Ancaps

You know, these guys have a point. WHAT IF the child consents?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-capitalism
m.youtube.com/watch?v=IcxGXcmr4ig
fb.com/HoppeanSnakeMemes
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

you get thrown out of a chopper for claiming an undergrown brain can consent to communism

but what if it's not for communism, but for benis?

can someone explain what the yellow and black are? i also missed the snek as well

...

ancap reporting in; just wanted to say:
>child
>consent
pick one

Hickory, dickory dent
What if the child consents

...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-capitalism

...

quality b8 m8. I r8 7/8. Good job, leaf.

rly megs thenk

The parents should defend their child.

...

Commies are just sad that they cant get the child to consent easily

no u

I wouldn't personally do it (since I don't find children attractive), but morally I don't see anything wrong with it as long as it doesn't break NAP.

What is the moral argument against it?!

I'm an actual autist btw.

...

Sage these trash slide threads

>In an anarcho-capitalist society, law enforcement, courts, and all other security services would be operated by privately funded competitors rather than centrally through taxation
I thought the gold membership thing was a joke. No they actually believe this shit.

I want this fucking meme to die. In an AnCap society, pedos will either be lynched or thrown out of society all together. I hope we lynch them.

t. Ancap

...

lurk more, this shit ain't new

children do not know what it means to be human, therefore they are not human, therefore they are their parents property, therefore they cannot consent.

...

Why would the state do a better job? The private companies have an incentive to max profits and they are going to have to protect their reputation, also violence is very expensive.

Good intro:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=IcxGXcmr4ig

what if the child consents and loves the perpetrator, tho?

>needing the government to govern you
I'll bet you think roads are magic and that no one else could pave them, too.

Probably in many cases yes.

Cultural patters won't change 180 degrees...

Ancap is so perfect that the only arguments against it are blatant exagerations.

Who would pay a company to pave an entire country

...

Enclosed hang-gliders

The people who would use it, duh.

The ppl that use the roads. You already have lots of toll roads Norway. You should know.

...

This is actually a good real life example of what a profit motive does.

Papa John have a reputation to protect and expand, so it's in their intrest to act "morally right" as judged by the adherence to general moral intuitions.

The fact that you can only make silly arguments against it proves how wrong you statist cucks are.

>violence is very expensive
Compton confirmed most valuable land in America.

I guess I don't see any functional difference between a government doing this over McDonalds.

Where's the general argument?

Look...

Negros don't understand the consequences of their actions.

>See wiki for warrior gene.

In an ancap society someone that repetedly violates NAP will most likely be killed or enslaved.

That's a lot better than the current situation...

As long as the child consented to consenting, everything's fine. Can't argue with that.

the snek is fb.com/HoppeanSnakeMemes
it's like gadsden snek but he likes helicopters

It will be cheaper and better with private companies since there will be free market competition, i.e. if one company does a bad job or it's very expensive there will be competition driving down the prices.

...

>nothing wrong with my ideas

>slavery is fine

My sides. Great job missing the point.

No slavery, thanks, its how white societies end up with shitskins anyway.

So who's preventing monopolies then?

If someone cursed with a woman's mind is capable of legal consent, so is the average child.

I've seen that hair before, anyone wanna tell me what game/anime/whatever it's from?

A time what point does a brain become fully developed? An arbitrary birthday number? Are biological things like this not unique to the individual?

McDonalds builds a road, but their McChicken Road Not-A-Tax Pass is too expensive for the average consumer, who is going to go to war agains them to demolish their road and build a new one on top of the rubble?

No government regulations and overspending that gives one company or conglomerate the market edge.

Jews own Sup Forums

Listen, we hunted down the #Hwndu flag in 24HRS, lets hunt down the jews in control of Sup Forums and kill them. Rape their women, make them sign over ownership to us, then kill them too.
Why not? I have zero tolerance for jews. Kill all jews.

The King of Burger.

So nobody then. Good luck with that.

I shouldn't spoonfeed.

