Do these wannabe Swedes not understand how capitalism works...

Do these wannabe Swedes not understand how capitalism works? They say "equal pay for equal work" but then they base their numbers on the income average of all men vs all women

This is LITERALLY the reason why the only white women in Europe who are having kids are doing it with Africans, because the men are such pussies. Nothing gets women dryer then to hear a man say he is a feminist

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=40hhc0cjYyg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

I don't understand how they could enforce something like this. By law they already do get paid the same for the same work.

Unless they are literally planning on imposing a gender tax on men.

but... I seem to remember this thing that we have in the USA called the equal rights act of 1964.

and england has had equal pay for decades also. I don't know about other places... am I mistaken?

I really hope some place as irrelevant as Iceland does this so we can all watch as it fails.

>the irrelevant country of icefight calls other countries irrelevant

keep sucking the syrup, moosefucker.

If shit like this becomes widespread, or our government turns communist'like, I will genuinely move to northen Canada where nobody lives, and start my own colony.

Are they acting like the equal rights act doesn't exist? Over 50 years.

It'll be hilarious when they enact this and notice that NOTHING AT ALL HAPPENS. Then the gender pay gap myth finally disappears.

Hey don't worry about it. No one will want to hire women anymore because they don't do anything and demand pay for it.

NUKE US ALREADY!!!!!!

I seem to recall similar bills all over the western world.

Surely feminists wouldn't ignore these things to falsely claim discrimination, would they?

There is two solutions based on this moronic principle of equity. Both of which are flawed.

Firstly actually start discriminating based on gender by either introducing a gender tax like said or paying women more than men which has the added bonus of reducing companies incentive to even hire women in the first place, meaning less women in the workplace and loss of jobs.

OR Restrict personal freedom for women and force them into areas of work and education that they have no interest in pursuing themselves, the exact shit feminism was created to fight.

Noooo... that would imply that they're lying, or stupid. And surely, feminists are neither of those.

Just looking at some of the shit true dough has done with your country's books.
It doesn't look like an "equality tax" may be far from your future to fill the deficit.

>Equal pay for equal work!
>But woman who do the same work get paid the same as men.
>...YOU'RE WELCOME!

Can't be though. Feminists are all brave wymyn standing up to oppression all by themselves with absolutely no help from men in any way and all of them are steadfast working as one.

>wannabe swedes

iceland is a dutch colony you derping faggot

>Unless they are literally planning on imposing a gender tax on men.

And they could literally just give money to women. Like welfare.

Except the equal pay act makes so we all ready do

Iceland? Do they have more than 5 women all in all?

...

Why don't feminists ever understand how the pay gap works?

Men and women already get paid the same amount for the same job. The question they should be asking is why do female dominated occupations get paid less than male dominated occupations.

If they really want to lessen the pay gap they should go out and fight for specific occupations to get higher pay. Like teachers.

I mean, we're in dire need of better education in America (I know the post is about Iceland). We really do need to invest in it more.

They could actually put their energy towards something useful for once.

>equal pay for equal work
since when do women do equal work?

>I mean, we're in dire need of better education in America (I know the post is about Iceland). We really do need to invest in it more.

Don't you already throw money at education like mad? The same with healthcare, you pay for way more than other westerners.

Oh wow, you're right.

Why are we still stupid?

Because education standards are constantly lowered to make up for dumb niggers and spics. I'm not even kidding; once it became apparent that no amount of investment into teaching these kids worked for the most part, they decided to just bring standards down so they could pass. You can see similar things in the military where standards are being lowered so women can pass the physical tests.

Treat your whores like women and your women like whores.

Lets say the average salary in a company is 40K with the lower ranking employees (men ans women) beeing paid 25K. But that company doesn't have enough women high qualifications so the average income for women is only 35K.

So what's the solution? Give a raise or a promotion preferably to women even if they don't deserve it, even if they don't make the same efforts as men to deserve it. Just for being women and correct the company's stats and don't get any penalty from the state. The result will be men losing the motivation to improve and the least qualified people costing more, so the business will either sink or relocate some or all of its activities in a country without those dumb rules.

