How long until women become obsolete? Will we really be able to replace them with sex bots?

How long until women become obsolete? Will we really be able to replace them with sex bots?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=hGY44DIQb-A
youtube.com/watch?v=ghFtR64y0XQ
mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/europes-first-sex-doll-brothel-9933456
youtube.com/watch?v=6dd3Qcs5PFg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

stfu pussy

>You tore up her picture
>I'm gonna tear up the fucking dance floor, dude
youtube.com/watch?v=hGY44DIQb-A

>How long until women become obsolete? Will we really be able to replace them with sex bots?
kek do people actually believe this?
Pretty much no one would prefer a sexbot to having sex (and a relationship) with another human being.
Same could be said about porn however and porn is very popular. Yet it's not making women obsolete at all.

>tfw I don't want a sex robot I want to be a sex robot.
youtube.com/watch?v=ghFtR64y0XQ

You may not realize it now, but there is a race to develop either artificial semen or artificial wombs. God help us if artificial semen happens first.

How long until your mum is obsolete?
Has the fat bitch forgotten to do your laundry?
Was your hot pocket still cold in the middle this morning?

>artificial semen
Why even? Semen is basically free already. Hell I'd pay to give it away.

>Implying the eternal parasite will allow it

Found the roasties

An artificial womb sounds easier to make
Men could just make clones of themselves

>Pretty much no one would prefer a sexbot to having sex (and a relationship) with another human being.
You must not hang out with gamers. Once we have good robots, the robots will have relationships. They will program interesting relationships into a "storyline" for these robots. They will be more interesting. You can have drama without the consequences of hurting another human. And before you say that is why relationships are interesting, it isn't. People get emotionally involved in "on rails" relationships in games. Guy will fucking love this. To answer OP. Sex robots will replace women as soon as they can be autonomous. Most guys don't want to have to lug around a heavy robot. They need to be able to at least move on their own.

>making women obsolete

Having sex is not what makes a woman unique. Men have sex with other men, but those other men arn't replacements for women. No, what makes women unique is their capability to give birth. This is something they use to their advantage to get all sorts of benefits. So the question is could this end?

The answer is yes. Artificial wombs can end the monopoly on birth that women have. Now, how this will affect our culture is uncertain. However, I except Japan creating artificial wombs, not to replace women, but encourage families to have children. 9 months of gestation is a very big commitment and in our materialistic societies filled with working professional women, they don't want to sacrifice this time. Thus, artificial wombs will be first marketed to mothers who don't want to take the risks of pregnancy, but still want to have children.

>Found the roasties
lel no. I want sexbots. It's just not going to make women obsolete. And I wouldn't want that anyway that'd be fucked up. It could reduce the beta orbiting and whiteknighting problem though.

MAGA 1.0 soon.

>implying we wont be living in VR within 10 years
Im going to marry Sylvie!

No, I prefer to have a real woman to beat.

Not soon enough.

Well easy access pornography is certainly having a major affect on the sex lives of millions of men, whether it be those who are content with just porn or all the ED or even just unrealistic standards making them less likely to approach "average" women.
Also, a robot that can imitate a woman almost completely is not at all comparable to a short film of two other people fucking.
Thing is, the second wave Germaine Greer era feminists got one thing spot on, men don't love women they love men. Women are attractive sure, it's shocking the things men will do for pussy actually, but if you put the personality of almost any female on the planet into a man's body they would probably hate his guts.
So honestly a robot lacking any real personality or even with a C3PO tier personality that you can fuck and know won't leave or cuck you will be a better option for most men. Especially if coupled with artificial wombs, or easier access to surrogates.

The realist in me don't think it will happen in our life time. Human sexual evolution hasn't exactly evolved alongside our technology, there would need to be massive shift in the social paradigm for there to be a large enough societal need for artificial wombs or robot partners to be a viable reality that the average person could afford.

>You must not hang out with gamers. Once we have good robots, the robots will have relationships. They will program interesting relationships into a "storyline" for these robots. They will be more interesting. You can have drama without the consequences of hurting another human.
Heh yeah I get that. It would be pretty neat. Once AI becomes this good, it's kind of like an interactive, dynamically-generated story line. Not all that different from reading a book or watching a movie but much more involving. Damn holodecks when?
>And before you say that is why relationships are interesting, it isn't.
What makes relationships with other real people is that the other person is real for fuck's sake. It makes it a lot more meaningful. A computer can simulate a lot of things but it can't care about you and you can't really care about it without massively deluding yourself. Not until AI becomes so advanced that it becomes person-like anyway. There's supposed to be real intimacy and affection in relationships. It's not always there though and not everyone can get it or want to deal with it, so I don't see anything wrong with the alternatives as long as people realize it's not what they should settle for in the long-term. If this becomes the norm society has effectively dehumanized itself and accepted that robots not only take care of each others' physical needs, but also their emotional and intellectual needs. desu I think it would be sad.
>People get emotionally involved in "on rails" relationships in games. Guy will fucking love this.
Yeah
>Most guys don't want to have to lug around a heavy robot.
True. Advanced AI and robotics like this is very far off though. In the meantime we're gonna have depressed loners humping heated silicon dolls with a noise maker. Not the most psychologically healthy way to try to fulfill one's needs.

