>there is a sun inside our earth because muh science
Just how naive and stupid can you get?
>there is a sun inside our earth because muh science
Just how naive and stupid can you get?
Other urls found in this thread:
m.youtube.com
m.youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
i.imgur.com
ifers.123.st
i.4cdn.org
twitter.com
What if inside is outside and outside is inside afterall?
Explain lava from volcanoes then if there is no sun inside the earth, the sun is literally made of lava created by nuclear explosions
Hitler knew about this. It's one of the reasons they had him killed. If someone in the USA invents a telescope which can penetrate the artificial forcefield they have in place, they would see China in the sky
Gee, if you break it down and phrase it like that...
Let me try:
>I'm a faggot homo leaf and I can't stop sucking cocks
>t. OP
Just how degenerate and gay can you get?
the sun is literally hydrogen and helium dumbass
the earth's core is literally iron
whoa
>the earth's core is literally iron
How can the earths core be iron if there's a star in the middle, if it was iron it'd would collapse and go supernova
Also Lava doesn't come from iron it comes from melted pebbles which the sun is made from
Iron and heavy materials that undergo nuclear fission, heating the whole core. Nuclear energy is so safe that we've been dying thanks to it since the dawn of time. Gotta love the occasional ash
That's quite the leaf post
No really. How can we be sure what is at the core?
>they would see China in the sky
What?
After reading about scientific history I think it's very plausible to think that everything we 'know' as fact now - might be proven to be different as new discoveries are made.
Sauce: speed of sound
*lesson
Science is a white man made-up construct
Fuck off to ifunny
>ifunny
>implying I even know what that is
If you took an Earth with fire inside and collided it into an Earth with ice inside, what would happen?
Thats where hell is. Ask Jesus really nicely and He wont send you there
thats how it feels to chew 5 gum
If this is a legit question (it isn't) it's possible to answer fyi
I took pictures of it
Nothing to help the shitpost stereotype desu
He's retarded, brain damaged, or just fucked in the head.
The center of the earth is metal and alloys. Everyone knows this.
The sun is a sphere mostly made of hydrogen, a little bit of helium and a really small quantity of heavier materials. All of them in a plasma state because of the high gravity that creates nuclear fusion.
The Earth's Core has 2 parts, the outside one and the inside one.
Both are mostly made of nickel and iron, and the outside one is a in a liquid state because of the 5000 degrees Celsius, while the inner one is solid, because of the high pressure.
Seriously, you learn this in the 9th grade, how dumb are you guys?
SUBTLE, LEAF
coooooool
If you drilled a hole straight through the earth and jumped into it, assuming safe passage through the magma would you end up levitating in the center? or just get stuck oscillating between China and America forever?
British intellectuals
EARTH IS FLAT ______ LEARN TRUTH
WATCH THIS DOCUMENTERY ______ youtube.com
THE WORLD IS FLAT ______ SO SAYS THE BIBLE (GREATES GIFT FROM GOD TO MAN)
WORLD IS FLAT
It's called gravitational pull.
>Literally
I'll just leave pic related right here. Enjoy that redpill, faggot.
youtube.com
Watch this, it'll inform you somewhat.
Can you explain to me how they reached that conclusion and refute it?
If you can't, you're an idiot.
EVERYONE SAYS THAT THE EARTHS CORE IS IRON, BUT IRON CAN'T BURN LIKE THE SUN, WHY IS IT HOT?
Truly bizzare, but I still like where you're going with this. Please expand.
THE EARTH IS HOLLOW. THERE ARE CONTINENTS INSIDE THE EARTH AND AN INNER SUN AT THE CENTER
>thinking flat earth got "inside"
Gets the job pretty goddamn well.
1) The horizon always appears perfectly flat 360 degrees
around the observer regardless of altitude. All amateur
balloon, rocket, plane and drone footage show a completely
flat horizon over 20+ miles high. Only NASA and other
government “space agencies” show curvature in their fake
CGI photos/videos.
