Is there a fourth way?

>communism is slavery to the masses
>capitalism is slavery to the rich
>national socialism is slavery to the state
Is there a fourth way?
Which one of these three is preferable?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Way
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>Is there a fourth way?
why yes there is

I meant a non-retarded fourth way.

>belgium
>a country
Choose one

>Is there a fourth way?
Why yes, there is.

I think that politics based on new gender identities is the only true way forward.
Also, OP's post makes no sense. Capitalism enslaves the workers, not the rich people.

>I meant a non-retarded fourth way.
why yes there is

Libertarians and Gnostics will take us into a Star Trek future where energy uses light to create matter.

Then we will all live in perfect abundance.

Jes

Fourth way is going off grid and starting an Anarcho-Primitivist community

youre professionally stupid, arent you?

As long as I get an Orion Sex Slave, I guess I'd be ok with this

Fourth Political Theory

This.

Humility, service to the community and the soul and living for the afterlife (metaphor for children).

Distributism

...

Democratic socialism.

> Implying People in the Third Reich were slaves.
They had more freedom than we fucking do now.
And yes there is a fourth way.
It's called the Fourth Reich. A NatSoc Monarchy.

In any form, the rich and powerfull will continue to use their means to keep the rest from comeing up and taking their place. Its normal power struggle. The problem is that in most cases they will win and turn society into a state that benifita them. Question is how do you setup a society in a way where, how rich or politicly powerfull you are wont affect other people grom competing with you.

>in a metaphorical sense
>not accepting that religious utility bridges the gap from opinion to fact and becomes non-rational reality
>being a retarded atheist rationalist

Democratic socialism is merely a precursor to gommunism
Try again

/thread

>slavery to an imaginary god

You will have your own personal Holodeck.

As a monarchist, what makes a monarchy Nat Soc, instead of a Monarchy akin to The German or russian empires?

Monarchy, where the king is the slave to the people

Distributism?

Also what said.

>Is there a fourth way?

AI-managed Technocracy is the only acceptable Fourth Way.

No more political prisoners because politics becomes software policy. No more taxes on individuals because the AI requires minimal management money, funds are collected from corporate taxes and used to benefit the corporations and people. All policy decisions involving the populace are through encrypted, verified online votes.

This is the only way to spread humanity to the stars.

Sounds good. Tell me more!

Mormonism. Every man gets his own planet in the afterlife. This eliminates most conflict and provides abundant resources.

Communism is slavery to the state. The masses of people in communist countries never controled shit, the communist party does.

>Implying Religion is based on metaphor and not on sincere belief.

>implying there's a difference

Monarchy

>>but muh 1776

You should've crowned George Washington king

The Kybalion teaches. All Matter is a Frequency.

Like the Emerald Tablets say:

"As Above So Below to do the Miracles of the One. As all things are a mediation of the One by Adaptation."

We are talking about the Wave. Everything is a wave.

Socialism is slavery to the state.
USSR never achieved full communism. Some would argue full communism is impossible to achieve in the first place.

should have an election for the king instead.

Defiantly agree. No more partisan politics, a Christian nation. I wish the US could have a King.

its ALLWAYS slavery to the the strong.
Comunism is slavery to the jews
Capitalism is slavery to the succesfull
NatSoc is slavery to the leader.

based Chesterton

The King has to have a divine charter, he has to be God's ruler on earth. People just can't elect a king like that and be a true monarchy

What's to stop the king from abolishing elections and instituting a hereditary line of succession?
Oh wait, if the king isn't allowed to do that then he isn't really a king, right?

Yep. Good ol' Theocracy. Slavery to God.

>You should've crowned George Washington king

We actually tried. He refused.

>Is there a fourth way
why yes there is

>>capitalism is slavery to the rich
said no one, ever. progressive taxation on the other hand...

Yes there is

The Bloodline Kingship comes down from the Anunnaki.

Anu is the King of the Anunnaki and Enlil and Enki are his sons and Heirs.

Anunnaki means the Bloodline Kingship of Anu who came down to Ki

Ki is an old name for Earth.

The Anunnaki are the Archons.

Archons means Lords. They are the Rulers or Authorities, the Principalities.

Dont confuse their Chief Archon with God.

The Demiurge is not the Father of the Universe.

>said no on ever
Read a fucking history book, m8.

and that divine charter should be the will of the people, the people of Christianity

whats to stop his son from denouncing a throne he doesn't want. his heir can run for the office of king

>the stories in the bible are just necessary metaphors and god doesn't exist
congratulations you're an atheist. now please stop larping as a religious person.

Scientific oligarchy. A group of informed citizens use science and economics to do everything correctly or to the best of human knowledge. Anyone uneducated on the issues can't vote.

Distributism

A king elected by the masses isn't a king. Call him a president or premier or whatever, but what's the point of a monarchy if it isn't absolute? Otherwise it's merely ceremonial.

A Prince would never turn down the throne if he was well educated.

western freedom is pretty cool

stop thinking about others or politics and live you own life, pursue your own goals and happiness

>western freedom is pretty cool

wait till you get enough of it
(((western freedom)))

National-Socialism is the only way to go, currently

How about the 200th way: Humans were meant to live like animals, so we need to abandon all technology and live in the jungle with no clothes eating raw corpses. That's the ultimate redpill.

