Judge Rules Title VIII Does Not Bar Anti-Gay Discrimination

For a primer, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act covers discrimination by race, color, sex, religion, and national origin.

Donald Trump has suggested amending it to explicitly cover sexual orientation in the past.

advocate.com/election/2015/9/28/donald-trump-15-years-ago-backed-amending-civil-rights-law

Many have been trying to claim the act explicitly covers gender identity discrimination by virtue of its inclusion of sex as a protected class.


---
archive.is/OSiMc
---

On Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not prohibit employers from discriminating against workers on the basis of their sexual orientation. Many federal courts—in addition to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission—have reached the opposition conclusion, finding that Title VII’s ban on “sex discrimination” encompasses anti-gay discrimination. But by a 2–1 decision, a panel for the 11th Circuit bucked this trend, reading Title VII as narrowly as possible and, in the process, ignoring at least one critical Supreme Court precedent.

Friday’s decision, Evans v Georgia Regional Hospital, involved the case of Jameka Evans, a lesbian who presents as traditionally masculine. She sued her employer, alleging that she endured hostility and harassment in the workplace in violation of Title VII. Although that statute does not explicitly outlaw anti-LGBTQ discrimination, it does bar “sex discrimination,” including sex stereotyping. Evans argued that this prohibition bars employers from discriminating on the basis of gender presentation and sexual orientation.

---

Other urls found in this thread:

vocabulary.com/dictionary/eunuch
vocabulary.com/dictionary/Servant
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Allahu akbar!

>Matthey 19:10-12
12 For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth
>eunuch: (n) a man who has been castrated and is incapable of reproduction
vocabulary.com/dictionary/eunuch

>Genesis 2:24
24 Therefore a man leaves his father and his mother and clings to his wife, and they become one flesh.

>Acts 8:26-40
34 And the eunuch said to Philip
>Eunuch

>Matthew 8:15-13
Jesus Heals a Centurion’s Servant
5 When he entered Capernaum, a centurion came to him, appealing to him 6 and saying, “Lord, my servant is lying at home paralyzed, in terrible distress.” 7 And he said to him, “I will come and cure him.” 8 The centurion answered, “Lord, I am not worthy to have you come under my roof; but only speak the word, and my servant will be healed. 9 For I also am a man under authority, with soldiers under me; and I say to one, ‘Go,’ and he goes, and to another, ‘Come,’ and he comes, and to my slave, ‘Do this,’ and the slave does it.” 10 When Jesus heard him, he was amazed and said to those who followed him, “Truly I tell you, in no one[a] in Israel have I found such faith. 11 I tell you, many will come from east and west and will eat with Abraham and Isaac and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven, 12 while the heirs of the kingdom will be thrown into the outer darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” 13 And to the centurion Jesus said, “Go; let it be done for you according to your faith.” And the servant was healed in that hour.
>Servant: (n) a person working in the service of another (especially in the household)
vocabulary.com/dictionary/Servant

I'm pretty sure Jesus would heal the faggots.

>would jesus discriminate
God said that anyone man who lies with a man as he would with a women should be put to death. Jesus took this to a new extreme and would say that simply having gay thoughts is grounds for eternal damnation, but you can still stop sinning, achieve salvation, and find your way back to God, and that he will treat you with the same kindness that he does everyone else. That is not the same as approving of shitpushing and this is blatantly clear to anyone who has read the gospels.

