This is your fault, America

shanghaiist.com/2017/03/06/comprehensive-sexuality-education.php

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/N1tv95DbI_I
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

homos have been around for millennia

>flag

Of course China would promote homophilia, they have an insane birthrate.

the problem arises when you allow them to show themselves as normal

Definitely, it's a fine line between """""tolerance""""" and promoting it as a life style. See any jewish HBO show or anything out of hollywood and you'll soon see that it's promoting the lifestyle, rather than demonstrating the existence of it.

They aren't called the asian jews for nothing.

It's also a problem to label it as unnatural.
It certainly isn't normal, but it does occur naturally and has at least some use.

Now trannies on the other hand, I can't for the love of me think of any use they have.

Yeah, basically this.

isn't china pretty conservative or is that japan?

>progressive = more degenerate, more explicit, more deviant
really makes your mind melt

>Not a black man having sex with a chinese woman

Nah it's over.
They're trying to promote having a 2nd child now.

I always thought that China is hard to describe using our western terms for this shit.

They kind of do their own thing and take what they want one moment, destroy anything that bothers them the other, without any regards to tradition and all that.
A bit like the concept of Utilitarianism turned into a country.

Guys I just realized it
>chinese government sees that one child policy is useless
>there are already too many chinese
>normalize homosexuality so they will reproduce less

Same could be done in India
>educate rural couples how sex works and how to prevent having babies
>normalize homosexuality and abortions
>less rural dumbfucks starving away

India get's another bonus:
There's tons of angry moon-worshipping sandpeople in their country, so whenever an abortion-clinic get's opened or a gay wedding happens, they will blow it up, killing more people.
That means they will have less people to feed AND less muslims in their country! WIN WIN!

I'm convinced what China has experienced over the last 60 years is comparable to the industrial age of Europe.

China is so fucking ignorant about sexuality it's a joke. They did some studies where they found out the average time of coitus is something like a minute and a half, and almost none of the women experienced orgams and even knew they had a clitoris
Paradoxically, you can see a ton of homosexual couples in the streets, because people are so clueless they don't even register them as such

Uegh... Racist and Sexist much? But It's not your fault. That's how white people just are.
Blacks can not be racists because they lack institutional power. Like Obama wasn't even a president.

If nobody told women they can have orgasms how would they know?

>almost none of the women experienced orgams and even knew they had a clitoris

How the fuck can you not know you have a clit? Chinks are such fucking drones, just live to work and don't even know what your own anatomy is.

africa as well but they already do homosexual shit in their "coming of age" ceremonies and it doesnt seem to help so idk

Niggers in Africa are superstitious and backwards as hell, the reason Africa does not advance is that they're not one ounce progressive. Most still rather believe what their parents say that a doctor or teacher and adults not honoring their elders are often disowmed and casted out of society. Disrespecting your elders is worse than rape and murder.

>It certainly isn't normal, but it does occur naturally and has at least some use.
>It isn't normal
>But it occurs naturally
>Putting benis in poop hole has a use

So this is what happens when you mix germanic grade autism with faggotry.

Your women being whores serve no purpose either because they're all ugly gyppos and nobody fucks them. Do leeches have a purpose? Do nipples on men have a purpose? Things exist even without purpose, like your dick.

The act itself doesn't have a use, but the existence of redundant adults does.
Theoretically, we are at a point where our population can sustain itself and care for all the children without the need for every adult to have 6 or 7 children.

Having a bunch of adults around, who don't have their own families to care for is positive.
Everything they produce betters the situation for the rest and they can be used for jobs that are dangerous.
Why use a father of three as a soldier when you can use the gay guy?
If the father dies, there will be a bunch of orphans, or worse, they will be raised by a single mother.
If the gay guy dies, nobody is left behind and everything he had get's to be used by the rest of society.
Win - Win.

That's how it should be in theory, at least.

What makes this so "progressive"?

Someones triggered.

>The act itself doesn't have a use, but the existence of redundant adults does.
>Redundant people have a use

>Why use a father of three as a soldier when you can use the gay guy?

Because it has been shown that gays reduce unit cohesion. And also if you send the father to die it teaches the next generation to not be pussies. Plus studies have shown and widows are not the same as single moms when it comes to raising kids.

