Makes you think

Makes you think.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/u8CqkupU7Fw
twitter.com/AnonBabble

With jews, you lose.

Yeah, fascism's retarded. The only people who are fascists are doing it ironically.

>Hitler commanding the red army

The fuck.

the pic is implying that fascists cant into war

mite be because they get ganged up on, but don't tell OP that

>Sup Forums reading comprehension

You guys really do give our site a bad name, and the sad part is you're all retarded

>Invade a bunch of countries
>They proceed to BTFO you

w-w-w-w-why d-d-d-d-d-d-did you all gang up on me?

kek, I would've expected this post from a burguer

never said they didn;t bring it upon themselves, just that that didn't make them bad at war

>giving a shit whether or not our site has a good or bad name

Granted
strongest method to govern but nothing more, the rest is shit, no free expresion, no jobs no nothing just a shit hole like all those arab countries.

Fascism supports:
>thought crime
>political correctnes
>class warfare
>hate crimes
>opression
.
.
.

You want fascims? go live with ISIS

>Rapid expansion is a good thing in war strategy
>It's not the opposite

Why didn't Rome keep Mesopotamia? Why didn't they take over all of Central Europe?... this is Rome and Central Europe is full of potential wealth.

>Ha it took two (Or insert any number here) of you to beat me

Maybe for you, but as a non-Sup Forumstard I don't want to be seen as viewing an edgy pariah site full of racists and fascists. (Even if you're just 16 year old edgelords who don't know anything)

>class warfare
Where?

>1 post by this id
gtfo with your strawman leftypoo

>mite be because they get ganged

>Qing China gets ganged up on
>Remains the most powerful nation on Earth until the middle 19th century

>Revolutionary France gets ganged up on.
>Completely dominates the Europe and has an unprecedented global influence despite falling apart internally for decades.

>Soviet Union gets ganged up on.
>Goes from being a failed state to one of only three superpowers in human history, and turns humanity into a spacefaring race.

"Getting ganged up on" is a problem for fascist specifically because they cum to the idea of war and get off on starting fights they can't win.

found the spanish fucker who makes the commie general threads

Fascism was the only political system ever devised which successfully rolled back the kike onslaught on our civilization. If fascism was truly ineffective, then we wouldn't be conditioned from childhood by every ((social institution)) to hate and fear fascism.

you don't understand fascism very well m8
it's the jdea of combining leftist ideas of cooperation with right-wing ideas of meritocrisy and heirarchy

>throuht crime
no, not for anything short of treason neccisarily
>Poitical correctness
nah
>class warfare
that's commies, not fascists
>oppression
that's vauge, explain

no offense but this comic fucking sucks

>giving a shit about his reputation
>on an anonymous imageboard

>You want fascims? go live with ISIS
But I hate both sandniggers and Islam, so that's not really an option.

Shouldn't white people have the option to live in a fascist country? Isn't denying us this right inherently against freedom?

Sometimes, I wonder whether pol is a haven for the inbred. You just can't fake stupidity this intense. ^^^^

Fascist states are inherently authoritarian. You do not have a right to take away the rights of others. As a matter of fact, you do have the option to live in a fascist country, it's called getting a passport and becoming a citizen of Syria.

>it's the jdea of combining leftist ideas of cooperation with right-wing ideas of meritocrisy and heirarchy

bro you live in the same buble as those comies who say "comunism was never tried"

ITT: fascists BTFO over and over and incapable of seeing it.

Antifa commies are just as retarded as though fascists

Got more ass than a mothafucka

>dat kdr
commies are noobs
fascists are 1337

Of the four outliers, China and the USSR were being actively genocided, Poland got fucked in every direction, and Germany was, as we all know, stunningly incompetent.

no wonder german men are so gay

KDR doesn't matter as long as you complete the objective. Don't play comp if you're not serious about the fucking game, fag

How did the French resistance kill anyone when they we always just fighting themselves?

>only three superpowers in human history
Which are the other two?

United States and (formerly) Great Britain.

>As a matter of fact, you do have the option to live in a fascist country, it's called getting a passport and becoming a citizen of Syria.
Syria isn't a fascist country. Also, I already explained in the post you're replying to why that wouldn't be an option.

I don't want to take away the right of others either, I want to give away my rights in return for certain perks fascism offers. I don't agree with forcing people to live in a fascist society; they should have the option to leave whenever.

I on the other hand just would like to have the option to join one, but for some reason there's no such thing allowed. Makes me wonder why the (((forces to be))) hate freedom so much.

Except none of this is true? Am i the only one in thread who has done reading on fascism?

>stunningly incompetent
>Conquer majority of mainland Europe in 2 yrs
YOU MUST CHOOSE

As long as we never gain the numerical advantage
>once that happens it's game over for communist scum

Your image forgot to list:

>Fascist Spain
>Fascist Portugal
>Fascist Chile
>Fascist South Korea
>Fascist Taiwan
>Fascist Singapore

All of which were successful in that they were at the very least stable and peaceful (keeping psychopathic lefists in check) or wildly economically successful (Chile, S. Korea, Japan, Singapore).

No Communist regime has ever managed to do anything but collapse it's economy and murder enormous numbers of it's citizens (no, shills, China since the 70s/Deng isn't Communist) while all the 'failed' fascist states are pretty much entirely made up of WWII Axis powers.

At worst, fascism has a mixed record of success - which is infinitely better than the record of communism.

