Communism general

Hello Comrades. This general is for the discussion of Marxism-Leninism, the ideology of revolutionary socialism and communism.

Communism is the next stage of humanity following the capitalist stage.

What exactly is communism according to Marxist-Leninists:

>Communism is a stage of society in which the productive infrastructure is socially owned, and goods are produced not in order to sell for profit, but in order to meet a social need.
>Communism in it's full form is a stateless, classless society that follows the maxim "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need."
>To achieve such a society Marxism-Leninism teaches us that we must replace the capitalist state, which is controlled by the capitalist class, by a socialist state, which is controlled by the working class. Then, a period of class struggle follows in which the capitalist class is liquidated by the working class. When the capitalist class has been completely vanquished, there will be only one class, the working class, and eventually the functions of the state will become indistinguishable from the functions of the society as a whole, and the state as such will 'wither away' as Marx said.
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/

ML uses a philosophy called dialectical materialism, see here:
marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1938/09.htm

It is recommended that you read some of the critical works of Marxism-Leninism so you can make an informed assessment of the ideology.

Resources:
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/sw/
marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/sw/
marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/decades-index.htm
marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1884/origin-family/
marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1914/mar/11.htm

Other urls found in this thread:

gommies.gom/fug/
gommies.gom/starve/
gommies.gom/ohfugme/
gommies.gom/ohshid/
gommies.gom/1984/
gommies.gom/guck/
gommies.gom/probaganda/
gommies.gom/XDDDD/
gommies.gom/wheresfood/
gommies.gom/benis/
heritage.org/international-economies/report/guide-understanding-international-comparisons-economic-mobility
facebook.
youtu.be/CmOUDMAtRt4
youtube.com/watch?v=UnIuhRt3D-E
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

heil Stalin

Slava comrade Stalin.

...

Communism is created by Jews to enslave gentiles. So you as a person who's seduced by the dandy outlook of communism, are basically less valuable than a whore riddled with AIDS in a back alley of Vladivostok

Kys

...

...

...

...

>make commie thread every day
>people bombard with anti-commie facts
>number of anti-commies on Sup Forums increase
>number of commies decrease to 6 recognizable people
Are these commies actually controlled opposition here to help us?

...

>there's a 70% chance of rich families losing wealth by 2nd generation
>90% chance of them losing it by the 3rd

How is stealing peoples labour right? What incentivizes individuals to work and progress?

ur rong. wrong.rong. leftypol is growing. started out with two people now there are 10 that post in this thread

Why do you prefer communism to anti-capitalist nationalism?

Hello gomrades! XDDDD Dis general is for disgussion of margsism-lebonnism, da ideology of revolutionary socialism and gommunism.

Gommunism is da next stage of guckery following real society.

Wat exagtly is gommunism according to gommies:

>Gommunism is a stage of guckery in which the produgtive infrustrugture runs away from gommie country, and no goods are produced and beeple starve. XDDDD
>Gommunism in full form is obressive, statist society dat follows maxim "gib gib gib!" :DDDD
>To achieve gommunism we must replace broduction with murderous obressive rulers liek me, fug working glass beeple. XDDDD Struggle while I liquidate you all lol. When capitalists run away we win and I kill you all. Eventually the functions of state cease and state becomes murderous and indistinguishable from other gommies. Da state withers away liek da people.
gommies.gom/fug/
gommies.gom/starve/

GL uses philosphy of gib and starve, see here:
gommies.gom/ohfugme/

It is recommend you kill yourself so you can avoid starving.

Resources:
gommies.gom/ohshid/
gommies.gom/1984/
gommies.gom/guck/
gommies.gom/probaganda/
gommies.gom/XDDDD/
gommies.gom/wheresfood/
gommies.gom/benis/

_________________________________


Da sdages of gommunism.

>Sdage one
Bourgers aren't allowed to vode :DDD but otherwise da system is digtadorshib of gommies. Everything is stole by digtadors and digtadors rule all.

>Sdade two
Withering
All beeple who aren't digtador glass starve. XDDD Once glass disabears and we steal everything more beeple wither away. Bolice begome unnecessary as beeple are dead lol :DDDDD Central blanning begomes unnecessary begause sgarcity caused starving. Money is all ours.

>Sdage three
Gommunism.
No beeple. No food. My money. Much benis.

[Citation needed]
also ur wrong heritage.org/international-economies/report/guide-understanding-international-comparisons-economic-mobility

...

SAGE

Reminder:
The original "porky" propaganda caption was:
>whenever you skip work you are doing what the bourgeois wants, but when you work really hard, you scare the bourgeois
It is exactly what Yuri Bezmenov said, after the rebellious wave of people, commies have to convert all those idiotic and senseless troublemakers into conformistic workers.

"Thank you for helping the great revolution come about comrade, now, you know what really makes porky really scared? It is if you shut up and just work really hard."