2) The horizon always rises to the eye level of the observer
as altitude is gained, so you never have to look down to see
it. If Earth were in fact a globe, no matter how large, as you
ascended the horizon would stay fixed and the observer /
camera would have to tilt looking down further and further
to see it.
3) The natural physics of water is to find and maintain its
level. If Earth were a giant sphere tilted, wobbling and
hurdling through infinite space then truly flat, consistently
level surfaces would not exist here. But since Earth is in fact
an extended flat plane, this fundamental physical property of
fluids finding and remaining level is consistent with
experience and common sense.
4) Rivers run down to sea-level finding the easiest course,
North, South, East, West and all other intermediary
directions over the Earth at the same time. If Earth were
truly a spinning ball then many of these rivers would be
impossibly flowing uphill, for example the Mississippi in its
3000 miles would have to ascend 11 miles before reaching
the Gulf of Mexico.
5) One portion of the Nile River flows for a thousand miles
with a fall of only one foot. Parts of the West African
Congo, according to the supposed inclination and movement
of the ball-Earth, would be sometimes running uphill and
sometimes down. This would also be the case for the
Parana, Paraguay and other long rivers.
6) If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference as
NASA and modern astronomy claim, spherical trigonometry
dictates the surface of all standing water must curve
downward an easily measurable 8 inches per mile multiplied
by the square of the distance. This means along a 6 mile
channel of standing water, the Earth would dip 6 feet on
either end from the central peak. Every time such
experiments have been conducted, however, standing water
has proven to be perfectly level.
7) Surveyors, engineers and architects are never required to
factor the supposed curvature of the Earth into their projects.
Canals, railways, bridges and tunnels for example are
always cut and laid horizontally, often over hundreds of
miles without any allowance for curvature.
8) The Suez Canal connecting the Mediterranean with the
Red Sea is 100 miles long without any locks making the
water an uninterrupted continuation of the two seas. When
constructed, the Earth’s supposed curvature was not taken
into account, it was dug along a horizontal datum line 26
feet below sea-level, passing through several lakes from one
sea to the other, with the datum line and water’s surface
running perfectly parallel over the 100 miles.
9) Engineer, W. Winckler was published in the Earth
Review regarding the Earth’s supposed curvature, stating,
“As an engineer of many years standing, I saw that this
absurd allowance is only permitted in school books. No
engineer would dream of allowing anything of the kind. I
have projected many miles of railways and many more of
canals and the allowance has not even been thought of,
much less allowed for. This allowance for curvature means
this - that it is 8” for the first mile of a canal, and increasing
at the ratio by the square of the distance in miles; thus a
small navigable canal for boats, say 30 miles long, will
have, by the above rule an allowance for curvature of 600
feet. Think of that and then please credit engineers as not
being quite such fools. Nothing of the sort is allowed. We
no more think of allowing 600 feet for a line of 30 miles of
railway or canal, than of wasting our time trying to square
the circle”
10) The London and Northwestern Railway forms a straight
line 180 miles long between London and Liverpool. The
railroad’s highest point, midway at Birmingham station, is
only 240 feet above sea-level. If the world were actually a
globe, however, curving 8 inches per mile squared, the 180
mile stretch of rail would form an arc with the center point
at Birmingham raising over a mile, a full 5,400 feet above
London and Liverpool.
SPACE IS INSIDE EARTH WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG YOU PEOPLE WE ALL KNOW THE MOON CREATES LIGHT
11) A surveyor and engineer of thirty years published in the
Birmingham Weekly Mercury stated, “I am thoroughly
acquainted with the theory and practice of civil engineering.
However bigoted some of our professors may be in the
theory of surveying according to the prescribed rules, yet it
is well known amongst us that such theoretical
measurements are INCAPABLE OF ANY PRACTICAL
ILLUSTRATION. All our locomotives are designed to run
on what may be regarded as TRUE LEVELS or FLATS.