If we revitalized our religious institutions then socialism would be handled by the churches. Churches would take care of the poor and help them get jobs, and capitalists would donate to churches to get people to buy their shit instead of everyone else's.
Problem is no one likes Christianity anymore.
We should develop a Germanic Church to balance out the church of England and the catholic church.

Capitalism enslaves workers to the rich

National Socialism has a state with rules for the greater good of the people to have happier lives long term.
>inb4 morality spookz n shit

>companies become huge
>collaborate
>have corporate bets, odds and cold battles over the monopoly
>dumb goyim become cucks to capitalism as usual

The only problem is that informed citizens tend to run into the same problems the masses do, just at smaller scales. Because they tend to be informed only about specific subjects. On that subject, they can be trusted, but then devolved into completely illogical arguments when speaking of other subjects.

It's what happens to all climate change scientists. They can very readily explain the science behind the change in climate, but can't bother to give any sort of informed opinion regarding the economics behind a steady implementation of renewable energy.

Specialization is in some ways more dangerous than pure ignorance. Because it makes people think that you're intelligent in an absolute sense, when the reality is that you're likely not.

Off topic I know, but what happens to all of the cum that gets shot into/onto the holosluts?

Who decides what constitutes an uneducated person? Who determines the standards of education? Sounds like slavery to the pseudointellectuals to me. How easy it would be for (((them))) to co-opt and subvert such a system.

Nanorobot clean up crews take care of it.

...

He beams it out to space.

kekism is slavery to the keks. your whole life lived only for the keks

the workers can quit. no slavery. stop equating voluntary transactions to slavery. that's insulting to both people who work for a living, and the victims of actual slavery.

to rule is to serve the masses. a king is a servant to his people. and some people do not want to spend a life of stress and servitude, a prince could never run free in the world if he submits to the shackles of kingship. a well educated prince could and would turn the throne down. I'd rather see an illiterate man who was lived 40 years butt naked in the woods than a pompous prince you has never been outside his castle be king in the first place

a Monarchy shouldn't be restricted to a bloodline, what happens when you get a bad apple? the people should be able to change their king when their king stops ruling for the good of the people, and starts ruling for the good of himself. an absolute monarchy creates problems in the wrong hands, and when people don't have the freedom to hold an election to root out a bad king then it turns into a bloody war where good people kill good people for the wrong reasons.

Is it time for a Distributism general?

Under the right circumtances it wouldn't be so bad.

Not rooting for it obviously, but kind of curious how it would be like.

Ancap is also slavery to the rich.

Except like, actual, literal slavery.

but muh capitalism oppress the workers, muh communism.

Those gets...

Bogpill me on distributism.
I thought Pope Leo was a proto-commie.

>Is there a fourth way?
yes, freedom.
Freedom from the state.

It's better to die for your state, than to live for yourself

TAKE THE GREEN PILL SENPAI

I'm glad you asked...

>the workers can quit

It's not ownership slavery, it's not liek you have a single "master",

I think that the main argument for the "modern slavery" thing, is that in essence you really are a slave to the system, there's no way to "opt out", there isn't a comunity free of goverments and regulations, and the international comunity will never accept a stateless territory.

We don't really have a choice in the bigger picture, we are either in or left alone to die (which happens inside too anyways)

>not queer-anarchism

The Elite claim that they bloodlines are the closest to the Sumerian Anunnaki gods.

But Gnostics say that we have a Divine Spark in us, the light of the Aeons shines in us.

You need to provide more details than a book cover, Mark.

A well educated Prince would be outside the castle though. Education and sense of duty is everything. Instill a sense of duty to the child at a young age, and they will not only feel the need to serve the country, they will do it well because that is what they were instructed. And because of that, they will teach there children that, a whole family who's only job is to rule, and serve.

I'm no expert, but here's a (shitty) rundown:

Distributism:
>Believes neither state nor corporations should be too powerful
>People should own their own means of production
>many local small business
>trades organized vertically, somewhat like a guild system
>some advocate no taxes other than a land-value tax
>Teddy Roosevelt influenced by Distributism (trust busting)
>may cause a sense of well-being and community

Here you go.

H++

Valar Morghulis

...

Those all make sense, thanks guys.

fpbp

>The Fourth Way addresses the question of humanity's place in the Universe and the possibilities of inner development. It emphasizes that people ordinarily live in a state referred to as a semi-hypnotic "waking sleep," while higher levels of consciousness, virtue, unity of will are possible.

>The Fourth Way teaches how to increase and focus attention and energy in various ways, and to minimize day-dreaming and absent-mindedness. This inner development in oneself is the beginning of a possible further process of change, whose aim is to transform man into "what he ought to be."

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Way

What is the premise of this theory? I never really understood.

Cringe

It's fucking nothing. Dugin just wrote a nothing-book for Putin to interpret as he wishes and justify his actions.

Centrism

desu that might actually work

I refuse to subscribe to the theory that Dugin and Putin don't have a master plan.
The collusion with the Trump campaign and the meddling in our election is obviously a long-game operation that's been in the works for years.

Fourth way= who needs a government in the first place? Just let people mad max that shit.