...

>tfw wagecucks defend wealth inequalty

>is a Communist
>uses Heritage Foundation as a source

as always, thank you spurdo

>stealing
>labour
>a fucking leaf

wtfuggg, I gezz im a gommie nao :DDDDD

the original pepe was made by a leftist on tumblr. things change faggot :^)

Exactly who's fault is it that your family ended up dumber than Chinese immigrants, who managed to go from railroad workers to doctors and respected professionals here?

...

It was not though inbred hick.

Lefty politically incorrect is an oxymoron, every politically correct view is leftist at the moment

I'm pretty sure it actually started with dozens of people, now there's the spanish autismo, one guy from neatherlands, two from US, and every now and then some new random newfag that shows up confidently thinking he'll explain commie economics and eventually getting BTFO and then never showing up again.

>has no counterargument so nitpicks about the source
BTFO

>tfw commies are just wagecucks jealous at not being business owners or self employed

"Innocents" is a funny way to spell filthy commie

Not everyone is cucked in Canada

...

I don't get it, if these cocks want to discuss this cuckery why don't they piss off to actual /leftypol/? They can discuss gommie starvation and genocide to their shrivelled hearts content

good work wagecuck. you tell him

...

facebook.
com/HoppeanSnakeMemes/?fref=ts

Look at this faggot piece of capitalist propaganda.
Who the fuck shills crap like "Ancap" on the youth?

A mere try to dilute and destroy the society and every fabric inside, pushing individualism to prevent any kind of organized protest against workers opression.
Removing the state to prevent companies and markets from restrictions, minimum wages and workers safety from being enforced.
I can´t believe how dumb and blind people are to this filthy subversion.
Ancaps seriously should do force labor in a good ol´ Gulag, showing them what their "utopia" leads to.

>has no counterargument so nitpicks about the source

Nope, I'm just commenting on how amusing it is. Next you'll start citing Cato Institute and Stormfront.

...

MUERETE HIJO DE LA GRAN PUTA

Why did Communist countries need to build walls to keep their people from running away?

Czech em

he will tell you that it wasn't true communism. It's pointless: people older than 18 and who are still communist are braindead

In all seriousness though, this is why you go to college. So you don't end up protesting as an unemployed rioter, but instead get a comfy job as an engineer or business owner.

Stay in school kids.

Reminder:
Communism has already been economically debunked. It is not "good on paper" as idiots keep saying.
>youtu.be/CmOUDMAtRt4

Yeah Hoppes great, isn't he?

I second this notion. Grande

roll

>43pbp

What about cars in the soviet union

He´s a cuck for the ultimate victory of the high finance over anyone who isn´t part of the 1%.
And propably a Kulak as well.

So can anybody in these threads actually explain why it is in my interest to split my wealth with assholes I never met? And let my wealth get diverted to junkies, losers, NEETs and people with simply fucked up genes?

>there isn't a 70% chance to lose wealth, it's only 60%

you know you have to do work to count as a worker right? This is a NEET board.

Either you split your wealth with assoles and someone who might need it right now, or you split your workforce to feed your fat, capitalist boss and the rest for your own merit.
Since your wealth is the product of your workforce, what´s the difference for you?
I better would have my wealth invested in our society instead of the third vacation house of my boss.

Your chart proves my point.

If you think commies are actually capable of explaining what they believe in, you are very mistaken. Not even commie university professors can even begin to do so: All they can do is bitch about a very vague boogeyman they call "capitalism". See >police peperspraying protesters? Capitalism.
>US government intervening in Iraq (while even the Koch brothers lobbied against)? Capitalism.
>US government does a trillionaire bailout while much of the top 1% in the free market argued against it? Capitalism.
Their whole ideology relies on having no real definition for capitalism. Just attribute everything you think it's bad to the word capitalism, and after you do that, you come up with the glorious solution: end capitalism. All problems will be magically solved if you just kill that boogeyman.

As you can see, they program themselves to be delusional.

>or you split your workforce to feed your fat, capitalist boss and the rest for your own merit.

The capitalists get a cut of the profit because they supply the land and capital. The workers just supply the labor. There is no "surplus value" that is being stolen.

>gommunism

>what is self employment
>what is investing and using your money to accumulate more welath

Even a wagecuck can become middle class/upper middle class if they are smart. Literally the only thing that keeps poor people poor in the western world is laziness, being born in an absolute clusterfuck like a ghetto or having shit genes and intelligence. The latter is not my fault and I don't see why I should pay for it.

If poor people would learn how to do household economics and manage their funds they could easily rise higher and aquire more wealth, but they instead are low intelligence giant households who eat fried shit all day and do nothing for their future.

I would rather use my wealth to fund things I actually want. Things that will have sustainability, and divert my wealth to people on my own terms and free will who I know wont use it to fuck shit up.

