> SEOUL, South Korea (AP) -- Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said Friday it may be necessary to take pre-emptive military action against North Korea if the threat from their weapons program reaches a level "that we believe requires action."
> Tillerson outlined a tougher strategy to confront North Korea's nuclear threat after visiting the world's most heavily armed border near the tense buffer zone between the rivals Koreas. He also closed the door on talks with Pyongyang unless it denuclearizes and gives up its weapons of mass destruction.
> Asked about the possibility of using military force, Tillerson told a news conference in the South Korean capital, "all of the options are on the table."
>YES, good goys, open up those central banks for Rothschild control
Jeremiah Barnes
I thought he left Korea because of "fatigue"?
Chase Young
Mi Amigo, you are the Mexican who is allowed to come to the United States.
Henry Adams
bump
Wyatt Nelson
Nothing will happen
Nolan Foster
>9/10/2001
Charles King
Then we need to make it happen
Adrian Gray
This isn't really news. Why would they say it so openly?
Think of it from their position. It's just mind games with the North Koreans.
Have some lateral thinking, my dudes
Ian Bennett
>all of the options are on the table almost like relations of all other nations throughout history oh wow, it's fucking nothing
Gavin Torres
Or it's because Norks are subhumans and North Korea is run by a madman.
Angel Gonzalez
Yes, and Gaddafi was such a threat to national security.
Jacob Diaz
If we do go to war with North Korea, people will portray Trump as a warmonger. But will they consider just how bad it could have gotten had we elected another "yes man" like Obama?
Joseph Kelly
>It's just mind games with the North Koreans. It's telling China to get tougher on NK. Tillerson is meeting with the Chinese later today, though, so I guess that remark was just a warm-up.
Isaac Hill
Why stop at N. Korea? Maybe it's time the US flexes its muscles and bombs China, Russia, and Europe into submission.
Aaron Cox
>Why stop at N. Korea? this desu i hope they forcibly annex this shithole
Logan Martin
How would NK fair against a SK/US coalition invasion compared to Iraq? They seem much more prepared as they have been fortifying for like 60 years, but the quality of their forces is still kind of shit I think.
Charles Mitchell
Hillary would've gone into war against Russia. If North Korea forced the US into action after that China would probably stand behind them and another world war would get sparked.
Isaiah Howard
>Trump starts a war with North Korea >"B-b-but Hillary would have started it sooner!"
Aiden Sanders
Dunno. I doubt China is willing to actually go to war over Korea again. A lot of their posturing has shown they're absolutely fed up with North Korea's shit. Seems more like the Soviets bluffing over Egypt. If they do anything, they'll invade North Korea themselves.
>a nobody state incapable of creating a requisite of mutual total war is the same as war with the second foremost military power on the planet No refunds.
Carter Gonzalez
Oh great Trump is going to start another Vietnam
Jaxon Cox
Are you fucking retarded? He said China would ally with North Korea.
Jacob White
How little you remember that the war never ended. There was no treaty signed, simply a cease fire with north korea for the last several decades. Not much of a cease fire though as they keep launching missiles into the sea of japan.
Jaxon Peterson
Alone? Crushed. They'd probably have some sneaky-ass vietcong tactics but they're working with soviet-era AA and the US has unquestionable air superiority.
However they still have direct ties with Russia and China, and although their willingness to back NK is murky at best, it's incredibly likely that this would escalate into a US v China v Russia mess
Adam Ross
Pedantry.
Ryan Gutierrez
At first sight it looked like they were holding the manlets hands and walk him
Jaxon Collins
Why not just leave North Korea alone? They will never start a war because they would get smashed. Just let them fall under their own ideology and sit back and laugh.
Jaxon Thompson
>number of countries NK has invaded, destabilized, meddled with: 0 >number of countries USA has invaded, destabilized, meddled with: countless
But yeah, clearly it's NK who's the threat to world peace here.
Joshua Carter
I dunno man. I haven't heard of the U.S. launching missiles into North Korean waters or shelling North Korean islands for the fuck of it. I haven't heard of any country doing it for that matter. They're basically a retard with a loaded gun and shooting it for shits and giggles and no one will let anyone take the gun from the retard before it accidentally shoots someone. NK is a ticking time bomb.
Isaiah Gray
>we good boys, we dindu nuffin
Americans really are the niggers of the world.
Ryan Gomez
Please give a source that shows American artillery firing into North Korea after 1953. You won't find one. You will find sources of North Korea firing into South Korea several times, just from the last two years alone. Norks should be happy war didn't come about in the fucking 80's after they murdered multiple U.S. servicemen.
Jace Sullivan
NK is threatening to nuke Seoul and Tokyo dumbass.
If we let them do that, the USA loses all trust from it's allies.
We have satellites looking down on NK to see the second a nuke is loaded Pyongyang will be a crater in the Earth.
Isaac Phillips
North Korea is 99% racially Korean, does not have a Rothschild central bank, and possesses nuclear weapons. The jews Trump works for can't let that stand because it gives White goyim too many ideas.
Angel Kelly
>NK is threatening to nuke Seoul and Tokyo So the same script for the last how many decades? >If we let them do that They aren't going to do that. >the USA loses all trust from its allies Allies that are more than capable of developing their own nuclear weapons and delivery systems and who already have an armed forces capable of defeating North Korea in a conventional war.
It's just an excuse for the US kikes to keep occupying other countries under the guise of "protection".
Jace Moore
Why do they wear sunglasses?
Angel Evans
No no no, you don't get it. We don't let our allies develop such high tech.
The divide between the rest of the world and the US technologically (militarily speaking) is like night and Earth.
If the US unveiled everything it had at once, it would be like aliens invading what people commonly think the US is capable of.
The world has been occupied by the USA for a long time, that's why Trump winning is such a big fucking deal.
Hudson Scott
Is this a subtle way of saying America single highhandedly won WW1?
Matthew Taylor
North Korea has a smaller population than Texas. We could completely obliterate them at any moment if we so chose.
Fact is, China and South Korea do not want refugees from North Korea if the U.S. went in and destroyed North Korea's military.
That is the only reason why China does not want the U.S. to destroy North Korea.
Levi Rogers
I get there was an argument against flattening Pyongyang when China and Russia were backing them, but it doesn't sound like anyone gives a shit about DPRK anymore. Even China were saying they should calm down after their last set of missile tests.
Tyler Adams
They are wearing the patience of everyone thin
Jacob Taylor
>i don't want a war with the norks but Kek does
Ethan Lee
>Possibilities are the same thing as imminent realities These threads are made by retards, of retards, for retards.
Ian Jenkins
>.02 cents has been deposited into your account.
Ayden Torres
THANK GOD WE DON'T HAVE THAT WARMONGERING BITCH HILLARY TO START WORLD WAR III
Christian Brown
>cleaning up syria >ww3 That's a libtard sense of geopolitics for you
