CBC race baiting against Kelly Leitch , starts at 4:05

CBC race baiting against Kelly Leitch , starts at 4:05

youtu.be/kBHK4WWDdq4?t=4m5s

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=q7cRbRR94s8
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_ownership_of_companies_of_Canada
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Do you still believe the news in Canada?

I believe it when they report that liberals hate her, yes.

Leitch has no chance, it's O'Leary or Bernier and O'Leary is a nightmare

>Leitch has no chance
Canadians seem to let the media affect them more than Americans.
I feel like I've heard this before.....having no chance and all.......yeah I guess we should just give up then.

Trump was the frontrunner you mongoloid

>Talkin' shit about Based Bernier

The only thing Leitch ever talks about is immigration and Bernier's stance is better than hers!

No he wasn't. They had Clinton leading the entire time.
It's the same now with the CBC putting Bernier and Oleary ahead because they don't mind those cucks, they are afraid of Kelly.

And look at the success it has- you are evidence.

Bernier is no better. if Leitch loses I wont be voting conservative.

In the primary he was, baka

What don't you like about him? He's the highest rated by the CCFR, he wants to gut the federal government so that provinces can handle their own affairs, wants to remove interprovincial trade barriers...

Yeah if someone needs to be forced to start talking about immigration and it wasn't part of their initial talking points- the person is a ted cruz.

There's a reason the media don't care about him. There are various ways to judge who is authentic and one way is to see who your enemy focuses their efforts most.

250k immigrants is horrible. That's the same number as Harper.
And take a look around outside.
It isn't Justin we have to blame , but Harper.

And I am actually in fact under the belief that Bernier is actually weaker on immigration than even Harper because as a self described libertarian he believes government as a last resort when it needs to be treated as the first and only resort when it comes to opposing immigration.

He's the ONLY ONE who wants to lower the immigration rates.

And hey, you want to talk about the CBC backing some candidates over others? Fucking take a look at this shit:

youtube.com/watch?v=q7cRbRR94s8

Yeah let's remove interprovincial trade barriers so the cancers that are Chinese Columbia and Hindutario can spread to the other provinces more easily.

So say if a nationalist in sask or mb was employing protectionist policies for certain agricultural industry in his province, this is something that would not be possible.

>(((canadian values)))
Fuck Leitch. She'll let in just as many shitskins, she'll just turn them into liberals first.

250k is how much they were for 12 years. That isn't lowering them. Again, Justin isn't to blame for what we see around us he's been in for 1 year.
Harper is. And 250k is Harpers number.

>female Trump
I see a niggling problem with this phrase

I'm voting for Bernier 100%

He is the anti Trudeau and just what is needed to defeat him.

It will be one of the biggest landslides in Canadian history.

wow they really push this guy they actually get him on and treat him fairly? Meanwhile they treat Kelly with animosity and don't even get her on the show and get someone to act as her.

Notice the difference?

Removing interprovincial trade barriers means small companies like brewers in Maritime provinces can access a larger market and actually grow. It does absolutely nothing to change the cultural makeup of the provinces. It also doesn't stop provincial governments from subsidizing their industries. Your post is a complete non-sequitur.

Trudeau's government raised the limit beyond 250k/annum and every other candidate for the CPC leadership, including Leitch, either wants to maintain the current rate or increase it. Going back DOWN to 250k/annum is a reduction from current rates.

He literally wants to defund the CBC. They cut him off repeatedly and constantly attempt to push O'Leary over him. Just look at the coverage of the vote rigging.

No, max has officially said he would. He said he will let in 250k which is what we've BEEN doing.
Liberals want to increase it to 300k which hasn't even taken effect yet.

So essentially what is being said is he wants to keep immigration the same.

I've talked to him in person. He's red pilled.

He pretends to be a somewhat normie cuz Canada.

The Cbc is getting dismantled if he gets a Majority. The commie tears will be delicious. I'm gonna take a day off work to celebrate.

Interprovincial trade barriers must exist until we come under a proper full national socialist government that would enforce ethnic nationalism across the land- until that happens we must ensure some areas are quarantined.

This goes for Supply Management as well which he wants to get rid of. There are times when the free market is not the answer and this is one of those times.


Also it doesn't matter to bring up the cbc in this argument because both Kelly and Max want to get rid of the cbc.
But you miss the point if you don't see the difference in how cbc treats Max and Kelly. You can support Max, but it would be deluded to say they don't oppose or are afraid Kelly more.

Hell, the guy even wants to get rid of equalization payments. Considering he's from Quebec, that SHOULD be political suicide, and yet he has the higher percentage of the votes in his riding than any other CPC leadership candidate (Of the ones who actually have a seat, lmao). He's just shy of 60% of the votes in his riding. The only two others who have over 50% are Blaney and fucking Chong of all people.

You are dreaming in technicolor, user.

And sorry, but I'd rather cut into the profits of the dairy mafia and not have to import milk from China in order to meet national demand at a reasonable cost.

Kelly can't even hold her own against Chong in an English debate. What makes you think she can debate against Trudeau in French?

Sorry but what makes you think Max can debate anyone in English when he sounds like a deaf person.

Also it's not a dairy mafia- these are our Canadian growers, everything from hutterites to multiple generation old farms. These people must always be taken care of first and foremost before any foreign product can enter the market. Ideally we would be much more autarky than simple protectionist policies like supply management allow but we hold onto what we currently can and move forward with rebranding the cpc into the anti immigration party.

Not just being the same old 250k immigrants fiscally conservative garbage that changes nothing.