>3 people in a company, 2 guys, 1 girl
>1 guy makes x amount in wages
>Other guy makes x+y amount in wages after negotiating a better pay

So should the girl automatically also get x+y simply because one guy had the balls to go for it?

HEY THIS IS POL NOT INT

TAKE YOUR IRRELEVENT ASS COUNTRY AND FUCK OFF

Teachers also fail to moderate their own biases and opinions. Instead of reading classic literature or learning about ancient cultures, humanities teachers love to push watered-down essays and focus lessons on "intersectional issues." Most of the people I know who have learned about these subjects did so on their own time, where they wouldn't receive a bad grade for giving the wrong opinion. Thankfully none of my math/ science courses had this problem, but most high schools only call for one science class and two years of math. I'd guess the standards are even lower in large cities.

Yo chill, did a canuck steal your girl or aome shit?

Do people unironically believe that women make less for the same job? At my company on average men just take more shifts

>make equal pay for equal work
>discover that women don't work as much
>nothing changes

You see, the problem is that women are forced by society and their partners into taking a greater part of the housework and child rearing duties, which is why they aren't able to take those shifts. So the men are seizing the means of production by monopolizing the extra shifts that are made unavailable to women, and thanks to that, the men end up with more experience and higher pay, even though the women are working just as much (in the form of the "housework" that keeps them from taking the shifts). All of this is done in order to assure that women don't gain power in society.

Marxists actually believe this.

Women should just be give a UBI so more will become housewives.

They know what you know.
Single women with no kids under 30 actually make 120% of what single men with no kids under 30 actually make.
Forcing companies to "equalize" the pay means paying women more for the same unit of work.

Guys up top benefit from this because it is easier to take money from women than it is from men. So they are using this political movement to take money from the men, transfer it to the women, then take it off the women.

That's the inevitable outcome of the "equal pay" movement. Companies will simply hire fewer women because it's too expensive to employ them.

>become a woman / transgender just in the forms
>nothing changes actually just your status
>did you just assume my gender?
> ???
> MASTER RUSED

Nope, they have diversity officers to shut down companies that have fewer than 40% women.

Then they will simply introduce quotas, so that companies are forced to hire women, even if the women have absolutely 0 qualifications.

>Need programmer
>already filled all male slots
>need to get female "programmer" in order to be allowed to hire a new male programmer
>hire some random woman
>she must be paid the exact same as her male counterpart, but she has no idea about programming
>have her clean the toilets instead

Result: A new generation of highly paid cleaning staff!

This would be crazy, men & women already get paid the same, what they're proposing is paying women MORE than men for doing the same job, that's not going to end well.

They'll be sneakier about it. They will reduce the number of hours men can work, and pressure companies to always fill a promotion with a women whenever it's available (or have a damn good reason for promoting a male instead).

>>she must be paid the exact same as her male counterpart, but she has no idea about programming
>>have her clean the toilets instead

They'll all become scrum masters or some other shitty management job.
>look at all the female leaders in our progressive company!

Let's remember that and when Iceland's economy goes to shits so we can show them the middle finger.

There was a roastie in England who started a company and said she was gona pay her male employees 15% less, I have no idea how she was planning to do that legally speaking. There must be a way of exploiting these feminist laws.

(not sure if she ever actually did it, haven't heard anything about it since)

for how useless and annoying they are i'd say they're already over paid.

As a white male I'm literally on the lowest rung already, hope they don't bring this shit here, but they probably will, I might just have to opt out of society.

for what job?

>I have no idea how she was planning to do that legally speaking.

The legal system wouldn't touch her, and only men absolutely desperate for a job would work there.

>There was a roastie in England who started a company and said she was gona pay her male employees 15% less
Cunts like this need jail.

for blow jobs

Great
Let them run this simulation so we won't have to

>first

What? How? We've had equal pay laws since the 60's. How are they the first?

But we already know why those different fields have less pay, and thats because on the whole they are less economically valuable and make less money.
Like, do you really think teachers are going to be paid as much as software industries? What are you comparing here?

