Why aren't you a libertarian? Why do you hate freedom and responsibility?

Why aren't you a libertarian? Why do you hate freedom and responsibility?

Imagine a society of OP's picture and a reverse society.

You don't understand libertarianism.

Because I'm not retarded.

Yeah, let me guess, you are a national socialist or something? Really intelligent.

Freedom ain't free.

>ok but in return i need you to not brainwash my son gay
>ok but stay off my path under your meth trip
>ok but drink like an adult and accept responsibilities that come with alcohol intoxication
>ok but offer me an alternative
>ok but have a slow food restaurant outside city centres as well like mcdonalds do
>ok whatever?
>ok but in return i need you to smoke in designated places
>ok whatever
>ok but you're a bottom feeder for jacking off to other people fucking
>ok but you still look like a shitbag for wearing that crap
>ok but let me know if i should prepare my children for incoming lexicon

I am

Keep guessing.
Libertarianism when taken to the extreme is communism, anarchism or neo-liberalim tier retarded.
You need a socialist state to take care of everyone and a non hysteric nationalism because the opposite is self defeating. Right now that's civic nationalism. Neo nazi romantics are primitivist tier retarded.

That pic is retarded

>Don't like murder? Don't murder.
>Don't like stealing? Don't steal.

>don't like this society you're forced to live in? Don't live in it.

Really activated those almonds.

Don't like being robbed don't rob anyone..... it doesn't always work faggot

Because it's the same type of meme ideology as all the other extremist ideologies.

Communism, Anarchism, Libertarianism and so on might all sound great on paper but they all purposefully ignore parts of reality that mean their ideology will never work in the real world.

>don't like gay marriage
>don't get gay marriage
tell me more, lolbertartian kike

Using semantics won't help you. Socialism is the pinnacle of retardation, especially when it has show how much of an utter failure it has been in every single country in the world.

>Confusing socialism with progressism
user please...

You forgot
>Don't like paying .for roads? Don't have them.

I dont want degenerates around me

>Liberals are for freedom and responsibility

No. A very few are but most? No

>Don't like the rights of others? Don't let them have them.
>Don't like niggers? Don't conserve your ammo when shooting niggers.
>Don't like jews? Don't take jews out of the oven.
>Don't like gays? Don't stop Mike "Taze the gays" pence from frying them.

*Don't pay for them

The difference between gay marriage and watching porn(etc) is that porn is an entirely voluntary action.

Marriage is a contract enforced by the State. So in actuality we heteros are trying to save gays from the fate we face with women, namely being run through the meat grinder that is the divorce court system

If you don't pay for roads, you practically won't have roads, idiot.

Well, you would have tolls or a tracking device that would show how much you used a road. Then you'd pay the company that owns the road for however much you used it.

>Dont get gay married
that sentence sounds really off to me

Why go through all that work, than to just pay for roads?
How autistic do you have to be that if you live in a state, you are going to pay for the roads that are provided?

At least you wouldn't be paying for it with your taxes!

Libertarians are probably the people that talk about the right to discriminate more frequently. If they don't want to perform same-sex weddings, they are in their right, and I wouldn't want my church to be marrying gays either. I actually think that the right to discriminate is infinitely more important than specific issues like gay marriage or drugs.

Marriage is a contract between two people and the state. State marriage is more akin to a ménage à trois than to traditional marriage.

People don't like keeping their nose in their own b-hymen.

They wanna sniff around other people's shit. Nosey assholes.

You just don't like the tax is there.
You'd pay for the same amount if there is and isn't a tax.
We don't need to go through all this trouble of tolls, "tracking device", or other shit.
Just pay the tax on the road, like wtf?
It's not that big a deal because you have to be retarded to hate being taxed for something you use every day.

>be other guy
>doesn't want roads
>doesn't pay for said roads
>shitdike ooga booga calling someone a dumbass cuz no roads as if they didn't know!!1!one1!1!1
>hahahahahaaha
hAhahahahaha

If you fags want to get gay married and can find some gay church to gay marry you, then hallelujah, go be gay over there and leave me and my church out of it. But that's never what you demented homos do is it? Because you have a psychological need to flaunt your faggotry as part of your perversion. You're a deviant half-formed shadow of the human race, that should thank the great white God everyday that you live in a nation of christian laws and values that won't stone you like the depraved vermin you are. Please die from aids soon, thanks.

I don't use roads that much. My work is close and I bike there when it's nice. I bike around to stores. I'm using the road, but not damaging them like a car. Why should I pay the same as those that use them a lot?

Because I don't want to live in Angola, if every angolese decides freely to live in Spain.

I'm alright with it in an all-white ethnostate with a non-degenerate culture. As things stand in my country right now, googles skypes and illegals would totally screw up a libertarian system.

You are still using the road.
The government isn't going to calculate how much each person's road time is.
The main citizen does use the road and they do contribute to society. They probably help you with their service, so you can help them with them driving to work.
You see how autistic this argument is?

ONLY SOLUTION

We already allow more than half of that shit and our country is going down the shitter.

Because people are not responsable and we end up with no responsability, and guess who pays, the ones who have money because they werent up to stupid shit.

Libertarianism and classical liberalism are weak ideologies that are easily eroded by authoritarian ideologies.

Why don't libertarians ever fight against child porn laws?

The problem with a libertarian society is that it would quickly and easily be conquered by another country, with a powerful government and powerful army. The libertarians wouldn't want to raise taxes to fund an army, so they wouldn't have one.

Ah yes, destroy all borders and allow those beautiful diverse migrants to settle your land!