There are, of course, partial inclines or gradients here and
there, but they are always accurately defined and must be
carefully traversed. But anything approaching to eight
inches in the mile, increasing as the square of the distance,
COULD NOT BE WORKED BY ANY ENGINE THAT WAS
EVER YET CONSTRUCTED. Taking one station with
another all over England and Scotland, it may be stated that
all the platforms are ON THE SAME RELATIVE LEVEL.
The distance between Eastern and Western coasts of
England may be set down as 300 miles. If the prescribed
curvature was indeed as represented, the central stations at
Rugby or Warwick ought to be close upon three miles higher
than a chord drawn from the two extremities. If such was
the case there is not a driver or stoker within the Kingdom
that would be found to take charge of the train. We can only
laugh at those of your readers who seriously give us credit
for such venturesome exploits, as running trains round
spherical curves. Horizontal curves on levels are dangerous
enough, vertical curves would be a thousand times worse,
and with our rolling stock constructed as at present
physically impossible.”
12) The Manchester Ship Canal Company published in the
Earth Review stated, “It is customary in Railway and Canal
constructions for all levels to be referred to a datum which
is nominally horizontal and is so shown on all sections. It is
not the practice in laying out Public Works to make
allowances for the curvature of the earth
You wouldnt oscillate forever. Friction would eventually slow you down until you reached equilibrium at the core. At the core you'd float, experiencing a feeling of weightlessness, as if you were in orbit.
High pressure results in higher temperature.
What's outside the Earth?
La Gias confirmed.
According to Solon the people who inhabited Atlantis had a creation myth about themselves where they crawled up from the inner earth on corn stalks
(Corn here not meaning maze or teosinte)
Abandon thread, don't want to frighten the caveman.
13) In a 19th century French experiment by M. M. Biot and
Arago a powerful lamp with good reflectors was placed on
the summit of Desierto las Palmas in Spain and able to be
seen all the way from Camprey on the Island of Iviza. Since
the elevation of the two points were identical and the
distance between covered nearly 100 miles, if Earth were a
ball 25,000 miles in circumference, the light should have
been more than 6600 feet, a mile and a quarter, below the
line of sight!
14) The Lieutenant-Colonel Portlock experiment used oxy-
hydrogen Drummond’s lights and heliostats to reflect the
sun’s rays across stations set up across 108 miles of St.
George’s Channel. If the Earth were actually a ball 25,000
miles in circumference, Portlock’s light should have
remained hidden under a mile and a half of curvature.
15) If the Earth were truly a sphere 25,000 miles in
circumference, airplane pilots would have to constantly
correct their altitudes downwards so as to not fly straight off
into “outer space;” a pilot wishing to simply maintain their
altitude at a typical cruising speed of 500 mph, would have
to constantly dip their nose downwards and descend 2,777
feet (over half a mile) every minute! Otherwise, without
compensation, in one hour’s time the pilot would find
themselves 31.5 miles higher than expected.
expected.
16) The experiment known as “Airy’s Failure” proved that
the stars move relative to a stationary Earth and not the other
way around. By first filling a telescope with water to slow
down the speed of light inside, then calculating the tilt
necessary to get the starlight directly down the tube, Airy
failed to prove the heliocentric theory since the starlight was
already coming in the correct angle with no change
necessary, and instead proved the geocentric model correct.
Is there a fusion reaction in the center of Earth? I thought it was hot because of the gravity.
It's not a sun. It's molten iron/nickel
17) “Olber’s Paradox” states that if there were billions of
stars which are suns the night sky would be filled
completely with light. As Edgar Allen Poe said, “Were the
succession of stars endless, then the background of the sky
would present us a uniform luminosity, since there could
exist absolutely no point, in all that background, at which
would not exist a star.” In fact Olber’s “Paradox” is no
more a paradox than George Airy’s experiment was a
“failure.” Both are actually excellent refutations of the
heliocentric spinning ball model.
18) The Michelson-Morley and Sagnac experiments
attempted to measure the change in speed of light due to
Earth’s assumed motion through space. After measuring in
every possible different direction in various locations they
failed to detect any significant change whatsoever, again
proving the stationary geocentric model.
