>delete ancap debate thread leave up bait threads

fuck the mods

Other urls found in this thread:

propertarianism.com/
propertarianism.com/2015/07/31/a-list-of-hans-hermann-hoppes-errors/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Ancap is by default bait

Hi

I was trying to deprogram them

fuck the mods

Fuck the mods. Tired of seeing;

"POL BTFO, WHITES BTFO, RIGHT WINGERS BTFO BTFO BTFO BTFO HOW WILL YOU EVER FUCKING RECOVER HOLY FUCKING SHIT"

Its pretty much fucking spam at this point. granted there can be something to talk about in such threads but if they're gonna delete other threads of more worth, they might as well just start cleaning out those "BTFO" threads

Sup Maltabro.

>not having "Sup Forums btfo" auto filtered

not an argument

Physical removal soon lads.

...

...

you're going for a little helicopter ride with me

How do we solve the mod problem?

Nothing much, just realizing the Matryoshka doll on Hoppe's picture and having a giggle, you?

still listening to the Hoppewave video. Also, notice he has two copies of Tom Wolfe's book The Bonfire of the Vanities.

This. No one is unironically a lolbertarian anymore. Any real follower of Rothbard would have followed their leader into fascism or at least nationalist libertarianism by now.

The mods here have been cancer for a long time, people tried fleeing to twice the amount of chan but they tried so hard to prevent this future from repeating itself they smothered it. We do need a replacement though, compromising on our principles will eventually come back to bite us.

>LEAF?
>NO COMMIE?

Crazy world.

I was ancap until i realized all races arent equal

This is how a fanatic thinks.

>Ancap

>Not the most degenerate, toxic, completely bat-shit insane political position in the world that is shilled by the rich/Jews.

The non aggression principle is unenforceable, and simply not being a devoted libertarian can count as not adhering to it.

All of you deserve the gas chambers. Complete idiots.

Boy, do I have bad news for you...

>Doesn't want to live in a society where racial discrimination is just a market choice

>NAP
>not the epitome of fanatic

You're not alone with that conclusion. In my eyes libertarianism can't work unless it is within a set of people with the same cultural values. Doesn't necessarily have to be about race, but it usually comes down to that.

and another one

and this

I am not a strict adherent to ancap values just because I happened to post in this thread you ingrate.

>One Jew tells the left that all races are equal and then floods their countries with Low-IQ shit-skins.


>Another Jew promotes greed and unregulated capitalism and loots the country of all it's wealth and destroys it's government and thus enforcing body.

But at leats the second jew gives lip service to the flaws caused by the first Jew's bullshit.

>m-muh Jews!

...

You know it's true, faggot.

Shill your bullshit some-where else.

Welcome to my castle (which may easily become a redoubt for you to doubt your intentions. And smile, your savageness is a reality show in the internet)

You should read about Rothbard's life and the people he politically supported if you ever pull your head out of your ass.

fuck rothbard and fuck ancaps. don't go ruining user's life.

Blah blah blah freedom private property human rights yadda yadda.

Prove to me a priori that private property is an inalienable human right then we can talk. Spiler alert: you can't.

>fuck ancaps
>says the guy that lives in a microstate that was expelled (seceded) from some shithole and is now one of the world's richest countries because of free market practices
W E W L A D

>I don't own myself but I'll use my vocal chords and body to post on Sup Forums and act

YOU STEPPED ON SNEK

>Mods don't delete Commie General
>Mods dont delete BTFO threads
>Mods Delete ancap threads
>Mods Delete Anti commie threads
REALLY FIRES MY ALMONDS

you evidently don't know much about my country. Our economy and policies are extremely well regulated. We trust the free market but realise its excesses must be reined in.
Ancap is just taking capitalism to its extreme.

SNEK HAD IT COMING.

I know your state controls everything. Your country is one step away from becoming the City of Glass from the Mirror's Edge game. Your country would be even richer if you people were not so autistic and the state did not own all housing and land. Enjoy your literal serfdom peasant.

Wassap freedom Bros, why does /lrg/ always die if I'm not the OP. Every time I see one I think "fuck yeah, someone made a new thread" but it's fucking archived with only 5 posts.

It's probably because the time of day and day of the week. I'm down for a Hoppe thread or /lrg/ thread.

>Snek had it coming

Right on. I can't make one now as Im phone posting during my work hours.

...

I'll make one later then. Nice image btw, saved.

...

...

>what is a priori

>what is a priori moral belief system grounded in axiomatic-deductive logic

gassed.

>Black or white fallacy

Great arguments there finnbro

...

>Not wanting to own a nuke

>wanting public nukes

>wanting every jihadist sandnigger to own a nuke

i have

Not for very much longer tho. Socialism and statism always fails :^)

The NAP is not some kind of commandment or something. The NAP is the strongest argument against the legitimacy of the state.

BTFO

...

