Where's your empathy, Sup Forums?

Where's your empathy, Sup Forums?

I agree, if we print our own money then why do we care about a miniscule amount of money being spent on the needy?

Did you know that we can feed people that fell on temporary hard times AND keep bums from leeching of workers?

Did ya?

Im okay with this since im a lazy bum

You mean sympathy, retard

>I'll pay the minimum legal amount of taxes and pretend poor people getting whatever's left after filtering through fifty layers or bureaucracy means that I care
>no I don't donate to charity, why

Don't have kids

i cant afford to feed myself. welp looks like i better make more humans that i also cannot feed. personal responsibility fuckers learn it

>I'd rather have thousands of lazy bums who suck up all tax dollars, murder my countrymen, and rape the women in my country than let one blah blah blah


ftfy

A single mother is not a family.

if america were a white ethnostate i would agree.

If dolan tump puts drug testing before you are approved to get stamps and welfare then i wouldnt mind as much.
Right now i rather not pay at all

The lazy bums shouldn't exist. Society needs to be purged of the apathetic, the unhealthy, and the bigoted before we can go further into socialism.

Socialism is fine by me.
But it needs to put our nation and people first, not sending money overseas or giving it to dindu immigrants.

Went away real fast when I started working with the poor

the problem is not the thousand lazy bums you have today.

the problem is the millions of lazy bums you will have tomorrow, when they come from all over the world to make fun of your empathy

>40%+ of the local population is on welfare
>Austerity measures about to kick in
>Trump wants to slash welfare spending
>mfw
Empathy my ass. Fuck welfare abuse.

...

Yeah, that.

>I want to give my money to the poor.
Good. Then do that. In fact, why wait for government legislation when you can literally open your wallet right this moment and donate your entire life savings?

But that's not what you're actually interested in, though. What you'd rather to do is legally strongarm others into footing the bill for you so that you can feel better about yourself with little to no sacrifice on your own behalf.

Let's make one thing abundantly clear; Neither voting nor paying taxes can be considered altruistic. They are both inherent methods of self- preservation with direct consequences for not cooperating.

yeah, especially when it's not your money, it's so easy to spend them.

Shirkers breed too much.

'Lazy bums' have children too, and they are shit at life, so their families become 'poverty stricken'.

Well I doubt you could even feed a thousand lazy bums, so probably those will all turn to crime after your tax dollars aren't enough and then the poverty-stricken family will go without food AND shelther all the same.

> Implying a liberal can support 1001 people
> Implying a liberal can support himself

just look at europe attracting loads of new countrymen for the welfare

Tell me this ideology was a good idea in 50 years time, progressives. If you were truly willing to share your paycheck with the poor you would be doing it already. Not giving 0.1% of your disposable income to charity then wearing the badge they gave you everywhere.

Why do liberals trust the government with their tax dollars?

Just go donate then.

>it's almost like if you get government out of welfare you yourself can directly help families you find worthy or select organizations you believe in with the extra money you have
>but hey i'll just decide this is the way i want it and force that choice on everyone else

Raised by single parents.

They crave authority and structure.

why dont we just physically remove the thousand lazy bums

well that's not very rational. it's probably why you're poor.

came in here to post this.

>Do not reply to slide threads

Maybe they're not lazy, maybe they are just sick of your bullshit. Ever think of that?

This is so stupid. Imagine how many "poverty-stricken families" they could help if there weren't so many lazy bums leeching off the wellfare system.

So assuming we have one deserving family which we would support at $20,000 a year, (which I think might be a conservative estimate), it would cost a mere $20 million to save them assuming we have one thousand undeserving families. Is my math correct?

Btw, OP is a faggot, but anybody who replies to these type of threads without saging is a retard.s

Money is based on the value put on it. If money is just handed out to everyone like air then money losses it's value, meaning business lose money when doing business with America and Americans loss money value making the average American even more poor. Then you add the loss of job with buisses decline and everyone gets even more poor.

Then you add the fact that all my money I earned to by myself nice stuff isn't mine really mine, since gov. Takes it and give it to whoever, robbing me without permission to spend my money on stuff I don't like.

Tax is fine when everyone agrees and benefits off it like roads, but I am at a loss when bum fucks get free money. So it's bad for most Americans.

Donate to charity then, faggot.

Stop pretending that the government is the only or the most effective and efficient vehicle for addressing society's problems.

>I'd rather have a thousand families move out of poverty into the middle class using responsible work incentives than let one lazy bum use my tax dollars for food and shelter.

You're on Sup Forums friend; this is where empathy goes to die.
Where life operates on a one strike basis because I'm sure no one on Sup Forums has ever had any assistance of any kind, ever.

In the soup kitchen where I work on weekends actually feeding the poor and hungry instead of stealing other peoples' money and redistributing it you Leftist cuckold.

> Supporting people who make bad decisions by taking away money from people who make good decisions.
WHAT COULD GO WRONG

Better version of that pic

Whenever I see someone begging, I give them money. It's usually not a small amount either, it's $5-$10. And I really don't care if they spend it on drugs, because eventually they're going to have to buy food, and my money contributed to that. What I don't want is 40% of my money getting lost in bureaucracy and the other 60% going to single-mom Tyrisha who would rather have kids than work.

I can help people myself and I'm sure others can too.

This.

Cancel all welfare programs, give free dormitory and free popular soup to anyone asking.

>I'd rather have wealthy people pay for a 1000 bums than have to accept responsibility for my choices

Don't act like it's charity when you're forcing someone to give it away

It already is handed out like air to many

The FED is a gaping oozing stoma that we can't fix without killing the systems that rely on it.

Because the more needy you reward and keep needy, the the less money you can print.

>1 post by this ID

Learn to identify slide and bait threads you fucking morons.

Sage.

>What is Private Charities
>What is the church
>What is personal contributions to individuals

Eurocucks give less money to charity and volunteer less time than Americans do at every economic level. Europe passes laws to 'do good', Americans go out and do it. One is more moral than the other.

Stop being a lazyass, go out and work at a soup kitchen. Don't feel good about yourself just because you voted for a dem because muh poor and think you're actually helping anyone.

Empathy is a relationship. I have no empathy for lazy bums because they have none for me.

You can feed 1000 needy families if you stop feeding 1000 bums.

I'm so compassionate that I actually want to help MORE needy families than you do.

Where the fuck is your compassion, faggot?

I want to help needy families and you want to help bums.

Show some compassion

Shoot noncontributing citizens. No help at all for non-citizens.

Safety nets should exist for unlucky or even stupid citizens, but a net and nothing else. Also, gov should see to policies that lend to a healthy job market and low home prices.