Can't Trump just fire these Federal Judges?

Can't Trump just fire these Federal Judges?

Other urls found in this thread:

senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=1&vote=00106
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Imagine the medical science the Japanese could have pioneered if their Unit 731 could have used superior samoan specimens rather than chinese peasants?

Wish we could ship that mongrel looking ocean nigger to Syria and see how many refugees he wants then

Congress can impeach them.

Because they are life time appointments, in a sane world, this would be passed up to the Suprime court, who would then say "The President is LITERALLY following the law." But well, it's a 4-4 split. The bright side is that the reaper is slowly but surely coming for Ginsberg, lets just hope it makes a visit within the year.


Kinda, but there is no way we'd get the needed 2/3rds vote

why doesnt Trump just say if Hawaii wants more immigrants then their about to get flooded with everyone brought to America so far.

There are supposed to be 3 equal branches of government. If I was Trump I would just ignore them.

He can just appoint new ones who come to their work and sit in their seat

Ayy checks and balances work, get fucked. God bless America

The libs appointed a lot of judges that don't give a fuck about constitutionality and are more than willing to legislate from the bench. Activists. Their oath means nothing to them.

We elected the politicians that appointed them. The hillaries and obongos.

if that one guy fired the entirety of the air traffic control why couldnt trump kick out all the people who want to burn our constitution

Why doesn't Trump just follow the law and smear himself in shit while he jerks off his micropenis?

Oh wait he already does the latter.

In order to MAGA, Trump really needs a branch of the military that is completely and unwaveringly loyal to him. Then we can shoot these activist judges in the streets and end their lifetime appointments.

Is he Japanese?

That would be incredibly ironic lol,

Judiciary branch is trying to rule the country, time for them to be put in their place.

Make it so executive orders can only be challenged by the supreme court. The highest ranking official should only be blocked by the highest court of the land.

It's time for the MAGA team to get work again. Take a break from Shia Lacuck and start war on these bullshit judges.

He can't, but Congress can just delete their courts entirely, or restructure them, or make them responsible for bird law oversight. Whatever they want really

Judiciary branch is doing what they're supposed to do: enforce the law.

Law and order doesn't apply only to black niggers, it applies to orange niggers too.

These judges were given lifetime appointments so that they would be insulated from short term political fads, vicissitudes, public opinion, threats, bribes and etc. But it is incumbent on our politicians to appoint judges that uphold the laws enacted by the legislators.

Our politicians are shit, our judges are shit.

The constitution is a powerful tool but it is not immune to corrupt men and an idiotic electorate.

>

Conservatives fight to enable liberals to use the Constitution against themselves and the country of which their supposed to serve. You're fighting a losing battle with your misplaced sense of moral superiority

You do know they can get rejected by the senate if enough of them vote against the appointment right?

Like this hawain judge who got a unanimous decision
senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=1&vote=00106

lol dat freemason ring

they should go back to doing bumfights

>corrupt men and an idiotic electorate

In other words, it's not immune to liberals.

LETS TROLL SOME JUDGES!

These liberal judges are actually stealing power from Congress and the Executive Branch when it concerns immigration.

These judges are not allowed to legislate from the bench. That is not their job at all.

Federal judges can get impeached.

Circuits can also be enlarged, downsized, broken up, and created since Congress has the power to do this.

>gov't does something illegal
>judges say you can't do that, it's illegal
Fucking amazing. Living in a country where politicians are require to follow the law and shit. Revolutionary.

Right the executive branch has to allow immigrants from countries with no real governments to speak of into the country even though their native country can't even adequately issue passports in some cases because not to would hurt tourism, make us look unfriendly, and is perceived to be "unfair". What a bunch of faggots.

>Judiciary branch is doing what they're supposed to do: enforce the law.


Read United States Code/Title 8/Chapter 12/Subchapter 2/Section 1182

If you read that and still believe that judge is enforcing the law then you're retarded for real.

kek

>Judiciary branch is doing what they're supposed to do: enforce the law.

They create the laws, they do not execute them. That is what the Executive branch does. An Executive order is the executive branch trying to do create a law, which is what the judiciary branch does.

The judiciary branch has 94 federal courts, and executive branch has 1 President, meaning 94 potential fuckers stepping in to stop the president from doing his job.

>Judiciary branch is doing what they're supposed to do: enforce the law.

Wrong branch, liberal.

But I guess you liberals want Unelected Judges to have both the power of the Legislative and Executive Branches.

