Wire Taps

Trump has gone on record, publicly proclaiming the existence of wiretaps on Trump Tower. Presidents do not have the authority to just create a wiretap on anyone by decree. You have to go to a judge and submit evidence strong enough to convince them to grant a warrant with specific targets, goals, limitations, and often supervision.
So, either the President is straight up lying on Twitter about a make-believe criminal investigation against him, or a judge found probable cause of criminal activity strong enough to approve wiretaps in the most controversial circumstances imaginable. Both of these scenarios are damaging to Trump, and one is disastrous.


>OR
>The President is accusing Barrack Obama of doing something VERY VERY illegal.

Other urls found in this thread:

venturebeat.com/2012/12/31/obama-fisa/
telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/10407282/Barack-Obama-approved-tapping-Angela-Merkels-phone-3-years-ago.html
zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-04/obama-advisor-rhodes-wrong-president-can-order-wiretap-and-why-trump-may-have-last-l
myredditvideos.com/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Trump has been OBSESSED with getting Obama on something.

Now is his time!

we know what happened, Obama's guys presented the fake pee party dossier.

Which has been already confirmed that Obama has done that in the past, and worse, so why is it so hard to believe?

>a judge found probable cause of criminal activity strong enough to approve wiretaps in the most controversial circumstances imaginable

>Implying the involved judge is any more trustworthy than the Democrats

>implying the NSA isn't wiretapping everyone in the country

>You have to go to a judge and submit evidence strong enough to convince them to grant a warrant with specific targets, goals, limitations, and often supervision.


yeah...because that is how the Patriot Act of the NDAA works.

pshhh

He got a FISA warrant to tap a server in Trump Tower without citing Donald Trump's name. Found literally nothing. The tapping went on. The leaks from conversations of American citizens illegally came out on the press. What is NOT wrong with this, we may ask.

rump's Twitter Titillates Truth!

How low has President Obama gone to tape Celebrity Apprentice during the very sacred?Trump is exposing Arnold for low wire of Trump Tower ratings. Obama didn't voluntarily leave the white house his own, but was fired from wire taping. Not for Trump's doing executive caused Arnold to be removed illegality. McCarthyism found nothing in just before victory. Because Nixon/Watergate bad (or sick) guy to sad end to great show.

Obama was fired by his bad (pathetic) ratings, not by Trump.

You don't need probable cause for a FISA court, that's the whole point.

When Democrats act crooked and paranoid on a level that would make Nixon vomit in disgust it's okay because they know what's best for everyone.

venturebeat.com/2012/12/31/obama-fisa/

Trump's Twitter Titillates Truth!

>How low has President Obama gone to tape Celebrity Apprentice during the very sacred?Trump is exposing Arnold for low wire of Trump Tower ratings. Obama didn't voluntarily leave the white house his own, but was fired from wire taping. Not for Trump's doing executive caused Arnold to be removed illegality. McCarthyism found nothing in just before victory. Because Nixon/Watergate bad (or sick) guy to sad end to great show.

>Obama was fired by his bad (pathetic) ratings, not by Trump.

Trump just has to shout into the world, his followers will either be convinced to think it actually happened due to very questionable sources/facts or lack thereof. It does not matter how often Trump is proven wrong. Fuck, he's been blown the fuck out by facts 6 times on his inauguration day.

>You have to go to a judge and submit evidence strong enough to convince them to grant a warrant with specific targets, goals, limitations, and often supervision.

Or you can be a scumbag like Obama and go to a federal judge that he appointed and collude/make shit up so Democrats can spy on their rivals.

I see this claim made in every thread still ther e is no evidence for that.

Strange....

>shills in full damage control mode

Tell me what judge approved this wire tap.
telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/10407282/Barack-Obama-approved-tapping-Angela-Merkels-phone-3-years-ago.html

And yes, a president can order wire taps.

zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-04/obama-advisor-rhodes-wrong-president-can-order-wiretap-and-why-trump-may-have-last-l

And, the president can declassify things

so why doesn't Trump?

While I don't put it past Obama to actually do that, there still is no evidence at all except a tweet.

Also the president has that power without a warrant only in cases where communication between foreign nations is affected and it is unlikely that the communication of an American citizen is recorded. Read the statute.

>because judges always do the right thing
>also assuming probably cause means guilt of anything, when already Trump has been cleared by fbi

CNN and Democrats just have to shout into the world, their followers will either be convinced to think it actually happened due to very questionable sources/facts or lack thereof. It does not matter how often CNN is proven wrong. Fuck, they've been blown the fuck out by facts 6 times on Trump's inauguration day.

Oh you mean like Putin and Trump being buddies? Like they've been accusing for the past six months? Building the story up so they could tap him? I agree with the no proof, but it sure does explain why they push the Russia angle so hard.
Unrelated, and no he can't.

Obama spokesperson did not deny the tapping. Also: 1) we're talking information which should be classified but was leaked illegally. 2) evidence is to be released in court , not on Sup Forums for the sake of a germancuck like you.

>2 paragraphs spaces
Fuck off back to The_Donald

Lol ok shareblue

it takes a long time to brute force all the options in 4d chess.

he wont drop anything new untill this fills a news cycle.

In itself proof that he is in fact playing 5d chess.

bravo mio fratello, fuckin germans