Redpill me on Pinochet. Did he do nothing wrong?

Redpill me on Pinochet. Did he do nothing wrong?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_of_Chile
youtube.com/watch?v=R9R4zPTpS9w
youtube.com/watch?v=5rsb7dT6sEM
youtube.com/watch?v=zhrYY3ocQ5o
link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-011-8902-6_8#page-1
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

he didn't go far enough.

Not enough dead commies? Explain

Dont know much, but as far as I'm aware he ruined his country economically, might be wrong. But hey, he threw commies out of helicopters so good on him.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_of_Chile

I question why his country didn't become better, but instead became worse economically, which seems to challenge my free-market views, though perhaps the shock of introducing such policy is too much for any economy to handle, which is exactly what happened to former Soviet and Socialist countries in the Easter Bloc. Still, those countries, after a few years of economic decline, had this living standards improved immensely, and Chile, after adopting neoliberalism, has become by far the country in Latin America with the best living standards.

>> Ruined his country economically

Its the one Spic country that you never see immigrants from.

Yeah, he was a dictator.

Most based spic to ever live
well they had a commie gov elected after he left
>implying that being a dictator is bad

He started like a champ , then went "Slighty" overboard. Also some accounts filled with money on overseas banks did not help either.
It is what it is.
Peace sells but who's buying.

Its the only country in the OECD with higher income inequality in the US. If you think corporations have too much power in the States, read up on Chile's politics.

Its a pretty great country though. Studied abroad there in university and really enjoyed it

>esto nunca ha sido dictadura, esto es dictablanda!

the man is a genious

...

Actually this , it was a perfect 10 years plan.

So a patient comes into a doctor's office with a complaint that he can't move his fingers. The doctor says 'Well, it's good you came in when you did, you have this terrible condition called frostbite. It'll spread throughout your body, killing you slowly. The only way to stop it is if I cut off your hand.'
The patient says 'But wait, I came here because I couldn't move my fingers- if you cut off my hand, I won't have any fingers!'.
Doctor cuts off hand.
For the next forty years the patient mutters to himself that the fingers were totally getting better.
Source: I've studied in Chile.

he was mediocre
look up on perez jimenez, he crossbowed commies and was strictly about national progress

Pinochet is based.
There's a shit ton of people who still love him and I'm not talking about alt-right types

>but as far as I'm aware he ruined his country economically
Chile has the best economy in Latin America, he didn't ruin crap.

He didn't invade the neighboring countries and kill their communists too.

Not sure but I think there were actually plans for that

>Be Chile 1970
>Communist president was literally turning Chile into Venezuela
>Queues for food and scarcity everywhere
>Coup d'tat de fuck out and kill the president
>Kill literally all the leftist in the government
>Kill more leftists in the streets
>Leftists literally had to evacuate the country to not get kill
>He even hunted down the runaway leftists and killed them
>Fixed the economy and turned Chile in the least shit S.A. country (See the miracle of Chile)
>Ruled with iron fist for 17 years
>No degenerates in the streets and no crime
>Soros plotted to take him out of the power
>20 years later, he dies of old age
>20 more years later, Chile is crowded with commies, SJWs and immigrants from poorer S.A. countries.

...

We didn't need to. Argentina was killing their communists too. The thing is Argentina ruined itself economically(and the US helped in that too) while Pinochet did a marvelous job economically.

What is important are the people behind Pinochet helping him. Chile had a dictator with a good team of thinkers backing him up, Argentina had a Dictator but with morons backing him up. Result: Argentina is a shithole, Chile is okayish.

Top kek great analogy.

youtube.com/watch?v=R9R4zPTpS9w

youtube.com/watch?v=5rsb7dT6sEM

youtube.com/watch?v=zhrYY3ocQ5o

Too bad he didn't get a chance to take out the communist trash in Europe. There would be a lot less of an Islamic internal security problem if he took out their enablers.

You're worried about gay shit like income inequality and ignoring the fact that it's the richest nation in South America per capita and common people there are better off than in Venezuela where you can't get fucking toilet paper.

This is why socialists are fucking faggots and why Pinochet was right.

confirmed, I wish Videla had been Pinochet

I have a question, what does it mean for the new world order to nationalize the bank?

first paragraph:
link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-011-8902-6_8#page-1

It got me wondering, the last man two men that tried to mess with the banking system, Gadaffi and Hitler, turned out to be good people. Was Allende truly the shitlord we were told he was, or did the CIA lied and made us believe he was?

It really made me think.

10/10

neoliberal usa shill

but hey at least he killed le gommies :DDDD

A $12 million nest egg account is nothing, you have to let the man have one of those

This. Imagine how much he might have taken.