>Farmers are forced to purchase "quotas"
>They cannot sell directly to consumers or any companies who process it into something else
>The quotas are super fucking expensive and create a huge artificial barrier of entry into an already expensive market
>Farms HAVE to produce more than their quota to avoid ever coming below and losing potential money, so they literally just throw away the excess because they can't do anything else with it
>It is now so uncompetitive internationally that our farmers are being squeezed out by foreign producers
>This is protecting Canadian interests, according to you
>We're losing global market share and we pay more for our dairy, maple, eggs, grain, meat, etc

Give your fucking head a shake. It's a racket, pure and simple.

Wrong. What would occur with the loss of protectionist policies is not somehow the complete domination of Canadian farmers at home and even abroad but in fact a fast takeover in which our agricultural industry becomes more and more foreign owned and operated.

Mel Hurtig wrote a good book on the vastly increasing amounts of foreign ownership of various Canadian industry and I am inclined to believe the same will happen to the ag sector.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_ownership_of_companies_of_Canada

Supply management does absolutely nothing to prevent farms being purchased wholesale.

In fact, as long as we have supply management, that means that foreign businesses can buy our farms and then the conditions are so in favour of them that Canadians can't enter the marketplace unless they suddenly materialize severel hundred heads and all the infrastructure from thin air because the quotas are so freakishly expensive.

>then the conditions are so in favour of them
Ah yes like how the conditions are so infavour of our farmers who own it now. Gives them an unfair edge over foreign competition- this is a good thing but only an intermediate step towards full autarky that will come later.

holy shit among republican contendors yes he was, vs. the witch he wasnt not even fucking close. thats the point, you tards let the media win you over like the fucking lemmings you lot are.

It gives them an advantage over everyone. That's why they gouge the crap out of us and unless you're already a fucking billionaire, setting up a commercial farm is not fucking possible because of the artificial barrier.

>Trusting a woman with power... ever?

Not saying she isn't great... but Mad Max is where it's at.

I wanna spunk that lil butthole up somethin fierce

Please have an argument beyond sexism or you will defeat yourself.

idk how it works in Canada, but we have a similar situation here. You either break even or most often lose money for farming / livestock. the more you produce, the more money you get from the government.

Our goal is to maximize our output. its a really shitty deal b/c it massively and artificially deflates the real value of food. and yet, we cannot possibly run out of food in this system.

go to bed retard

It's frustrating. We're the 2nd largest country in the world. We've got farmland coming out the ass and we're leaving all that money on the table to protect huge farms that don't need our protection and preventing small farms from even forming.

Yes in a situation where a foreigner wishes to come here and set up a farm it must be difficult or impossible. This is intended.

This is not the ideal situation but it is a damage control situation. It is untenable that the markets be completely opened, and likely the ag industry becomes globalized instead of having a monopoly in favor of our farmers already here.

The free market is diversity. And just to clarify I am a national socialist.

CANADIANS can't start farms. Right now, we're not protecting our industry, we're STRANGLING IT.

If you want to protect it from foreign businesses, just implement a tax on foreign purchases of land. When BC did just that for their real estate market, sales dropped over 80% from the previous year.

While many small farms could be of our own people- there would be no reason why many would just as well be foreigners/non whites.

Ideally yes the situation would be made more free so small farmers can begin and in fact I would support this massively as a settlement program to settle our vast nation and explode in population.
But this is not that point yet.

I will state that I am not arguing on the basis that I believe what I argue for in the moment is the economically most efficient - that is not the current goal.

From the national socialist perspective the ideal situation is to preserve as best we can what we can- while attempting to create a massive crash in which a revolution can occur. Hitler could not do what he did without a massive economic crash- and without the reichstag fire.
We are a crisis born ideology and any smart comrades realize this and will work towards this.

Obviously opening the market up completely can reduce prices and increase production but that is accepting the situation and world. We aren't here to do that. Trump is not here to do that either, if you start to think from the Crisis reliant theory you will begin to understand how Trumps presidency is working on another level you may not have previously considered.

Well hey, if your plan is to crash the country with no survivors, go ahead and vote Leitch, because we'll end up with another 4+ years of Trudeau and he's more than capable of fucking up our shit. Then you can try for your fantasy revolution shit.

I'd rather we just move towards more freedom and if anyone tries to take what belongs to me they'll eat a cloud of .330" lead spheres.

You must one day come to put the preservation of your race above your own individual or you will just be another weakness that caused us to go extinct.

And you'll either learn to leave people the fuck alone to live their lives in peace or you'll eat a bullet while trying to step on their throats.

I am an individual first. Everything else comes second.

Yes libertarians like to talk about defending themselves but have a complete vacancy regarding protecting the collective- the race.

Individual gun ownership has amounted to no movements, no opposition to liberals. Look at the u.s. The least white white nation by far. It's time to move past this individualism and look to what succeeded at bringing change previously.

I joined and am voting Conservative for the first time ever just to vote FOR her. No party represents me, always a mixed bag, but the bag is mixed best in the Cons this time round.

Indeed. I am as well voting con for the first time. This is an attempt to rebrand the party into an anti-immigrant party and this chance must be taken. The media will do the job for us.

cheers and beers my dude

Not posting this image as in I defend the leaf seriously, but just because I never get to post this image cause peru posters dont exist.

lol that's great. Yeah, we got some fucking house cleaning to do...

fukin RIGHTS

Uhh are you forgetting the nine months of the Frontrunner known as Jeb!
>Jeb!

Bernier is a libertarian and thus easily maleable by those in power because he is an ideologue. Above all, they fear a non-ideologue, a populist which Bernier is not.

Indeed. Kelly is already painted by the media a certain way. A way we like. As I said before, we should not pass up the opportunity to strengthen the brand that the conservative party into the anti-immigrant or Trump-like party.