>You do know they can get rejected by the senate if enough of them vote against the appointment right?


No shit, dumbass. Elected politicians. Can you libfucks even have basic reading comprehension?

>more retards who think the president is above the law

>Can't Trump just fire these Federal Judges?

right wing retards know fuck all about their own country.

Nothing is illegal about the executive order.

I bet you didn't read the 46 pages released by that Hawaiian judge.

His argument is based on opinions. The judge barely cites any legal cases.

In fact, he is making the dangerous precedent of citing campaign statements which has never been done before by a federal judge since such a precedent would allow any kind of future legislation to be tossed out based on campaign statements for any politician.

but the military hates trump because he hasnt punished all of the marines for daring to post pictures of women on the internet which is a sex crime. We need to clean house at the US marines first as Gloria Allred said because their all a bunch of sex predators and like she said what is next whose daughter or child will the men in the US marines target next?

You've got your head so far up your ass it's ridiculous.

The legislative branch makes the laws
The executive branch executes the laws
The judicial branch interprets and enforces the law

Executive orders are not illegal per se. But they sure can be.

>Retard who thinks judges should be above the legislative and executive branch.

>the executive branch trying to do create a law, which is what the judiciary branch does.
your retarded the judiciary does not create law user.

lel
>A federal judge in Hawaii blocked President Donald Trump's new travel ban on Wednesday afternoon, hours before the ban was set to go into effect.
>In a 43-page ruling, US District Court Judge Derrick Watson concluded in no uncertain terms that the new executive order failed to pass legal muster at this stage and the state had established "a strong likelihood of success" on their claims of religious discrimination.

The judiciary most certainly does not make law they interpret it the legislative makes law.

>Watson
>Gook
Interracial adoption is even worse than race mixing

...

Because those campaign statements make it clear that the ban is a violation of the first amendment. Jabba the Trump should have kept his stupid mouth shut.

> dangerous precedent

Here's a traditional American idiom you may be familiar with: anything you say can and will be used against you in court.

No. The judiciary are committing suicide though. There are shitloads of vacancies right now and Trump can pretty much put whomever he pleases into them. This grandstanding bullshit of liberal judges pleasing their local pals just pushes the standard for all appointments to the right.

Usurping presidential prerogative is no fucking game. Even Robarts, the Western District of Washington faggot who blocked the first order, declined to touch the second one. He likely had an epiphany in this regard.

Yeah I believe in rule of law. Kinda like how you right wing retard pretend to believe in it.

That could be funny, hire a new judge for the weekdays and relegate old judge for weekends only.

This. Fuck rural and suburban retards.

To try and assert something said on the campaign trail is somehow a reasonable deliberative position gives room to remove these judges for incompetence, they are allowed to consider what is entered as evidence, nothing more. Are you functionally retarded? Do you drive?

>fire judges
Why can't presidents just start rounding people up and executing? Very unfair!

LMAO FUCK DRUMPF

Judges doing their job.

If there is to be a change in immigration, it needs to come from the legislature. I've had enough of Presidents running the country through executive order. I was against it when Obongo was President, and I'm not gonna suddenly reverse that just because it's Trump now.

Enough with the Imperial Presidencies, return power to Congress. Let them pass a law on this as representatives of the American people. Good on the judges.

see
It's literately already written into law that the president gets to pick who gets to come into America

since you have exhibited through your posts you have no fundamental understanding how parliamentary system is designed to operate, your opinion doesn't mean a fucking thing.

>Judiciary branch creates the laws

>Suprime court,

>Judges doing their job.
>If there is to be a change in immigration, it needs to come from the legislature


I can't believe I'm having the same argument with you idiots over and over.

The law already exists
It's US code. Read it (see pic).

The first amendment does not apply to aliens on foreign soil.

Also, here is the text of the law:

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182

The part that bothers me is how a judge from one state can change policy for everyone in the country. It doesn't make sense. I can't imagine this war foreseen by the men who designed this country.

I'm kind of hoping he tells them to fuck off and directs ICE to ignore the court order, even though it would touch off a constitutional crisis.

Make sure you take a civics class in your first year of community college, retard.

The Education department is succeeding in turning out people so stupid they believe anything they are told if the person is perceived as an authority figure.

Its funny how Erdogan does all this shit firing everybody and no one gives a shit but in the USA everyone is muh freedoms.

