Basic Income™ is implemented

>Basic Incomeā„¢ is implemented
>infinite free universal healthcare is implemented
>quit my job, sit back, and fuckin' COAST

Who else here /readyforuptopia/?

Fuck those rich CEOs, they didn't even earn their money. It's our turn.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0Z760XNy4VM&t=1s
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Ready to quit my job too. Gonna set up my paid for house in a trustfund to be leased to me for property tax and to keep me withn indigent status for irs reasons.

COAST

>5 years of utopia
>suddenly serious inflation
>economy collapses
>there's no-one to fix it because everyone is unemployed
>companies don't hire anyone because the taxing is too much for the expenses
>mass starvation for the next 30 years until new Hitler is born to fix the nation

youtube.com/watch?v=0Z760XNy4VM&t=1s

see human race end clap clap

Easily fixed by printing more NEET BUX

naw, all without purpose will eventually be eleminated. universal income is right before the end of everything, you fucking idiot

That causes more inflation.

No.

>implying CEOs didn't earn that money
what did he mean by this

LOL

>keep the statu quo to maintain economy in good shape
>hedonism & greedy capitalists continue to ruin everything
>world is kill
>no more nations to fix

b a s e d NOAH SMITH is on the right track

if we can implement these 3 things we'll be three steps closer to Commu- I mean, utopia.

Go back to /leftypol/

Basic income is literally Orwellian. You'll be scrounging for rats like a Venezuelan because your monthly stipend isn't enough to buy food. All the while, party members drink champagne out of crystal glasses while laughing at your suffering.

Fucking checked

life would be mad boring without working

naw dawg, think of all the free time we'll have to paint and write poetry and study math? It'll be hella awesome.

Nice pipe dream, Bernout.

Never gonna happen. You're going to die in the streets fighting over the last scraps of what's left before UBI becomes reality.

It already failed in test in Europe, you're fucking retarded and need to die if you think it'd ever work here.

Please, just kill yourself.

Video title: How to deadlift
Duration: 2 hours

"...nowadays people aren't enjoying their lives..."

hell yea son sheit these dumb ass white niggas stay suckin karl marx's dicc od & shyt

REMINDER: The whole wageslave/wagecuck maymay is a psyop to get people to support left-wing economic policies. DON'T FALL FOR IT, DO THROW COMMIES OUT OF HELICOPTERS.

As long as food is still produced and homelessness is prevented, this wont happen.
>Implying global NEET BUX income and prices cant be continuously adjusted.
>in b4 price fixing bad
>job guarantee
I'll be an online memer and vidya reviewer.

The way of every communist revolution. But wait, we haven't tried real communism yet. It just works. My Prof told me so.

Switch party members with democrats and their friends in Hollywood and you have it dead on.

Yeah, i'll be a party member, scholar, or historian or something if i have to. Im far to valuable as a intellectual to work the fields, plus robots will do that part now.

t. NSA

>Not getting your own ship and robots to transport goods, mine, and explore/colonize our neighbor planets.
>Not learning how to maintain all of this while forever staying at the wild west edge of civilization, free from ever-encroaching totalitarianism.
>Not getting a strong-ai, robot waifu with functioning reproductive organs.

Basic income could be implemented easily. Every single faggot in this thread left out the key piece: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, SEX BOTS, AUTOMATION.

Food is grown, harvested, and delivered for free.

Shelter is built and repaired for free by androids.

Internet is free. Solar energy powers the grid. Robot Bros maintain and repair.


Btw, OP is a massive shariablue shill.

Basic income (or a world without money or unnecessary and unwanted labor) is completely feasible

So many wagecuck jobs are completely worthless. We need NEETs and wagecucks to go to make campuses out of suburbia and cities and learn to program n shiet.

We need Mincome for that. It also has the benefit of streaming gibs

worldwide mincome, why is an illiterate african family that produces nothing not equal to an american neet that produces nothing?

Hey, it's what lazy unearned inherited wealth clusterfucks do anyway.

>Basic income (or a world without money or unnecessary and unwanted labor) is completely feasible

Only one slight stumbling block.

When the rich don't need labour, what makes you think they'll want or need you?

All this UBI shit is just under the assumption they won't just get rid of you. Meanwhile we're seeing them prepare for a showdown by flooding our countries with internal splits and religious and ethnic war in preparation for the big crunch. We'll be too busy infighting to notice who's responsible.

All that shit you've been reading for years about the better earth ruled by a small elite is real. They were working out how to sustain their lifestyles in that future. We're almost there.

"Maintain earth's population under 500 000 000 people."

Gotta get rid of that excess.

What makes you think some African mudhut dweller needs you? He can hunt.

What are richfags going to do with money when people get feed, housed, and internet entertainment for free?