>McDonald's CEO makes 8 million
>420 000 McDonald's employers

>8 000 000/ 420 000
>McDonald's CEO, exploits from the workers a whopping 19 bucks per year.
>that's actually one of the worst CEO to worker gap and people use it to bitch about capitalism all the time

Wait, it gets better

>Federal government will take at least 10% in taxes from the worker
>being horribly pessimistic and assuming a McDonald's worker only makes 10k a year
>governments takes 1 000 from him.
>let's be horribly generous and assume 80% of this money is very well kept and spent
>government workers will still be taking 10 times more than a CEO

So, going with the idiotic commie idea that the management of a CEO produces zero wealth, the amount they take from the worker in a free economy is negligible.

Tell me again how capitalism is oppressing you. A tiny flaw a commie collectivist economic system would wipe out 100 times more from workers than any free enterprise that respects individual rights in history.

Of course not. If the land and capital is communized though, the worker loses his dependency from the capitalist and his possible oppression.
I´m not a real communist, just hating on Ancap because it´s a way to install economic dictatorship by removing everything that prevents companies from installing it, like organized resistance.

Implying you would have a choice. You would be sent to camps with other undesirables.
>communism just works goy

>gommunists

>gommunismus

you guys always fall for the bait don't you. ITS THE SAME FUCKING SPANISH GUY OVER AND OVER, DONT RESPOND

>Of course not. If the land and capital is communized though, the worker loses his dependency from the capitalist and his possible oppression.

There is nothing stopping workers from doing this now. They can pool their money and buy land/capital goods if they want to. The reason why it isn't done is because it's also a really inefficient system beyond the small scale.

>cuckmunism

>Implying building the vacation houses doesn't help hundreds of laborers, electricians, plumbers, etc
>Implying the leaders of your socialist utopia wouldn't cut themselves a fat paycheck anyways

>cuckmunist

I've seen anarchist, communist, Bolshevik groups in Facebook. If anyone makes a neosoc group on fb it would get shut down. It is not politically incorrect in society to be a commie. Wear the workers symbol in public vs the swastika and you will get no condemnation from wearing the workers party symbol

>The reason why it isn't done is because it's also a really inefficient system beyond the small scale.

That´s why Ancap is anarchist, breaking the scale down to a reasonable size by removing the state and filling the void with company-controlled influence areas.
(Kentucky Fried Caliphate™)

Physical removal, the only solution for gommies

...

Reminder:
The real class struggle is not between entrepreneurs and wage earners, it is between free individuals and tax benefactors
>youtube.com/watch?v=UnIuhRt3D-E

roll

Roll

How naive are you? Capitalists don't make goods out of thin air, they need to buy them. They do not sit on piles of cash, they reinvest it. I would never allow the government to spend my money, I'd rather spend it myself. The real question is how to make the poor earn more.

Spain user, the only thing you deserve is to live in is Communism. Its not something I'd wish upon others.

Die in a hole in Moldova, you fucking retard.

why comrades aint celebrating the death of Rockefeller?

This is what passes me off no fkn end.

Six years of fighting and defeating nazi Germany vs 70+ years of commie hot wars, cold wars, proxy wars, starvation, genocide, and threat of nuclear annihilation. I'm no natsoc, but if I wore swastika gear I'd get shit, but kids can buy a fucking che t-shirt at topshop....

>2017
>not being in the extreme left
>not being to smart for economical spooks

Oh look is the same fucking retarded from Spain posting again his pathetic copy n paste text

So just have communism with a free market.

What's the problem here?

>So just have communism with a free market.
>What's the problem here?

>when your library of pre-written copy-paste "arguments" is no longer relevant so you collapse into spastic fits
Yes, demonstrate your mastery of communist theory to me and explain exactly how a free market is incompatible with communism.

It's almost as if the ideal of communism is emancipating the workers and the ideal of nazism is fucking genocide.

I wonder why people react differently...

>ideal of nazism is fucking genocide.
I refer you to the image in
300M+ deaths and counting. How many does there need to be? Funny, you want to here real anticommunism, talk to someone who lived under it...

...

...

Firstly
>usual inflated numbers
Secondly, the facts don't really matter. You asked why people perceive things a certain way. I answered. No shit you disagree, you clearly don't perceive them the same way.

What's your point?

If you want to know why the average person thinks communism is edgy and nazism is evil try asking them instead of soliciting guesswork on a nipponese child exploitation radio broadcast.

Oh it was demonised - try wearing a hammer and sickle in 50/60s Britain or the US, see what happened to you. But nazism didn't have a power structure any more to subvert western education etc, communism did. I suggest you read up on how much they spent on this. Scandal at one of my old unis a few years ago after the wall came down, and records were available, turned out a few profs were on the stasi payroll. Read about the long March through the institutions etc