tomshardware.com/news/senate-allows-isps-sell-data,33968.html >Monitor and sell all your location data, search history, app usage, and browsing habits to advertisers without your permission >Hijack your search results, redirecting your traffic to paying third parties >Insert ads into web pages that would otherwise not have them
>republicans selling the common man out wow how could I not see this one coming
Daniel Fisher
good thing i have adblock
Isaiah Harris
Why are Republicans so evil?
Like seriously it goes beyond just simply having a different outlook they're fucking cartoonishly evil
Nicholas Sanchez
Reminder that trump still has to sign it
Cameron Long
You don't trust (((X))) company with your data so you pay (((Y))) to have your data? How many parties do you want involved because one seems safer than two (or more). All these futile efforts and your device was likely compromised before it left the assembly line.
Landon Scott
All politicians are evil, never forget it
Jonathan Phillips
>The (((((((((((((((establishment))))))))))))))) cucks sold out the US citizens I'm shocked.
Carson Nelson
>Americans gone full cuck mode while discussing CIA They bend you over, raped you and came back for more, now doing it legally.
Bentley Evans
Reminder this just makes it easier for people with money to push an agenda. They will essentially buy out all competition through pushing them off search results.
You're better off contacting your House representative and telling them to fuck the bill over
Henry Johnson
>trump selling the common man out wow how could I not see this one coming
Adrian Morris
don't worry he will
Wyatt Cook
this
Owen Morales
im confused how republicans are getting blamed for the previous eight years. nah, im not really confused
Andrew Diaz
I'm glad CNN was covering the fake news about russia instead of focusing on things people care about, like this.
Sebastian Cook
check 'em faggots.
Leo Sanders
TRUMP LOTS OF AMERICANS WILL THINK YOU ARE A COOL GUY IF YOU STOP THIS!
Brandon Hill
fine, checked.
>you thirsty devil
Cameron Ward
How is this justified? What benefit is there to trump voters?
Henry Gutierrez
Nigga those kikes have been doing that shit for years already.
Mason Hill
Feds have no business regulating local ISPs
Tyler Diaz
1. It was an FCC rule, not a law passed by Congress. Resolution didn't repeal it. One section was struck because it didn't do anything to actually protect user privacy because of exemptions in rule, it didn't address privacy issues of services like Facebook, Google, Amazon.com, and because it likely violated 1st amendment protection of commercial speech by singling out ISPs while not addressing other communications service providers. 2. It was approved by the FCC 2-1 vote in late October 2016. It was a last minute decision that 3. It was scheduled to go into effect March 2 2017, but had been stayed after the election. The privacy rule has never been in effect. 4. It was an attempted power grab of the FCC over that of the FTC which, up until a ninth court of appeals decision in 2016, had regulatory jurisdiction over broadband data providers. Expect more regulatory reform to reverse the 9th court's ruling and to make it a requirement that any major change to a regulatory agency jurisdiction will need congressional approval first.
Austin Fisher
>The Senate has just voted to kill those protections, before they went into effect.
Still shitty, but not as shitty
Daniel Green
>So it says here you visit the racist neo nazi website Sup Forums
Julian Taylor
Demand for privacy solutions has just increased. A quick question for Sup Forums: Can VPN hide you from ISP?
William Martinez
>so it says here often visit "BLACKED"
Josiah Reyes
>implying that wouldn't get you hired
Ryder Edwards
Before the FCC's 2015 Open Internet Order, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) was the primary regulator of companies' privacy and data security practices. The FTC had the authority to bring enforcement actions against companies who engaged in "unfair and deceptive practices." The 2015 reclassification of broadband providers removed internet service providers (ISPs) from the FTC's jurisdiction. On April 20, 2016, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) proposed a rule applying privacy requirements of the Communications Act to Internet Service Providers (ISPs). However, the proposed rule would not apply to edge providers and web sites, like Facebook and Twitter, since they still fall under the FTC's authority. As you know, Senator Jeff Flake of Arizona introduced S.J. Res. 34 on March 7, 2017. This resolution would repeal the FCC's privacy rules. I do not believe a two-track system in which the FCC regulates ISPs while the FTC monitors the rest of the internet ecosystem is good for consumers. For this reason I cosponsored S.J. Res 34.
