How did this meme start?

How did this meme start?

Other urls found in this thread:

snopes.com/irish-slaves-early-america/
dailykos.com/story/2013/12/27/1265498/-The-slaves-that-time-forgot
raceandhistory.com/cgi-bin/forum/webbbs_config.pl?md=read;id=1638
ewtn.com/library/HUMANITY/SLAVES.TXT
nytimes.com/2017/03/17/us/irish-slaves-myth.html?_r=0
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

When the Niggers realize that they have to share slavery reparations gibs so they want to "debunk" slavery of other races

I don't think anyone has ever said the Irish were slaves, just compared their treatment to that of slaves.

I finally understand what they call black Irish.

this started when it became politically convenient for the left to accuse dirt-poor starving potato farmers turned disposable industrial workers of having 'white privilege'

Irish slavery wasn't as prevalent in the US, but it still occurred. Most of the irish slaves were sent to places like the West Indies, although irish children were sold to places like New England. The irish were most definitely pressed into slavery by the English and sold off.

Snopes seems to think otherwise.
snopes.com/irish-slaves-early-america/

Slavery is a unique phenomenon that white Americans must always never forget and pay reparations for, whether directly or indirectly.

There is simply no comparison to what poor blacks went through, even after they were emancipated. It doesn't matter if there were other whites who were slaves. It doesn't matter if Arabs had a bigger slave trade or more slaves were sent to the Caribbean and Brazil than America. America only received 2% of the local slave trade but it doesn't matter one bit.

Blacks were treated worse in America than any other people in history. It doesn't matter if you yourself never owned any slaves, or your family never did ancestrally, all white Americans benefit from slavery because of their institutional advantage. America must never forget its shameful past and as long as there is a single black person in America, slavery will still loom its ugly head over our culture.

From 1641 to 1652, over 500,000 Irish were killed by the English and another 300,000 were sold as slaves. Ireland’s population fell from about 1,500,000 to 600,000 in one single decade. Families were ripped apart as the British did not allow Irish dads to take their wives and children with them across the Atlantic. This led to a helpless population of homeless women and children. Britain’s solution was to auction them off as well.

During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish (mostly women and children) were sold to Barbados and Virginia. Another 30,000 Irish men and women were also transported and sold to the highest bidder. In 1656, Cromwell ordered that 2,000 Irish children be taken to Jamaica and sold as slaves to English settlers.

Many people today will avoid calling the Irish slaves what they truly were: Slaves. They’ll come up with terms like “Indentured Servants” to describe what occurred to the Irish. However, in most cases from the 17th and 18th centuries, Irish slaves were nothing more than human cattle.

Slavery only existed from 1776-1865 in the United States. No other nation ever practiced it.

This is a fact.

>when you're almost done completely revising history because what really happened doesn't fit your narrative
holy fuck we need to kill all lefties

this. you can still note traces of it all, such as how Island nigs all speak hibernian english. The previous version of this denial was Irish became slave owners after being slaves, so no gibs for them.

> as long as there is a single black person in America, slavery will still loom its ugly head over our culture.

a final solution to that seems pretty obvious now doesn't it

also kys

Yous muddafukn rigt! Them dam whiteys opres us wit dem instimatutootional sheit! At les dey pay for mah chilluns programs!

The white guilt is strong with this one.
They will never get reparations and rightly so

Still working on getting your G.E.D?

Rubbadubdubs! Good satire bro.

Nailed it. Reparations arent so sweet when they have to share with whitey.

Because Irish slavery, and slavery of whites in general did exist in U.S. history. Albeit not on nearly the same level as black slaves, they still existed, and that hurts the "poor innocent blacks" narrative that claims slavery is something only blacks have had to endure. It's not as easy to perpetuate white guilt when whites were right there with them.

This. You're a credit to your continent.

>How did this meme start
According to most people of color whites are to blame for everything therefore all history of whites suffering must be rewritten or erased to fit the liberal agenda

I believe he was being facetious.

Kek supports it. Soon!

Irish weren't slaves. They were just forced to work and not allowed to leave while receiving corporal punishment! Not slavery at all!!

>indentured servitude totally isn't slavery

...

...

Is this HuffPo or some variant? Why are liberals always trying to destroy us?

...

...

Hey retard, if you aren't owned as property you are not a slave. Irish slavery is a lie invented by racists to diminish the significance of african slavery.

While slavery has existed as long as people have, there is no question that the last few centuries of slavery were focused on certain races, namely not the Irish.

>Without a doubt, life was bad for indentured servants. They were often treated brutally. Not all of them entered servitude willingly. Some were political prisoners. Some were children.
>Not all of them entered servitude willingly
>but they werent slaves tho


Holy fuck the mental gymnastics.

There does exist indentured servitude where two parties sign a contract for a limited amount of time. This is not what happened to the Irish from 1625 onward. They were sold as slaves, pure and simple. Children by definition can not be indentured. they can't sign a contract.

dailykos.com/story/2013/12/27/1265498/-The-slaves-that-time-forgot
raceandhistory.com/cgi-bin/forum/webbbs_config.pl?md=read;id=1638
ewtn.com/library/HUMANITY/SLAVES.TXT

no it's the fucking ny times

nytimes.com/2017/03/17/us/irish-slaves-myth.html?_r=0

I guess other formerly enslaved people should take notes. From "irish need not apply" to the white house in 60 years. Although i've heard it enough to think the need not apply narrative isn't true at all and or is exaggerated.

