Communism will win

How does it feel that one day your grandchildren will be praising Karl Marx under the worldwide socialist republic?

Other urls found in this thread:

thegreateststorynevertold.tv/portfolio/part-7-stalin/
youtube.com/watch?v=lZj1emEb1-g
youtube.com/watch?v=q6c_dinY3fM
youtube.com/watch?v=pI6a7WySFsU
youtube.com/watch?v=g5rVD_TXrjo
bbc.com/news/magazine-28785420
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Grandchildren? Of a kissless Nazi virgin? They are pretty safe from such a threat.

>dat poster

why are russians so gay?

fuck of shill. sage'd

>How does it feel that one day your grandchildren will be praising Karl Marx under the worldwide socialist republic?
Eastern european have heard this one before, didn't work out the way (((they))) wanted.

The Communism delivered to the people of China and Russia was not what was promised.

You cannot just trust the Party, when it becomes the sole power, it becomes corrupt.
Its human nature. sadly.

thegreateststorynevertold.tv/portfolio/part-7-stalin/

youtube.com/watch?v=lZj1emEb1-g

youtube.com/watch?v=q6c_dinY3fM


"Should the Jew, with the aid of his Marxist creed, triumph over the people of this world, his Crown will be the funeral wreath of mankind, and this planet will once again follow its orbit through ether, without any human life on its surface, as it did millions of years ago" -t Hitler

FUCK OFF COMMIES

>why are russians so gay?
because they are still secretly communists

Different cultures.

To Russians (and europeans in general), Americans are extremely insecure when it comes to nakedness and close interactions.

No English speaking country has ever tried communism. We would do it best, see 1984 for example.

>if everyone is poor, we're all equal

Sorry, I don't thing anyone here has any right to even slightly condemn the Russians of gayness. Definitely not the Eurofags (Poles and Hungarians excluded)

What exactly was promised and what wasn't delivered?

Free people will rather die than bow to your communist oppression.

Feels good :^)

Why would you even want that to happen, OP?
I genuinely don't understand how you could possibly see that as a good thing.
Do you not know anything about history?

Wh-what is that user?

desu id live in a communist world if it was 100 percent white

Literally the only communist countries left are Cuba, China, Venezuela, Vietnam, and North Korea, and most of those nations are moving away from communism.

We are seeing a drift towards socialism though, but that's okay because we're moving towards National Socialism instead.

capitalists shall watch this video and realise that the arguments they once thought supported their ideology are in fact flawed. youtube.com/watch?v=pI6a7WySFsU

thats why you buy free range, user

You seem to conflate state authoritarianism for communism.

Ah, but Karl Marx is buried in London, and we Brits have the NHS, the most cost effective and efficient health service in the world. See wikipedia for proof. Governments in English speaking countries placated revolutionary fervour by making concessions.

Of any of the major ideologies my lowest bet for winning would be communism, pretty much every other ideology hates you, even libertarians have a better chance of taking over then you. Plus you'd get utterly wrecked in a civil war.

If they show those tendencies, I will give them the Pinochet treatment.

You are mistaken in thinking that Fascism and Socialism are at all similar. The definition of Fascism is an undemocratic state that violently crushes worker movements. Socialism, on the other hand, works to provide a democratic state and workplace where workers are well represented and have basic human rights. The push towards far-right movements in recent times is unfortunate, and I would urge those who do hold such beliefs to questions if they are brought to believe in that sort of politics because they live in times of economic insecurity.

>pretty much every other ideology hates you
They're so hated that they managed to get Libertarians and NatSocs to ally against them.


Of course, it doesn't help that their ideology is pro-totalitarianism AND pro-degeneracy, that's never a good combination.

>How does it feel that one day your grandchildren will be praising Karl Marx under the worldwide socialist republic?
> one day your grandchildren will be praising Karl Marx
>grandchildren
>poster of gay lovers and their possibly incest kids.
so are the kids my grandchildren or the older fellows? this poster just seems too off for me

Communism will win, Communism has already won. Capitalism has failed humanity. See video. youtube.com/watch?v=pI6a7WySFsU

...

...

It won't be communism, but it will likely be some form of very advanced technocratic socialism. Mainly because communism which is also known as state capitalism or private capitalism still relies on the market system to work and once artificial intelligence and automation take over it will be very difficult to keep everyone employed.

