New Study: Hillary Ran Worst Campaign in Years

archive.is/nnL6e

By Ian Miles Cheong | 7:38 pm, March 8, 2017

Like

   
A new study by the Wesleyan Media Project has found that the 2016 presidential campaign run by Hillary Clinton is without a doubt one of the worst-run political operations in years.
Interestingly, the directors of the study dispute the argument that “advertising doesn’t matter” in elections. Clinton’s failure to advertise in certain key states, they argue, was the biggest reason for her defeat by Donald Trump.
The study also backs the view that Clinton’s focus on identity politics and emphasis on condemning her opposition contributed to a campaign message devoid of substance with no clear message on policy.
Published in The Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics, the study found that one candidate in particular, Hillary Clinton, “almost ignored discussions of policy.” The study states the lack of advertising effectiveness “may owe to the unusual nature of the presidential campaign with one nonconventional candidate and the other using an unconventional message strategy.”
Clinton, who was widely predicted to win by the mainstream media, suffered unexpected losses in states where she failed to air ads until the final week before the polls. In contrast, Trump advertised in these states (Wisconsin and Michigan) for weeks before he won.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=MfrRzW-Yqog
youtube.com/watch?v=YttscNOoAjA
youtube.com/watch?v=XKHa9ldznx8
politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/jan/25/cokie-roberts/have-democrats-lost-900-seats-state-legislatures-o/
degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/for.2016.14.issue-4/for-2016-0040/for-2016-0040.pdf
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Clinton is a fucking loser, movie at 11.

Remember in 2008 when people were voting for 'hope and change'? They were voting against her.

losers lose and winners win

that's life

Fuckin hell, isn't ian miles cheong is that asian SJW fuckwad?

No shit

> threaten WW3 with a nuclear power REPEATEDLY in the belief it will make you popular with the electorate?

Fucking hell, the fact Trump said he was considering banning abortions in the election and yet more white women voted him in, over the first woman prez illustrates how fucking dumb Hillary Clinton was in her retarded strategy of threatening nuclear war over alledged Russian hacking

What a stupid cunt. So much for ivy leage educations

Did Obongo run the worst two-term presidency in years? How does anyone lose this many seats? Bush couldn't have lost this many trying his hardest

The only people who voted for Trump are rural and suburban retards.

City people all voted for Hillary.

Do you think she was ever even meant to win? Is Don (((/theirguy/)))

City folks wanted nuked first!

In other news, water is wet, the sky is blue, and shit tends to smell bad.

Calling a large percentage of people retards.
Great work leaf. I hope the Dems go with your view.

now you're starting to catch on

What about when all the losers team up on you in 1914 and you still almost win but they get somewhat lucky/fortunate and manage to win?

56%
faggot

>The study also backs the view that Clinton’s focus on identity politics and emphasis on condemning her opposition contributed to a campaign message devoid of substance with no clear message on policy.

liberals thought they were invincible. Turns out americans aren't held hostage by them as much as they thought they would be.
The silent majority have ousted their bullies.

#
Kushner is their guy
Bannon is our guy

Trump is a narcissist who could go either way

That's why (((they))) got rid of Flynn (good oul Irish name) and are gunning for O'Conway and Mc'Bannon

>replying that pasta seriously
lurk more

Reminder that this are the best campaign ads Hillary could come up with:
youtube.com/watch?v=MfrRzW-Yqog
youtube.com/watch?v=YttscNOoAjA

Another leaf who has no idea where the wealth that makes his ridiculous urban lifestyle possible comes from.

>needing to invest another millions of dollars into a study just to tell the obvious

They are still losing it seems.

He switched sides as soon as he realized how insane liberals are.

Hillary let's millennials shape her race. Put too much weight in celebrity and media endorsements. Misjudged American attitudes towards refugees and Islam, no we don't have a hard on for them like the dems supposed.

What the fuck? Someone payed for this survey. They payed money to find out what everyone has already known and has stated repeatedly about the campaign.

>By Ian Miles Cheong
Why are people suddenly pretending Ching Cheong is our guy? The man has no integrity and no spine.

Her second biggest mistake next to just not being very likeable was assuming people would care about facts or truth over someone going 'YEAH I'LL MAKE IT ALL AWESOME AGAIN DON'T WORRY HOW I'LL DO IT'

How many of these were up for election during his two terms? The US are a big country (for me) so the plain number doesn't mean anything.
I expect it to be a bloodbath, but how much?

Also the Trump/Hitler ad:
youtube.com/watch?v=XKHa9ldznx8

the ""educated"" need some form of occupation.

