Whats wrong with Anarcho Capitalism?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-39311336
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

nothing

Stripping people of governance is throwing them to the wolves. In no time you'll have warlords like the Middle East has.

humanitarian concerns like sweatshops

Unrealistic but at least they aren't complete retards like every other flavor of anarchism.

>white people are like sandniggers

...

White people became great because we come from a religious and cultural history of recognizing the evils of human nature and the necessity of self government and personal responsibility to keep them in check. Don't throw it away out of senseless pride.

Also, you're not white.

le 56% face

It's an ideology that never should have happened, the frankenstein abomination of left wing anarchism combined with the Old Right put together by (((Rothbard))). It pushed the Right in the exact opposite direction it should have been going to fight the bourgeois liberal menace and globalist capitalism, instead injecting it with a turboautism vaccine that it didn't recover from until recently.

Coming from a 0%

>Whats wrong with Anarcho Capitalism?
it's not NatSoc

remember when Spain was relevant?

Poor thing, my condolences

the NAP is a bad meme

autism.

This man knows.

Neither do I.

Other than Anarchism being an impossible form of government as we would have no borders and people would freely invade there would be no rules saying you cant form your own society and take over the country and impose your own rules.

Man needs coercitive institutions, read Heidegger's commentary of Antigone and Gehlen's theory of institutions
Even outside anthropological and philosophical matters ancap is a meme in today's world, there is just not way you are going to survive against organized states that could invade your ass in no time while your people are bickering about the creation of a temporary tax for fighting the invader off

Communists can't compete

Anarcho-capitalism is just as autistic as Communism. Also Communist governments have lasted longer then Anarcho-Capitalist ones have.

>Anarcho-Capitalist
>Government
What did he mean by this?

Meant to say countries, my bad.

>le white people meme

...

You mean societies

Yeah, my english ins't working today.

...

...

...

Nothing wrong with ancaps at all actually. The only people who would get so flustered about the ideology are actual statists. People who want to be left alone and don't bother others are not an obstacle except for those who wish to make said people do what they want them to.

You're trading a government for a corporate government

>except for those who wish to make said people do what they want them to.
Like big business?

Could only work if everybody was totally self governed and worked off set of really great values.

It is 100% better than communism though. Like you could actually grow as a society there would just be a lot of tragedy sometimes.

It's hard for retards to understand it, and it's hard for the weak minded to accept it (they either want SJWs or Hitler 2.0 telling them what to do because they have no self initiative)

>Could only work if everybody was totally self governed and worked off set of really great values.
If humans were capable of this then why be anarcho-capitalist and not anarcho-syndicalist?

>It is 100% better than communism though. Like you could actually grow as a society there would just be a lot of tragedy sometimes.
It'll start better than communism but will end a lot worse when their stock market routinely crashes (which is natural in capitalism) and you have no way to yourself out of the depression it creates.

>It's hard for retards to understand it, and it's hard for the weak minded to accept it (they either want SJWs or Hitler 2.0 telling them what to do because they have no self initiative)
Retards understand it perfectly because they are the only ones who are willing to support it.

What do you care if other people are ancap, anyway? Are you a fucking commie?

>What do you care if other people are ancap, anyway? Are you a fucking commie?
I don't. Not a communist but I feel AnCaps are just as bad as communists. OP asked a question and I am answering it. I'm sorry, that your echo chamber is broken and isn't echoing back properly.

>I don't
>6 posts by this ID
>numbered pictures of some whore for maximum attention grabbing.

Get gassed.

nothing

Tread on my democratic republic and I'll shove a nuke up your ass.

People only support ancap because they think they would be the ones that would rise to the top because everyone is stupid except them

How quickly they would change their tune if they were a poorfag under ancap though

Nothing. It's how we will return to city states in the modern age.

Stop, read the rules.

>without government businesses would kill their customers

that's the level of general retardation we have to deal with on the internet

The only wrong thing about AncapTM is that is not happening fast enough.

Based Belgian there should always be a spot for people like you in the reich as honorary Aryan

implying I'm not at the top already and just don't want to pay taxes

You really overestimate your inteligence

>missle

It's about as stable as a one wing plane without fly by wire.

This is fine as long as it's all voluntary

>US
>Democracy
holy fuck my sides

You can't promote capitalism when property and contract law are not properly enforced.

Productivity will not be efficient where torts and labour law are not respected.

Anarcho Capitalism naively assumes laws and governance of a non Anarcho Capitalist system will perpetuate when they remove all the discincentives and incentives of compliance to the previous system.

Technically, our society is voluntary. If you don't like it, you can fucking leave.

SAGE

SLIDE THREAD

>Whats wrong with Anarcho Capitalism?
It quickly transforms to feudalism.

bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-39311336
>without government businesses would kill their customers
It is crazy, not?

>implying that's a bad thing
City state best state

Federal republic

Yeah, I wonder where they went?

This. Communism and Anarcho-Capitalism are just two separate ways of gaining power, one through the state and the other through big business. They both end with a select few individuals controlling the lion's share of the resources while the rest of the populace fights over scraps.