Both NatSocs and capitalist "Libertarians" believe in dictatorship of the workplace, so it makes sense that they should want to unite against a movement that has the intention of liberating workers. See video. youtube.com/watch?v=pI6a7WySFsU

What are you even talking about? The liberals don't hate us, rather, Marxism and Liberalism is incorporated together.

And those two ideologies dominate the world. Who even cares about lolbertarians or edgy fashy NEETS?

what is up with that picture, it makes no sense

Literally sending Adolf Hitlers quote in an effort to convert a lefty. How can you be this autistic?

Leftist Authoritarians are still leftist. Even capitalists don't distance themselves from when a capitalist authoritarian dictatorship happens.

I could see a sort of totalitarian AI ruled socialist state coming into place. I suppose that would be pretty good, as long as they worked out the kinks in the AI beforehand.

Why are you lefty/pol/ spergs so cringy? Why can't you post something normal?

Pretty much this. Although I wouldn't rely on those who now own all the capital, and do a good job of hiding it away in tax havens, to benevolently give it all up once automation reaches a certain point.

Either that or we nuke ourselves back to the stone age.

I'm ok with it either way desu.

>lefty/pol/
theres your answer

>in an effort to convert a lefty
Convert you? I don't desire to convert you. I've never had a productive conversation with a communist anyhow. I just like laughing at you guys.

Besides, I don't care what Marx thinks socialism is. His ideology has never been relevant to the real world anyways.

Lefty/pol/ is besty Sup Forums - We are the silent majority on this board.

>We are the silent majority on this board
I guess you guys must not participate in the polls too then.

So establishing the rights of workers to demand better conditions is totally irrelevant to the real world, and false claims about eugenics and ethnicity are relevant to the real world? Right. Good one.

no, fascism and libertaianism is. no one here likes lefties, commies or you annoying redditors

>establishing the rights of workers to demand better conditions is totally irrelevant to the real world
Well one thing's for sure, workers rights aren't a big issue in North Korea. I guess I just have trouble respecting an ideology that has failed to even establish itself after so many attempts.

[autism intensifies]

I think you're implying that the America hasn't backed plenty of authoritarian regimes in the past. youtube.com/watch?v=g5rVD_TXrjo

do not reply to communist threads

Well, there must be someone else on Sup Forums who is a lefty, because it isn't me that creates the communism threads.

Sure we have. We've set up plenty of regimes in the name of globalism, but I'd like to see that change.

And what is reddit?

so these two are fags and have inbreed children?

It's happening folks.

So you state north korea as an example of Communism, but deny that America is Capitalist?

No, of course America is capitalist.

Communism is a meme and soon we'll have plenty of helicopters to deal with you.

>liberals get the bullet, too

Yeah, real friendly dipshit.

Jesus you r/leftyfaggots guys aren't even trying.

>silent majority
>literally thousands of responses to the polls show Libertarians and NatSocs are dead 50/50

Yeah keep up the memes, retard.

The Trump presidency has actually driven Libertarians like me and NatSocs like over at /nsg/ into a pretty solid alliance. I'd fight on the same team as those guys.

>The liberals don't hate us, rather, Marxism and Liberalism is incorporated together
>"Scratch a liberal, and a fascist bleeds"

a wonderful place for people like you but sadly it requires a helicopter to get there. Maybe I can help you though, I got a coupon that's good for one ride.

...

goddamn such arguments

Can you idiots stop responding to the lefty/pol/ shills? You are literally trying to argue with 16 year old redditor neckbeards

Because every supporter of a billion strong ideology subscribes to the same ideas.

If you refer to Marx, who founded Marxism, or Lenin, who founded communism, it would be a different story.

Pointing out that there are poor places in the world that are communist is a poor argument. There are many more poor countries that claim to be capitalist. Communism served a few countries quiet well. Remember how it transformed a feudalistic state called russia into a global super power in a few decades, one that beat the US in all but one of the space-age goals. Additionally, Cuba is a beacon for the third world that has superior health-care to you amerifags.

[autism intensifies]

>Because every supporter of a billion strong ideology subscribes to the same ideas.
That's a major problem for you guys. You're super divided, communists vs socialists vs georgists vs mutualists vs anarchists, and yet because you have a globalist ideology the only way to settle your differences is with violence.

Sorry, you must be mistaken, it's Sup Forums not 8ch/pol, you can't tell people what to do here.

Also note how many companies like NIKE exploit child labour in third-world countries. If there were no regulations on companies, a world of ideal capitalism, there would still be children dying in chimneys. Now get fucked you disingenuous racist twat.

