People the in 50s were really happy it was social pressure to pretend happiness because of religion?

people the in 50s were really happy it was social pressure to pretend happiness because of religion?

Brazil cannot into english.

i don't even how to know what your trying to

I actually read it as a coherent sentence asking if the perceived happiness of 50s USA was real or just a show put on over social/religious pressure, but then you pointed out the Brazilian flag, so now it just looks like subhuman chatter.

Okay I'm going to respond to something vaguely shaped like your question(?):

The USA in the 1950s was a HUGE post-war economic boom. We had tons of money, tons of industry that had grown up post-depression. Religion was still strong, but so was tolerance which is why the civil rights movement finally gained traction. The middle class was gigantic and the economy was good. There was social pressure but they weren't so separated from their community to leave stragglers behind.

People (mostly) WERE happy, they were also strongly theist. Everything was working in their favor for a limited period of time.

the 50s was superior

>easy to find jobs
>income high enough to for the wife to stay at home
>art that is not too degenerate
>not being reminded of everything that is bad with your ethnicity/sex/religion everyday
Of course most people were more happy, social/religious pressure brought it down though, well, boredom played a major part too.

I don't think that even being the case in Brazil and you always been 90%+ religious after the conquerors spanked the origins out of you.

But i thought the people back then were afraid of nukes and a 3rd world war vs the USSR at that time
or did that shit come much later?

woman with children in intact family = generally happy woman

It was scary but people didn't let it consume their lives

>people the in 50s were really happy
Because we had no leftists by todays standards. Only Americans and commies, and we all hated commies.
People never, ever change.

The '50's was the end of democrat Party control, and the end of their hallmark 1930s lifestyles.

Were the 1950s proof that world war is good for western society?

The need to pursue foreign wars to keep up the industry gains made in Post-Depression/WW2 era to maintain such a society caused backlash. The happiness and prosperity of that society itself tore itself apart ideologically too. Too free to sit still in that freedom.

>Political parties
Admittedly the FDR works projects DID improve society technologically. The economic benefits were shared more with lower classes by means of their work.

Not for everyone, hell Britain remained on rationing for like decades.

Honestly, the 50s were good because we had a boom economy and no feminism (feminism mostly only ruined women's lives, not men's so much despite what virgins here complain about).

>Admittedly the FDR works projects DID improve society technologically.
That was done despite government. BigGov didn't put a washing machine in anyone's home, they just assured that only the richest could buy one.
>The economic benefits were shared more with lower classes by means of their work.
Here's another pic of your shared wealth.

>Not for everyone, hell Britain remained on rationing for like decades.
That's another benefit of Big Gov.
Britain became socialist in 1945. They've never recovered.

Feminism did not ruin the husband but ruined the son.

I'm not pro-FDR but the infrastructure didn't exist to modernize even with radios and later television. The works projects really didn't help anything in their own time but the later post-war era did benefit. The lower classes were higher than pre-war lower classes on a lot of fronts.

Modernization is hard to get rolling under its own power, the free market can only build so many roads on its own, etc. Not a good thing or a bad thing, but the lower/middle classes did benefit from it.

>the free market can only build so many roads on its own, etc
They could have, and did, with toll roads. We use toll roads today, but the money goes to the wealthiest counties in the US, i.e. Washington, D.C.
The only benefit was watershed improvements, but that is open to debate. The deserts bloomed, and Vegas was made possible, but neither was necessary.

Necessary no. Potentially even harmful as you got the more powerful classes industrializing stuff like agriculture and pushing lower classes out of that.

Still things like TVA/boulder dam/electric infrastructure, interstate highway things would have needed to go through federal channels anyway pre-depression.

Yes we got a lot of awful big government shit on top of them but they did frame a nice lower/middle class quality of living bump, too.

the 50's were goals

I read
>give him Old Gods

kek, same.