19) Tycho Brahe famously argued against the heliocentric
theory in his time, positing that if the Earth revolved around
the Sun, the change in relative position of the stars after 6
months orbital motion could not fail to be seen. He argued
that the stars should seem to separate as we approach and
come together as we recede. In actual fact, however, after
190,000,000 miles of supposed orbit around the Sun, not a
single inch of parallax can be detected in the stars, proving
we have not moved at all.
20) If Earth were truly constantly spinning Eastwards at
over 1000mph, vertically-fired cannonballs and other
projectiles should fall significantly due west. In actual fact,
however, whenever this has been tested, vertically-fired
cannonballs shoot upwards an average of 14 seconds
ascending, 14 seconds descending, and fall back to the
ground no more than 2 feet away from the cannon, often
directly back into the muzzle.
By that logic the heat generates itself by force of gravity, but that doesn't make sense to me, where does the energy come from?
I HAVE POSTED 20 UNDISPUTABLE TRUTH _____ OPEN YOUR EYES
AND LISTEN
There are three main sources of heat in the deep earth: (1) heat from when the planet formed and accreted, which has not yet been lost; (2) frictional heating, caused by denser core material sinking to the center of the planet; and (3) heat from the decay of radioactive elements.
>has never visited agartha and the inner earth
normies get out REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
THEY ALL FAKE SPACE _____ RUSSIA CHINA AMERICA
WATCH HIM FALL FROM ROPE _____ youtube.com
THEY DONT WANT YOU TO KNOW THE WORLD IS FLAT _____ SATANIC LEADERS
This is satire right?
>Iron and heavy materials that undergo nuclear fission
Negative. The heat of our core is generated by radioactive decay of isotopes and left over energy from when the earth coalesced during the beginning formation of our solar system. Not Nuclear Fission.
Nuclear fission would rend our earth apart and cause massive volcanic eruptions several orders of magnitudes higher than any known event.
READ AND THINK _____ DONT BE SATANAS PUPPET
I've read and thought about it.
5th grade science will quickly debunk your shitty tin foil hat conspiracies.
With point 15 doesn't autopilot adjust the altitude ?
Go there and find out.
EXPLAIN BUBBLE IN SPACE _____ SCIENCE
i.imgur.com
gravity kind of pokes holes in all those points
If the earth has a magnetic field then why isn't it controlling the rotation of the giant iron ball
If Britain has public education why are you so stupid?
from all 20 points, that one does seem flawed to you?
>How can the earths core be iron if there's a star in the middle
"Theory" of gravity
Slide thread.
Bump
GOD IS LIGHT _____ HIS LIGHT IS CLOSER ThAN YOU THINK
Honestly i dont think we even know how the sun works, its all just theories and bs.
and how can you explain this photo of a round earth that was taken in the 60s?
21) If the Earth were truly constantly spinning Eastwards at over 1000mph, helicopters and hot-air balloons should be able to simply hover over the surface of the Earth and wait for their destinations to come to them!
22) If Earth were truly constantly spinning Eastwards at over 1000mph, during the Red Bull stratosphere dive, Felix Baumgartner, spending 3 hours ascending over New Mexico, should have landed 2500 miles West into the Pacific Ocean but instead landed a few dozen miles East of the take-off point.
23) Ball-believers often claim “gravity” magically and inexplicably drags the entire lower-atmosphere of the Earth in perfect synchronization up to some undetermined height where this progressively faster spinning atmosphere gives way to the non-spinning, non-gravitized, non-atmosphere of infinite vacuum space. Such non-sensical theories are debunked, however, by rain, fireworks, birds, bugs, clouds, smoke, planes and projectiles all of which would behave very differently if both the ball-Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning Eastwards at 1000mph.
24) If Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning eastwards over 1000mph then North/South facing cannons should establish a control while East-firing cannonballs should fall significantly farther than all others while West-firing cannonballs should fall significantly closer. In actual fact, however, regardless of which direction cannons are fired, the distance covered is always the same.
