I'll give you credit, you are determined.
>2) Your actions are your property, therefore, if you build a house, the house belongs to you. You can voluntarily exchange your effort for someone else's effort, i.e. you provide something that someone wants, and this someone gives you something you want. E.g.: work, get paid, use money to buy a house someone else built; build a house, sell house, buy food with money.
So this entire system is utterly reliant on people agreeing with you. That's the problem , Humans rarely agree, especially on who owns or deserves what. You keep dropping the word "voluntarily"(and from what I see many times in the rest of your responses, but I'll deal with it on a case by case).
>Stop trying to think of ancap as an alternative to statism.
You...do know what alternative means, right? It means the other option. Choosing between having a state or removing it to live in an AnCap system is an alternative choice.
>A system means there is a force above you dictating your actions which you must abide - ancap is the opposite, it's how you see your reality.
No, it doesn't. Having no government means there is a system in place that is void of a government, it doesn't mean there's no system. We can argue over this semantic crap all day, but it's a waste of time if you can't understand concepts as the rest of the world sees them.
>Yeah, it's called the government, or the State.
Yes, a state does this and ensures via it's ability that nobody else does it. If one or the other is inevitable, then it's clear to anyone with a sense of reality that having a power player like a government that is controlled through democratic means is much preferable to any power player beholden to nobody.
>oluntary militia. A local group of people band together to protect themselves from an otherwise bigger threat.
You're thinking too small picture. A local militia of a town with a few thousand people cannot hope to stand in the way of an army.
cont.