Those are not the understandings of those terms, from those times. They are from modern dictionaries. Christ heals all who believe in Him. He said the born eunuchs (everybody knew these as boys who weren't attracted to females) dont apply to the Genesis marriage parable. Xq28 gene. There is nothing to heal. Then look up what it says about "regular" eunuchs in Isaiah

You cant lay with a man as you would with a woman because men dont have vaginas
Logic: 1
God: 0

Pimps and shrine hookers. The priests for Molech would lay eachother in a temple while cross dressed. That is not me. Female beds bud. What about David and Jonathan and the 144,000? Why didn't the Centurion want Christ in his house? Centurions were forbade marriage. Also. Grab em is sodomy. Aids is all gone. They can reproduce like Hagar did. And there are many right wing pedos. Christ is more socialist than He was Rambo. Your pic is shit. Tolerance is hard. And anger is not good. There are meme pics about the two swords parable. To what? Defeat the Roman army? No. To fulfill prophecy. Ribbit. And live by sword die by sword. Isaiah 40:17. Pink swastika. Haavara. And the golden rule. Also serpent seed. Which was not homosexual in the least. And was heterosexual and of the devil and of females
Exactly. It says as yoh lieth. I dont lie with them at all. See above

>Those are not the understandings of those terms, from those times.

Proofs?
That seems to be a fallacy

>seems
Freud invented your definitions in 1880. Sodomy used to be defined as fapping. Heterosexuality used to mean "an abnormal attraction to the opposite sex". And etc etc etc. They didnt have the word gay. Nor homosex. And He wasn't talking about anything else they wouldn't understand

Loving Jesus is gay.

Loving vaginas is defilement

IT LITERALLY SAYS ON LEVITICUS THAT IF YOU DO GAY SHIT IS SIN

The bible seems pretty clear that it knows what a homosexual couple is regardless of the term used at the time. In the OT it was punishable by death, so clearly they knew what it was.

As for Ruth Naomi, David and Johnathan they were not same sex couples in the modern sense.

They did not fuck one anothers assholes or scissor eachother, they loved one another in a none sexual way as a human loves another human, faggots will try to spin this to say "see having gay sex in mens washrooms and sleeping with strangers every other day is a okay with the lord" it fucking isn't.

As for the "born eunuchs" he is talking of Celibacy not go fuck men since you don't like women, you have to be retarded to think he's talking about homosexuals in that context.

>Title VIII

It's Title IX retard.

>I'm pretty sure Jesus would heal the faggots.

1 Corinthians 6:9-11New International Version (NIV)

9 Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men[a] 10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

Here comes the "but Jesus didn't say it!" crowd.

Sorry meant to say Title 7.

>New International Version
Heresy

Might as well be quoting pic related

>I'm pretty sure Jesus would heal the faggots.
fags are called to a life of celibacy. Deus vult.

I feel if you were to take anyone more than 100 years ago and put them in the present they would look like a radical.

What should I use the latin one from 1000 years ago?

In that story of the Centurion's "servant", the Greek word there is "pais". Which in that context translates out as "boy toy". It was the underage boy the Centurion was mentoring. Mentoring in all ways, including sex.

There's a split amongst translators on whether to follow the tradition of using the oldest extant texts, or whether to use the most widely available extant texts for translating. Protip: it doesn't matter.

It also says that shaving is a sin, as is mixing fabrics in your clothing, and most ironically, mistreating foreigners in your land.

>old testament
were not jews

Perfect response.
This is basically the answer

Boi pussy
Simulation
Anal penetration
Perversion

Context: 1
Fucking Leaf: 0

>using boipussy unironically
Stone yourself

That's what your kind calls it Leaf, boi pussy

God thought well ahead of disingenuous faggots like yourself.

When Paul was preaching to the faggots in Greece and Rome, he was not condemning them for shaving, mixing fabrics, and treating foreigners (Subjectively) "badly".

What Paul said was man on man relations was a ticket to Spiritual death.

Jesus was preaching to an audience that held the law. They already knew faggotry was degenerate.

>this autism
Dont you have another flag to find?

Leaf's problem of not knowing what anal intercourse is in relation to vaginal intercourse in the context of Hebrew translated to Latin translated to English, is not a flag issue.

Logic and reading comprehension must be a foreign concept in Canada

bump

>Faggot claims to read scripture.
>Takes scripture so far out of context they make no logical sense.

Those scripture referenced in that pic are quite a stretch. One needs super-powered mental gymnastics to even comprehend how you came up with that shit!

Saged