>sexbot
>Just a human with metal patched on

Fuck off

Eventually we will, but just like with those fake vagina toy things, women are going to do absolutely everything in their power to try and make it culturally shameful to use them. They are completely aware that their hole(s) are the only thing of value, and the only reason men ever bring themselves to put up with their bullshit, and view anything that seems like competition as a grave threat.

It's why women can ride fake dicks and there is absolutely zero shame attached to this, but men getting off in other ways is so heavily derided.

>Men have sex with other men, but those other men arn't replacements for women.
I honestly couldn't imagine having sex with a man or it being as satisfying. Hard to explain desu.
>No, what makes women unique is their capability to give birth.
>Thus, artificial wombs will be first marketed to mothers who don't want to take the risks of pregnancy, but still want to have children.
Good points. I really wish people could get a fucking break in their 20s-30s instead to raise children without sacrificing their career. It's the labor surplus and the willingness of people to sacrifice everything that created these terrible conditions.

This man knows what's up

wh---WHO ARE GONNA CALL?!!!!!!!!! WHO ARE YOU GONNA CALL???! THE GHOSTBUSTERS?!!!! .....its a------ITS A JOKE! THE FUCKIN GHOSTBUSTERS...WHO ARE GONNA CALL....

What he need more of to be honest. If you want to fuck a human just do it to a real one.

One of my favorites films of all time and 100% in my top ten scenes in a movie.

>Well easy access pornography is certainly having a major affect on the sex lives of millions of men, whether it be those who are content with just porn or all the ED or even just unrealistic standards making them less likely to approach "average" women.
Hrm yeah. Sexbots are like porn+ I guess.
>Thing is, the second wave Germaine Greer era feminists got one thing spot on, men don't love women they love men. Women are attractive sure, it's shocking the things men will do for pussy actually, but if you put the personality of almost any female on the planet into a man's body they would probably hate his guts.
Sad! Does it really mean we don't love them though? Men just aren't as indulgent with other men. We don't treat men and women the same and the feelings end up being different. Also it's not all that bad how women think differently and have different temperament even though you wouldn't put up with it from a man. The difference can be kind of nice. Maybe it's not """pure""" love because it matters so much that they have a female body but it doesn't have to be ideal and these things can develop.
That's a good point though.

You guys might enjoy the work of Hajime Sorayama

Prob not for long, statisticly speaking less ppl are having sex per generation inclouding malenials, things that can factor in for that is anything from sjw anti-masculinity movements to men not having the proper time or "standards" which females require now days in order to find a mate, therefore i concloude that men as biologicly programmed to do, will find a way fuck even if we need to make an army of sex-robots to satisfy our primodial needs

>implying robots wouldn't have more personality than women
Sure.

I have met plenty of girls that didn't convince me of their sentience. I think the romantic ideals you are talking about are relatively new and are not a natural part of human societies. Robots will hack our brain with novelty, the same way porn does. Porn hasn't destroyed us because jerking off isn't as good as sex. I am not convinced it will be robots that destroy us though. It could just as easily be VR, or a combination of both.

This. I wish they'd make alien ones desu. Or dryads or echidnas. Something original, just not the 3DPD.
t. Chad

I got my mony on artificial wombs to win first, do you know how much biology goes into making one seamen, and theres literally trillions of them in just one testicle

>not the most psychologically healthy way to fulfill ones needs
But it is a way. And for some, the only way. Better to fulfill a need than to leave it unmet i think.

100% this. Probably one of the most interesting things about human-robot relationships will be the sheer fucking hatred tossed at it the likes of which the world has never seen. Women fucking HATE other women for a variety of reasons, but vanity being a huge one. Imagine what they will think of a robot that for all intents and purposes is a living thing, indistinguishable from a normal woman, other than it is catered to be as pleasing to a guy as possible while also always retaining its perfectly engineered beauty and in all likelihood its sexual exclusivity. There isn't a male equivalent of this for women. Male sex bots will not have the same impact on women as female sex bots will have on men. The female sex bot only has to be beautiful, loyal, and pleasurable. The male sex bot would have to be far more, almost an impossibly behaviorally shifting construct. In fact, if a male sex bot were able to intuitively read what women want, it would probably eventually end up beating them to death or at the very least, cheating on them. From a sociological perspective it's going to be amazing.

Can I have them in Star Trek design+clothing?

