Should gay couples be allowed to adopt children?

Should gay couples be allowed to adopt children?

Other urls found in this thread:

trueorigin.org/gaygene01.php
discord.gg/BKmb2
cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6893897
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1619854/https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/substance-abuse.htm
cdc.gov/std/healthcomm/ngi-msm-execsum.pdf
markregnerus.com/uploads/4/0/6/5/4065759/regnerus_july_2012_ssr.pdf
thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/2012/pdf/bg2736.pdf
ktla.com/2014/06/08/adoptive-parents-arrested-after-abusing-starving-2-girls-arizona-police/
ibtimes.com/shiloh-jolie-pitt-transgender-rumors-2016-what-angelina-brad-said-about-their-2419943
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Yeah I don't see why not, there is no peer reviewed psychological research that says it would have any negative effects on a child's development.

This desu.

I don't give a fuck about gays.

I just hate Islam desu, lmao.

australians are degenerate.
i prefer leafs over you shitdicks

depends.
I feel like if they are not total faggots but somewhat decent people, it's better than having them in an orphanage. I oppose making new ones though.

Your flag is toothpaste, lmao.

Never

So brave!

Right because people are allowed to conduct studies like that...

That depends, do you like to play dominos on pizza or pasta?

no they will molest and rape the children

yea I think so. I do think that one of each gender is better, but two good gays are still fine and a bajillion times better than the kids growing up in foster care

It seems that you mixed with abos too much and became retarded.

they'll fiddle them
they'll fuck them up with hormone blockers
they'll indoctrinate them before they even get to school

Best answer. Although I'm skeptical that it's the healthiest of environments, there are many that are worse. The majority of parents still beat their children FFS.

you've gone too far man

100% of gay people also rape kids. They also eat dogs and punch you when you accuse them of being dog eaters. Think about that.

Nuke Sweden when?

Why are you faggots claiming to be "redpilled" yet are so passive when it comes to the Sodomite Question. Homos don't even deserve rights, let alone adoption.

Also probably worth noting that gays that adopt are a self-selected sample that is probably more responsible than your average gay.

OR they could be into pizza. But so could hetero couples (them adopting might even be more sketchy desu).

Better than a single parent

i think they should be allowed fag marriage but they should not be allowed to adopt children.

Sure-sure, good goy.

How does a gay gene exist?
If there is a gene that makes it so that the offspring, male or female, is only attracted to the same sex, how does that gene survive? If a gene is dependent on procreation, and homosexuals, male or female, can't ever reproduce if they are homosexual (which means they will never be attracted to the opposite sex; if they are to both sexes, then they are bisexual), then how does a gay gene even exist?

No

Short answer: No.

Long Answer: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

what drugs are you on?
fucking capital F fag over here, dogs are absolutely disgusting. I mean yeah there are some weird shits and fuck me I wish I could find a cute boy who doesn't subscribe to the liberal shit but come on
Dogs? Fuck off.

I thoughts that's the French and Russian flag.

Fags should only be allowed to adopt kids that have no chance of being adopted by anyone else. Lesbians should not be allowed to adopt kids.

>two fags adopt kid
>instill it with their warped view of reality
>kid is now as fucked up as its parents

sure, let the faggots adopt kids. but only if you think its a good idea.

Am a fag with a biological child I made before I became gay somehow. I have him every other week and he's doing fine, at first he was weirded out seeing me kissing my bf, so we started to avoid him seeing it, but he told me that he is fine with it after I explained everything to him.
He is lucky that I am the top, so he has a male role model at least.

So should gays be able to adopt?
Jesus no!
Except the few sane gay men they always show you on TV for propaganda most gays are fucking warped in their minds, trust me.
I had some real horror stories in dating until I found my bf, most of those people I met during dating shouldn't even be allowed to drive a car in my eyes.

Good point. Lezbos should not be able to adopt.

THANK YOU! I've been saying that for years! No one has been able to answer it.

Also, where is the "foot fetish" gene?


A gene associated with risk-taking behavior, or sexual experimentation, makes much more sense.

Fuark

Only if 2 fags adopt girl.

Don't side with that faggot m8, remember we're your best ally.

Yesterday. The fuck is wrong with these people?

What do you think of leaf post , user?

(Full disclosure, have fucked & been fucked by shemales) Pic semi-related

Most of them are bi.

trueorigin.org/gaygene01.php

Colgate is one of our largest brand exports, we know what flag Toothpaste is.

