WILDERS VS RUTTE GET IN HERE

>politiek.tpo.nl/2017/03/13/livestream-en-liveblog-eenvandaag-debat-mark-rutte-versus-geert-wilders/
politiek.tpo.nl/2017/03/13/livestream-en-liveblog-eenvandaag-debat-mark-rutte-versus-geert-wilders/
>politiek.tpo.nl/2017/03/13/livestream-en-liveblog-eenvandaag-debat-mark-rutte-versus-geert-wilders/
politiek.tpo.nl/2017/03/13/livestream-en-liveblog-eenvandaag-debat-mark-rutte-versus-geert-wilders/

Other urls found in this thread:

beloftenbingo.nl
google.nl/search?q=kosten immigratie probleem&oq=kosten immigratie probleem&aqs=chrome..69i57.3663j0j1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
google.nl/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Please be a bit more specific than just a google search&*
cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2017/10/in-januari-2-7-duizend-asielzoekers-en-nareizigers
nrc.nl/nieuws/2017/01/04/vijftig-miljoen-moslims-accepteren-geweld-6023657-a1539706
twitter.com/telegraaf/status/841343584158769153
twitter.com/tomvanteinde/status/841343882000490496
twitter.com/AnonBabble

1st for geert

Let's hope Wilders makes good use of the current crisis. That he points out Rutte wanted to look strong but it backfired.

I can't understand this gibberish.

Dit is een belangrijk debat ja. Denk dat hier zo'n 2 zetels op staan

beloftenbingo.nl

Anyone up for a fun game?

What impact is the Roach chimpout having on the mood there?
Good news for Geert I guess?

MASSIVELY yeah. People are publicly vouching for Geert and hating on Turks. Never seen that like this before

Rutte will easily be able to turn it around. Geert did nothing except angry tweets, Rutte was responsible for standing up to Turkey.

Geert would've won if they were allowed to speak in Holland.

Im in

But who is proposing solutions?
It's one think to stop a rally.
It's another to propose solutions on how to deal with hundreds of thousands of hostile Turks.

The crowd is biased though

Proposing solutions is notoriously not Wilders' thing.

Got a dutchbro who says he liked Geert, but is dislikes his higher corporate tax rates, raising tuition (He's not in college though), and another issue I can't remember. Can someone help me redpill him and convince him to vote Geert? I'm too unfamiliar with Dutch politics.

>Rutte was responsible for standing up to Turkey.
Roemer (SP: Socialist Party) today said that he finally stood up to the Turks after years of doing nothing while the long arm of Turkey grew stronger in the Netherlands. I think Wilders' counter will be along those lines; Rutte can act bravely now because he neglected the problem for so long.

"Wilders understands that culture and demographics are our destiny. We can't restore our civilization with somebody else's babies." -John King

Tell me honestly Canabisbro what are his chances?

The immigration problem is the selling point. They cost us BILLIONS a day

immigration can change a nation for HUNDREDS of years, while economic issues can be literally overturned in a year

You're going to need to provide a source on this claim

can anybody explain Wilders being the only member of the PVV?

Good to get a majority, but to form a coalition will prove difficult

google.nl/search?q=kosten immigratie probleem&oq=kosten immigratie probleem&aqs=chrome..69i57.3663j0j1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

How is Geert doing in this debate?

google.nl/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Please be a bit more specific than just a google search&*

will there be a transcript of this?

Pretty okay but it just started

>Merkel lets shitskins in
>Germans finally getting pissed at her
>Merkel says "oh no there are too many shitskins"
>Germans are cool with her again

Why do Europeans do this? It's the same with Brexit and British people not really seeming to care that May openly doesn't want to reduce immigration, or the French being against le ebil Le Pen but willing to vote for Trudeau's old world French cousin or "the conservative" who helped let in a bunch of Algerians.

Vote for fucking Wilders for fuck's sake, he was right the whole time. Why is it Trump constantly being right makes him strong enough to beat the odds and win but Wilders being constantly right gets a sigh from the Dutch? Vote in the right man, stop electing wrong but nice-speaking politicians.

>Good to get a majority
This is already something, at least it proves that you are not such incorrigible idiots as germans and the french.

These guys in the show are all pro VVD and anti PVV

Leftist student audience lmao

Yeah, bevooroordeeld

*Audience is all pro vvd
Painfull for geert

I'm not expecting any surprises in this debate, to be honest.

>Rutte says they did good
>Wilders says they didn't

This

True, Rutte is good is saying "this must happen", and yeah, indeed that must happen but he's not providing any content, they're either lies or just hot air

I think I'd be able to destroy the turkish army.

Seriously,

I practice MMA since 6 years, boxing in parallel since 7 years
I also do bodybuilding since 4 years, 1m87 for 86kg, I could

I have an inbelievable speed and reflexes as insane as my speed. I just have to wait these roaches to charge me, dodge them, hit them with a great punch in the head and block them one by one with a joint lock. I will not let them escape me, one mistake and they're finished.
There will always be some virgins on here to say it's impossible. First, nothing is impossible in this life my friends and number two, this is not with your weak bodies of cowards that you'll be able to do anything.