>I have met plenty of girls that didn't convince me of their sentience.
kek yeah.
>I think the romantic ideals you are talking about are relatively new and are not a natural part of human societies.
Yeah it's recent and I think it's already going downhill. Women don't care all that much about relationships either. They can date social media itself. Many care first and foremost about what boyfriends can do for them socially.
We're going towards BNW-like relationships I believe.
>Robots will hack our brain with novelty, the same way porn does.
Porn is pretty damn boring to me desu but I can imagine what advanced AI could do.
>I am not convinced it will be robots that destroy us though. It could just as easily be VR, or a combination of both.
Yeah advanced robotics is pretty far off but there will be Augmented Reality before then.
pic related. It'll allow you to molest your waifu.

Of course! Robot is down with anal 24/7 versus some girl who will never do it. Who do you think wins?

There is already a booming sex doll industry. If those things could move with autonomy and speak, every woman not worth a conversation would be out of value.
And most women aren't worth a conversation.

That won't stop women from being born retard. Unless you just abort them all.

VR headpatting is the only thing I want in life

Why do you fear human cyborg relationships? its still Cis Het.

>But it is a way. And for some, the only way. Better to fulfill a need than to leave it unmet i think.
Yeah and I'm all for it but the idea that it could or should replace women is still pretty ridiculous to me.
Heh good points. Yeah the hatred will be nice to watch.
Sex bots are just going to be dolls for a while though. There will be more shaming and ridicule than hatred. There's going to be some genuine concern about this too. It is pretty pathetic that it comes to this. But it's understandable and we know why here.

>Sad! Does it really mean we don't love them though?
Yes user, it really does. Romantic love is a product of modernity anyway.
>Men just aren't as indulgent with other men
exactly, this creates personalities that are enjoyable, that and bonding over common experiences.
Honestly you're really reaching with all that crap about different temperaments as well, it's not nice or different, it's you being willing to put up with an entitled needy individual who will have experienced a fundamentally different existence from you which you can't relate with at all, because you're getting your dick wet and maybe some kids down the line.

Bottom line, if you didn't want to have sex with them you wouldn't want to be around them at all.

Women get jealous of fucking drawings and polygons. Hell, they get jealous of pets and their own children. Men having easy access to a subject that cares for them unconditionally would ruin women to the core.

mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/europes-first-sex-doll-brothel-9933456

soon(TM)

if sexbot was as sophisticated and life like as in ops pic, it'd work.

t. Thot internet defense force.

This is going to be fantastic, and it's a consequence of the inherent superiority of men. Men build and create civilization, so this is what women value in them. However, this cannot be automated because it is the highest function of our species. Women are valued for breeding, pleasure, and beauty, and only the first one is even remotely a challenge today. nth wave feminist cunts are already preemptively spewing geysers of salt over the fact that the men who have been fucked out of the sexual market dare to mollify their natural desires with too threatening of dolls. Fuck them, and fuck their entitled pettiness. Justice has never been sweeter.

...

>Honestly you're really reaching with all that crap
A bit. I do believe differences can be nice and that men and women *can* complement each others for the best. But it's not happening like that. Men and women truly could replace each others with robots for the purpose of intimate relationships (actually women replaced men with the government and social media) because things are so fucked up. Good relationships are getting rarer and rarer occurrences.
>Bottom line, if you didn't want to have sex with them you wouldn't want to be around them at all.
Probably. But I would have a hard time being intimate with a man even if he had a woman's body, believe it or not. And traps that are feminine might be OK but let's not go there kek. The masculine and feminine matters for sex. Women aren't the same in bed. I'm not gay I don't wanna fuck dudes either mentally or physically. Nevermind the traps stuff I said.

>How long until women become obsolete
Real women? nah, but feminist have already been replaced with VR porn

Huh. Well he makes good points. Damn that's hateful though.

But would this really lead to better behavior from women and actually be better for society? Lots of men act like shit too desu. It's mostly women's fault for flocking to the alphas but still.

Seems to me all this would do is reduce the amount of real relationships even more. Women already can get dick on-demand and it's not gonna change. Now women for the most part do want real relationships but they want to get a lot out of them and they know they can get away with a lot of crap. I don't think it'll correct that, women will just retreat into social media and the cock carousel even more. It's not like they actually need men.

Not saying sexbots are bad but damn you guys just want to BTFO women and you welcome anything that might hurt them with glee. You don't want to fix shit.

They are sex bots, just get better at programming them you faggot.

Sandman just made a video on this:
youtube.com/watch?v=6dd3Qcs5PFg

kek brillant

>It's mostly women's fault for flocking to the alphas

Nope, nothing wrong with that, it's the natural way.

>Not saying sexbots are bad but damn you guys just want to BTFO women and you welcome anything that might hurt them with glee.

