But that's okay because he's just giving the cucks a taste of their own medicine for their russia allegations.
If anyone approaches you criticizing Trump's lack of evidence, remind them of this, and be sure to tie them as closely to the cucks as possible: It's where they belong.
It's literally nothing.
Although it would look partisan, Obama should sue him for defamation.
That's a cute tweet
This.
Yep. 100%
But nothing is everything in this administration, and here's why:
Because Trump's still playing 4D chess. Most moves are distractors. He's distracting the Mainstream Media machine and Ethics Watchdogs with the Obama fiasco while he deregulates corporations, tears down government programs, creates infrastructure jobs with a Great Wonder (the wall) and implements a watered-down version of his Muslim ban.
The construction jobs will disappear after next election but he'll already have won by then from the momentum and optimism they create (however temporary). Also there'll be a lot of border patrol enlisters. More "jobs created." This will be a big talking point of his, against whatever dem they run against him. The only situation you should be scared is if they ran a silicone valley billionaire against him. More of that "capitalist superhero" meme from the left could help them take back control of the overton window.
Incidentally his wall idea is ethnonationanlist in multiple senses. It favors whites by giving them jobs that only they would want (I can't imagine minorities lining up to help build Trump's wall, or join the border patrol...)
He's carrying through his agenda 1 distracting outrage at a time.
His putin tween from 2013 was a preemptive attempt to outrage liberals 4 years later. Not kidding.
Except we have public confessions of the russian allegations.
fuck off sharia blue
I don't get it.
Stand and deliver.
That and there's absolutely no reason why Trump should or would disclose such evidence to the public first, especially when it would contain information from his own private communications just by nature of the accusation.
Evidence is here:
youtube.com
> Mark Levin
What the fuck does Levin know about life? He's a shitty radio personality with a following of geriatrics and Truck Drivers his opinion is about as valid as that of Alex Jones Mainstream Meteor Thernovich and Molyjew
Watch the video. He offers MSM sources stating this.
Where is it?
>attacking the person and not attacking the sources
Sad.
And who are you leaf?
>Watch the video. He offers MSM sources stating this.
Those MSM sources can only be used against the MSM themselves to shut them up, but it still doesn't conclusively prove whether or not wire tapping occurred.
bbc.com
forgot this.
This is evidence for something, but not Trump's claim.
Trump's claim is that Obama called for this.
Mark Levin has presented evidence that the DOJ contacted FISA for a court order to perform surveillance on the trump campaign.
While Obama could have somehow suggested to his contacts that the DOJ do this, there is no direct evidence yet.
Would Trump put his hand on the bible and swear Obama did this? I think that might be an important distinction.
Russian allegations have more base than obamagate. Congress and Obama had investigated a hack from guccifer and tracked it to russian intelligence.
We have no idea where trump got his allegations from and as far as we know obama can't do it unless he is allowed to or the fbi itself wanted it and not him.
>a United States Senator twice met with the ambassador of a major world player in his capacity as a United States Senator
>as well as plenty of other foreign officials
>one meeting arranged by Obama Whitehouse
Say it ain't so.
>Speak to 30+ country representatives as part of your job
>Same as treason because the news owners want a war
Here's another neat setup:
>FISA warrant on Trump tapping denied in july, the 13th denied request of over 35,000 requests
>obama then sends russian ambassador to meet/call flynn and sessions, ambassador purposefully takes a pro-russian stance and gets in a verbal spat with sessions over ukraine.
>next thing you know the FISA is granted
>same ambassador who has a seemingly super pro-russian stance is the only ambassador out of 36 not to be sent back to russia
>during trump joint congress speech last week, said super-pro Russia "I will relay the info to Vladamir" Ambassador sits among the Democrats and engages in conversations.
>why hasn't this guy been expelled from the US? Why is he sitting with Democrats last week? Why isn't he being interrogated over his relaying of information between Trump camp to Vladimir Putin?
Trump is the President, he can declassify anything he wants and he knows Obama did do this, purposefully, probably personally. Trump says it in an unverified tweet and gets the news to cover it non-stop and flat-out lie to the people. Then he'll declassify the info, proving it's true, and making the media into a bitch again.
He does this shit ALL. OF. THE. TIME. and yet people don't suspect it, fucking somehow.
Trump is always right. He is the smartest man in DC.