Join the OFFICIAL /polgb/ Discord:

discord.gg/BKmb2

>A gene associated with risk-taking behavior, or sexual experimentation, makes much more sense.
Perfect line of thinking, but this applies to homosexuality too. Kinsey scale you know? But of course, sexuality being a construct, people align themselves (rightfully) generally as straight or gay. Also I hope those example genes are supposed to parallel foot fetish rather than homosexuality

Because is it error gene.

>200x150

>I'm a good gay look at me! I have "conservative" views and I don't like the other icky gays!
You and the rest of your kind deserve to rot in hell, and especially you for destroying a family all because you valued your disgusting fetishist above it.

The odds of this are astronomical.
These cunts need to be hanged.

cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6893897
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1619854/https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/substance-abuse.htm
cdc.gov/std/healthcomm/ngi-msm-execsum.pdf

I honestly don't even have a clue if it exists or not I'd be pretty rad to get it removed for the good of the species and all that jazz. Going on topic about fags adopting simple answer if their hair is dyed and they only talk about progressive bullshit don't let them fuck up a poor kid

No, because not enough that gays are being born kids adopted by gays are converted to gayism.

No, they should be stoned to death.

But how can it be genetic, when you say gene, you mean that it is passed down.
Unless it is recessive and is very, VERY rarely expressed (the times the child actually displays homosexuality is when there are other siblings who are not gay to have children), then it would have been removed from the gene pool. In essence, it is the same reason why a gene that makes you incapable of having sex with the opposite gender to produce children isn't as prevalent as homosexual "genes" are.

That's good shit user. I'll just add my personal experience.

Started out 100% straight. Degeneracy. First disgusted by shemales. Fetish grew on me over time. Fetish is now dying away as I squarely face & accept it will prevent me from having children.

However, the urges lag behind your thoughts. It's similar to an addiction. So, someone who is not honest, or not self aware could truly believe there was no element of choice involved.

Compare it to an addiction.

"Queer" reviewed research.

no it influences kids to be cucked

With all my hate towards LGBT-scum, I wouldn't be so sure that he was the one destroying the family. 99.9% of families are destroyed by females. Why? Because it's hella profitable for them. They can find a new dick while keeping all the assets and income from the previous one.

>Le edgy amerifat

You have no clue, my fucking ex wife ruined the family by cheating.

I guess in your eyes I should have been a good cuck and swallow it all up so that whore can have it easy whilst cheating on me.

After that shit I was alone for three years before finding that side of me.

We the onion now

no

This is the time for the "stop watching porn" vargposter to stop by.

Because the APA isn't biased, they are the unicorn of scientific objectivity, because the scientific community is never wrong...
markregnerus.com/uploads/4/0/6/5/4065759/regnerus_july_2012_ssr.pdf
thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/2012/pdf/bg2736.pdf
Before you rush and cry that it is a false equivalence
>As Regnerus makes clear, these
results establish an association
among family structures, parental
relationships, and adult outcomes—
not causation. The study does not by
itself establish that having a parent in
a same-sex relationship is a root cause
of the differences in outcomes that
Regnerus observed. However, it does
suggest that such a causal mechanism
is plausible and cannot be ruled out.
The claim of no measured disadvantage
for children with parents who
have same-sex relationships cannot
be justified by the existing research.
Despite what some media reports
might suggest, Regnerus’s study
draws no conclusions about how marriage should be defined. The
report focuses on the data, not their
implications for the political and
legal debate. However, his study is
significant because its findings discredit
a popular argument for samesex
marriage: that it makes no difference
whether children are raised by
parents who had a same-sex relationship
or by a married mother and
father, an argument that the existing
data cannot support.

NO

Should a single man with a history of hedonism, social transgression and risk taking be allowed to adopt children?

Should two single men with a history of hedonism, social transgression and risk taking be allowed to adopt children?

Certainly there are no straight adoptive parents who are abusive :^)

ktla.com/2014/06/08/adoptive-parents-arrested-after-abusing-starving-2-girls-arizona-police/

I have two fathers and in my opinion as long as they know how to be good parents, why not? I had no single disadvantage from that. My parents explained me at the right age that their relationship is not the "normal" way, etc. etc.

The only thing that comes to my mind which was a bit awkward sometimes when friends came over and asked me why there are two men. But even they took it easy.

Only if one of them is a woman

>rate of molesting among gays
Anybody know it, seems high from what I understand.

A lot of problems these days are simply due to women being shitty at life and also being in charge of raising new people.

Yep, that shit happens here. Makes my blood boil.

Anecdotal evidence never counts for much, but I've always been rather disgusted by the lax morals of other gay people, but also have never been interested in women in the least, from as young as I've been. Not a virgin, but only been with people seriously. I think I'd be an alright dad.