25) If Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning eastwards over 1000mph, then the average commercial airliner traveling 500mph should never be able to reach its Eastward destinations before they come speeding up from behind! Likewise Westward destinations should be arrived at thrice the speed, but this is not the case.
FAKE _____ AMERICAUSSR GLOBAL CONSPIRACY
These are good redpills toothpaste, but what's with the spacing of your comments?
26) Quoting “Heaven and Earth” by Gabrielle Henriet, “If flying had been invented at the time of Copernicus, there is no doubt that he would have soon realized that his contention regarding the rotation of the earth was wrong, on account of the relation existing between the speed of an aircraft and that of the earth’s rotation. If the earth rotates, as it is said, at 1,000 miles an hour, and a plane flies in the same direction at only 500 miles, it is obvious that its place of destination will be farther removed every minute. On the other hand, if flying took place in the direction opposite to that of the rotation, a distance of 1,500 miles would be covered in one hour, instead of 500, since the speed of the rotation is to be added to that of the plane. It could also be pointed out that such a flying speed of 1,000 miles an hour, which is supposed to be that of the earth’s rotation, has recently been achieved, so that an aircraft flying at this rate in the same direction as that of the rotation could not cover any ground at all. It would remain suspended in mid-air over the spot from which it took off, since both speeds are equal.”
27) If Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning Eastwards over 1000mph, landing airplanes on such fast-moving runways which face all manner of directions North, South, East, West and otherwise would be practically impossible, yet in reality such fictional concerns are completely negligible.
28) If the Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning Eastwards over 1000mph, then clouds, wind and weather patterns could not casually and unpredictably go every which way, with clouds often travelling in opposing directions at varying altitudes simultaneously.
>Theory
You know what this word means right? Especially in a scientific sense
WRONG DOCUMENT FORMATTING _____ PROPER LIST WITH IMAGES HERE
ifers.123.st
MAJOR REDPILL _____ UNDENIABLE TRUTH
The core theory is intuitively correct, of course the heavy materials would be filtered towards the centre
No Agartha posts?
21) For example, when you throw an object while in a car, the object wont drag behind. The object will have the same velocity as the car.
22) Have your ever played KSP? A real good game that will explain how this was achieved.
23) You don't have to believe in gravity, to affect you, and the birds, use their wings to push the air down, while pushing themselves upwards.
24) Not really.
25) Check the explanation for 21, the airplane's velocity is relative to earth's rotation velocity.
How so?
Have you ever used a flashlight, or are you just autistic?
Flat earth autists should be exterminated.
It is a theory lad, the phenomena we call gravity exists but it will remain a theory until its true mechanics and causes are fully revealed
that's the point you FUCKING WORTHLESS LOSER, there isn't a star inside earth. it's iron. he just told you that faggot.
Yes. Like an iPhone. Built in China, brought to US and sold, traded in for new iPhone, brought back to Asia as new again, Asian stows away on ship and brings back to US where it becomes Obamaphone, gets traded in for new iPhone, and the cycle continues.
The center of the earth is Hell.
Jesus called it a lake of fire where the worm dieth not.
What are the worms?
The worms eat us in the grave and we burn in the soil as worms until we are fed to a higher lifeform. The soil of the earth burns our souls inside the worms and we recycle as worms until eaten by a bird or fish or whatever else eats worms. then our souls transfer into them and we continue that cycle until that animal is eaten by a man that then impregnates a woman.
Thats the cycle of life.
This is professional grade shitposting. Toothpaste has impressed kek.
You wouldnt levitate because the earth is not a perfect sphere. Also, if you dont ignore the air in the hole too, the air columns pressure would kill you right away.
Flat earthers need to gas themselves
This is one of the Seven Hermetic Principes
>The Earth is flat
Flat Earthers are retards. The Earth is a mobius strip.
i.4cdn.org
explain the curves here then
what is this