I've been seeing a lot of discussion on this board about differences between races on this board, primarily pretaining to IQs. What are Sup Forums's primary scientific sources for these studies? I would like actual MLA citations, not an infographic or a link to infowars or the daily stormer.
Race statistics
Nathan Hughes
Other urls found in this thread:
telegraph.co.uk
nature.com
sciencedirect.com
jbhe.com
udel.edu
psycnet.apa.org
sciencedirect.com
udel.edu
wsj.com
articles.latimes.com
psychology.uwo.ca
pastebin.com
fda.gov
cbsnews.com
genengnews.com
jhered.oxfordjournals.org
tau.ac.il
nature.com
rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
digitalcommons.unl.edu
journals.plos.org
jstor.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
citeseerx.ist.psu.edu
sociology.as.nyu.edu
collegium.hrvatsko-antropolosko-drustvo.hr
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
bio.miami.edu
pnas.org
science.sciencemag.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
mbe.oxfordjournals.org
researchgate.net
uff.br
eebweb.arizona.edu
jstor.org
bearproject.info
eebweb.arizona.edu
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
researchgate.net
researchgate.net
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
mbe.library.arizona.edu
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
research.amnh.org
jhered.oxfordjournals.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
sciencedirect.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
people.virginia.edu
isites.harvard.edu
webspace.pugetsound.edu
atavisionary.com
sciencedirect.com
sciencedirect.com
sciencedirect.com
pastebin.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ucr.fbi.gov
twitter.com
Sebastian Ramirez
Human intelligence up to 75% inheritible
telegraph.co.uk
Human intelligence is highly heritable.
nature.com
Scientific consensus is that IQ tests are not racially biased.
sciencedirect.com
Very poor Whites are comparably intelligent to very wealthy blacks.
jbhe.com
Privately, intelligence experts hold more hereditarian views than they express in public.
udel.edu
Black children raised in White households have similar IQs to black children in black households.
psycnet.apa.org
The average African IQ is estimated at 79.
sciencedirect.com
The average African-American IQ is 85, compared to the average White IQ of 100.
udel.edu
The white-black gap in SAT scores, a proxy for IQ, is increasing.
jbhe.com
Genes for large brains, linked to high IQ, are common everywhere except Africa.
wsj.com
Intelligence has a 40-50% genetic basis.
articles.latimes.com
IQ scores are the best predictor of success in Western society.
psychology.uwo.ca
Asher Anderson
Justin Jones
If race isn't real then why do different races react differently to certain medications?
fda.gov
Why is our genetic makeup inextricably linked to culture and behavior?
cbsnews.com
>Scientific consensus is that race isn't real.
source?
(1997) Barbujani et. al., find a human genetic distance of ,155. There are no recognized subspecies.
jhered.oxfordjournals.org
(2001) Kim et. al., find an Asian dog genetic distance of ,154. There are eleven recognized subspecies.
tau.ac.il
(1994) Roy et. al., find a North American coyote genetic distance of ,107. There are nineteen recognized subspecies.
nature.com
(2002) Schwartz et. al., find a Canadian lynx genetic distance of ,033. There are three recognized subspecies.
rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org
(2014) Jackson et. al., find a humpback whale genetic distance of ,12. There are three recognized subspecies.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(2008) Lorenzen, Arctander & Siegismund find a plains zebra genetic distance of ,11. There are five recognized subspecies.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(2003) Pierpaoli et. al., find a European wildcat genetic distance of ,11. There are three recognized subspecies and five biogeographic groups according to (Mattucci et. al., 2016).
Joshua Davis
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
(2007) Lorenzen et. al., find a Kob antelope genetic distance of ,11. There are two to three recognized subspecies.
>Scientific consensus is that race isn't real.
source?
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
(2003) Jordana et. al., find a south European beef cattle genetic distance of ,068. There are eighteen recognized subspecies.
digitalcommons.unl.edu
(2004) Williams et. al., find a red winged blackbird genetic distance of ,01. There are twenty-two recognized subspecies.
journals.plos.org
jstor.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
citeseerx.ist.psu.edu
sociology.as.nyu.edu
collegium.hrvatsko-antropolosko-drustvo.hr
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Mason Edwards
pnas.org
science.sciencemag.org
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
digitalcommons.unl.edu
tau.ac.il
(1997) Wise et. al., show that the genetic variability within humans is 0,776. There are zero recognized human subspecies.
mbe.oxfordjournals.org
(1997) Wise et. al., find a chimpanzee genetic variability of ,63. There are four recognized subspecies.
(2001) Uphyrkina et. al., find a leopard genetic variability of ,58. There are thirteen recognized subspecies.
source?