I know but I can still make fun of you lolcow neckbeards

USSR reached economic level of russian empire (1913) only in 1930s.

Communism made only harm and wasted russian demographic potential. Just like hitler wasted germans.

>communists purge ~1 million of their own in the Soviet Union for not being commie enough
>communists starve 10 million of their own to death in the Ukraine
>communists starve another 40 million to death in China
>commies kill ~1.5 million in China for not being commie enough
>communists starve another 3.5 million to death in Korea
>communists in Cambodia kill 2 million out of 7 million people via genocide and starvation for not being commie enough
>Soviet crackdowns in Eastern Europe kill half a million (at least) for not being commie enough
>commies kill ~1 million Vietnamese for not being commie enough

Yeah, you really convinced me, I'm gonna go sign up at my local Proletariat Recruitment Center today!

>muh childuns
>"racist" twat

Lefty/pol/ isn't sending their best I bet you are some kind of shitskin/nigger

first off i think u posted the wrong comment. secondly,
>Pointing out that there are poor places in the world that are communist is a poor argument.
its a great argument cuz its never been proven wrong.
>Communism served a few countries quiet well.

all of ur cases will either be cherypicked o bullshit.
>Remember how it transformed a feudalistic state called russia into a global super power in a few decades
ya the state was wealthy, not the people. they wee in breadline and killed for talking out of line.
> Additionally, Cuba is a beacon for the third world that has superior health-care to you amerifags.
just no.

I'd give the second from the left the iron fist of my proletariat.

Something tells me that even if I do see a surgeon in Cuba that is better than one in the US, his shit speckled hands will cause an infection that will kill me anyway.

bbc.com/news/magazine-28785420

Because cherrypicking photos and personalities is a highly productive and intelligent pastime. Well, to each their own I suppose.

>You're super divided, communists vs socialists vs georgists vs mutualists vs anarchists, and yet because you have a globalist ideology the only way to settle your differences is with violence.
Really? The only major conflict was between Cambodia and Vietnam. Otherwise, the relations are pretty amiable since the fall of the Soviet Union. When shit hits the fan, however, even the anarchists will join whoever is fighting rightybois.

moral ethics arent the same as economics retard

Yeah theyll be communist for about 20 years before it collapses again

>The only major conflict was between Cambodia and Vietnam
And the Soviet Union and the Spanish Anarchists.

and Winston Churchill saw over the starvation of over 23 million Indians. Your point is? You're constructing a straw man. My point was not that 'totalitarian regimes have never committed genocide', my argument is 'I don't think we should have child slave labour making our products'.

>Has DAB as ID

Are you really going to compare starving, murdering, enslaving, and purging your own people to colonial bullshit?

Wew lad. Alright, so what you're telling me is you double pinkie promise you won't starve everyone to death this time?

For some reason I don't believe you.

Economics doesn't exist in a political and moral vacuum.

>I don't think we should have child slave labour making our products
Well I think most of us can agree with you on that.

Your numbers are pretty sane, I must say. Merely 2 times inflated and including rather close numbers of the sufferers of famine.

Still, everyone killed quite a lot, and even the most developed countries in the world had devastating famines. Thus, I wonder, whom do you sign up to with such high standards? Narnian Neverlandism of some sort I bet?

And the Vietnamese and Chinese, don't forget another half a million dead due to commie infighting.

because they get fucked in the ass by the government daily

Well then you would agree that the drive for profit by global companies shouldn't come before basic worker's rights - a basic tenet of socialism.

SINK
THE
CHINKS

Dunno man, maybe the side that fed their folks for most of the 20th century. I like that side better.

Oh yeah, and the side that doesn't crack down and kill millions of their own for no particular reason other than "you probably aren't commie enough because your neighbor (who was paid in bread) said so"

Also, the "inflated numbers" is bullshit and you know it, I'm only counting big stuff.

Only if you promise first. :^)

>gay race-mixing poster
>Russia
every single time

Absolutely. Never been a fan of globalism anyways, the needs of the nation come before the freedom of the profiteer.

>Libertarian
>Socialist

The weather is pretty hot cold here

Last I checked we only genocided the natives on purpose, we even fed people during the dust bowl.

Interesting how when people have a stake in the government and economy they don't mysteriously die in a "famine" :^)

What does it says?

do you give worker rights before or after you rape his wife, enslave his kids, and shoot everyone?

Commie scum. Saged