Day of the rope looms, liberal faggit

Yeah, I'm sure Hawaii is being kept in check with the 2nd.... O, wait, they pass unconstitutional arms laws.

Don't be an idiot. It's partisan politics at its finest.

Having the legal authority to drive a car doesn't give you the legal authority to drive drunk. Executive power is no different.

Trump isn't the first president to be cock-blocked by the courts. He's just the first that doesn't seem to understand it.

So is it a coincidence that Trump pays homage to a president notable for ignoring a court decision and doing whatever the fuck he wanted anyway?

Great. Can't wait to watch you hang.

Judges will not let fascism take over America. God may bless them.

Which just proves that decades of executive overreach have born fruit with Obongo and Trump's abuses of power.

The Executive branch should be doing nothing but enforcing the laws that Congress enacts. Anything beyond that is too much.

That was a very stupid analogy.

You are very seriously an idiot if you're not trolling.

Trump should put the Muslims in jail/camps next to the illegal wetbacks until the supreme Court can rule

Kek has ruled

>The Executive branch should be doing nothing but enforcing the laws that Congress enacts
You mean like the pic he posted? Because that act of Congress gives him exactly that power.

>The Executive branch should be doing nothing but enforcing the laws that Congress enacts


Arrrgh!

Congress enacted the part of the US Code that trump executed by executive order.

The president executes, the judiciary enforces.

>be judge
>from hawaii
>think your opinion and/or state is relevant

Overreaching.

Hawaii doesn't have to worry about the same problems faced by the continental US.

Funny how conservatives whined about checks and balances when Obama was in power

Makes you think

Just because Congress decided to pass the buck on this one doesn't mean it's okay.

The President should not be creating national policy by proclamation. Period, full stop. If you think that's okay, you need to go back and re-read the Constitution.

Can you even tie your shoes, let alone a noose? Didn't think so, Jamaal.

No, but you'll let terrorists take over your country. I almost got jumped by some refugee scumbags walking outta Gare Bruxelles Nord one night. Fuck going back there and fuck your chocolate

The difference was that his executive orders were not nearly so cut and dry as this one.

Everybody calm the fuck down and just wait until we get Trump's appointment to fill the Supreme Court vacancy.

You're feelings have been noted.

>that one guy

>doing the hard labor myself
What do you think we're importing immigrants for?

Rest assured that Achmed can tie the meanest noose you've ever seen.

>You're feelings have been noted.
>You're feelings
>You're
>'

>The president executes, the judiciary enforces.
Wrong. The judiciary interprets and rules. The problem is when activist judges deliberately rule that an action is unconstitutional without ever referencing the law that explicitly authorized it.
>If you think that's okay, you need to go back and re-read the Constitution.
Article 1 Section 8 allows congress to dictate immigration policy. This is part of the policy congress passed into law:
>Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.
If this is unconstitutional, perhaps the judge should have ruled this section unconstitutional somewhere in his 16 page ruling.

Typo.

Whatever.

>I almost got jumped by some refugee scumbags walking outta Gare Bruxelles Nord one night.
lol sure you did.

>The judiciary interprets and rules.


Enforces and interprets, stupid fuck. Idiotic oversimplification.

You must have missed the part where it says "With the unanimous approval of all federal judges"

>If I was Trump I would just ignore them.
He's free to ignore them and they're free to use the US Marshals to arrest anyone that listens to Trump's order to ignore them.

We don't actually have 3 equal branches of government in practice. The judiciary is more powerful than the legislature which is more powerful than the executive.

Mad.

>Enforces
Just like they "enforced" Worcester v Georgia, right?

These aren't "checks and balances" at all.

This faggot judge literally just declared "It's Islamaphobic", to put his long ass conclusion into 2 words.

>the majority of x country are x therefore it's discriminatory
>oh and also just because it's not ALL countries containing X, doesn't suddenly make it NOT discriminatory HA checkmate Drumpf

That was literally this faggot judge's reasoning.

Can you put that into context? WTF are you talking about?

No it wouldn't. During Operation Wetback in the 1950s, Eisenhower told some of the judges to f themselves and initiated the operation.

If the judges are out of line, it isn't unconstitutional. The question is does Trump have enough political capital that the Republicans and Democrats wouldn't drum up impeachment proceedings.

Bullshit, it doesn't say that whatsoever.

Can you please put this into context. I don't feel like going on a Google excursion to check obscure references.

>Is he Japanese?
His name is Derrick Kahala Watson. Does that sound Japanese to you?