Gun Show Loophole

Should private individuals be allowed to sell firearms without a background check? Some states prohibit this (like California) but many states allow the private sale of a non-FFL dealer without carrying out a background check.

Does the Gun Show Loophole pose enough of a risk to necessitate legislation to close it?

Other urls found in this thread:

thevipconnect.com/Natlie-Austin.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

That chick is fat nigger

whose this semen demen that i'm dreamin about creamin in?

When need to shut down the background check loophole before the communists try to take away the second amendment.
We also need to shutdown the hurt feelings loophole that's being used to shut down the first amendment.

Learn to read file names.

So you are advocating for universal background checks then? The "loophole" is what prevents some sales from requiring those.

no filenames on phone browser

>should private individuals be able to sell-
yes

...

should private individuals be able to sell recreational nukes and child porn and slaves?

>Gun Show Loophole
Fuck off you double nigger, there's no such thing.
Saged

>So you are advocating for universal background checks then?
I'm advocating right wing death squads to kill everyone trying to take away constitutional rights.

...

Background checks is the hot buzzword so the government can pretend it's keeping the public safe by keeping firearms out of the hands of criminal and mentally unstable. But every background check is paired with a gun registry log entry so that they know who owns guns, what kind and how many they have to take away once guns become illegal full stop.

You can buy a car without a driver's license. Why not guns?

There is no such loophole. Background checks don't fix anything anyway because the federal system is broken. If the system worked it would be arguably unconstitutional anyway.

There is no such thing, this "gun show loophole" is standard Democrat playbook, they make up shit about guns and then proceed to create leglisation to further regulate guns even though the very issue they bring up never existed to begin with, watch the laws, they'll have nothing to do with the gunshow loophole other than by name and instead will have a lot to do with general gun buying and selling.

That's the common term for it. I know there is no "loophole" in the law, because this applies to all private sales, gun show or not (and FFL deals at gun shows still need to run background checks)

How do you enforce that? I wanna sell my gun to someone. Meh I don't feel like going through the government. I sell it to them anyways. What are cops gonna magically pop up and get me? Are you going to require me to register my gun with the government? That's when you get people skittish that the government is going to have better means of coming and taking your shit (should things hit the fan with the gov) or some hackers (or even just simple human negligence) results in people knowing where the guns are.

Plus what is this even trying to combat? The nut cases? From most of the nut case shootings that have occurred lately they haven't been through guns bought from private individuals. Are we talking gang violence? Well shit those people are going to break the law no matter what so you're just dragging law abiding citizens into an annoying process.

shall not be infringed

The gun show loop hole is a myth.

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!!

There's no such thing as a "gun show loophole." Anybody that promotes this terminology is a moron who's never purchased a firearm.

yes, keep the government out of it. Gun ownership is a right, not privilege

It's not a loophole.
It has nothing to do with gun shows.
Fuck off.

No one should have nukes.

If the child consented.

If the person consentented to being a slave.

>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State
You fucks are not a well regulated militia.

The gun show loop hole has nothing to do with gun shows. Most sellers at gun shows have a licence.

The "gun show loophole" should be called the "private property loophole" because humans can do with their fucking property as they please. Next we'll have the "financial transaction loophole" because some people give their children an allowence without paying tax on it. Fuck you.

>Does the Gun Show Loophole pose enough of a risk to necessitate legislation to close it?

No. Straw purchases are already illegal. Felons can't legally buy a firearm. If they do they only prove that they don't obey the law, so a private sale law would have no impact as they would ignore it as well.

You can buy a car without a drivers license.
There is no constitutional protection for car ownership.

>No one should have nukes.
why not? and whatever your argument is, why doesn't it extend to guns?

Citizens are the militia.

And 'well regulated' means properly functioning. You can't properly function as militia without arms and ammunition.

Why should anyone have nukes?

>why doesn't it extend to guns

I responded to your post, your post made no mention of guns, only nukes, child porn, and slaves.

Your other posts might have but I didn't look at them.

Are non-whites allowed on those gun shows?

Should I have to pay taxes when I sell my car on craigslist?

Cars kill way more people than guns.

Expand the picture you dumb fuck

>Why should anyone have nukes?
to defend from other people with nukes obviously

>"financial transaction loophole"
we've already had that debate, and the commies won. 16th Amendment.