Because they are morons and think that a shitty admin should make as much as a computer engineer. Equal pay is one of the first steps towards socialism.

STEM companies satisfy their woman quotas in admin/sec positions. Always hire old, fat, and married, bringing in some harlot is absolutely disruptive.

Egalitarianism is the joke.

ICELAND SHOULD BE NUKED FOR THAT MOVE
TO GIVE OTHERS VERY STRONG WARNING

>require equal pay
>what is America
>what is literally every country on earth that isn't niggerville
????

It's literally illegal to pay a woman less than a man for doing the same work of the same quality in the US. Fuck off, Iceland, you aren't special, this isn't new.

>We already have laws stating women MUST be paid the same as men
>Women can sue a business if they're not paid the same as men
>Women HAVE sued businesses because they've discovered they weren't being paid the same
>This scares the living SHIT out of businesses all over the country
If women are cheaper to hire than men, why bother hiring men at all?
>Justice system hears a case with zero evidence for plaintiff or defendant
>It's a rape case
>Man was raped by woman
LOL NICE
>Woman is raped by man
>10-20 years jail, sir!
>Women still think there's a huge conspiracy out to get them

time for redundant, third-wave, quadruple-laws-for-it woman thing

>he thinks pay corresponds to work quality

>equal pay for everyone! *nothing changes*

when will this shit just die?

Diversity works because you get diverse brains working towards solving problems, which allows you to be more efficient and find solutions more quickly.

Find any successful globally competitive company and it will probably be diverse.

Find any shit-tier small business that's failing and never got off the ground and it will probably be full of rural and suburban retard white males.

youtube.com/watch?v=40hhc0cjYyg

few days ago after this vid, leftist butthurt was so strong that they collected several kk signs to kick him out of EU parliament

We've got them beaten by 40 or so years.

How would they be the first?

university educated western women are literally the epitome of cumdumpsters. The only reason why people still having babies are decent women who choose to mothers instead of fucking their time with useless degrees.

Most of america has an education monopoly unless you're rich. Most western countries have a verying degree of competition in education. In america, because of the monopoly, they dont have to provide a good service and will demand ever more money for it while lobbying against any sort of reform.

>They'll all become scrum masters or some other shitty management job.
THIS SO FUCKING THIS

9/10 Women I've seen in development jobs are all stupid scrum masters or agile consultants or UX experts, who wouldn't know how to fizzbuzz even with a tutorial in her hand.

Not saying there aren't women who can do development, it's just that the one that are getting hired are all token hires who do more damage to a company in the long term.

Delusional.

Hi, so question for someone who knows the US Tax system better then me.

Assume that Alice and Bob work at the same job for the same allotted time. However, Alice gets paid less, in fact lets pick the standard feminist number of Alice getting paid 70% of what Bob gets.

However, As per the yearly US tradition, both Alice and Bob have to report their income to the IRS, which I think the IRS will cross reference with what Alice and Bob's company sends in.

Now, the IRS can easily see that Alice is getting paid less then Bob, why doesn't the IRS report this? They are privy to both Salary numbers and are in a position to at least inform Alice that there are people who work the same position as she does at the same company who earn more than she does? I'm honestly curious about this.

Too true cunt. My highschool history teacher knew his shit (((factually))) but would not stop forcing his saturated opinion down our throats and his "I have a German uncle in the SS" anecdotal bullshit. When I brought up (in a very cucky way) that the Nazis may have disliked Jews due to them beingn overrepresented in communism and socialist movements, he sort of froze, said ok rather dismissively and went back to saying "Hitler was an insane evil man" the very next lesson I had with him.

Also every single female teacher I have has been borderline incompetent (teaching 5 year olds how to write isn't hard), and forced their feminist revisionist history down my throat. Luckily I slicked back m'locks and put on my fedora again so I was ready to debate with the teachers and BTFO them, but they just acted like petulant 5 year olds when I tried to make a point.

Don't bully the leaf, or else!

They don't cross-refrence within the same company. They might refrence an overall industry benchmark to flag someone who may be reporting considerably less than typical wages for a type of job. They don't especially care about overreporting income though; it would only allow the gov't to keep/tax more. Essentially, they just check for fraud.