(2001) Eizirik et. al., find a jaguar genetic variability of ,739. There are nine recognized subspecies.
eebweb.arizona.edu
(2000) Culver et. al., find a puma genetic variability of ,52. There are six recognized subspecies.
Josiah Gomez
The relevant academic field is called "psychometrics." Psychometrics is a subset of both statistics and sociology. The 1SD black-white IQ test gap is one of the best-established principles within psychometrics and therefore sociology at large.
This raised the question of CAUSATION, which is more controversial. That's where recent work in genomics tends to come in.
Michael Morgan
nature.com
(2002) Schwartz et. al., find a Canadian lynx genetic variability of ,66. There are three recognized subspecies.
jstor.org
(1998) Paetkau et. al., find a North American brown bear genetic variability of ,5275. There are nineteen recognized subspecies.
bearproject.info
(2000) Waits et. al., find a Scandinavian brown bear genetic variability of ,687. There are nineteen recognized subspecies.
eebweb.arizona.edu
(1996) Garcia-Moreno et. al., find a coyote genetic variability of ,629. There are nineteen recognized subspecies. They further find a Gray wolf genetic variability of ,574. There are thirty-seven recognized subspecies.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(2001) Girman et. al., find an African wild dog genetic variability of ,643. There are five recognized subspecies.
(2001) Kyle & Strobeck find a North American wolverine genetic variability of ,55. There are two to three recognized subspecies.
(2001) Walker et. al., find a Scandinavian wolverine genetic variability of ,325. There are three recognized subspecies.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(2000) Polziehn et. al., find an elk genetic variability of ,395. There are seven to eight recognized subspecies.
Dylan Sanchez
(1995) Forbes et. al., find a bighorn sheep genetic variability of ,6235. There are three recognized subspecies.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
(2000) Reinartz et. al., find a bonobo genetic variability of ,535. There is one subspecies.
research.amnh.org
(1999) Paetkau et. al., find a polar bear genetic variability of ,68. There is one subspecies.
jhered.oxfordjournals.org
(1999) Wilton, Steward & Zafiris find an Australian dingo genetic variability of ,445. There is one recognized subspecies.
eebweb.arizona.edu
(1996) Garcia-Moreno et. al., find a domesticated dog genetic variability of ,5085. There is one recognized subspecies, and there are many breeds.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
sciencedirect.com
Christian Morgan
people.virginia.edu
(2000) Turkheimer presents his Three Laws of Behavioral Genetics and explains their meaning.
Turkheimer begins by stating, "The nature-nurture debate is over. The bottom line is that everything is heritable, an outcome that has taken all sides of the naturenurture debate by surprise. Irving Gottesman and I have suggested that the universal influence of genes on behavior be enshrined as the first law of behavior genetics (Turkheimer & Gottesman, 1991), and at the risk of naming laws that I can take no credit for discovering, it is worth stating the nearly unanimous results of behavior genetics in a more formal manner."
The Three Laws are as follows:
? First Law. All human behavioral traits are heritable.
? Second Law. The effect of being raised in the same family is smaller than the effect of genes.
? Third Law. A substantial portion of the variation in complex human behavioral traits is not accounted for by the effects of genes or families.
In short: no one is born tabula rasa.
isites.harvard.edu
(2005) Philippe Rushton and Arthur Jensen (author of, "The g Factor") conclude that IQ is the greatest indicator of future success in Western societies when inter-generational income dependence is accounted for.
They also found that IQ is at least 50% heritable and likely nearer to 80% heritable. To draw comparison, height is 70-90% heritable.
During their analysis they concluded that Whites have a minimum of 75% IQ heritability.
webspace.pugetsound.edu
(2004) Plomin & Spinath discuss intelligence in the wider context of genetics, genes, and genomics.
Liam Bell
Their discussion is multi-faceted; their analysis illustrates proof of the genetic heritability of intelligence, the immense weakness of environmental explanations for intelligence, changes in heritability during development, a multivariate analysis of IQ and various testing metrics, gene expression profiling, and genomics.
This is an excellent compilatory piece.
sciencedirect.com
(2009) Rushton & Jensen refute erroneous claims made about the nature of the Flynn Effect and its relationship with the Black-White IQ gap.
In their conclusions they state, "We conclude that predictions about the Black–White IQ gap narrowing as a result of the secular rise are unsupported. The (mostly heritable) cause of the one is not the (mostly environmental) cause of the other. The Flynn Effect (the secular rise in IQ) is not a Jensen Effect (because it does not occur on g)."
sciencedirect.com
(2001) Rushton & Rushton show evidence for racial-group differences in the form of brain size and structure, IQ, and musculoskeletal trait variation.
