Ok for the last time, did the United States put men on the moon in 1969 or not?

Ok for the last time, did the United States put men on the moon in 1969 or not?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=lNiscigIgBc
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

ya

Rent a telescope capable of examining the lunar surface and verify for yourself.

50%

They put astronauts on the moon. It's rude to assume their gender

No, it was us.

Sure, name one earth-bound telescope that is capable of the necessary resolution.

No Newtonian physics did

Britain wins again

Rule Britannia

Kek. Big white potato.

probably, though conspiracy thoery says otherwise.
we all know it was the finns.

they knew stuff before we did

praise

No. People who believe in this are either blue pilled as fuck or a dumb burger who believes in their country 100%.
The astronauts could not have been able to get past through the Van allen radiation belt, unless their probe was made of thick lead plates.

that's impossible to do

Baltics have some finns in them.

Yes. It was cover for ICBM development by nazis and everyone knew it. The probes were p. cool though.

They did go to the moon though

The last time?
If we tell you will you promise to shut the fuck up from now on?

>for the last time
you wish.

Didn't you hear Joe Rogan 911? We probably did, but we also probably faked footage in case of failure to fool the ruskies

REMEMBER - Fake conspiracies theories like the moon landing hoax are designed to distract you from real conspiracies such as chemtrails and crop circles!

Yes, this is why we are not talking about sending people to Mars.

>muh van allen belts
youtube.com/watch?v=lNiscigIgBc

Then so is ``Ok for the last time''.

yes an Rosewell happened an dead aliens , THEY we allowed Mars But .. No contact since Cos the USA /MILITARY ?????

the only reason we went to the moon is to show the russians look what we can do with our rockets we can just swap out the astronaut for a nuke and drop it right on your door step

Yes, it isn't hard to get to the moon, its just expensive.

And during the space race money was no object. NASA's budget was upwards of 5-6% of the total federal budget back then.

If they had a similar figure today, the budget of NASA would be $200,000,000,000+.

Yeah but we got BTFO by aliens. NASA had to give the public something so they used the Front Screen Projection film technique and called in the best director they found: Stanly Kubrick, who negotiated for absoulte full creative freedom and unlimited budget for the rest of his life.

He redpilled millions, but died for exposing the pedophiles in EWS.

During the broadcast of this historic event on the Canadian network coverage, they were discussing at some point a light which kept appearing while the astronauts were actually on the surface. Then it just seemed to be dropped.

One explanation for the halo's seen around or near some of the Appollo astronauts was that it was gases being vented from their backpacks.

Timothy Good writes that HAM radio operators receiving the VHF signals directly picked up the following message which was screened by NASA from the public.

Mission Control: What's there ? Mission Control calling Apollo 11.
Apollo 11: These babies are huge, sir ... enormous....Oh, God, you wouldn't believe it! I'm telling you there are other space craft out there... lined up on the far side of the crater edge... they're on the moon watching us.

Timothy Good uses "SAGA UFO SPECIAL #3" as a source for this quote.
From the book "Celestial Raise" by Richard Watson, ASSK, 1987, page 147-148;

"During the transmission of the Moon landing of Armstrong and Aldrin, who journeyed to the Moon in an American spaceship, two minutes of silence occurred in which the image and sound were interrupted. NASA insisted that this problem was the result of one of the television cameras which had overheated, thus interfering with the reception.

This unexpected problem surprised even the most qualified of viewers who were unable to explain how in such a costly project, one of the most essential elements could break down... Some time after the historic Moon landing, Christopher Craft, director of the base in Houston, made some surprising comments when he left NASA.

Yes

Retard

Underrated kek

REMEMBER - fake conspiracy theories like the moon landing hoax are designed to distract you from fake conspiracy theories like chemtrails and crop circles which are are designed to distract you from real conspiracies like alien-human hybridization programs and whatever is going on in Antartica

I watched it on TV when it happened as a six year old boy... I sure believed it was real at the time.

I didn't know senior citizens came here.

Dude, it's so fucking easy to land on the moon. You must be a fucking somalian on lsd to not believe it.

Literally point a rocket to the moon and land.

Yes, recording it is easier. You've spent most of your life watching videos. You can't comprehend that people went to the moon.

H.P. Lovecraft wrote stories about aliens and telepathy in the early 20th century. It's not far fetched that humans could walk on some rock in space.

In 500 years we will be able to fly to and from the moon whenever we want.

In 1000 we might even be able to teleport there.

WEW, getting sleepy.

>literally point a rocket to the moon and land
Landing is the hard part idiot

Jesus h christ. Nasa left essentially a mirror on the moon that can return a laser beam it's still operating today.

You couldn't bounce a laser off the moon unless we went and put it there.

>what are unmanned missions

yes.

however, consider this:

the reason we haven't gone back, and instead are setting our sights on mars, is in fear of a failure.

if we tried to go back to the moon, and something went wrong, our credibility would be shattered. "what, they could do it in the 60's but not now?" it would be a PR nightmare.

so instead, mars it is. that way, if it goes wrong, well, we've still got the moon. While if it goes right, we can boast that we've been to the Moon, AND Mars

No we don't go back because it would serve no purpose anymore.

>spend $50 billion
>land a couple guys on the moon
>?????
>we already did this 60 years ago who cares?

>implying a robot can handle glass without breaking it

>implying it's ordinary glass used in homes

>implying space glass isn't more fragile after it passes through the Van Allen belt

the achievement would be, potentially, in proving we can do it again.

ETERNAL ANGLO
T
E
R
N
A
L

A
N
G
L
O

No. Germans did with American taxpayer's money

>implying the glass is more affected and not the people on board

You just said it was an unmanned mission

the real question is when will hulk hogan answer for his crimes

>ruling out the possibility that a crew was not launched into space to deliver the glass without actually landing on the moon

What's it like being autistic?

Oldfag

What's it like being bluepilled to the core?

God damn, you fucking tea&crumpets need to read before you hit post. Maybe /pol is riddled with autists.

Those Nazis were naturalized Americans by that point, Europoor.

Well, nazi rocket scientists working for the US.

Sure. But their whole intelligent property was a product of Germany, not America.