This is it lads! INB5 SHILLS: >Unredacted information on the court document included the case number, 1:15-cv-07433-RWS. This case is better known as Giuffre V. Maxwell, and is a suit filed by a woman named Virginia Giuffre against British heiress Ghislane Maxwell, alleging that Maxwell acted as a facilitator and groomer for Jeffrey Epstein’s child prostitution enterprise, and that Maxwell was directly responsible for trafficking the then-underage Giuffre as an unwilling prostitute. >Cernovich inserted himself into this case in January of 2017 when he made a motion to intervene and a motion to unseal previously sealed court documents and exhibits in this case. Cernovich’s claim is that his motion to unseal these items is a purely journalistic investigation, and that it was part of his “quest” to oppose pedophiles. This is, apparently, not the case. >It is then with no small amount of irony that we note that Cernovich’s motion was aimed against Giuffre, not on her behalf. >According to the response in opposition to Cernovich’s motion to unseal, documents filed by Giuffre’s attorneys state that Cernovich is attempting to unseal documents that were sealed under an order intended to protect Giuffre. The opposition documents further state that Cernovich’s motion to unseal mirrored earlier motions to unseal filed by celebrity attorney and close personal friend Alan Dershowitz– who is also named as being involved with Epstein’s sex ring– and that Cernovich is acting as Dershowitz’s proxy. They also noted how Cernovich has been a pro-rape advocate, often using rhetoric favoring the targeting of rape victims, as well as Cernovich’s relationship with Dershowitz, most notably Dershowitz’s appearance in Cernovich’s movie “Silenced”. Dershowitz’s involvement in this case stems from his concurrent status of being accused of patronizing Epstein’s criminal enterprise.
>Dershowitz is a toxic figure in this case in his own right. From the opposition to Dershowitz’s motion to unseal: >Indeed, in over 50 statements to the press, he has explained to the world (if not this Court) his reasons for maintaining his attacks on Ms. Giuffre in the media, in which he has publicly called her a “prostitute” and a “bad mother” to her three minor children. McCawley Dec. at Exhibit 20, Local 10 News, January 22, 2015. For example, Dershowitz has made the following statements: · “The end result of this case should be she [Jane Doe No. 3] should go to jail, the lawyers should be disbarred and everybody should understand that I am completely and totally innocent.” McCawley Dec. at Exhibit 21, CNN International, New Day, January 6, 2015. · Dershowitz also stated, in an interview in Newsmax, that he is “considering” bringing a lawsuit against Jane Doe No. 3. “And we’re considering suing her for defamation as well, but right now she was trying to hide in Colorado and avoid service, but we found her and we served her and now she’ll be subjected to a deposition.” 38 By his own words, Dershowitz wants to intimidate and harass Ms. Giuffre with the specter of his sending her “to jail.”
(part II)
Benjamin Scott
>By essentially re-stating Dershowitz’s motion to unseal, Cernovich is little more than Dershowitz’s tool by which he seeks to intimidate a victim of child sex trafficking– and he is stating the opposite to his network of gullible and sniveling fans who throw cash at him for his useless vitamin supplements and badly written books. >And to add more proof of the collaboration between Cernovich and Dershowitz , Dershowitz filed filed a motion in support of Cernovich’s motion to unseal >Cernovich is, of course, little more than a Twitter crybully who bemoans the deletrious effect “feminists” have on males and western society, and to that effect has offered free legal advice (you get what you pay for, I guess) to his followers about how to “get out” of “false rape charges.” Cernovich has been banned from Fox News of all places, for his continued advocacy for the decriminalization of rape and as an apologist for rapists. All the proof needed to destroy this kike and any political leverage he had. Spread it to the four winds. Dershowitz is a piece of shit: defended Epstein, pro-torture zionist, defends pornography. Caricature of a disgusting jew. pic very related. http:/ /idavox.com/index.php/2017/03/09/mike-cernovich-alan-dershowitz-and-the-jeffery-epstein-underage-sex-trafficking-case/
Adrian Martinez
How did you dig up all this info?
Nolan Sanders
Did Laura Silsby really change her name and take a job working for the Amber Alert service in the USA?
Parker Wright
Big if true.
Ayden Flores
It's been out there for months, but no one is looking. Cerno flies under the radar. Few people are digging on him, because they don't suspect him of anything. His fanbase is loyal and stupid. Since he was caught in a livestream bragging that he has paid people "digging" on his critics, some of us decided to start looking into his connections. He connects, by several degrees of separation, from the same pedo rings and social circles as the rest of Washington. All those periscopes he gave on Baked Alaska had moments where he mentions suspicious points.
His investors are rabidly liberal, zionist, and anti-white. More research is needed.