This isn't what they mean, they mean when they add up ALL the money ALL women make & compare it to ALL the money ALL men make, regardless of job type or hours worked, they find a disparity, they put this disparity down to discrimination against women whilst overlooking the fucking obvious dubious nature of the data analysis, such as ignoring hours worked & job type.

>wrong opinion

That shit triggers me hard but thats how the school system works

>When I brought up (in a very cucky way) that the Nazis may have disliked Jews due to them beingn overrepresented in communism and socialist movements
But that's not why, the Nazis themselves were a socialist movement
On the contrary, Nazis hated Jews for being overrepresented among the rich, and created their own socialist movement because they saw the others were started by and shot through with the agents of international finance

The pay gap technically doesnt exist. Its an earnings gap because women do jobs that dont pay as much, servive industry etc. What are they going to do, pay waitresses $40 an hour?

>What are they going to do, pay waitresses $40 an hour?
>types this with his own hands
>still doesn't get it
Feminism is just a prybar for trying to introduce communism from another angle. The more you think about it, the more you'll realize that every single thing feminists want has the purpose of creating an artificial equality where there is none. And yes, ultimately they'll want higher pay for waitresses. Then less pay (or more likely just insane taxes) for CEOs that put them on the waitress level. And so on. Just gradually distort capitalism until it's communism in all but name. Frogboiling.

>gender tax on men
>white person tax

sheeeeeeeeeit.

what the fuck are they doing
don't tell me high-ranking government officials are buying into the wage gap meme

Or they'll just reduce the pay of men, further hampering our ability to start families or leave any kind of legacy. Lefties think share holders and CEOs care about anything but their bottom line. Hard to believe they were anti-corporatist only a few years ago.

Real tired of these uppity vaginas

oh wait nevermind now I remember
this is all part of a push by one of our political parties (ViĆ°reisn) that wants to get through legislation that forces all unofficial (ergo non-federal) institutions, companies and organizations to submit all the information needed to ascertain whether or not they're paying people less based on their sex

Sound about right desu. What pisses me off is the government stepping in to 'fix' a problem that doesnt exist. Women have equal opportunity to get into the same professions as men. When they say women are only paid 72c compared to men, they got that figure by combining all mens wages and all womens wages. Literally the only reason men make more is because of the professions they work in. Its akin to me complaining that a doctor makes more than me.

Also, what if chad makes more than stacy at the same job because he performs better. Are they going to impliment maximum wages for jobs? Or is the employer going to send every performance review to the government to prove chads wages arent because of gender bias?

They want the same privileges as men without the responsibility. This a staple of feminism.

You can see the same in how they always cry for more females in high positions of society (CEOs) but never will you hear crying for more females in low positions (sewage workers etc.)

>This is LITERALLY the reason why the only white women in Europe who are having kids are doing it with Africans, because the men are such pussies.

Is the law also that they have to perform equal work too? Or will companies be forced to pay them the same even when they're looking at Facebook 40% of the day

They already do though

Unless they mean every woman in the country is going to be paid the same as the richest man in the country regardless of what they do

>Equal Pay when their entire economy is EVE Online

Ok

>white women in Europe who are having kids are doing it with Africans
why are you obsessed with nigger dicks? interracial couples are literaly clsoe to 0% in europe and mixed kids even lesser. kys cuck amerishit

They're several decades late. Most western countries have laws like that.

american has to always put in his cuck fantasies. you are rly scum of the earth you degenerate destroyers of white race

/thread

>Dutch
>Not Turkish

Corporate interests and their profiteering infest American Education almost as much as it infests American healthcare.

Textbook companies get cushy deals with schools whenever possible.

Standardized testing companies keep politicians fighting over which yardstick to measure progress with than actually making progress.

Then there's the ever meddlesome school administration bureaucracy that prioritize prestige over preparedness - because making yourself look good gets you promotions and bonuses, those ungrateful students that just go on to be successful people won't do that for you.

And that's without touching Common Core's academic weirdness and subtle agendas.