Camden Wilson
Yes
Gabriel Hughes
Are you high?
Easton Lee
This should be used as motivation to not look at internet porn.
Piss off the wrong people,and suddenly your internet history from the last 3 months is made public.
Julian Baker
It's more difficult to block shit ISPs send you directly
Aiden Williams
Let's buy some politician's internet history. I've always figured Pence was a trap fan.
Jackson Davis
Do Americans see this warning before using Google?
Joseph Parker
>Pi Hole >firewalls
just block the ad domains
Samuel Stewart
Same reason democrats are evil, if they aren't the spooks release the blackmail info. If the spooks can't blackmail them they never get that much power, e.g. them loudmouth black lady senator/congress always bitching cause they can't affect policy.
Evan Hughes
https would prevent most of that. it's still shitty though.
Colton Richardson
Only Republicans voted for it. The establishment is you.
Nicholas Lopez
What about ISP reading your VPN password?
Connor Flores
Important post!
Pic related - me after getting a VPN.
Lucas Hernandez
I never have
Christian Young
Rand voted for it
Kike schumer voted against it Fienstein voted against it
Sounds like a good bill to me
Chase Rivera
Nobody asking the important question: Why would they sell your data? I mean they made anti-terrorist excuses so far. It looks like somebody wants to conquer the market, to bankrupt you. This what it is all about since forever. The merge fever of everything under Zion ownership.
Sebastian Thompson
>Only Republicans voted for it What's your point? There's plenty on both sides of the political spectrum being controlled by their Jewish puppeteers.
Camden Martin
>that's not how it works
James Sanchez
>laugh at burger for losing privacy >get arrested after M-103 passed
Grayson Thomas
Funny how this isn't nearly as discussed as the typical rumors and lies.
This is really happening. Obama isn't going to prison and pizzagate is fake, but this is really happening and nobody cares
Sebastian Gomez
Why not?
Jordan Diaz
Your thinking of a key logger
Gabriel Cooper
I am think you being in ISP network and they being your administrator.
Andrew Kelly
>this is really happening and nobody cares
I care but can't do shit.
For now it'll be another retarded american idea, but since the networks are global what you decide affects our data too.
And honestly while the EU gives chase sometimes on privacy issues I think in practice there's a backroom deal already in place like with TTIP to sell us out along with you. Not that they don't already do this and just lie about it.
The world is awful. We got to the "everyone is tracked, government can predict your actions, everything is gathered, stored and AI compiles predictive profiles on you" stage willingly. Everyone has a recorder and GPS tracker in their pocket. We give this up freely. The leaks show the NSA routinely scrapes personal information, even unrelated to actual terrorists, just normal people.
Dystopia is here.
Ryder Watson
So trump killed the TPP but is killing net neutrality. Was it worth it?
Brayden Martin
Anglo recently got a spying fever: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investigatory_Powers_Act_2016 >The Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (nicknamed the Snoopers' Charter[1] or Snooper's Charter) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that has been passed by both Houses of Parliament,[2] and the Queen signified In UK basically whole parliament, including the queen agreed to record every click you do online and share it with all kinds of agencies, including some unimportant cop and healthcare businesses. Surprisingly nobody complained.
Ryder Wood
Well its this or Islamophobia laws so make your choice
Charles Russell
Words >This guy's
Kevin Diaz
proxies are against the global rule, faggot
Noah Richardson
No it's not you retard. It's all the same.
Ian Brooks
This is the most real post I've seen today. Actual, ridiculous shit is going down and nobody pays attention, because they're too caught up in tabloid-tier bullshit.