There are 7,383 state legislative seats

politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/jan/25/cokie-roberts/have-democrats-lost-900-seats-state-legislatures-o/

>Obama’s record for losses, at least through the 2014 midterms, is historically bad having overseen two horrible midterm elections for Democrats. Overall, Sabato wrote, Democrats during Obama’s presidency lost 11 governorships, 13 U.S. Senate seats, 69 House seats, and 913 state legislative seats and 30 state legislative chambers. (Our analysis of legislative seats is off from Sabato’s by three. The small discrepancy is likely due to run-offs and recounts.)

>The shedding of U.S. House seats, state legislative seats and statehouse control is at least twice the average two-term losses from Truman through George W. Bush, Sabato said.

> at least twice the average two-term losses from Truman through George W. Bush
> at least twice the average two-term losses from Truman through George W. Bush
> at least twice the average two-term losses from Truman through George W. Bush

>pokemon go to the polls!

Her campaign was managed by reddit millennials

How fucking pilled out is she to lul at her own powerpoint effect?

Sad

She looks like she's never been in a room like that before

degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/for.2016.14.issue-4/for-2016-0040/for-2016-0040.pdf

>almost 50% of all campaign ads and nearly 100% of outside ads were personal attacks on Trump

Nice to have numbers for this. Turns out doing nothing but Tourettes-ing 'racist' and 'literal Hitler' for months doesn't win elections.

That's what you get for hiring the head of a pedophilia sect to run your campaign. Hers was the campaign of child molesters, war criminals, Satanists, and liberals. The worst of society supporting the worst of society.

>losers lose and winners win
>that's life

Is this the neonazi flipflopper who's like banana, white on inside yellow or outside or is he not?

Does anyone happen to recall what the context of OP's photograph was taken in? Wtf is she doing? Was this a tour of the appalling conditions in which the common people live? Fuck is going on?

...

That's actually interesting

It's breakdown of ads.

Just so you understand what those things mean:

Positive - talk about our candidate
Negative - talk about other candidate being the devil
Contrast - look, the other candidate is shit, ours is great because

Pty/group = PAC's and party sponsored ads, candidate = campaign sponsored ads.

Note the insanity of Dem pty/group

Look below

No policy discussion in Clinton's ads, Trump packs policy almost everywhere in contrast ads(which are the best for arguing for policy from marketing standpoint).

I didn't knew she was this bad. Hilldog campaign was visibly shitty but the breakdown really makes it look horrible.

In total, over 60 percent of ads supporting Clinton were solely about candidate
characteristics, while only about 25 percent were focused on policy. This is a
huge difference from Trump’s advertising, over 70 percent of which was focused
on policy, and it is a huge difference from every other presidential campaign for
which we have comparable data (Figure 9).

In a typical campaign, ads that focus
on candidate character have comprised less than 20 percent of total ad airings,
and in some years like 2000, there were hardly any ads that focused on the
candidates’ character.

Formating screwed because of pdf copypasting

Seriously look at this shit.

Also note McCain's low energy campaign.

Is that the new shareblue slogan? Ive been seeing that in every thread

No, trump is not their guy. They dont paint a target on their guys back. They dont call their guy a racist sexist russian spy.

Over eight years? Every elected offlcial in the country would've been up for election at least once. Those numbers are godawful, they amount to collapse, essentially. To compare to the UK, the Democrats are currently in the position that your Labor party seems to be heading towards, gettig elected in big cities but irrelevant everywhere else.

They also played the game knowing they had stacked the deck. Wiretaps, Media in back pocket, paid internet trolls, etc...

>being THIS new.

very interesting, thank you based Sup Forumsack

This is actually pretty incredible. While Trump was staying on topic and being presidential from the very beginning, talking about what his side stands for, shldawg was just talking trash and being a salty bitch

Now. Imagine if we actually gave HER the nuclear codes

interesting. Goes to show that the Dems try to destroy anyone who poses a real threat to them.

I think this sums it up the best

In stark contrast to
any prior presidential cycle for which we have Kantar Media/CMAG data, the
Clinton campaign overwhelmingly chose to focus on Trump’s personality and
fitness for office (in a sense, doubling down on the news media’s focus), leaving
very little room for discussion in advertising of the reasons why Clinton herself
was the better choice.

B-but how did she lose? She called Trump names and everything!!

>Clinton campaign overwhelmingly chose to focus on Trump’s personality and
>fitness for office

hahaha, and then clinton fainted and got pneomonia

sucks to be her

Oh, I can imagine.

>By Ian Miles Cheong
what the shit

I'm not gonna lie, former Trump supporter here.

I tried watching the first one, could only make it about a third of the way through due to cringing too hard

Fucking nice

These CIA Meme Engineers really need to up their game.