>That's how it should be in theory, at least.
In theory not in reality. In reality faggots just help societal decay and never actually do anything particularly useful for society.

Again, studies have shown Romanians do nothing for society either.

>Theoretically, we are at a point where our population can sustain itself and care for all the children without the need for every adult to have 6 or 7 children.
Except every major first world nation keeps crying about how it's population is in decline. Gays are like a cancer. They are natural in that they occur as abberations from the norm that do not serve a species or population or genetic line since they do not reproduce and do not pass on genetics.

they're like islamists without the religion itself. super conservative

>Because it has been shown that gays reduce unit cohesion.
>What was Sacred Band Of Theben
Gay-only units. They will fight to the bitter end and will do anything for their comrades.

Also:
>Because it has been shown that gays reduce unit cohesion.
I do not trust any studies done in the last decades on this issue, since the entire situation was shit. Don't ask, Don't tell and all that shit does not help unit cohesion.

>muh 'you have to fuck and have your own kids to pass on genes' maymay
It's ONE way of continuing your line.
Example from humanity:
I have a brother. My brother has children. These kids share my genes, all be it less than my own would.
Since I do not and will likely not have my own kids, alot of what I earn and do is for the benefit of my nieces and nephews. My genes get passed along and the kids have a slightly better upbringing.
Should something happen to my brother and his wife, I can act as their guardian and wouldn't have to worry about funds and all that because I have no children of my own to spend it on.
Think of it as a safety net.

>Muh 'gays shouldn't raise children'
Obviously it would only be an emergency solution.

Example, animals:
Lions sometimes abandon their own cubs in favour of those of a sister or aunt, when they would save a greater number or a healthier cub if they leave their own to die.
Indirectly passing on genes is a thing.

I don't care where people are putting their dick

Sup Forums does though. Sup Forums has a strange NO HOMO attraction to penises.

lol dog fuckers

With the obsession in regards to passing on genes and genetic superiority you should be fine with it. If you don't like it then good news, they won't have kids. Just as bad as the faggots in the pride parades.

I don't fucking care where people put their dick

If I had to choose I'd probably do a big rabbit, not a dog. Like one of those dog sized rabbits. A dog doesn't even look like it would feel good.

>where people put their dick
lol roman polansky
fuck off

Are you an innocent little girl or did you not yet notice that guys by nature talk about cocks and sex all the time?

>and genetic superiority
These idiots? HERE? These fucking uggo shits?
Surely you jest!

>honestly thinking children won't learn what sex is and want to do it once they hit puberty if teachers dont tell them what it is

conservative "logic"

>people seriously think this is some sjw lgbt plot

jesus, you're retarded.
About time those chinks started to instruct kids about sex and how to prevent a FUCKING INSANE BIRTHRATE.

>Because it has been shown that gays reduce unit cohesion.
Only in societies that inherently look down on gay shit

I've been around other dudes a lot, and we don't talk about penises.

>Plus studies have shown and widows are not the same as single moms when it comes to raising kids.
MAGIC WOMEN

Cite these studies BTW.

What kind of mutant dick do those chinks have??

They'll know what to do, mostly. The issue is they won't have safe sex. They won't know much about pregnancy or STDs. Their sex will also suck because they don't know shit about how each other's bits work. Basically it would be Africa. Is that what you want?

Safe sex and STDs is important, but not know how each other's bits work?

What kind of sex ed did you go through? It's pretty obvious to begin with that tab A goes in slot B, and it makes sense to learn anatomy and how it all works, but did they teach you tips and tricks for how to get a girl off or something?

>Their sex will also suck because they don't know shit about how each other's bits work.
>my fucking tax dollars go to public education sex courses

do you guys seriously never sit down together and talk about what you like in bed?

More or less ya. Knowing what parts are what, a very minor bit of talk about "Ya this is sensitive, don't yank on this or anything", etc, adds a lot of context. Obviously most of it comes from porn and then experience but it gave context. I'd probably think girls had tiny penises because of how my chinese pornograph pictures talk about clits.

