How do we stop these faggots?

How do we stop these faggots?

give them enough power to snuff themselves out.

send them to somalia

with McNukes

Let Ancaps enslave them all.

This

Let them experience what semi anarchism feels like.

Anarcho-capitalists are allies of the right wing. They make good memes.

Everyone else goes to the gas chambers.

fascism

give them what they want an watch them crumble

This. Despite the fact that they are anarchists, they are pretty based. I'd pick an ancap over some egalitarian liberal fuck any day

>Anarcho-Totalitarianism

>Anarcho-Statism

>Anarcho-Authoritarianism

These people are retarded.

I don't think it works but ancap is pretty redpilled

>your propriety,means your rules
>free to discriminate whoever you want however you want
>no welfare
>true meritocracy
>guns

...

I want to declare a sizeable island like New Zealand Anarchistan and drop all these faggots all of there. Then install cameras and drones and market it as a reality show or something. I'd pay good money to to see an anarcho-feminist "society" in action

no need to, they will blow themselves up sooner or later

You should add America pointing gun at the peasant.

they literally did this a few years ago. It wasn't political victums though, it was just reality survivor type show. one island had all men and one island had all women.
the island with the men ended up having people hunt/fish and build homes. while the island of women sat around and did literally nothing but complain.

They are all just mentally disabled individuals.

Meritocracy is shit. it looks like a good idea on paper but then you realize that you're part of the bottom rung of losers who have no rights because you suck at everything.

What is anarcho feminism?

>>your propriety,means your rules


You means the warbands rules with more men and guns.

We AnCaps are the purest form of right-wing ideology.

Everyone else are cucks at best.

It's an idea that patriarchy is hierarchy, and that you can't have anarchism until male privileged is gone. I don't have a very good understanding of their ideas, so that might not be a perfect summary.
What I do know is that Anarcho-Coms and syndicalists hate them (along with queer anarchists, which is the same basic concept) because they're basically preventing any type of revolution with their identity politics. Anarchism was happening perfectly fine in Catalonia, there was no issue with Feminism or gays, because fuck it, the people were free from government and corporations, social issues no longer even make logical sense.

And you feel good dragging everyone else down to your level?

No thanks, I'm too much of a Statist to deal with any of these fruity-in-the-booty faggots.

See, how far has trannies come? If they have a properly plumbed pussy and I don't have to buy lube, I'm game for that.

Ancap is hilariously entertaining

>Anarchism was happening perfectly fine in Catalonia

Well yeah. Untill they were conquered.

>implying that it work this way

You must be a special kind of retard.

there is literally nothing wrong with anarcho capitalism

the rest may be tossed out of helicopters, though

Because the USSR helped fund fascist Spain to conquer them. I already had this argument earlier today and I'm honestly tired of repeating it. All countries are dependent on other countries, if you have no allies, or you have weak allies, you will fall. This is the same reason Germany fell.

What happens when one company vertically and horizontally integrates? And then it merges with the private courts?

>We AnCaps are the purest form of right-wing ideology.
>Everyone else are cucks at best.

I unironically agree with this. Ancaps and extreme libertarians are the only true right wingers. Everybody else are indecisive cucks who don't stick to their principles.

There is literally nothing wrong with Anarcho-syndicalism
>against both corporate shills and socialist shills
>Zero taxes
>Good mix of individuality and community responsibility
>Literally every Ansyn movement evolved into a Fascist movement.
Prove me wrong.

>USSR helped fund fascist Spain
Nope, they just didn't help the commies.

>How do we stop these faggots?

Use meme warfare to herd them all towards anarcho-pacifism and then wipe them the fuck out

...

Authority is derived from strength, not morality. Humanity is strongest in groups, your Anarcho-capitalist society will be doomed the moment it is created, as all it takes is an ideology that acts contrary to your beliefs and your Anarcho-capitalist system collapse. Your ideology is impossible.

Ok then. Have fun listening to some angry liberal yapping on about how niggers deserve welfare while I discuss depriving niggers of all welfare thus driving lazy nogs to cannibalism-tier poverty with an ancap

Definitely. Not everyone has things like talent or skill and those who do should be a little accommodating and look out for us stooges.

Honestly, just let them get enough negative media attention so that the general public knows about them and thinks they're dumb. They'll give up pretty quick when everyone thinks they're a joke.

forgive me if this is a retarded question, but what is wrong with any of those?

>Because the USSR helped fund fascist Spain to conquer them

The fuck is that retarded shit?

They did help the commies with weapons and shit. Too bad being commies and anarchists they were horrible fighters and then stalin stole all their gold.

>Anarcho - Anarchism
>Anarcho - niggerism
>Anarcho - retardism

Ansyns are literally ancap shills, luv u guys.

There is literally nothing wrong with anarcho-syndicallism

> How do we stop these faggots?
From what?

We don't have to. Anarchy will always be an ideology for social outcasts.

Anarchism communism isn't even possible.

Ancap and libertarian philosophy on general is incredibly stupid and unrealistic. If people are allowed to do whatever they want with no restrictions or regulatory barriers they are going to always choose bad. Civilisation would cease to exist within 5-10 years in an Ancap utopia.

Anarcho Primitism is pretty based though

>inbf t. unibomber

>queer anarchism
wat

and this is bad because...?

>anarcho-kekism
can this be a thing?

Anarcho capitalists don't bother anyone, NAP would not let them riot. Anarcho-primitivists are just hobos innawoods or LARP as hobos innawoods. Fem/queer are irrelevant clowns, pacifists are hilariously non-threatening. Only problem are anarcho-comunists but this has more to do with them being commies than anarchists.

