ''the right should ally with the immigrants, because they are conservative''. Which is not something a race-realist would say for obvious reasons. He might have changed his opinions by now, I don't know.

Canada/US is so deep in the shitters with multiculturalism they might be beyond saving. America, 60% white or what, they will require a military dictatorship to segragate themselves. Maybe the New World could be kept as a melting pot, but keep the Old World contintents pure. We can still just close the border.

>implying we can keep our libtard populations in check without throwing them out of helicopters
We had to nip the problem at its core and that core is cancerous western culture and cancerous liberal education. We won't get rid of HolyJew with out outright censorship which would make Jordan butthurt.

>spot the projecting tranny apologist

Peterson. #ourguy. Le Enlightened. He basically invented /pol as he talked about Pepe and Jung practically years before others.

Literally calls himself spokes frog

I was disappointed as time went by - he was such a big-swingin'-dick alpha in his earlier videos, then I got to see him go all emotional Jungian hero and crying with love for his civilisation then he goes and pisses it up the wall by being a supplicating beta loser to monotone autismjew Sam Harris.

He talks a lot of shit about nazi-germany though.

Sort yourself out.

Why ask a board full of fake racist trolls to tell you about a smart person?

Good.

>Psst.. hey kid. Wanna sort yourself out?

I haven't seen the last one yet. Thanks, user

I dont understand why he cant just use the pronouns that people want them to use. They should be free to be referred to whatever they want. Gender fluid people are amazing. If you guys ever left your houses you would know. If you want proof, then here.

youtube.com/watch?v=VHJeqPVGTUY

I think he wants to appeal to normies without scaring them too much. Just look at this video:

youtube.com/watch?v=aDRgMUoEvcg

"Everyone tries to figure out more or less why he is a biased moron. And that's a very long list of reasons for that. And then you have to find out why you are wrong. As a short term mechanism for attaining psychological stability, I would not recommend it. But as a long term process, where you try to make things better in the long term, it's the only way".

He calls them morons right in the face, and then tells them what they need to do to avoid being morons all the time. After he explains in a language so they could understand all these abstract but basic concepts, he takes them to something more difficult. But in small steps. So they applaud him, they understand.

Maybe he will talk at some point about archetypes, Eliade, Bannon, but now it's too soon. It's like trying to prove Riemann Hypothesis to a child who just learned what are the basic operators in arithmetic.

ESSENTIAL (TRAGEDY VS. EVIL):
youtube.com/watch?v=MLp7vWB0TeY

METAPHYSICS OF PEPE:
youtube.com/watch?v=Ixc9i1G7eew

i think he knows since he talks a lot about IQ and in a maps of meaning class he describes this 80 iq guy he knew who couldn't even fold paper and put it into envelopes, likely he's not talking about a caucasian. also you cant be that intelligent and well read and not know about it. Simply, its a subject he doesnt want to talk about publicly, its a pill he doesnt want to be the one spreading so he circles around it.

Jordan Peterson. Canadian professor. He was in that video trying to have a rational discussion about pronouns and all the trannies kept freaking out.

>the right should ally with the immigrants, because they are conservative

Yes, I remember that too. But that was an obvious pragmatic sentiment. It could be a good solution to plug the waves of immigration, since that's the only thing the left and the immigrants have in common.

He touched on racial differences somewhere but he doesn't have a solution to that. He said "Then what. What are you going to do with that information" Can't remember the source on that so take it with a grain of salt. But I think since he values the individual more than anything he refuses to judge whole demogaphic to be "inferior" and secondly he probably thinks the offered solutions are totalitarian.

youtube.com/watch?v=I8Xc2_FtpHI
19:50 he talks iq
1:31:00 he gives a little snarky comment about the jews

He's what Molymeme would be if he was a smart and humble person.

"If Richard Dawkins was wiser he'd be Carl Jung"
-Jordan Peterson

This is a chick. I don't care if it used to be a guy or not but no man would do this to himself.

Hello Peter B. Jordanson

I don't even see how it's ever going to be an issue, logistically.

These people are upset because he will only refer to them as "he" or "she", "him" or "her".

These are typically 2nd or 3rd person pronouns, meaning you wouldn't use them in the presence of that individual anyhow.

I don't refer to my friend, standing beside me, as "him". I say his name, if I'm not speaking directly to him but he's in my presence.

So basically, they're trying to police how he refers to someone in the second or third person, when they're not even FUCKING PRESENT.