Anybody a minimum trained can kill a bunch of roaches with an insecticide. Beating their whole army just by crashing them with my bare hands is not much more difficult you just need some practice.

And Wilders makes up statistics on the spot. I don't know if either one of them comes across as reliable.

The big winner of this debate will probably be CDA and D66.

Wilders is doing better than I expected

Quickly fact checked. cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2017/10/in-januari-2-7-duizend-asielzoekers-en-nareizigers

Rutte is right. The numbers are wrong.

you will be downvoted, but i thank you for this link

i can't understand this shit

I wouldn't call making up numbers on the spot "better than expected"

Wilders has some nice bants, but that's it.

Rutte is much stronger on immigration stand points, did not expect that.

I don't know those numbers by heart desu. Doubt anyonere here does.

Koopmans his research, which Wilders just quoted, has been firmly debunked.

nrc.nl/nieuws/2017/01/04/vijftig-miljoen-moslims-accepteren-geweld-6023657-a1539706

Gebakken lucht man. Deuren dicht betekent dus echt niet dat je evenveel immigranten krijgt die illegaal binnen komen. Rutte verstopt zich achter domme grappen

Don't know what they're saying but I hope a fight breaks out!

In contrary to the two gentlemen debating at the moment, we have Google at our finger tips. Let's objectively fact check their statements.

Yeah I'm surprised too, although Rutte should limit on interrupting Wilders with scoffs etc.

Sorry, I don't speak weed.

Well they are verbally attacking each others ideas and it's a pretty exciting debate of two guys lying.

...

Speak weed? seu brasileiro safado kkkkkkkk

Wilders would kick his flat ass

That was short and underwhelming

He says he's leaning towards PVV. Help me persuade him guys.

Rutte did not provide anything with body. It was hot air like "This is the problem, [insert stupid joke here]" whilst Wilders showed balls and discredited him on most points. And the Live Fact Check running show a STRONG prefence towards Wilders. He was saying the truth, Rutte wasn't

So is there an aversion of PVV like there is of Front National in France? As in other parties just refuse to work with them.

Also is the media more fair to Geert in comparison to the bias in things like live (((fact))) checking in the US elections?

Our media is a LOT less biased and corrupt than America but they do try. Our voters aren't (as) retarded though and there's a clear wave of skepticism and "enough is enough" attitude.

Other parties DO refuse to work with them but that would be an insult to the voters, that shit will not fly here.

Damn wilders got BTFO

t.

HELP

Rutte and Wilders... They both suck.

Think i'm gonna vote good guy Pechtold

Noem 1 punt wat wilders maakte, rutte maakte gewoon duidelijk wat wilders is: hij maakt problemen en zeikt er over zonder concrete plannen

My friend is mentioning how VVD is not socialist, doesn't tax entrepreneurs, and wants to limit benefits for immigrants.

He says PVV does lots of barking and though he agrees with what he says, he doesn't believe Geert wouldn't be a good Prime Minister. He also PVV is more lower class and has less entrepreneurs.

...

1 punt van Wilders is dat Rutte alleen maar erop wijst wat problemen zijn en dat Rutte eveneens geen oplossingen biedt. Hij neemt alles terug en ontwijkt vragen erover. Begint dan over iets wat wél gelukt is, en als Wilders door hamert komt Rutte met een ingestudeert grapje. Goeie politiek voering bro (Y)

Rutte lies about those things. 75% of his promises take a 180° turn within ~3 weeks after being elected.

He is not controlling immigration, he's taking them all in with open arms and legs. He literally said that CLOSING THE BORDER WONT DO ANYTHING. Seriously, he just literally said that

Any proof of the 180? Idk about these things.

Wilders mentioned several in his debate, don't have them memorised sorry.But Rutte is well known for avoiding stuff and "changing his mind". Anyone who gets their news from other sources than DWDD, NOS and Facebook knows this

That's fine. D66 is one of the parties I was thinking about to vote on and while I won't in the end it's still not the worst option out there. It's unlikely, but if Pechtold would end up prime-minister I feel like he's pretty suitable for the job

One of you dutch fuckers needs to post all of the debate polls from news sites and their twitter so we can go in there and fuck shit up

What about Dumpert?

twitter.com/telegraaf/status/841343584158769153

fix

this

Damn, everyone in favour of Wilders! :D

That's an odd little cult but they're pretty right as well. They were "against" Wilders like a week ago but that changed so quickly

Wilders got btfo in this debate desu. It was almost cringe, if you can't even take Rutte you're a fuckin useless faggot.

>lets manipulate the news polls so that Wilders takes a strong lead. Hahaha take that!
>Meanwhile in The Netherlands:
>OH SHIT! WILDERS TAKES A HUGE LEAD! Better vote strategically on the VVD

Fuck off leaf

t.

You have to go back

I told him to watch the rest of the debate (He watched half). If anyone has more specific points pls post.

You are very sneaky. Good job goy

One man against one million roaches, seriously?

Tell him to vote FvD, they have a more right wing economic position, but the same opinion as the PVV on immigration and the EU.