>nytimes
>not the original fake news
wew

Check your privilege.

b-b-but I watched the quiet man

Yes.

Of course,

will ignore this post because invalids don't like pesky facts interfering with their narrative.

Dailykos

FUCKING DAILYKOS AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Is it bait ?

Here's what's next: The Barbary Slave Trade never happened.

This

no it's true, and there are pubs here that have kept the 'no blacks, irish or gypsies' signs which only got taken down in the 60s-80s. But the irish that went to america were usually lowest common denominator criminals and extremely alcoholic. The Chinese covered more miles through the rockies of railroad than the Irish could over flat plains due to drinking, fucking and fighting in the Irish camps.

Consider the words from the English State Papers in 1742.

"In clearing the ground for the adventurers and soldiers (the English capitalists of that day)... To be transported to Barbados and the English plantations in America. It was a measure beneficial to Ireland, which was
thus relieved of a population that might trouble the planters; it was a benefit to the people removed, which might thus be made English and Christians ... a great benefit to the West India sugar planters, who desired men and boys for their bondsmen, and
the women and Irish girls... To solace them."

"in 1699 Father
Garganel, S.J., Superior of the island of Martinique, asked for
one or two Irish Fathers for that and the neighboring isles which
were 'fill of Irish' for every year shiploads of men, boys and
girls, partly crimped, partly carried off by main force for the
purposes of slave trade, are conveyed by the English from
Ireland."

Maurice Lenihan, History of Limerick, Cork,
Page:668

"More that "100,000 young children who were orphans or had been taken from their
Catholic parents, were sent abroad into slavery in the West
Indies, Virginia and New England, that they might lose their
faith and all knowledge of their nationality, for in most
instances even their names were changed... Moreover, the
contemporary writers assert between 20,000 and 30,000 men and
women who were taken prisoner were sold in the American colonies
as slaves, with no respect to their former station in life."

Thomas Addis Emmet, Ireland Under English Rule, NY & London,
Putnam, 1903
Page: 101

The general argument of "my slavery was worse than your slavery," is the worst argument ever and is truly disgusting. Left media is such shit.

>Snopes
¿¿¿Seriously nigger???

Next they're going to try to debunk the idea that Islam took Christian slaves.

Blacks just need slavery, since it's their victim card. It's like how the jews always try to "debunk" other genocides so they can feel special about their imaginary holocaust.

>It doesn't matter if there were other whites who were slaves. It doesn't matter if Arabs had a bigger slave trade or more slaves were sent to the Caribbean and Brazil than America. America only received 2% of the local slave trade but it doesn't matter one bit.

Subtle and refined, I'm surprised these Sup Forumsniggers didn't pick up on it.

From 1641 to 1652, over 500,000 Irish were killed by the English and another 300,000 were sold as slaves.

That is MORE than the number of Black Africans that ever disembarked in the US.

...

PREACH IT GURL

WE WUZ N SHIETTT

Only anglo saxons are white. Irish were never whjte.

slavery isnt actually a bad thing tho

16th-19th century—Irish were not considered white, so it was acceptable to enclave them.
20th century and beyond—Irish are now considered white, so their history as slaves is rewritten.

>Slavery is a unique phenomenon that white Americans must always never forget and pay reparations for

yes goyim

>There is simply no comparison to what poor blacks went through, even after they were emancipated

YES GOYIM!

>Blacks were treated worse in America than any other people in history

NO GOYIM!!!

Those are not Irish slaves. They're mixed race negroes and according to the 1% rule they are BLACK.

Pic related: African American male

As an Irish-American, deeply offended about my peoples' history being all sullied and disrespected. We want reparations too and we'll gas the niggers if we have to.

>it doesn't matter that america only received 2% of the local slave trade
top zozzle

This debate is useless unless you first define slavery

By the standards of the time no, the Irish were not slaves.

But by current UN definitions, which include things like slavery by debt, then yes, the Irish were very much slaves.

So unless you're arguing with someone from the 1800s, then they must agree that the Irish were slaves. Otherwise all the kids in Indian sweatshops are totally free people.

holy shit the niggers do not want to piss off the Irish.

That's insanity.

The Irish are first in line for reparations from the British and the Americans since their slavery occurred earlier than African slavery.

Lel. Imagine being a nigger and thinking you deserve reparations and that there is even the slimmest chance of it happening.

Hitler trips means it's habbening soon!

Hold on, hold on.

Are you saying?

We were indeed not slaves and such?

Irish were beasts of burden, not slaves. Slaves have to be human

They are trying to ask us to genocide the blacks cause they don't want to get their hands dirty and don't know how to ask.

Well puny Man This Beast is Unchained.

Well that is simple then.
Indentured Servants could never have been Irish because the Irish were not considered human in the 1600's. Well into the 1700's the Irish were considered like Africans not fully human.