Read the entire sentence. Is the right bear arms belong to the people, or the militia.
>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

>I don't know what words mean
- the post

Private individuals should not be allowed to do anything, period.

Privilege vs. right.

Fucking dipshit!

Why is this fucking whale being smeared all over my board?

In my experience, the gun show loophole is a myth in practice.
Most sellers at gun shows I go to are FFLs, even if they aren't a business.
I tried to buy a pistol at 18, legal in a private sale, but you have to be 21 to buy a handgun from an FFL.
All the non-FFL guys had were surplus rifles, hunting rifles and shotguns.

Mmm, magos.

theres no gun show loop hole, its been debunked. kill yourself you brainwashed zombie.

Private property is a privilege?

You're making a huge leap so let's reel it back a bit for a second. Why are grenades and c4 explosives illegal for citizens to own but it's okay to own guns? You can't control an explosive and you have much greater control of a gun. If you have less control of the thing that can cause death you're more likely to take out people who aren't a threat to you while taking out the threat. You can use a gun to defend yourself but you can't use a bomb to defend yourself. Extend back to nukes and you're gonna definitely include mass death of non targets.

???
do you think your little gun is going to protect you against someone else who has nukes?

Stay cucked, canadabro.

fill me in OP, how do you enforce rules on private sales? How do you keep my father from turning over a gun to me in his house?

Yes.

i remain unconvinced burger

This is anti-Constitutional lying. There is no loophole. Every gun I bought at a gun show involved a background check.

Learn how to read or leave the country if you dont like it.

She's so hot, I want to impregnate her

Yes

NOT

THAT

HOT

Militia is any male between 17 and 45 years old so yes we are.

>You're making a huge leap
No you are.
What you're doing is making up reasons for why the ATF has regulations on what are usually called "Destructive Devices" The real question is, are those Arms? or Armaments? And, should the militia, and people, have them?

GAY

ASS

NIGGA

Thats why your in canada and not here.

COME

AT

ME

id cum in her loophole if you know what i mean

to enforce background checks on all firearms sales and transfers. you would need a rigid system of registration, inspection, record of background check keeping.

even then it still wouldn't work.

If you can sell your car (private property) to anyone why shouldn't you be able to sell a gun (private property) ?
I have always tried to sell to dealers if I sold one, but it's my right to sell my property ! I'm an oldfag, they didn't have background checks when I purchased my first gun. An M1A in 1989 !

Stop arguing bazookas and nukes.
It's a tactic to change the subject.
They want to outlaw handguns, rifles, and shotguns; force them to stick to that.

GOD DAM

>Should private individuals be allowed to sell firearms without a background check?
Yes. Firearms either are, or aren't, private property.

The act of a felon buying a firearm is a crime perpetrated by the felon, not the seller.

Only pussys and faggots want to regulate the sale of firearms. They could realize that by moving to niggerland Trenton, Baltimore, Chicago, or Hartford, where virtually handguns are banned, never fucking works.

Gun violence is just regular violence, but with a projectile moving at several hundreds of feet per second. People cite the ability to carry out mass casualty attacks with firearms as being the reason to make legislation against them. However, people can do that with home-made explosives, and vehicles. Guns provide an equalizing component in the event that someone of ill-intent had procured a firearm illegally, and to bar against the law abiding citizens from owning their own firearm, denies them the ability to protect their life and belongings.

Violence is never going away, as will the prosecution of violent offenders of the law, so let it be that people have a means to fairly defend themselves without being in defiance of the legislation.

Any LA bros here can pick her up as an escort if they want.
thevipconnect.com/Natlie-Austin.html

>Straw purchases are already illegal. Felons can't legally buy a firearm. If they do they only prove that they don't obey the law

This. the thing about criminals, is that they dont obey law, thats why they are called criminals. more legislation on guns diminishes the freedoms and property rights of more and more law abiding americans. legislation will never be a means to stop crime. crime has always been stopped by men with guns, (ie. cops, or armed civilian.)

>Should private individuals be allowed to sell firearms without a background check? Some states prohibit this (like California) but many states allow the private sale of a non-FFL dealer without carrying out a background check.
>without carrying out a background check.

your lying.
bought several firearms at a gun show.
had to do a background check.
there is also one point where my brother wanted to buy a gun and couldn't so i got it and its kept at my house since i could pass the check..

You lie cia. stop spreading false rumors.