Anyway- What I hope at least, is that the degeneracy associated with gays may be a product of their marginalization- or even, their need to latch on to progressive sexual political trends as a means to gain approval- instead of some inherent moral lack. Unless you think buttsex is inherently degenerate, which is really random and probably hypocritical when you think about it; I'm not going to hate myself that much.

>Perfect line of thinking, but this applies to homosexuality too

Absolutely. That was partially my point. My other point is the absurdity of finding a separate gene for every fetish.

> But of course, sexuality being a construct, people align themselves (rightfully) generally as straight or gay.

I don't have a problem with people saying this. I have an issue with how it is used deterministically, such that it promotes helplessness & victimhood (i.e. they are descriptions of a present state, which is changeable [though it may be so difficult as to be undesirable]).

See my anecdote . This is my empirical experience, and it matches how homosexual behavior worked in nearly every historical culture.

There is, actually.

>cuckstamp insulting other flags
Kek

Because mutations and errors occur.
"Gay" gene can be some dominant gene copied with errors.

If you can prove to me that it doesn't make the kids more likely to turn gay, or otherwise mentally ill - yes.

Only muslim refugee children

>Unless you think buttsex is inherently degenerate, which is really random and probably hypocritical when you think about it
The rectal cavity is not designed for penetration in our species. In what way is it hypocritical?
Human is born--->develops into a sexually mature adult--->interested in member of the opposite sex--->pursues and gets to have intercourse--->inserts penis in vagina and fulfills the definition of sexual organs (uniting with the opposite sex for the purpose of procreation; in principle, it always happens, but circumstantially/anecdotally, it might not always result in conception).
The penis inside of an anus will achieve nothing beyond temporary sexual thrill. It is purely hedonistic, it is degeneracy incarnate. Even in safe-sex couples who are heterosexual, the possibility to actually fulfil the goal of sexual intercourse is still there (pill might not work, condom might break, etc.).

Then it is fringe, and not sustained over tens of thousands of years. And does not result in millions of gay people.

welp

Any white person, gay or straight who adopts non-whites into white countries are traitors and need to hang.

Fuckkkkkkk.

I thought you were shilling. Both of those are real reports.

A real fucking "before" and "after".

Ofc not
They can't reproduce, so they have to recruit youngsters and children to their destructive lifestyles
Thats why Russia passed that law, and everyone else should

Fucking lesbians though. They are much more fucked up than male gays.

Lesbos should not adopt.

A fair point, but most parents still beat their children. That is probably even worse than simply having gays for parents. (Except lesbos, that's probably far worse).

Posting sexy gals to balance out the gay

It's hypocritical because this disclaimer:
>pill might not work, condom might break
made me laugh, for obvious reasons

BUT IT IS SOOO PROGRESSIVE ! ! !
LOOK EVEN ANGELINA JOLIE DOES IT ! ! !

What about oral, if any sexual release outside of designated slot A is wrong then aren't you being either prudish or orthodox af?

>beating your kids
>comparable to making your kids live with two literal faggots
>bad, even

wew

Gays shouldn't be allowed to exist let alone exist around children, what the fuck is wrong with you city cunts

You are aware that some degenerate straight parents also did this to their child right?

>Any white person, gay or straight who adopts non-whites into white countries are traitors and need to hang.

You would dislike Barcelona intensely.
This is like a fashion statement here.

I hope that cunt was being sarcastic
Otherwise she should have every children taken away by social workers

No. If it doesn't gross you out, something is wrong with you.

Most lesbos carry their own children. They only need a sperm donor.

And they are not fucked up. Women are natural at being parents, while men aren't, even gay men.

No. Every time we have this shitty thread with that same shitty picture, the general consensus of Sup Forums is "no", except for a few faggot leafposters. I see this same thread almost every other day. Fuck off.

Contraception is not 100% accurate in heterosexual couples. Is this news to you? You also need to explain your reasoning, why is it hypocritical?
Oral sexual intercourse does not have a purpose, no. You don't impregnate the female that way. However, in straight couples who wish to stimulate the other in order to prepare FOR penetration, that is a different story.

Who care about retarded celebrities.

Yes I am. One doesn't excuse the other.

I can agree with this. You get a fine if you litter on the sidewalk, but are allowed to pollute the gene pool??

Not in my fucking utopia.

Don't worry...

Jolie has let the kid self-identify as a boy.
Is a minority now also.

ibtimes.com/shiloh-jolie-pitt-transgender-rumors-2016-what-angelina-brad-said-about-their-2419943

They're totally going to fuck those kids, aren't they?

I rather have a lesbian parents than degenerate straight parents.

Of course, degenerate gay parents will be the worst.

SPAIN YES!