Only humans could enter into contracts with other humans.

the Indentured Servant meme started in the late 1800s and early 1900s when "white" Irish didn't want to think that their ancestors had been slaves like the blacks.

>As an Irish-American, deeply offended about my peoples' history being all sullied and disrespected. We want reparations too and we'll gas the niggers if we have to.

That sounds like a fair deal.

AYYYYE YEEE BE SAYIN WE BE SLAVES N SUCH

from the Library of Congress

Lol "white" Americans and Brits were getting their jollies fucking animals. Sick.

...

The narrative is that blacks are unsuccessful today because of slavery and not because of low IQ. Irish being slaves blows apart the fiction of the left.

When Romans invaded northern europe many irish and more were made slaves

Carlos Slim is a rent seeking faggot.

>Facts are for dumb libruls lel!!

...

>Romans
>Ever reaching Ireland in a meaningful way.

American education.

In this groundbreaking work, Richard Hayes Phillips has collected the names of more than five thousand children kidnapped from Ireland, Scotland, England, and New England, and sold into slavery in Maryland and Virginia, c. 1660-1720.

Tell me where you at mate.

Literally this. It destroys the victim narrative.

I'm for the extermination of all plebscum.

I think the funnest fact is that there were many many English slaves too. They pretend it never happened and they were kangz and qwans.

Oh shit don't tell me there were Scottish slaves and sheeeeit!

Why do we have to go back to colonial America to talk about slaves? Do niggers seriously think that slavery ended with them in the 1800s? Do they not realize Jews in the holocaust were slaves? Do they not realizes millions of people were slaves in the gulags? In the 20th fucking century. Why do we only use the term slaves for niggers in America?

Whites in Slavery before the Civil War

if darkie wants to do this we are ready to throw down against a few billion of them.

Such as yourself, Go back to sleep.


>If you don't atleast have 5 tonnes of platinum I don't even consider you a human.

According to the theory of Thomas Charles-Edwards, who wrote about the Irish Dark Age, between the 1st and 3rd century there was a depopulating slave trade from Hibernia toward rich Roman Britain, that had an economy based on villa farming and needed slaves to perform the heaviest labour in agriculture.[4]

>America must never forget its shameful past and as long as there is a single black person in America, slavery will still loom its ugly head over our culture.
I guess you're right. Let's politely move every black person out of America.

Saqāliba (Arabic: صقالبة, sg. Siqlabi) refers to Slavic slaves, kidnapped from the coasts of Europe or in wars, as well as mercenaries in the medieval Muslim world, in the Middle East, North Africa, Sicily and Al-Andalus. It is generally thought that the Arabic term is a Byzantine loanword: saqlab, siklab, saqlabi etc. is a corruption of Greek Sklavinoi meaning Slavs (from which the English word slave is also derived.[1] The word is often misused to refer only to slaves from Central and Eastern Europe,[2] but it refers to all Eastern Europeans and others traded by the Arab traders during the war or peace periods.[3]

There were several major routes of the trade of Slav slaves into the Muslim world: through Central Asia (Mongols, Tatars, Khazars, etc.); through the Mediterranean (Byzantium); through Central and Western Europe to Al-Andalus. The Volga trade route and other European routes, according to Ibrahim ibn Jakub, were serviced by Radanite Jewish merchants. Theophanes mentions that the Umayyad caliph Muawiyah I settled a whole army of 5,000 Slavic mercenaries in Syria in the 660s.

In the Muslim world, Saqaliba served or were forced to serve in a multitude of ways: servants, harem concubines, eunuchs, craftsmen, soldiers, and as Caliph's guards. In Iberia, Morocco, Damascus and Sicily, their military role may be compared with that of mamluks in the Ottoman Empire. In Spain, Slavic eunuchs were so popular and widely distributed that they became synonymous with Saqāliba.[4] Some Saqāliba became rulers of taifas (principalities) in Iberia after the collapse of the Caliphate of Cordoba. For example, Muyahid ibn Yusuf ibn Ali organized the Saqaliba in Dénia to rebel, seize control of the city, and establish the Taifa of Dénia, which extended its reach as far as the island of Majorca.

There are more people enslaved today in Africa than the number of slaves that ever existed in the US in total.

Bullshit. There were prisoners that were sent to do hard labour in the Caribbean. A lot were English too, people captured after failed rebellions like the monmouth rebellion. There was no slavery like they were slaves and their families were slaves etc like with Africans. It's a meme.

Platinum pics with timestamp or your a pleb too faggot

Also if you think that the Caribbean accent is the Irish accent you are a total retard.

>Convicts are not slaves

Okay.

>The Modern U.S. Justice System Is Just Slavery Under A New Name

Hmmm.

Wish liberals would make up their mind.

They did say it, because they were slaves. Also other white people.

They were not the victims of Chattel Slavery in the U.S. however.

Divide and conquer (((tactics)))

shhhhhhhhiiiiiiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeetttttttttttttttttt fuck dem niggaz familampai they don't know what its like I gotsta feed ma kids babay mah kids!!


English Diploma with timestamp go.

>1 post by this id
>1 post by this id everywhere