if everyone voted according to their economic interests

> if everyone voted according to their economic interests

> if everyone voted according to their (((economic interests)))
FIFY

10/10 post bernie

>> if everyone voted according to (((their))) economic interests
ftfy

if everyone voted according to (((their))) economic interests

>implying there is a benefit to working class people in smaller states voting to subsidize entitlements for the populations are larger coastal cities

wew

...

yeah we should embrace a victim complex

>If everyone voted

The actual fix to this.

TOP KEK
Let me help ya out, OP.
DRUMPFTARDS BTFO

>missing the point of the quote and strawmanning to discredit it

the term is stratification, or economic mobility, and the high taxes of a socialist welfare state squanders the prospect

>if everyone voted according to their economic interests

>if everyone voted according to (((our))) economic interests
fixed

It's still hilarious how fat asses actually believe its possible to starve in america.

The only people starving are the ones with mental illnesses who cant even chew properly.

>what is project housing
>what are black kids born into single mother home who is a heroin addict who sells their school books for dope

This.
Slide thread, faggots.

He's right except the part about Texas still being part of the U.S.

Yes OP that's why Democrats have full control (governorship and state legislature majorities) in just 3 out of 50 states.

Also this exact image was posted yesterday. Saged.

>muh welfare

Yeah keep fantasizing you ignorant, self-absorbed, socialist prick..

Nice argument, Nazi!

Exactly right. When you try to divide "success" equally, you kill upward mobility.

The only people that love socialism are the few bigwigs at the top, and the useful idiots who always think they are going to get free gibs.

>America flooded with third world which pushed down the wages and strains system even more
>mandatory diversity quotas in all jobs
>live paycheck to paycheck after the rich move all their money to offshore accounts to evade taxes which mysteriously the government and liberals will never consider making a law against and the middle class gets saddled with paying for all their stupid failure programs

Yeah definitely for their economic interests. And yes I basically described Canada in the present day there

Makes you wonder why the Dems keep fucking themselves with identity politics.

The only people who like socialism are people who think they'll be able to take power and be at the top when it's implemented and tee people on the bottom who think they've actually found the answer to the problems

> if everyone who voted was a lazy working-class retard who wanted everybody else to pay for their shit instead of earning it
FIFY

fpbp
Shill OP needs to kill himself.

...

Sage
>IMG_4232.gif

that map should be yellow

> lazy

>working class

Uh...

...

> Obama
> pro Israel

Voting to squander, deplete, and indebt the country for my own economic gain at the expense of my children's future is immoral and it's exactly what democrats (and republicucks too) have been doing for decades.

Literally not even an argument.

Working-class =/= working and working =/= not lazy. Billionaires work too, moron.

...

Also paying to house refugees, creating more wars, more food stamps and welfare programs for lazy people and higher taxes and regulations on business isn't my economic interest

No, It has never worked because It's shit,
Next.

no that's not correct.
i have $0 if i vote for being a slave.
i have more than enough if i'm free.
i vote to be free; you're trying to convince me of two things:
1) being a slave to corporatists is better
2) you are a more moral person
you're wrong on both, and you're wrong because you have atrocious reasoning abilities.
i don't make a habit of listening to sub-human morons.
sage.

Unintentional political compass

really

Sounds like a law enforcement issue to me.

Why are corporatist interests better for the Commons dipshit ?