How did Euros fail to colonize Africa so spectacularly when they did it to the Americas?

How did Euros fail to colonize Africa so spectacularly when they did it to the Americas?

Other urls found in this thread:

edition.cnn.com/2015/12/24/africa/africa-corruption-transparency-international/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Local fauna was different.

niggers ruin everything

Because it's easier to exploit a country in a chaotic state than any other one.

why go to the nogs when you can bring the nogs to you

Colonization of Africa was a success, it wasn't a failure.
Decolonization was hasty and done on the presumption that niggers can maintain a country.
Pro-tip, they can't

Niggers were use to smallpox

*used

This.
Pretty much what Danebro said.

Btw. European colonial powers could have had an idea about what was going to happen. Remember Tortuga? That was once the richest country in the Western Hemisphere. Then black slaves revolted, and it became Haiti/Dominican Republic. Haitian blacks couldn't into organization at all, and today it is a total shithole. Potential didn't change, just the management.

The rise of white guilt and other PC degeneracy.

>Imagining a classically European world where the globalists and useful idiots never came to power

We'd probably have warp drive and massive colonies on those 6 exoplanets by now.

we should've kept the lesser races under our yoke, producing resources needed for the european space colonies

Niggers are still going to be exterminated from subsaharan Africa, it's just going to be Chinese doing the job instead of Europeans.

We haven't had a need for obsolete farm equipment since the internal combustion engine was invented.

...

>calling niggers obsolete farm equipment
kek

But user, European colonization was the original globalism.

mega fucking kek christ

>Niggers were use to smallpox

this. if 90% of africans had dropped dead, the rest could not have resisted colonization. Not that they stopped colonization, they just outnumbered whites by such a huge margin that it failed.

And as for South Africa, as soon as white people made it a nice place, well, the hordes poured in and well you know how that worked out.

...

No thats imperialism

gave them food and medicine while they bred like rabbits into an unmanageable population.

>what is tsetse fly

The environment in Africa isn't suited for the white man's colonies.

The sun intensity burns our soft, delicate skin.

There were plans to connect Africa using a single railway.

>European colonization was the original globalism.
This meme

It just cost us money and gave niggers who weren't even slaves an excuse to complain all the time and invade our countries

turns out it was a mistake

we gave them everything good they have and what do we have to show for it? our homelands infested by the worst of their kind

Thats still imperialism since i dont think there was any actual government or people to work with in africa

Globalism is just Imperialism over the entire earth.

This.

Just watch Empire of Dust to see even in this age the average Black community is completely ignored by their now massively corrupt government.

edition.cnn.com/2015/12/24/africa/africa-corruption-transparency-international/

Trying to colonise a country full of such corrupt people was an impossible task, and when the PC brigade started demanding they "give the power back" it was all finished.

Imagine if we did take over Africa, killed the natives and made it liveable and even prosperous.

Perhaps even use certain parts as a containment zone for 'refugees'

It would solve so, so many problems.

Why not?

digits confirm

>Colonization of Africa was a success, it wasn't a failure.
Ding ding ding.

niggers were resistant to disease

That was imperialism, my dude.

Hell of a lot more blacks than natives in North America. The cold of North America limited how big their population could grow because they could only carry a certain amount of food in the winter

Checked. Digits of truth.

It's also their bigger population

There are more natives in Canada now than there ever were and they're still barely a few percent of the population

Also the natives initially were friendly and welcoming to us whereas most of the niggers behaved like apes the moment whites arrived

The answer is the quality of niggers on the two continents. Whites in Africa had to deal with wild baboon niggers. Whites in the new world imported hand picked niggers of very high quality (comparatively).

>yfw we have only the very best niggers.

Europeans brought an assortment of contact-transmissible plagues like smallpox and the common cold. Americans gave syphilis, but it took several years to get around to driving the sufferers mad. As a result, the American societies imploded more rapidly than the European societies. After two hundred years of colonization attempts, European colonists in America were capable of surviving a winter without resorting to cannibalism.

Africa has been in continuous contact with Eurasia for tens of thousands of years. African tribes did NOT just randomly die off by the tens of thousands just because some Christian missionary sneezed. As a result, they were in a much better position to fight and maintain their own societies.

Colonization applied the structures of empire to Africa. Decolonization applied the structures of the nation-state to Africa.

It would be funnier watching you two spin your racist fantasies if it weren't for the fact that your faction seems hell-bent on giving America and Europe the opportunity to experience the rich cultural heritage of international nationalism.

Why did the Rhodesians love the M60 and the FN FAL?

>implying the breakup of Yugoslavia has nothing to do with different ethnic, cultural and religious groups being forced to live under the same roof and is not a textbook example of failed multi-ethno-culturalism
>implying Sudan & South Sudan, Somalia, Zimbabwe, Haiti and every other failed nigger state don't exist
>implying South Africa during eviiil rayciss whitey's rule didn't have hundreds of thousands of niggers immigrants from neighboring countries who'd rather live as second class citizens in a country ruled by whitey than as free men in their native land
>implying "colonization" of Africa didn't fail because Europeans didn't intend to genocide an entire continent [BIG mistake, imo] and were instead just doing what mankind has always done (i.e. conquer land inhabited by weaker people and seize part of resources for themselves), so at the first moment of weakness the natives, supported by USA & USSR looking to further weaken Euro countries and establish their own superiority, took back control
>implying multi racial/cultural/religious states are good and not a civil war waiting to happen
>implying shouting "racism" means anything here
>implying lots of implications
Kys shitskin.

It was a huge success. They never should have left.
Kaffers are most happy and safe under a sturdy white man's rule.

>what is Australia m8?

the country with the highest skin cancer rates in the world

don't be blind m8.

>implying lots of implications

I lel'd

>Citing failed African nation-states in support of the meme that nation-states work
>Not knowing how to find Sudan and Zimbabwe on a map
>when they are clearly labeled
>and it's a map of Africa
>and most of other the countries in Africa AREN'T labeled

Don't ever change, Sup Forums.

> our homelands infested by the worst of their kind
No that's the genuinely sad part.
The vermin infesting your lands are the best of their kind. Think upon that and die a little inside at the prospect of what the future holds when the black man holds the whip hand over the white man.

This. The main failure of African colonization was KEEPING the niggers around as labor (slaves). IF they had just genocided them all then Africa would be as awesome as North America.

Lesson learned.

Multiculturalism only works if its white culture :^)

Infact, white people are probably the only people who make naything work including the asians we assisted/colonized(korea, japan, hong kong/china)

British give natives small pokes they die tries the same on africans and they counter with aids

It works out. We can let them all die of aids and starvation after we cut funding to africa.

Then we can actually re-colonize it but this time with a wall.

Globalism in Warhammer 40k would be the imperium trying to integrate Tyranids and necrons into their society.

Niggers vs Indians

>short shorts
That's kinda faggy Tbh

They didn't, they succeeded.

But Germany then decided to colonise Europe and that fucked everything up.