The main issue here is safe sex. 100 threads a day about blacks having aids and fifty bastard kids, then steps to prevent that are bad? It's obviously anecdotal but my parents were extremely forthcoming about sex ed with me. I knew where babies came from at 6, they didn't make a big deal about it. I've watched all my friends have shitty life ruining teenage pregnancies and drop out of school because they couldn't grasp the idea of safe sex. I've always been taught to wrap my little wiener and that's what I do. Don't have a condom? Don't fuck the girl. Pretty simple.

OK, that sounds totally reasonable and appropriate. At first you made it sound like they were going threw different positions and techniques or something, which there are 100 other and better ways to learn about.

I seem to recall in my case (early 80s) they also emphasized communication, but predominantly from the angle of ensuring that it was consentual, not painful, etc. Which also seems sensible to me.

>I've been around other dudes a lot, and we don't talk about penises
Same. Ive never talked to a man that wasnt a doctor about penis.

There you go. Just giving a name to the different parts helps a lot. It makes the whole thing less alien. Making sure everyone is comfortable, and preventing unwanted pregnancy is important.
As far as "progressive" sex ed, it depends on how big a deal they make out of it. Kids like to feel special, if it's made a big deal they'll probably tell themselves they're something they aren't to be special. Kids that are just learning about those feelings are also fairly likely to mistake "Well billy sure is fun to play super mario box with!" as romantic or sexual desire. I don't care if people are gay and I see the reasoning behind including it. I do think it should be a very minor point though. Something like
>So when the man ejaculates the woman might become pregnant. Sometimes two men or two women may love each other or have sex, which is fine, but that won't make a baby.

Just kind of slip it in there.

>A dog doesn't even look like it would feel good.
Wut?
Never heard of a knot, leaf?

>I do think it should be a very minor point though
Agreed. I don't even remember whether it was mentioned or not considering that everybody knows some guys are gay. And honestly most other straight guys I've met find that repulsive but don't really care and even freely engage in homoerotic humor (had to explain that to a gay friend of mine once who felt left out). IIRC it was all kind of bundled up into the whole don't hate people just because they're niggers or faggots or whatever else.

Telling little kids there's a gender spectrum and having them try on different roles to find out where they belong on the rainbow chart and shit like that is ridiculous.

Also I was once singled out as wrong for thinking a 99% prevention rate with a condom sounded like a sure bet. Teacher was sure to make it clear that the only way to not get a girl pregnant was to not have sex. Perhaps somewhat overboard, but probably good to scare that into the kids a bit.

Show me the one teenager in the entire world who would feel comfortable to talk to their partner about this before doing it for the first time.
First of all:
They don't fucking know themselves yet, second of all: Teenagers.

m8, your first time is supposed to be clumsy.

Exactly.

yeah, and why do i need to pay money to the government so they can teach kids to pay attention to the balls and be careful in case your girl is one of those ones that can't handle direct clit stimulation?
this is shit you learn from communication. the government has no business putting their nose in it.

If the current zeitgeist about homosexuality was more level headed and less extreme on both sides I would say it would be almost entirely unnecessary to teach. Putting it into the heads of impressionable youth is foolish, but apparently necessary. Sup Forums aside I think most people don't really care if you're gay or not anymore. If the vocal minority stopped making a big deal about it then people would feel more comfortable just trying it out if they felt they wanted to suck dick once they're more mature and sexually developed. I don't remember if they mentioned it in my sex ed class either.

Definitely a bit overboard but it's good to make people know there are always risks. If you're with a girl for a year and fucking every night with a condom, suddenly 99% sounds a bit scary. We shouldn't be trying to fear monger, but realistic education about risk and how it can effect your life is great.

Yeah, I agree with that.
But the government does have to make sure that the kids at least know to wrap it before they tap it.

Hurting your dick doesn't matter to the government, but getting a 14year old pregnant does.

There's 2:1 ratio of males to females, do they expect the every second male NOT to fuck another every second male?

>implying that the chink can reach the cervix.
Kek.

Is this your doing OP?

parents should be teaching their kids about this shit. if a14 year old gets pregnant and mum heads straight down to centrelink first thing the next morning (yes, this does happen in 99% of child pregnancy cases), you should have a case for at worst child neglect, at best child abuse. you shouldn't have another statistic to back up another educational course on putting a condom on (seriously, they had us put condoms on bananas at school, the fuck?).
the thing that people don't like to admit is that this isn't a widespread problem. it's a very small minority of people knocking each other up at 14. we should be targeting the cunts that allow it to happen, not boring everyone to tears with time and resources that could be better used somewhere else.