>Let them experience what semi anarchism feels like.
Ah, the old "tried it with niggers" fallacy.

You can't. Capitalism is against human nature.

ancap is different than libertarianism. Libertarians still advocate for police/military

other than the "anarcho-" part.

Don't get too mad there, leaf.

>Leaving out the best kind of Anarchism

you could have the most perfect system in the world and niggers would still fuck it up. The problem with Somalia isn't that its lawless, it's that it has too many niggers.

>destroy authority
>speaks from a position of authority
What does he mean?

you can never have good communications reasonable population density and not have serious coercion from interest groups. Without government, you get corporate coercion. There's no way to prevent people from banding together to fuck you over. The strongest coercive organization needs to have a power base that spans most of the population or you'll have a minority getting oppressed pretty badly. No matter what you will get some bad, it's about minimizing it. Also fascism is inherently undemocratic and hierarchical. It has collectivist elements but it's more about everyone being in their place and contributing as expected

>Capitalism is against human nature.

Making money from the sweat of your brow has been going on for at least three thousand years.

I don't see any arguments here.

This. Any sort of anarchist system eventually just ends with people forming small factions and reverting back to tribalism.

>those who do should be a little accommodating and look out for us stooges
No. Society naturally has classes, unfortunate for you if you end up as a have-not because you're inferior.

He means: can't be in any hierarchies if we kill everyone that disagrees. BRILIANT!

Keeping what you produce has been going on for millennia. Making money for another man is is a recent invention.

You're a faggot; suck my dick.

>Egoism
>Literally the biggest meme out of all of them

I'd tell you to kill yourself but I guess you think your own life is a spook already

>Don't stick to their principles

Mate. Anarchists have no principles.

In this regard, Stirner was right.

No such thing as a retarded question, just retarded answers - and retarded reactions to non-retarded answers.

If a business integrates either vertically or horizontally, they will become a monopoly (more literally true with horizontal integration, but still inevitable with vertical integration). Near-Monopolies DO NOT need to operate within the free market system, they do not need to compete, they can use unique tactics to keep competition out. Once they are a complete monopoly, then they really do not need to operate in a free market, because consumers can no longer boycott their product, they need it, and only one company makes the product. This allows the company to grow in power. And in a completely free market, this company can just merge more and more. Let's say the first monopoly in the world is a food company - it probably isn't a monopoly on all food at first, just a few things, like bread. Then this super powerful bread company buys out all candy companies, then all beef companies, etc etc. Soon enough all food is in the control of this company. Why stop there? The Food company buys out more construction businesses, buys out healthcare businesses, etc. Fundamentally, completely free market economies allow for one business to continually grow and control more things.

Eventually there would need to be a government which makes it illegal for large companies to merge. Which is why it is illegal right now, why Windows and Apple don't merge together, even though they would make more money merged than un-merged. Because capitalism is NOT about competition, it is about making money, and competition is something which prevents you from making money, competition is a waste of money.

>What happens when one company vertically and horizontally integrates? And then it merges with the private courts?

Neocameralism.

Not those who disagree, just the one who order you around.

He means governments but authority just sounds cooler.

only pure anarchists (who are retards). Anarcho-x are based around a central principles, with ancaps for example basing everything on capitalism.

In that sense they have the most pure principles of all.

DON'T tell me which people to kill!

What stops me from starting my own company and providing cheaper food (lets say) and in better quality?
>captcha: road

you are that idiot drowning who pulls his rescuer under with him

>Making money for another man is is a recent invention.

Obviously not, because lots of ancient Romans toiled away for their employers or masters on farms, in mines, on ships, etc.

>Making money for another man is is a recent invention.

Lol no it isn't.

>Noble has land farmed by peasants
>peasants get crops
>Noble takes a tax from those crops because they used his land

Uncle Sam is actually pointing a gun at the citizen. Can't imagine why you left that out.

>wage labor has never existed until modern capitalism

Retard.

And at what point is the master entitled to the sweat of the serf?

>Somehow many states represent no states

Somalia has a booming economy faggot. Of course a country full of niggers is going to have a high crime rate.

The vertical integration. They don't just own the farms, they own the plants, they own the seeds, they've done the research to make seeds cheaper, plants grow better, etc. Once a company grows so large, it becomes nigh impossible to compete. You cannot make a mainframe that out-competes with IBM, because IBM owns all the infrastructure that surrounds a mainframe, if you make a better Mainframe than IBM, they will make it so their software and hardware does not work with your mainframe. This is why after a certain point, you cannot compete anymore, when capitalism stops being meritocratic. The company that is a monopoly DID make the best food with the best quality, that is why they became powerful.

>here I'll give you money to do this
>STOP TRYING TO MAKE ME LICK YOUR BOOTS REEEEEE

...

>Humans have existed for 200,000 years
>For the last 5,000 or so we have had the majority of people working not for each other, but for only one person.
>Somehow making money for another man isn't a recent invention.

Just don't agree to lick his boots in exchange for money dude.

> Exchange of goods and services is agains human nature

Wut?

>if you refuse me you and your family will starve
>this is totally voluntary

We do to, ours is private though.

No more benefits for the mentally retarded.

>I have to ensure your safety and wellbeing
nice goalpost moving faggot

>And at what point is the master entitled to the sweat of the serf?

Serf? At no point. But if someone who owns and has grown, say, a field of corn wants to hire someone to help him harvest it, what's wrong with that?

>This

Any anarchy is just a reset on society and will always float back to tribalism and eventually feudalism. Anarchists are just asking to reset history but too dumb to realize it would play out the same.