If you think Wilders actually won this debate you probably suffer from Down's Syndrome.

twitter.com/telegraaf/status/841343584158769153
twitter.com/tomvanteinde/status/841343882000490496
VOTE HERE

>ID color is orange
Praise kek. He makes the VVD-libero-shills easy to spot

Yes, they are university students not inbred provinciaaltjes that worship Wilders.

FVD Live vanuit Breda op FB

>Media zombies instead of the working class like PVV

FTFY

Is he projected to win? It's still close last I checked

No but who knows in this day and age right?

>Economiefaculteit
>Hartland van de JOVD
Natuurlijk zijn het Rutte-fanatiekelingen.

There is an aversion but it's also more personal than political. Wilders has been around as a parliamentarian since the late 90s, and started really insulting his colleagues since about 2004 or so when he left his former party and started his own. That's more than ten years of serious bants.

In the beginning he was right to do so, since his colleagues are cucks of the highest order and it got him a lot of screen time. But nowadays, even the most left-wing cucks around say he has some points.

He should not "moderate" his stances, just his rhetoric, so that he can work together with other parties more.

He's on permanent campaigns mode, and his campaigns are always smear campaigns. Makes it really hard for other parties to "give him a chance" even if they want to, without looking like bigger cucks.

tl;dr: switch tactics

Ik ken die typjes wel van mijn studietijd. Ik kan het er eentje zelfs heel moeilijk maken met haar carrière als ik uit de school klap wat ze op feestjes/enz. allemaal wel niet zeggen, maar het is verder wel een leuk wijf dus ik zal het niet doen.

Te lang, deed niet lees: het zijn bijna allemaal kast-nazi's die racistische humor hilarisch vinden en verder wel van een rood pilletje houden, maar omdat dit knopje slaat om in het openbaar, en dan zijn ze keurige liberaaltjes en is Nederland gewoon een gaaf land waarin iedereen welkom is.

Weet niet wat ik van ze moet vinden, maar mijn stem krijgen ze niet.

Ik weet het, ik heb een aantal lokale kopstukken ontmoet. Allemaal mensen die beweren liberaal te zijn, maar hun geld willen verdienen in de politiek of de ambtenarij. Ze willen een kleinere staat, maar wel een staat die groot genoeg is om alle voormalige voorzitters, penningmeesters et cetera van de JOVD een goedbetaald baantje te geven.

Carrière-politici waren inderdaad een vergissing.

Doet me denken aan die uitspraak van Rutte over dat net ontslagen mensen niet zo snel bij het UWV moeten aankloppen.

Gewone stervelingen krijgen geen jaren wachtgeld, Rutte. Alleen politici.

Kijk, van SP/PvdA/GL-politici kan ik nog wel begrijpen dat ze dol zijn op een grote staat.

Maar ik ben er wel kwaad om dat de VVD zich als liberale partij profileert terwijl bijna alle actieve leden van de VVD ook actief uit de staatsruif vreten (als politici, als consultants, of met dodgy gemeentelijke contracten voor hun bedrijfjes).

.
Stel je hebt de begroting van een bedrijf in handen, en je moet mensen ontslaan. Behalve dit kleine taakje één keer per jaar doe jezelf nagenoeg de hele dag niets binnen het bedrijf. Die tweede congiërge die een poosje geleden is aangenomen wel, maar als die ene congiërge iets harder buffelt moet het bedrijf redelijk schoon blijven.

Wie ontsla je, jezelf of die congiërge.

De VVD vermindert de uitgavedrift wellicht, maar uiteindelijk wil het er zelf ook nog van kunnen profiteren.

Politicus zijn is een vak. Weg zijn de tijden dat men zich na of naast een carrière zich met de politiek ging bezighouden. Alleen in gemeenteraden zie je dit nog, maar ook die lui kunnen prima leven van een hun ambtenarensalaris als ze genoeg politieke nevenfuncties erbij verwerven.

Daarom vind ik het FvD zo bemoedigend. Hiddema is bijvoorbeeld een jaar of zeventig en heeft nooit in de politiek gezeten. Hij doet mee omdat hij in Baudet en FvD gelooft en een grote schoonmaak wil, niet omdat hij er z'n brood mee moet verdienen.

Ben benieuwd hoe Baudet aan zijn knaken komt. Het lijkt me sterk dat een clubje als de zijne bijster veel subsidie ving, waarschijnlijk moest hij het van donaties hebben. En zijn boeken en media-optredens uiteraard. Hij leeft in ieder geval als een pauper aan zijn (gebrek aan) interieur te zien, maar wel in hartje Amsterdam. Wat moet je daar voor een kartonnen doos op de stoep dokken, 1600 in de maand?

Hoe dan ook, puike lui inderdaad. Met name Hiddema. Heb vernomen dat hij wil blijven pleiten naast zijn vak als politicus. Aangezien die stoeltjes in de tweede kamer buiten de dinsdag om nooit bezet zijn, moet dat wel lukken.

Als je we nou eens een aanwezigheidsplicht voor die kamerleden invoeren, zijn ze wellicht te moe om nepotistische netwerkjes op te bouwen.