>most people don't really care if you're gay or not anymore. If the vocal minority stopped making a big deal about it then people would feel more comfortable
This. In big big letters this.

> I don't remember if they mentioned it in my sex ed class either.
In mine it was mentioned two times. Once in a short video where a bunch of people were asking questions and all got the answer "Not weird."
The second time just really short to explain that homo-attraction does happen, might stay or maybe not, because teenage hormones are weird.

That's probably the best way to go about it. Just acknowledge that it exists and that you shouldn't kill yourself over it.

No, they're trying to teach chinks to pound the hell out of the cervix.

I'm trying to remember whether or not they might have subtly told us that could be a "very sensitive" area. I know during the course of explaining a hymen they were sure to emphasize that there could be pain involved and it would be normal to take it slow -- part of the emphasis on communication in general.

>not boring everyone to tears with time and resources that could be better used somewhere else.
At least here in my school it was just a single day, not even a full school day, spent on the issue, mostly as part of the biology classes.
There is no need for more.

My parents never told me anything about sex stuff. They asked the school whether they will cover it sometime and then left it at that, because they assumed that learning that stuff in a school from teachers would be less awkward and I would be more likely to listen. They were right about that.

They also gave me unrestricted internet-access ever since I could use a computer and never tried to look up what I did... Not exactly the best choice, could've used some moderation there, I guess.

>not boring everyone to tears with time and resources that could be better used somewhere else.
they took like one day out of the class we already had on health/anatomy or whatever, this really isn't a significant use of federal funds in any way whatsoever

For me there would be a solid week of it once a year from about the age of 7 or so onward. That always struck me as being a little much, but I don't know maybe the statistics show that does a lot to stop those handful of kids getting laid at 14 or 15 from screwing up their lives.

This shit just proves the point that we should go to war with China, or else the asian kikes will just end up spreading their liberalism here. Bomb them before they can destroy our country, I say.

Sounds like total overkill.

One day at age 11 or so should be enough. Make sure to do it at the start or right before puberty hits and nearly every kid should get the gist of it.

The rest should be left up to the kids to discover themselves by doing it or through the internet.

>At least here in my school it was just a single day, not even a full school day, spent on the issue, mostly as part of the biology classes.
at my school starting in year 7 (12-13) and going on to year 10 (15-16) you would have mandatory physical education classes, where one week you would do classwork and the next week you would actually play fucking sports.
i'll admit that i grew up in a poor area, but all of my mates echo the same thing.

>My parents never told me anything about sex stuff.
this is a huge problem and a symptom of a larger (((corruption))) in society. men aren't allowed to teach their sons how to handle women anymore, just the same as women aren't allowed to teach their daughters. we're just supposed to learn it from the state.

> they assumed that learning that stuff in a school from teachers would be less awkward and I would be more likely to listen
this is an artificial thing. there is nothing really mystical or forbidden about sex, western society just has this weird taboo about it.

see above.

Maybe it was 8 now that I think of it. I just remember the whole class screaming and running down the hallway when they told us we were going get to talk about naughty things like sex. I mean for fuck's sake some kids were still trying to get better at reading and arithmetic.

It was about the same time they started putting us through the DARE program for drug education, which seemed to be a mixed bag -- good to know that cigarettes are a bad idea, but it sure got a lot of kids excited about all these other neat drugs you could try.

>western society just has this weird taboo about it.
Yeah, on that we can agree. If that taboo were gone or just less heavy, we'd have it easier.

>men aren't allowed to teach their sons how to handle women anymore
That would have been rather awkward.
I learned what I liked in a broad sense when I did it with my best friend when we were 11.
Makes me kind of unfit to talk for the general population, but I agree with you on this too.

>we're just supposed to learn it from the state.
There should be both. Simply because there are many parents who'd forget something important or would try and tell their kids some shit like 'Kissing get's you pregnant'.
This way the kids can talk to their parents about it and still learn from an unbiased source. Of course only as long as it's the done the way it was done here.
Right age, not too much, just the basic stuff.

