Do you subscribe to the theory that your position on the political spectrum is genetic?

Do you subscribe to the theory that your position on the political spectrum is genetic?

the genetic factor, like in personality, must be very influential, at least 70 or 80% genetic.

No

No just a few years ago I was very liberal. Now I'm center right. Could've stayed liberal, til I educated myself.

Yes.

this

Do liberals subconsciously realize they have poor genetics, and thus screech for diversity to bring new genes into thier failing family?

Genetics plays a part, as it does in every aspect of psychology, but to simply say that it "is genetic" is oversimplifying things. Hell even if we discovered a conservative gene tomorrow, epigenetics is still a thing and it's much more complicated than "having the gene/not having the gene"

center right is liberal though

I don't have the same political views as either of my parents though.

Fuck, they don't have the same views as each other either.

A lot of people on Sup Forums switched from liberal to moderate/conservative, not really seeing the genetics.

Yeah but liberal =/= modern "liberal"

It would be funny seeing self titled "progressive liberals" actively campaigning against free speech if it wasn't so depressing

>center right is liberal though
You ever think maybe he meant the American political spectrum and not the electoral compass?

that dosnt even make sense. or maybe..

>genetically smart enough to take the redpill


im torn

inb4 my anus is torn

Yes, it's a mix of environmental conditions and genetic predispositions which leads you to your beliefs.

Yes, the higher your testosterone, the more chance you have of becoming conservative.
Also, people with both very low and very high intelligence tend to be conservative.
The fact that you "educated" yourself is genetic. Curiosity is determined through genetics.

8/8b8

The only way your political position is genetic is if you're genetically stupid and that's what makes you have retarded opinions. Politics has to do with education and knowledge, a North Korean can be a genius with 5 PhDs or something, but he'll still be a commie because the government kept all the information that socialism is bullshit away from him.

I've always, and so is my family, right wingers conservative and I'm a mestizo (white mother, black dad), which by Sup Forums it ranks me as a mongrel with shitty genes

My sole existence proves him wrong.

>Anonymous (ID: GvhM9RBs) 03/13/17(Mon)10:17:14 No.1164
any niggers online tonight?

>Curiosity is determined through genetics.
So is everything else but that has nothing to do with your political stance. What if you were genetically predispositioned to be a lefty but was only exposed to right wing ideology you're entire life. Everyone has a level of curiosity to at least some degree. What you're saying is like saying that you have a genetic predisposition to drink water and breath air

The more willing you are to find the truth (in western countries), the more likely you are to end up on things like Sup Forums and eventually become a conservative race realist.

No. My genes haven't changed as a result of new information coming in. That is an absolutely stupid suggestion, it implies that commies, socialists and other vermin are a necessary part of the ecosystem.

So people that have a genetic predisposition to be more curious than others, have a higher chance of becoming conservatives/race realists.

Sure, but sticking to the topic of the thread: genetics has basically nothing to do with political affiliation

More like people raised in liberal environments and around liberal people are more likely to become liberal. And even then you can change their mind just by convincing them that they're wrong. I'd you can change your mind about something then it's not determined by genetics

I don't think so. My sister is as far left as can be, my mom is center and my dad is off the chart right.

>No. My genes haven't changed as a result of new information coming in.

Not necessarily information, but epigenetics is definitely a real thing.

If someone who is not "curious" and is not a critical thinker, is raised in a liberal environment, he will remain a liberal.
If someone who is "curious" and is a critical thinker, is raised in a liberal environment, he will most likely change his mind and become right wing.

Curiousness and the ability to think critically is determined by genetics.
Genetics play a very big role in political beliefs.

Also women are naturally more empathetic, so they are more likely to vote left-wing (also genetics).

Wtf you're bringing epigenetics into this? That's like saying my gene expression changed when I learned 2+2=4. Before I learned that I was genetically predispositioned to be bad at math but then when someone showed me the answer. Even if epigenetics was the answer, that would suggest people aren't genetically predispositioned since the gene expression can be changed to whatever.

But what if they aren't raised liberal? What if a "genetically liberal" person is raised conservative? You're saying that person would just subconsciously unlearn everything they know about politics and become left wing?

Niggers and Mexicans have low intelligence therefore a high probability they will vote Democrat
so yes I guess I do

Correlation does not equal Causation.

People raised in an environment that promotes any ideology will have themselves (and thus their brains) wired for that ideology.

No, although you can't grasp complex positions when you're a retard I think the environment plays a bigger role in it than genetics

>will
That's a pretty strong statement, care for some proof?
Correlation does not equal causation after all

If a person is genetically liberal, he will be highly empathetic and not care much for politics to begin with (like most women). He/she will be more likely to not learn anything from their parents/school.

Also i'm not saying environment has no influence. I'm just saying that if two persons were raised in the same environment, the only thing that would cause differences in their political beliefs is their genetics.

I've hardly changed, and I used to be considered liberal. (Annoyed at christfags trying to censor shit) But the rest of the world went nuts and now I'm considered right wing because I think you should be allowed to say whatever the fuck you want and "hate speech" is bullshit.

>people raised in an environment that promotes any ideology will have themselves (and thus their brains) wired for that ideology.
Not necessarly, you can also despise that ideology and do the exact opposite because of that

Don't take me so literally hue nigger.

You can take just about any young animal and wire it the way you wish as long as the base material is good enough for your purposes.

A young human is the best material to possibly work with. You can do fucking anything with them as long as no one can stop you. This is pretty much scientifically proven, that as long as you indoctrinate from a young enough age, anything is possible.

Just because some idiots go about it entirely the wrong way doesn't mean it isn't possible.

There are a lot of factors in play when raising, most especially, a human from birth, and properly indoctrinating them as you see fit without causing a rejection over time.

There are genetic predisposition of course, however it's almost always 'user error', often a lack of ability to adapt to unforseen circumstances resulting in improper methods being applied.

Absolutely not. I was a literal member of both Antifa and the Socialist Worker's Party UK and use to bottle police at rallies for being 'class-traitors'. I'm now pretty much NatSoc, give or take a few issues.

story time?

>Missing the point that it can change within a lifetime

Obviously, one's politics can change over a lifetime.

I think the genetics of it has to do with the temperament of one's politics - if one was merely liberal, they might become merely conservative. Whereas if one was passionately leftist, they'll more likely turn hardcore right than merely conservative.