Whoever would make the most money from it, duh.
>mcdonalds
>expensive road
That's the thing about anarcho-capitalism, everyone is competing. If you don't like the road or it's too expensive, don't use it.
>we
>lets
>us
No, you didn't. McKill yourself namenigger.

>exaggeration he says

htis Sup Forums forum is heavily censored. So nothing will come of it.
Have some hook nose jews sniffing all these comments and banning them.

Just give me the name fuccboi

>Sup Forums is serious business
Its Sunday night, nothing important is happening until tomorrow. Let us shit post

Boku no Quake

It requires military force to create monopolies, not to prevent them, the NAP would prevent them.

>That's the thing about anarcho-capitalism, everyone is competing
Only the companies with the means to construct roads would be competing, and funny enough these only exist in a magical fantasy world where all goverments poof out of existance.

...

The free market. Most monopolies come from gov interference. Also some monopolies might be good ---- the possibility of a new microsoft increases the willingness to invest. Even though microsofts monopoly won't last forever like other monopolies.

Does some monopolies exist that won't be broken and that will reduce innovation? Don't know but I haven't seen one. Probably not and even if that's the case ppl will eventually make enough mistakes.

So, better not to have a gov if you want to prevent monopolies.

Closest to that is Standard Oil and it's monopoly was broken before the gov came in.

Why is slavery wrong? I don't think so, but sure most do... it's because it's against their moral intuitions. That won't change in an ancap society.

You most likely won't see much more slavery in an ancap society since it's against most ppls moral intuitions.

>It requires military force to create monopolies
And you've just privatised that, cutting out the middle man entirely.

And if they didn't have the construction equipment, they couldn't charge for the road.
It's almost as if you're actively making an effort to not understand.

But who enforces the NAP?

Your local unelected de facto government.

Do private construction companies not already compete with each other to get hired by the government to make roads?

The property owner's recreational nukes. If you can't keep it, you don't deserve it.

Amerifats are barbaric in anything that is remotely related to sex.
Murrika is torn in between radical christians and radical left hard to tell whos more fucked up.

Nothing wrong with having consent age at 16

...

No, you have decentralized it and weakened any one actor from gaining enough strength to enforce monopolies.

The frontal lobe stops developing pretty consistently around 25

Free Market Forces.

It's in most ppls interest to follow NAP since your reputation is very important and violence is very expensive.

If you're seen as someone who is willing to break NAP few ppl will do business with you and if you're a threat many smaller forces will probably band together and kill you.

>weakened any one actor from gaining enough strength
Boy it sure is a good thing that companies don't merge ever, or that would be a really retarded idea.

there is no such thing as anarcho capitalism
there is just capitalism
youtube yaron brook

Here

>yaron

...

A reason was already provided, reading comprehension isn't your strongest trait.

Then there's going to be a very strong incentive for other companies to break with the cartell. Have you even read basic game theory?

They don't Merge in the current environment a stronger company uses government maneuvering to buy up less represented companies.

But no country has the age of consent that high - so at what stage of development is consent possible, and how do you know an individual is at that stage?

That image is easily reverse image searched. I made it so simple for you.

Youjo senki

Posting in a shill/influence agent thread.

Pretty good bait this time, but your head is still on fire, motherfucker.

How about the incentive of not being wiped out?

I'm not seeing a counterpoint here.

Thanks fampai

What?

If you're too weak to defend yourself you're too weak to defend yourself... I don't understand what you mean.

I wasn't making a counterpoint, I was invalidating your point by showing you that your point was a false dilemma.

watch teh vids, hes one of the good jooz

when the post your making fun of blows you the fuck out lol
you low iq moron

Exactly. Sooner or later you end up with a top dog, that's how we got kings. Sure there'll be barons too, but they bend the knee.

You were being a retard, see above.

capitalism is the only moral system

depressions and crony are from socialist controls

individual rights, property, and low low government spending are they keys

Become mutualists. Free market anti-capitalism is a thing and pre-dates ancap by a century.