>person who lives in a country that's easily in the top 3 freest economies in the world mocks ancap

Do you not understand that political economy lies on a spectrum?

>not blowing them up first

what makes you think they wouldn't blow you up first?

How can you throw communist off the helicopter if it's an attack helicopter?

we have multiple models.

...

Because sandniggers can't gain capital without help from my government.

can someone plz come up with some juicy OC of ancap NAP violation escalation stories!
I fucking love them!!!!!!!!

Ancap threads deserve to get deleted, take your shit tier meme ideology somewhere else faggot

Alright then faggot, enjoy your communism general.

sure, he believes in ancap, i believe in cap, totally respect that.
I see first hand the benefits of my system while he waxes lyrical about the supposed benefits of ancapism. that's whats truly laughable.

haha maybe it will fail one day. no system is perfect. but representative governance seems to have a better track record than anarchism, no?

>implying rejection of ancap = communism
most ppl on Sup Forums reject only the "an" part of it.

>>>>>/leftypol/

...

The implication of pure capitalism is that institutions would be privately owned and not centralized and that centralized government would not be a part of capitalism.

Posting in a Nevi chan thread.

Meme ball threads were starting to get stale. No OC. Mods were right to delete the last one.

...

The more representation you have, the more political conflict and social strife you have. The more democracy and voting rights you have, the bigger the incentives are to "covet thy neighbor", i.e. to advocate for wealth redistribution policies which will favor your cause on other, productive peoples' expenses. While no 100% anarchist ("private law" society) has ever existed, remnants or fragments of it are still present today (voluntary market exchanges, freedom of association, social discrimination, etc.) Present states are determined to undermine the requirements for these social phenomena to exist, namely private property, the nuclear (traditional) family, exclusive covenants, clubs, meetings, etc. The state is hellbent on the destruction of all vertical social hierarchies and orders which are not state/citizen hierarchies. Democracy and representative government act as the perfect cover for that task since we are led to believe we all collectively "own" the country. We are not robbing other people, we are simply using "our own" money for our collective benefit. This, of course, is false, given the number of productive people whose money is distributed downwards to the peasant/animal caste of society—the welfare addicts, the illegal immigrants, the failed businessmen and the single parents (degenerative family structures). Democracy overrides any restrictions to wealth redistribution and hence rewards demagoguery, vote buying and high time preference (a preferring of present gratification over a future, yet more rewarding, gratification, i.e. civilization). Instead of a king or neo-cameralist government whose attachment to a country and its citizens is one of hierarchy, mutually-recognized authority and the protection of property rights, interchangeable caretakers ("representatives") are put in place for a limited number of years. This does not eliminate exploitation and de-civilization, it contributes to it.

Capitalists on MY imageboard?

>your imageboard

bump

Hoppean dump? Hoppean dump.

...

...

Fuck ancaps
National socialism is the ideology of Sup Forums

does anyone have the picture of the "don't tread on me snek" wrapped around a fasces?

...

The normal path of maturity appears to be Libertarian > Anarcho Capitalist > Dark Enlightenment > Propertarianism

You acknowledge how destructive welfare is to blacks yet somehow You think white man's NEETbux will work long term.

Does Dark Enlightenment not encompass Hoppeanism/Rothbardianism/Moldbug/etc. al under a single banner?

...

Hoppeanism is a revision of the original cosmopolitan-libertarian doctrine that rothbard produced.

>yet somehow You think white man's NEETbux will work long term.
Because whites adapted in an environment which required cooperation and the construction of a commons that the society could draw upon. welfare isnt bad when the society has the necessary guilt mechanism to prevent exploitation of it.

I know, don't lecture me on Hoppeanism, I know all about it. What is, however, propertarianism and why is it further down the line than Hoppe?

propertarianism.com/
TRS used to have him on their podcasts a lot a year or two ago.

chill out man, I'm just pointing out that rothbard isn't a part of the Dark Enlightenment and Hoppeanism is a revision of anarchs-capitalism.

propertarianism.com/2015/07/31/a-list-of-hans-hermann-hoppes-errors/

Sorry if my comment sounded callous senpai. I'll read the article, thanks.

The problem I have with most libertarians is that they end up defending complete hedonism.

>He wants to use crack? There is nothing wrong with this.
>She wants to get a gangbang? There is nothing wrong with this.
>He wants to binge drink instead of working? As long as my taxes don't pay him, there is nothing wrong with this.

You hardly ever see libertarians saying things such as: "The state should not prohibit it, but it is morally wrong to get gangbanged". Most are "WEED LMAO"

>You hardly ever see libertarians saying things such as: "The state should not prohibit it, but it is morally wrong to get gangbanged". Most are "WEED LMAO"
True, but libertarianism would allow large communities that absolutely abhor those behaviors to voluntarily form itself and perhaps secede from the degenerated "left-libertarian" miasma.