If the monetary construct continues to exist, it will be the most grotesque conceptual abstraction utilized by human beings that should have been phased out hundreds of years ago. Well before the industrial revolution.

All that you mention could make utopia, but who is in that utopia heavily influence whether or not it stays utopia.

Things could be better if most of us could chose our own work, most people want to work, help people, but the system could crash if people use welfare to have fifteen kids they don't care for, or to fund jihad.

If Basic Income is implement now, I would use my time to help seniors who live alone in my neighbourhood, tutor kids, help their parents with chores.

The way things are structure now, caregivers for the elderly get burnt out because they are overworked. It's better for a single senior to have 2 to 3 caregivers who work part-time, but it's not economically sound under current structure. Caregivers are trained, overworked, and then they quit in spite of the money.

It would be better for a caregiver to only work part-time but stay working for seniors,ideally the same senior, for a longer period of time.

I wouldn't burnout working with a senior who is lowly getting worse then dies, because it would only be part-time, and if they were at their own home is way less depressing than listening to them talking about suicide in the nursing home. At the same time, I would be tutoring kids and watching them grow over the years.

The only job where one can care for seniors and kids is being a nanny - but that a nanny has little control over which ours and which family she works for, and she is sometimes abused. At the same time, there are abusive nannies, maybe she's stress, but some NEVER want to care for seniors and children in the first place, but did so, For The Money, it's better that these sort be given what they need to stay out of everybody's way, then to have the incentive of money have them in positions of essential work that they screw up.

Firing someone should be easier. There should be no more Too Big To Fail where the loss of livihood must be considered.

We can have more small businesses, artisanal food items, craft.

It won't happen in our lifetime
AI is at least 50 years ago and the entire system has to be overturned so that'll take another 50 years

stop posting

>basic income implemented
>economic production declines as people drop out of they workforce
>inefficiency begins to increase
>cost of living getting more expensive
>quality of life down across the board

Socialists lose again

>What makes you think some African mudhut dweller needs you? He can hunt.

Actual subsistence lifestyle is almost gone, even in Africa. Even small tribes have trouble retaining the old ways. If you could survive like this sure, you're not in the crosshairs.

>What are richfags going to do with money when people get feed, housed, and internet entertainment for free?

Money is pointless. There are too many people on the planet, it's an ecological disaster. Better to rule a planet without the wasted resources of billions of unproductive NEETs who still consume resources and pollute even if they're all law abiding and on their VR porn terminals all day.

>If the monetary construct continues to exist, it will be the most grotesque conceptual abstraction

Money and power are two faces of the same thing. It never goes away. You can take away currency but ownership would still remain. You will never be able to create a flat "non-monetary" system.

>keep the statu quo to maintain economy in good shape

if you actually think the economy is in "good shape" rn you are a complete moron.

>hedonism & greedy capitalists continue to ruin everything

more like you're getting screwed by satanic central banks in their debt war credit ponzi scheme blood money bruh

then hedonists, neets, nit wits and all manner of degeneracy are subdued by the byproducts of a fossil fuel based energy system that they use to (((control))) us.

tesla's science could solve this problem if genuises like yourself would hit up the laboratory and stop dicking off to depressing tarsands pics and actually grow a pair and fight the system.

>world is kill
get keked you commie

>no more nations to fix
fuck you, MAGA

I think the existence of volunteering meant that people want to help people. Nowadays, kids need volunteering to pad resumes, but volunteering predated that.

People also hold doors for each other, help mothers with carriages up and down steps, help old people with groceries to their cars. People like helping people. I feel good when I help people.

So work would still be done, but now it can be more useful work. David Wong at Cracked on the future say, it's important for people to produce something useful that others could use or enjoy, even if it doesn't necessary turn a profit.

Heck, some profiteering activity contribute nothing and needs to be banned, and is outlawed in some country: I'm talking about planned obsoletence.

As a Canuck, I would pick Basic Income as we already have National Hospital Care. Drugs aren't covered and neither are vision and dental, but the very poor often qualify for it - it's a matter of application (then the middle class crunch, that have to be fixed so that someone isn't 'too rich' to be availed aid when they were made poorer than the poorest without it).

I say National Healthcare is important, because Americans actually spend more on healthcare than Canadians do, that disappear into the blackhole that is insurance industry profit. Without healthcare, a lot of money has to be tied up in emergency funds.

...and right now, America has the same problem as Canada when it comes to the Middle-Class-Crunch. Section 8 qualifiers get free healthcare don't they? So it's just the middle-class that goes bankrupt without universal healthcare, forced to chose which finger to save.

>As long as food is still produced and homelessness is prevented, this wont happen.
There was never a lack of food or homelessness on the rat utopia, you stupid cunt.

>Gotta get rid of that excess
So nuke Africa, The Middle East, and India?
Lets do it