>Simply because there are many parents who'd forget something important or would try and tell their kids some shit like 'Kissing get's you pregnant'.
this is why you change the culture so that the type of deadbeat cunts who do that shit don't go very far. or, you know, you can always kill them. i do believe a very esteemed man made a lot of progress on that front like 75 years ago.

>This way the kids can talk to their parents about it and still learn from an unbiased source.
none of it's unbiased. here in australia there's a program called "safe schools", which on the surface is geared towards educating LGBT youth (good cause, right?) but quickly devolves into forcing 7 year olds to cross-dress and 10 year olds to grind on each other in practice. and no i'm not joking. you can't get away from the ideological subversion.

>Of course only as long as it's the done the way it was done here.
your system would certainly be better than "Alright kids it's time to sit around for an hour and learn why you should eat fruit, no you're not learning how the tax system works, ask your parents or take an optional class in 4 fucking years" for 3 years straight.

>Except every major first world nation keeps crying about how it's population is in decline.

That is because of retarded social ponzi schemes and insane federal debt though. Not because there would be an inherent problem for us if we didn't have to stack people on 10 floors above each eather

>none of it's unbiased.
True enough, but I'd reiterate: The way it was done here. Just the basics and nothing more.
That way there is simply no place for any shitty ideological shit.

I'm starting to think that your school system is very shit, mate.

so Chinese people will skin dogs alive, beat factory workers to death and run over children multiple times

but god forbid two boys kiss, that's over the line

>10 year olds to grind on each other in practice
Sounds like something that should count as outright child abuse

>I'm starting to think that your school system is very shit, mate.
it is, and to top it all off they practically force you to go to university for 4 years after you graduate. and our university isn't like the system i've read about in germany, here it's basically 1 year of brainwashing and introductory math, 1 year of brainwashing and the very beginnings of your chosen subject, and once the idiots have been driven out 2 years of actual education intermixed with more brainwashing courses and seminars to teach you not to rape women. and that's at best, if you pick a hard STEM course.

do you know that you need an education degree to become a teacher in australia, and that takes about 4 years to acquire?

oh of course it is, there's a bunch of notorious pedos pushing it in the government. they even teach 12 year olds that using the term "male" or "female" to refer to themselves is wrong, and they should spend some time bouncing around with other genders. as if puberty isn't bad enough.

The Chinese has long transcended left and right. They are like ants.

>do you know that you need an education degree to become a teacher in australia, and that takes about 4 years to acquire?
>4 years
Cute.
Most people here start their courses around age 19 or 20 and only become teachers around 28, 26 the earliest.
It's a pretty hard road to take.

wow. what sort of education does that give a teacher. are you creating essentially industry ready experts and funneling them into education? if so, that's very good. here most teachers are in their profession as a backup plan after they find out they can't work in their chosen field, so you get a lot of sour and bitter teachers. i remember my history teacher used to leave work at 3 pm and was fucking blind by 6, every single day.

youtu.be/N1tv95DbI_I
Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
>>Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
>>Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
>>Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
>>Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
>>Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
>>Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
>>Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
>>Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
>>Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
Alex Jones: BREAKING! Podesta Says Trump Behind Pizzagate!
.

>Our fault

you crazy white fucks need to contain your cultural marxism to your own shitty countries, get the fuck away from China.

>contain your cultural marxism
Zhang, don't you know that the Jews intentionally caused a revolution in China to install Mao in order to take control of it? All you're seeing now is a natural progression and refinement of the global control system.

Exporting """Western""" culture is a common way of subverting and destroying foreign powers. Don't forget that they literally sent naked women to flop their boobs around at Putin in an attempt to undermine his popular legitimacy.

Hopefully Trump will turn out to be a pivot back toward a little more sanity.

>Implying its not our Jews that Israel controls

I don't think that's true I think if they were gonna do something like that they'd pick someone more competent.

It is a surprisingly lame attempt, but you'd be silly if you didn't think Soros et al were funding Cunt Parade or whatever it's called and similar organizations. That's standard practice.

Pussy Riot. That's the name. lol and now we have these domestic agitators with the pussy hats

fuckin jews

This is precisely the problem. Recognising that they exist and should be tolerated is well enough, but as soon as you start promoting it as a "healthy alternative lifestyle" you have opened pandora's box.