Their analysis shows significant variation in both the structure and sizes of the brains of Negroids, Caucasoids, and East-Asians. In addition to this, they have found differences in the skull shapes and structures of the races, alongside differences in average height and weight and all parts of the bone and muscle structures from the neck to the feet.
sciencedirect.com
(2007) Shatz analyzes the relationship between IQ and fertility.
Jacob Peterson
They find that IQ is negatively associated with total fertility rate, birth rate, and population growth rate. This means that higher IQ populations are less fertile than lower IQ populations.
sciencedirect.com
(2013) Michael Woodley, Jan Nijenhuis, and Raegan Murphy conclude that Western IQs have declined by an average of 1,6 points per decade since the Victorian Era.
Higher IQ people are more productive, healthier, and are more creative. The reduction in IQs across the West has been met with a marked decrease in average productivity and general health despite vast increases in average wealth, nutrition and access to healthcare.
The cumulative reduction in IQ is between 12,45 and 13,35 points or roughly one standard deviation on a normal IQ bell curve. This represents an eight-fold reduction in the number of geniuses and a counter to the Flynn Effect.
The resultant decrease in IQ is attributed to dysgenics in the form of outbreeding and negative mate selection within populations. The importation of migrants of different races and ethnicities preempts the outbreeding and subsequent loss in IQ. This effect has sped up as migration has increased.
Grayson Morgan
Final one is pastebinned:
pastebin.com
Hope this got your attention, now watch the greatest story never told or fuck off
Julian Garcia
>MLA...not APA as used by ACTUAL SCIENTIFIC STUDIES.
You are fucking underage of you are in the fucking sociology field which requires MLA. GTFO you worthless trash
Dylan Morales
or*
Andrew Campbell
Holy shit OP eternally and irreversibly BTFO
Jonathan Hughes
How am I BTFO? This is what I want.
Grayson Williams
You know what I meant. You can convert APA to MLA or just post the APA format. The problem is, especially after going through some of the links the anons provided, is that many of their sources can be tracked down to white nationalist or racial realist organizations with questionable integrity. That is what I am trying to avoid.
Nathaniel Brooks
I work in the health field for non-profit and i have some stats/studies I personally use for my own research prior to getting shifted into the finance department for asking too many questions on the research team....is that something you would want? I can dig them up if you want to stick around....firstly...what is this for anyway?
Ayden Evans
Sure. Anyway this is for testing the validity of the claims and sources of claims put forth by racial realists and neo-nazis. I was sick of having unsourced infographics thrown in my face.
William Walker
the stuff I focused on was what is called "social capital." and it is the "gold standard" by which all current organizations [U.N., E.U, W.H.O, C.D.C, A.M.A, etc] use as the basis of what defines and determines a "minority" and what and if any detriments exist against the comparison benchmark (i.e. White males) are you familiar by chance with Deborah Whitehead's ideological claims and her influence on such policies?
Gavin Reed
>are you familiar by chance with Deborah Whitehead's ideological claims and her influence on such policies?
No but I'm guessing it's along the lines of "muh tolerance" and "muh created equal"
Julian Lee
Social capital is the factor that has determined that population based numbers do not influence minority status. Look at it as "abc group" compared to "X benchmark." In the eyes of the Left this allows for Asians/jews/whites (benchmark) to not be viewed as a minority due to power and oppression. One can only be oppressed if there is a nominated factor that is considered to be in power. In relation to "abc group" comparison to "x benchmark" it means that "x benchmark" will always by default be in power and viewed as the oppressor
Henry Perry
Oh so it's "muh white privilege" basically
Jordan Fisher
here is the study that ALL non-profit and for-profit organizations MUST follow for standards and procedures. This is also the study that I was forced to study in depth while in college.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
This study and "social capital" determines ALL governmental assistance to minority groups
Jack Gray
Here is another shorter version but it does not go "in-depth" to explain the reasoning at each phase as seen here ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Hudson Robinson
mkay, so you are saying that there is an agenda being pushed?
Jaxon Ross
here is the most recent stats on crime and i mean the MOST RECENT published (the stats that i focused on while studying the effects of social capital on ethnic communities)
ucr.fbi.gov
Once you read....if you read the studies i posted then look at these stats you will come to the conclusion something is wrong with the way governmental aid is being distributed. an inconvenient truth that most are not ready to hear or fathom
Nathaniel Morris
>I can't use google, the thread
Brandon Bailey
Oh yes I am sure. The idea of pro-minority policies like race-based affirmative action and such being pushed for the sake of "muh equality" and potentially political interests is nothing new to me.
Cooper Sanchez
>I believe that x is true
>can you cite a source please?
>hurr google it
Fuck off newfag
Zachary Perry
>I've never done any research in my life and cna't find white papers to confirm if things are true without relying on strangers