Highlights:Opposition to Motion to Intervene-Unseal >archive isn't wanting to find it for whatever reason 6889-presscdn-0-68-pagely.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/589-Giuffre-Opposition-to-Motion-to-Intervene-Unseal.pdf >Cernovich’s brief is entirely silent on the fact that the sealed documents in this case relate to the sexual assault of minors (a fact he is no doubt aware of by his admitted reading Plaintiff’s response in opposition to Dershowitz’s motion to intervene).11His brief fails to make a showing to the Court (or, indeed, offer any explanation at all) as to why some unspecified interested in publicly revealing documents concerning the sexual assault of minors should take precedence over the well -reasoned Protective Order this Court not only entered but repeatedly reaffirmed. pg 15 >Tellingly, Cernovich cites no civil case in which a court modified a protective order to give an intervener access to information about the sexual assault of a minor (when the intervener was not the handicapped victim’s mother). Instead, Cernovichcites authority that is inapposite and self-evidently distinguishable. For example, in many of the cases Cernovich cited the court denied the motion. pg 19 >In addition, Cernovich cites cases concerning cameras in the courtroom – cases which have absolutely no bearing on the issue at hand. pg 21 >Cernoskype has wholly failed to make any showing to justify disturbing this Court’s Protective Order, entered for good cause. To the contrary, his comes to the Court with strong indicia of truly improper purposes of unsealing such sensitive material. >CONCLUSION >Based on the foregoing, the Court should deny Cernovich’s motion in its entirety. pg22
See also: Loren Feldman, anti-white zionist behind Cernovich:
Seriously who's gives a fuck. The dude is a lawyer
Evan Price
I never had anything against Cernovich. He was in on the nationalist bandwagon, so I didn't try to tear him down. In fact, I didn't try to police the right at all, and I think that's why we won for a change.
I know he's friends with people who are libshills. But this Dershowitz business is tricky for more than a few reasons, and yea, he is all the things that you say: businessinsider.com/harvard-professor-alan-dershowitz-trump-immigration-ban-2017-1
user, if you aren't a cuck shill, you should know that you run a good deal of risk by leaving digital fingerprints on anything to do with this. Especially if these pedo rings are half as powerful as some claim.
Tyler Roberts
He's Reagan Battalion no doubt.
This isn't a Sup Forums format at all.
This man is a professional.
Camden Richardson
>Seriously who's gives a fuck. The dude is a lawyer I think this is going to hurt Wikileaks reputation. Really disappointed tbqhfam. This is all fake news. Zero new info. Very upset. Big letdown. AMIRITE SHILL?
>He's Reagan Battalion no doubt. NO DOUBT. >imblying pol has a """format""" stfu kike
Carter Lewis
wow literally no one gives a shit
next e-celeb post pelase
Christian Roberts
Yea. People overestimate Sup Forums.
We just come here for satire. Not for raiding Cernovich. Stop the h8, end h8.
Ryder Cruz
>We just come here for satire. Not for raiding Cernovich. Stop the h8, end h8. Who called it a """raid"""? It's court documents, its proven facts. Why do they fire the most retarded fucks to be shills?
Why is this gook drawfag in every thread shilling against any kind of happening or information leak?
Noah Gray
wow ok keep me posted on more cernovitch or whoever the fuck you think Sup Forums cares about
next e-celeb post pls?
James Ramirez
If it doesn't matter, why are you raging about it? Fuck off to another post, don't sperg out in the threads that "dont fucking matter". Wtf if wrong with you?
Liam Murphy
Keep us posted OP
Adam Ortiz
>wow ok keep me posted >Keep us posted wew
Isaac Green
Because it's not the "facts" but how you create context and distort it through selective reporting, creating "probable cause" based on your own aabalysis without letting the Truth speak for itself.
You're pulling all the same tricks the main stream media does. You definitely have an agenda, and it's not simply to share the truth with others; anyone who felt the same gut reaction I did to your post will agree.
Aiden Young
>Because it's not the "facts" but how you create context and distort it through selective reporting what the fuck??? Facts are fucking facts: >he is connected to those liberal kikes >he did get involved in that case >he did file against the victim All your bullshit about context and tone, trying to tone police, is what muddies the water here. There are these facts that raise concern -- I PROVIDED FUCKING EVIDENCE -- not theories, not tones, fucking EVIDENCE. THe EVIDENCE is simple and direct, with no subjective interpretation. You pretending otherwise is the dishonesty and the distraction. >You're pulling all the same tricks the main stream media does RIIIIIIIIIIGHT.
John Anderson
My words speak for themselves. Either learn how to persuade, find more incrimating "truth", or fuck off with your mental gymnastics.
I'm sick of the systematic character assassination of alternative media.
Austin Ramirez
>My words speak for themselves. Either learn how to persuade This is a form of red herring, attacking tone while completely ignoring the facts presented. Then you accuse me of doing what you're doing lol. Fuck off with your bullshit tricks, faggot.
