What is Sup Forums's opinion on Anarcho-Communism? Does it work? If not, why?

What is Sup Forums's opinion on Anarcho-Communism? Does it work? If not, why?

Anarchism doesn't work, full-stop.

Not asking for myself, I am legitimately asking for a friend because he doesn't seems to listen to my words that anarcho-communism would never work

Yes, in ethno-centric communities of 10-20 people..

Yeah, I told my friend it would only work in a school project group of 4 people

Search: economic calculation problem

Because the people who don't like to work are just going to keep making up excused for why they can't work, and everyone else is going to end up picking up more and more of their slack.

it's pretty much communism with private property.
And Capitalism does not work because of private property and communism does not work because of communism.

No.

In small, voluntary opt-in groups, yes. When you try to enforce collectivism on an unwilling population, no.

Communism with private property? Then it wouldn't be real Communism.

This

Search economic calculation problem debunked then read chapter one of Capital.

anarcho capitalism is pretty much an oxymoron. That's why it's a ridiculous idea.

Good point, Brosniak

suppose it could work if you can find enough people willing to distribute their goods and services without coercion from an authority body. as someone already said, it won't work on anything other than tiny communities.

Ancom's are Ancap's retarded cousin who got doubly retarded after getting kicked in the head by a mule

Communism doesn't no matter the shape it takes.
It always, without fail, creates a centralized government with no real accountability to the people it governs. From there it's revealed for what it really is. A cleaver way of establishing dictatorship.

You gotta have a lot of well-defined symmetrical groups for reciprocity to work brah
The complexity and the resulting transactional costs increase exponentially making either centralisation and/or market transfer of goods and services preferable
Basically you gotta have:
1. Low amount of occupational diversity
2. Populace so small that you and each other person belong to at least one pair of symmetrical groups

That's a camping trip mate

>Anarcho-Communism
what an oxymoron

If people were robots, it would work. Communism is a revolt against human nature, making it an unattainable dream.

Actually it was the first ever form of anarchism.

"To look at people in capitalist society and conclude that human nature is egoism, is like looking at people in a factory where pollution is destroying their lungs and saying that it is human nature to cough."

—Andrew Collier

If you're talking about cavemen, it wasn't anarchism
If you're talking about Bakunin, it wasn't communism

How is Bakunin and not Communism?

youre confusing private and personal property

Anarchism does not work. Communism does not work. I can't see why anarcho-communism wouldn't do just fine.

Small anecdote from a friend about why Anarcho-Communism doesn't work.
I'm here in Montana, and while Montana seems like a red state, in the 70's it was pretty famous for hippies buying land out here to enact marxist communes away from the capitalistic system.
This story is gleaned from his grandfather who worked for the Forest Service out here for all his life.
So a bunch of Berkeley dropouts would pool enough money together to buy a patch of land and start their Utopian project,
but within five years they often failed.
Why? the members of the commune who were the top producers would do most of the work, and the rest would be parasitic twats, the producers would complain and eventually get expelled for being oppressive and going against the collective.
What was left was the people who either couldn't or weren't able to run a farm properly and the farm failed miserably, all the dropouts would scatter and the land would rot.
When the Forest Service would try to buy this acreage to roll into the national forests and wilderness out here they couldn't find the deed-owner. These hippies had often put the land in the name of someone named "sunflower mandela" and skipped town.
There is still land out here that's abandoned because anarchist rule cannot into logistics or long term planning.
The REAL irony in this is that the Ancoms bought private land for themselves to do what they want with it and the Federal Gov't couldn't purchase this private land to roll into public works projects.

School group projects fucking suck. You could almost always see the smartest guy in the group completely ignore the rest of his group and make some huge great essay while the rest are basically being a drag.

>implying the worst ecological disasters in the 20th century weren't perpetrated by socialist countries and environmentalism didn't grow out of liberal capitalist democracies

>Bakunin
It's just me being ignorant about that freak.
Prohibition of private property has nothing to do with Anarchism. You cannot educate your own children. Says who? Plato? Plato sucked cock of a hobo, fuck him and his creepy crap

All property is private. The factory and farm and etc are all private property.

The inventor of anarchism (Proudhon) was a communist. Its clear that anarchism is anti-capitalist.

Denying the natural tribalism and inequality in humans only leads to more human suffering.
also >Implying I'm a capitalist

communist is a little strong for proudhon; he strongly believed in the unit of the family as the most important part of any society, and also communist thought was developed after him

>he strongly believed in the unit of the family as the most important part of any society
So...?

AnarchoCommunism is a self-contradicting in and of itself.

Thank you for educating my barbaric me, but maybe you could explain me how could anarchists prohibit me from having my own property without oppressing me?

>Read chapter one of Capital
The book Marx wrote after the Communist Manifesto, because he formed his religion first and then went seeking facts to support it. Unsuccessfully.

ECP hasn't been debunked btw, but the Labour Theory of Value has.

BTFO hard. Go pick your teeth up and get a job, criminal.

It's irrelevant as soon as marx-engels wrote:
> the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property
and Proudhon claimed that property is theft (how about the property I've created myself? those useless greedy bastards!)

Could i just go and claim starmoon happy flowers' abandoned property?

>Anarcho-Communism

you mean fake anarchism?

Real anarchists hate their guts.

Not only does anarcho communism not work, it cannot exist. Communism requires government, anarchism cannot have government. The fact that anarchocommunism exists as a word is just more proof that leftists are idiots. Any anarchist society is libertarian by definition. Fucking pinko leaf

People need to come to terms with the inequality of life. The dice roll differently for all of us. I can't imagine a more unfulfilling existence than living in communism. Even if I never make more than 60,000 in capitalism, there's always a new possibility around the corner, and either way I'm not tethered to the mediocracy. Just go out on the highway and observe the traffic. That ineffectual, ego-driven throng of pure mediocrity it what you're beholden to.

Yeah, no thanks. "The worker" is fungible, it's not the benchmark around which a society is built. If people don't think they're getting paid enough, they can unionize. Until then, STFU

No.

Fuck no.

Go ahead and go on /leftypol/ and ask an anarcho communist how they feel about nations (not states as in governments, nations as in groups of people). Ask them about culture, history, art, community, family, people. They will tell you it all must be destroyed - and WITH A STRAIGHT FACE tell you they are not liberals.

All because papa marx said so. Everything that makes you you is just a means to an end and probably evil capitalism and must be crushed so that muh drum circle utopia can be born.

Also
>claim muh LTV
>"muh pig in a silk top hat cartoon is taking your monies"
>"therefore you need to give a community leader EVERYTHING you make so he can decide just how much he wants to give back to you"
ancoms are fucking hilariously deluded. The only reason they believe this to be feasible is because they want to sit in a drum circle and smoke pot and continue convincing themselves their vagina paintings are a meaningful contribution to humanity.