See Somali.

Thanks for looking after me dude, a true bro.

I didn't say anything about killing customers.

Except it has happen quite a few times and has failed each time.

A betting man would assume that you're not.

This.

It is. As much as I dislike Trump he is proof.

This. Also with no checks and balances on existential costs, shit gets ugly quick.

Getting people to cooperate will be kinda hard. Everything will dissolve into factions dominating with violence.

there is no such thing as anarcho capitalism

there is capitalism

cronyism is a feature of statism
lower gov spending near 0
enforce property
all win win transactions
and endless boom
gr8 dep and 08 from gov control

this

Crushed under the power of larger states.
With the advent of the internet, a loosely governed collection of confederate states that could hold a defense pact are now possible. How fast information travels is a huge limitation on what we can do as fare as government is concerned.
The internet changed everything. It will even change the way our governments function.

>See Somali.
Example discarded. Niggers cannot into ANY functioning society.

What are existential costs?

>Example discarded. Niggers cannot into ANY functioning society.
It's the only current functioning Anarcho-Capitalist society, thinking yours will turn out any better is just plain retarded.

It's based on everyone accepting everyone else's personal liberties, which just doesn't happen. It's about as plausible as voluntary taxes or complete socialism.

>I'm sure the fact that this society being comprised of hyper-aggressive and violent individuals that have never once in history been able to run a functioning society has nothing to do with the fact that their society does not function
Sounds like someone needs to eat his redpills.

wrong, you can't leave to elsewhere without society permission and offing yourself is not allowed.

Nothing.

>Implying American society isn't compromised of hyper-aggressive and violent individuals who only haven't completely murdered each other because our ancestors where smart enough to create a state to police us.
wew lad

Oh we got a fresh one here.

BEEEP BEEP OPEN UP FOR THE REDPILLS!

...

The very name is a contradiction. You can't mix anarchism and capitalism because capitalism requires a government to function.

CHOO CHOO
HERE COMES THE TRAIN

Never once did I say that Africans weren't violent. I was just pointing out that it has nothing to do with skin color so much as living in countries that have never had a centralized government. You remove the government completely here and that white statistic is going to go through the roof. It might even be higher because whites have a tendency for being more efficient.

>Example discarded

"You see, my particular brand of communism has never been tried" comes to mind..

These two don't even have sources.

Not a single one of those articles is a scientifically respected or verifiable work.

Democracy fails in Africa too. Does that mean democracy is bad?

If you really are so naive that you believe skin color is the only thing that is different between races then I can't help you.

Is the FBI good enough of a source for you then?

>wants liberty
>but only the liberty you find acceptable

you can't have your cake and eat it to. muh degeneracy isn't a valid excuse to ban things in a libertarian society.

Except that, you know, as opposed to communism and anarcho-capitalism demochracy has actually worked somewhere else.

It's retarded and you would get invaded by guatemala under 2 days of Anarchy ?

Real capitalism has neva ben dun befour

No seriously though, no form of government works in Africa. It's a poor medium to compare to.

Somalia is a good example of Anarcho capitalism, why don't you move there and live the dream, no big government to hold you down, no taxes, no regulations.

Sure it did, but just like your household doesn't work out quite as well when you leave it in charge of your 8 year old kids, South Africa goes to shit the second whitey gets kicked out.

anarcho-anything is fucking retarded.

But niggers.

That's exactly my point. They are literally two legged animals with the minds of children.

"fbi and us census" is not even a proper citation

Anarcho-Capitalism is the ability to buy recreational nukes with the profits you made by selling crack to 5 years old hookers with no governmental involved

The minds of children happens to be the perfect sort of minds required to live in an Anarcho-capitalist system, as it is childishly simplistic and incredibly naíve. One would thing Somalia would be the perfect place to try it out.

Information speed is not the problem, see how hard greek city states leagues got btfo
Confederation is shit tier against outside threat

>Not a single one of those articles is a scientifically respected or verifiable work.
The numbers are right they're just deeply taken out of context so he can try to push his bullshit propaganda narrative.

>If you really are so naive that you believe skin color is the only thing that is different between races then I can't help you.
I said the exact opposite, you're the one implying it just skin color.

This.

Any form of Anarchy is retarded when you live in a democratic society.

Constant colonization from different forms of government sure the fuck hasn't helped.

>That's exactly my point. They are literally two legged animals with the minds of children.
They're still humans and are adaptable and capable. They just have to find someway to unify.

This. Sup Forumstards who support an AnCap society are literal niggers.

This.

...

see
Only a naive and sheltered eurofag with zero real life experience with others outside his race would make this argument.
Please come and live in Detroit. You would love it. Race is only skin deep bro.

Information speed is a factor. City states in greece required runners to send info to others.
It's all about battlefield awareness and having your troops and equipment in the places it needs to be in time. With drones, and instantaneous communication we can start experimenting with alternative government types.

>hurr ur dum and africa is dum lololol
dam man I'm really going to rethink my whole argument