The problem is not women, but rather how (((((((((((feminism)))))))))))) turned them into psycho cunts and wrecked the family unit.

Sexbots that are a 10/10 and always swallow

Sorry, I'm not trying to insult you here but this post is a mess, I have no idea what your point is.
I also think
>I would have a hard time being intimate with a man even if he had a woman's body
is completely false
gender roles do exist, but there isn't some kind of universal absolute masculine and feminine
My original point was simply this, if women lost the monopoly on an attractive female body and reproduction, many men would indeed go for the robot option.
Sure there's a lot of hatred and anger coming from people when this subject is brought up, but that's just the level of discourse on Sup Forums and the rest of this site.

>nothing wrong with that, it's the natural way
Civilization isn't natural.
But sure, they have a right to behave like this. Can't really blame them until they start complaining that men are all terrible but that's what fucking happens when you flock to those with the highest demand.
The difference with men is that they generally know that if they want their own woman they have to be reasonable. They care about faithfulness a lot too.

Not soon enough

>Sorry, I'm not trying to insult you here but this post is a mess, I have no idea what your point is.
It is difficult to explain but I do mean what I said. It matters to me and I'm sure it matters to a lot of people. But I can't argue for it very well.
>is completely false
I'm telling you. I said "being intimate with", not just fuck. Yeah I could fuck anything that looks like a woman kek. It wouldn't make me all that happy though.
>gender roles do exist, but there isn't some kind of universal absolute masculine and feminine
Yeah, but I have certain thresholds where it's no longer going to work out for me.
>My original point was simply this, if women lost the monopoly on an attractive female body and reproduction, many men would indeed go for the robot option.
Well, you're right. Many would. But at the same time, most of those wouldn't see it as ideal and would hope for more I believe. At least I hope so. This matters.
>Sure there's a lot of hatred and anger coming from people when this subject is brought up, but that's just the level of discourse on Sup Forums and the rest of this site.
It is disturbing that things might come to this. People have ideals when it comes to these things and they might find this revolting. Not just because of power dynamics and gender warfare, but because some important, beautiful things can get lost to technological "progress" like this. Positive, meaningful relationships between men and women don't just happen. It has to be encouraged (because it is complicated and it does tend to cause a lot of problems). Now it's actively being discouraged.

>I said "being intimate with", not just fuck.
You're a fag.
>It wouldn't make me all that happy though.
GOD DAMN you don't deserve it then.
You're the one getting replaced by a male sexbot.
Not me though, I'll adapt and be better than any sexbot and cuck you all.
>sex robot sex robot
>sex robot sex robot
>sex robot sex robot
>sex robot sex robot
>sex robot sex robot
>coming to your town

Buzz cut and beard is suck a based look. It's he anti liberal haircut.

Once we have robots AND artificial reproduction, there will be no longer any reason to interact with human beings. In fact, I think it would become a net negative to interact with humans, because humans are so unpredictable, prone to error, and in general suck most of the time. The amount of conflict in human interaction will be seen as too expensive. Just like we learned to view war as an inefficent and expensive behavior, so we will view human interaction as too expensive. Once we are able to reproduce without having to play the social game, we will see it for what it is. A boring, sadistic, petty, useless competition.

this is such an amazing film.

i will debate and convince anybody that (spoiler)

Caleb was indeed an AI

I think I know what you're getting at, but I think it's more of a learned response than something innate. Intimacy, love, courtship, whatever you want to call it, is a cultural thing not a human thing. For most of civilisation, marriage was a an explicit prostitution contract.
Romance is the mark of an especially prosperous society.

I don't think sex bots even if they are as world changing as the most extreme predictions would make out (highly unlikely) are a bad thing.
The free market is doing what it does best, solving a problem, if new problems are caused it'll get on those next.

kek
>You're a fag.
It's a spectrum.
>Not me though, I'll adapt and be better than any sexbot and cuck you all.
Hey good luck with that. It's gonna take a while until they figure out just how much choking is enough and there might be a few accidents there and there. So yeah we won't be obsolete quite yet.

is that the state were we become post-human? Since we are political animals and all that?

>but I think it's more of a learned response than something innate
Which makes it something important to encourage and develop.
>is a cultural thing not a human thing
Humans are savages. Not matter how intelligent we still have the instincts of animals. Culture is what gives us any value.
>For most of civilisation, marriage was a an explicit prostitution contract.
I don't want that. It should be about more than this. At the same time the system has to encourage it being stable. Right the opposite happens. It can't be ideal because we're too flawed. Yeah the contract aspect should be more important than it is. Somehow.
Also women were always homemakers. The deal was way more than a prostitution contract. They built a life together and raised children. It's often feminists who try to present it as prostitution because they want to make families something dirty. It was wrong when men had too much power though. Power gets abused.