Well, you flip-flopped from the prospect of going off to make their own fascist society all the way over to making a fascist society here and now without considerations for others and now THEY must leave if they don't like the way things are headed.

You're an authoritarian. Just be proud of it and wear it. You don't give a shit about rights or freedom at all.

>YOU MUST CHOOSE

More like
>Realign your country into a war economy and bankrupt yourself attacking neighboring nations until you can't sustain your invasions anymore, the wave breaks, and Ivan rapes your grandmother.

>Describing any of those nations as stable or peaceful.
>Admiring Fascist Japan.

These countries had the entire world declare war on them and lasted years

>you flip-flopped from the prospect of going off to make their own fascist society all the way over to making a fascist society here and now without considerations for others and now THEY must leave if they don't like the way things are headed.
These are my two posts in this thread - can you point out where the flip flopping is precisely?

>You're an authoritarian. Just be proud of it and wear it. You don't give a shit about rights or freedom at all.
Why aren't white people allowed a fascist country by people that allegedly care about rights and freedom, hypocrite?

>Tojo
>Fascism

Are you retarded?

>Losers: The Post

Just admit that Nationalism and Singulism are impotent and potentionally impossible varients of an actual war

Even Rome needed Allied Tribes on their conquest of Gaul

>These countries had the entire world declare war on them and lasted years

Even the Vietcong and the Iraqi Baathists lasted years fighting the Americans. The Vietcong even managed to win.

How tf did all these guys do worse than commie rice farmers?

You used to be amazing under fascism spain

In reality, it was America that conquered Europe, you faggot cuck.

>muh war economy
>American education

>equating stability with economics

Baathists are fascists

Not an argument

>T-the greedy (((bankers))) and commies had it out for them all along!

All these massive copypastas exist to dodge the cognitive dissonance that comes from fascists and reactionaries reflexively sucking the dick of capitalism and power.

>fascism is compatible with capitalism
not really, you fag

>America

Well you were (((almost))) right.

>The most virulently anti-leftist philosophy that is almost synonymous with mass-murdering leftists and banning unions hates capitalism.

You are historically illiterate.

>Strasserism
>National Bolshevism
>Baathism
How does it feel to be the biggest retard on political ideologies senpai?

>you can only be anticapitalist if you suck commie dick and let jamal fuck your wife
I mean, ok

Fascism is a Boogeyman. Read about the origins of these systematized ideas, all commissioned from hyper rich leeches. Explicit systems are easy for the (((hyper rich))) to exploit regardless or the stated intent. Also, Jews were delt with quite well before fascism. Allowing them to monopolize white collar jobs is what allowed them to flourish.

Yes
Only retarded fucking leftist trying to conflate fascism with capitalism due to a lack of a moral argument against capitalism try and conflate them.
Fascism is just a different flavor of shit tier collectivism
youtu.be/u8CqkupU7Fw

Ah yes, the extremely woke "Capitalism is bad but so is anti-capitalism because of Jews" branch of fascism.

Ah yes, the extremely typical "its not socialism because they hate Jews in my mind" argument.

still better than
>communism was never tried!

To the fosa común with you. Come on, hurry

>We hate capitalism, but we also hate leftists because, uh...

>having no rebuttal and repeating your argument because you dont have the intelligence to realise Socialist Fascist is basically Socialism with Jews added in
>the dilapitate shitstained hovel known as lefty/pol/

The only choices at this point are

>Enter a long winded essay-fight over the definitions of socialism, leftism, etc., and why fascism always reflexively defends power, even when they hang on the coattails of capitalist critique to gain power.

>Acknowledge that people who make arguments like aren't made in good faith, and that this entire argument exists because of butthurt over failed ideology.

You're the Spanish fucker who was dividing the RWA thread with muh fashizum is bad

>I have an argument
>Im just too intelligent to define it because Im having an autismo fit over Fascist ideologies being Socialist

...

>We wuz socialsits
>murder socialists
>WE WUZ SO-

It really make you think...

Thank you for literally defining the history of the Soviet Union following 1917
>forgetting your own history of socialist rivalry
>the absolute state of lefty/pol/

>Hitler
>Mussolini
>Dickriding socialism for populist cred before making a U-turn and sucking capitalist dick for power.

IT KEEPS HAPPENING

>It really make you think
Words are words actions are actions.

You're making yourself to look as dumb as the people who thought Bernie was genuine

What would you describe the current state of affairs in the US as?
Democracy?
Sovereign?
Sustainable?

>tfw Finland could into arctic oil and northeast passage if Hitler hadn't fucked up

literally just finished making this

thicc

if that were a girl i would happily inseminate her

The nazis invaded literally three countries.

I meant technically like 10 but they BTFO most of them in a few days.

This Hillary Clinton-ish "We won by losing" doublespeak is typical of facism:

>The followers must feel humiliated by the ostentatious wealth and force of their enemies. When I was a boy I was taught to think of Englishmen as the five-meal people. They ate more frequently than the poor but sober Italians. Jews are rich and help each other through a secret web of mutual assistance. However, the followers must be convinced that they can overwhelm the enemies. Thus, by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak. Fascist governments are condemned to lose wars because they are constitutionally incapable of objectively evaluating the force of the enemy.

AKA "They we so strong that they didn't lose as fast as they should have."

Why are all red army holding guns? They couldnt afford guns.