Are most people permanently polarized in their political beliefs?

Are most people permanently polarized in their political beliefs?

I thought I will an independent but I am finding I am agreeing more with the right and I may have hit the point of no return.

Is it really possible to blend political ideologies?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syncretic_politics
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Politics suck the joy out of life. You're supposed to hate others to death because they listen to a different group of old dudes talking.
It's better to not worry about this shit and just live your life.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syncretic_politics
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position

Maybe you're a bluepilled democratcuck.

I mean in the non-fiction universe.

>checks flag
>continue down thread

...

What was fictional about 1933-1945 Germany?
The pic in your OP is a rigid, American-centered political spectrum. If you think that's the only polarization that exists, you're the one who isn't living in reality.

We've lost our connection with the practice of realizing our innerself. We run our lives using automatic life operations.

Did you breathe that last breath, or were you breathed?

Yes, of course you can hold dual beliefs, depending on circumstances. Social cohesion and demographics comes before ideology.

For me, if I was in a 99% homogeneous Norway/Japan, I'd believe in helping the disadvantaged (in Norway/Japan, not trying to absorb the poverty of the world). That makes me left-wing.

I don't give 2 fucks about this dog-eat-dog atmosphere in the UK, so I don't want to pay a single penny for the British underclass (created by Thatcher and the "Conservative" government) or the immigrants (brought by Blair and the "Labour" government). I guess that makes me right-wing.

Ideology doesn't matter as much as the personality of the persons in the government and the social cohesion in the society.

it just seems the 2 party establishment is too established and the polarization is at the point of never moving back to center from either side. third parties never gain traction.

>left
>beliefs
>science

Every Leftist from Feminists to BLM to the LGBT have some gripe with science as being sexist racist or some other made up buzzword

Polarization is a Jewish trick that is used to divide and conquer

Do not fall for the left/right,radical centrist memes

We are all brothers who must stick together, labeling and generalising each other is what (((they))) want

Half the shit listed on the liberal side doesn't even allign with the left anymore
>equality
>egalitarianism
>support: workers
>personal freedom
>votes for: pacifism, fairness, positive role models
>left family couldn't be more fabricated and false

>Individualism
NO! Individualism is a cancer!

The Urantia Book; Paper 69, Section 8

P778:9, 69:8.1 Primitive man never hesitated to enslave his fellows. Woman was the first slave, a family slave. Pastoral man enslaved woman as his inferior sex partner. This sort of sex slavery grew directly out of man's decreased dependence upon woman.

P779:1, 69:8.2 Not long ago enslavement was the lot of those military captives who refused to accept the conqueror's religion. In earlier times captives were either eaten, tortured to death, set to fighting each other, sacrificed to spirits, or enslaved. Slavery was a great advancement over massacre and cannibalism

Gotta love how the liberal side advocates peace and not war while during the 2016 election they voted for the candidate who wanted war with Russia.

You're confused.

There's never any point like that. There's only a breaking point where populism overtakes the status quo set by the 2 party establishment. That either results in a third party winning power, which is essentially what just happened in the US, or the established parties will evolve in order to keep power.

If the things outlined in your OP are what you're agreeing more with, then yeah you can blend ideologies fine. Most ideologies are blended from others anyway.
I agree with a lot of points from both sides of that graphic.

does pacifism even survive in a violent militant world?

what is up with this trying to "force" utopia?

> 34% on the left support war
> They worship a president who was at war every single day of his presidency and started a drone programm

Something doesn't add up

Government poisons everything it fucking touches. I want as little of it as possible.

>American* government poisons everything it fucking touches

Find me one that doesn't faggot.

read conflict of visions by thomas sowell. basically, people have a vision of what humans are like, and everything is built off of and in alignment with that vision. so most people end up on one side or the other. the only people in the middle are people who havent thought much about things yet.

There are something things I sort of kinda agree with the left on, but usually for different reasons (ex. I'm for abortion because it saves society money; couldn't give a fuck about your choice).

Find you a country that has cheaper college, healthcare, etc. than America?
Are you retarded, user?

Re-read what I said, and what you said. Use that large noggin of yours.

I have a nazi-tier opinion of jews, niggers and mudslims but i vote for far-left cuz i'm again capitalistic system. Perfect country = no nigger / no muslims / no christfag / no jews & no capitalists.

Was pic related here:
your example of government poisoning things it touches?

Sorry m8, are you at least 18? It's hard for me to believe someone this fucking stupid isn't underaged.

Why aren't you able to answer, user?

Try again user. I believe in you! Just repeat after me:
I THINK I CAN
I THINK I CAN
I THINK I CAN
I THINK I CAN

Is globalization working out well for the Chinese peasant?

Am I supposed to care about the Chinese peasant?
I bet it's working out well for the people who own them.

No. Political ideologies are the team you play for in life. They're sharply dividing along racial lines, and pretty soon your color will be the team you play for. This is inevitable as the US Balkanizes If you're white, stay right.

"muh gubmint fucks everything it touches!"
>every other first world country has socialized healthcare and education
>every other first world country has cheaper healthcare and education than the US

Search for the term "new political center".

Because the government is paying for it doesn't make it cheaper, it just means you're paying for it with you're paying for it with your taxes instead. And in a single payer system there's no reason for universities or healthcare to compete, which lowers prices, because the government patys for everything. I hope you like subsidizing fat niggers heart medication and dumb bitches womens studies degrees.

It makes it cheaper on the individual person, which is all his graph was detailing.
Socialism doesn't mean I need to tolerate fat niggers and feminists. Even progressive liberal countries that have single-payer draw the line somewhere based on their cultural standards. My standards are different, so my line would be drawn differently. It's easy.