Hey Sup Forums user here I'm looking for more stuff similar to this, something that lightly encourages women to be more conservative and a sense of belonging, im not looking for a nigger hate thread or a Miscegenation is bad thing. Specifically things that could slowly indoctrinate a normie woman
Thanks in advance.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
webmshare.com
twitter.com
Get rekt
Bump
I have a red pill, but this one is for you my friend.
Women aren't being indoctrinated into leftism, leftism is their nature.
How does that poster have a Nazi flag?
There is exception...
Bumping for interest
Of course. Like 5%, but there is.
But there truth in it...sadly
It would be nice if more women were interested in protect the land
Women don't need to protect the land. If invaders defeat the men, women will just be assimilated by the victors. That's why they don't feel any obligation to protect the country.
I know this, females generally have no loyalty to the tribe, that doesnt mean all of them.
Go away MGTOW fag.
Theres an ex gf of mine that ive recently started talking to, Im getting my life together, im working out, stopped smoking doing drugs etc. trying to build a healthy and responsible relationship.
Youre doing the right thing brother
That faggot you replied to will die alone, you will have a beautiful white family. Keep it up.
Stupids creatures
Fucking newfags
Or he becomes another statistic, which is save for red pilling people who don't think "lole I'm so special that won't happen to me"
My advice is to introduce her to other red pilled women. She'll try to fit in with them and it will let her question her beliefs in a safer space, meaning not in a male vs. female or Conservative vs Libearal, way. Same with videos of red pilled women like Marine Le Pen, Ann Coulter, Lauren Southern. Show the girl their popularity and she'll start to adjust her tribalism to perhaps align with them. Just an idea, but seems like a route that plays with their inclination towards inclusivity. Yeah, even learn to use their buzzwords (safe space and inclusivity) so they lose their power.
Implying being responsible and Honest is the same thing as being a cuck...
can you fuck off with this shit tier clickbait news sites, I am specifically looking for a more philosophical or romanticized articles like my OP that would appeal to the more sentimental side.
Fucking Christ.
Or if she has no friends, she will be more dependant, it will be more easy to red pill her
Just get a prenup brah
They work
I get you and I appreciat you trying to help, but I can only speak to her on facebook at the moment, I feel like she would lose interest if I sent her political videos I am just trying to find things that are short and sweet.
This sounds like planned parenthood propaganda
post abortion depression is very common
Your a cum dumpster
She's on facebook ? Crap ! It will be hard
This is why you will die alone OP
The Idealization of Marriage
83:8.1 (929.4) Marriage which culminates in the home is indeed man’s most exalted institution, but it is essentially human; it should never have been called a sacrament. The Sethite priests made marriage a religious ritual; but for thousands of years after Eden, mating continued as a purely social and civil institution.
83:8.2 (929.5) The likening of human associations to divine associations is most unfortunate. The union of husband and wife in the marriage-home relationship is a material function of the mortals of the evolutionary worlds. True, indeed, much spiritual progress may accrue consequent upon the sincere human efforts of husband and wife to progress, but this does not mean that marriage is necessarily sacred. Spiritual progress is attendant upon sincere application to other avenues of human endeavor.
83:8.3 (929.6) Neither can marriage be truly compared to the relation of the Adjuster to man nor to the fraternity of Christ Michael and his human brethren. At scarcely any point are such relationships comparable to the association of husband and wife. And it is most unfortunate that the human misconception of these relationships has produced so much confusion as to the status of marriage.
83:8.4 (929.7) It is also unfortunate that certain groups of mortals have conceived of marriage as being consummated by divine action. Such beliefs lead directly to the concept of the indissolubility of the marital state regardless of the circumstances or wishes of the contracting parties. But the very fact of marriage dissolution itself indicates that Deity is not a conjoining party to such unions. If God has once joined any two things or persons together, they will remain thus joined until such a time as the divine will decrees their separation. But, regarding marriage, which is a human institution, who shall presume to sit in judgment, to say which marriages are unions that might be approved by the universe supervisors in contrast with those which are purely human in nature and origin?
83:8.5 (930.1) Nevertheless, there is an ideal of marriage on the spheres on high. On the capital of each local system the Material Sons and Daughters of God do portray the height of the ideals of the union of man and woman in the bonds of marriage and for the purpose of procreating and rearing offspring. After all, the ideal mortal marriage is humanly sacred.
83:8.6 (930.2) Marriage always has been and still is man’s supreme dream of temporal ideality. Though this beautiful dream is seldom realized in its entirety, it endures as a glorious ideal, ever luring progressing mankind on to greater strivings for human happiness. But young men and women should be taught something of the realities of marriage before they are plunged into the exacting demands of the interassociations of family life; youthful idealization should be tempered with some degree of premarital disillusionment.
83:8.7 (930.3) The youthful idealization of marriage should not, however, be discouraged; such dreams are the visualization of the future goal of family life. This attitude is both stimulating and helpful providing it does not produce an insensitivity to the realization of the practical and commonplace requirements of marriage and subsequent family life.
83:8.8 (930.4) The ideals of marriage have made great progress in recent times; among some peoples woman enjoys practically equal rights with her consort. In concept, at least, the family is becoming a loyal partnership for rearing offspring, accompanied by sexual fidelity. But even this newer version of marriage need not presume to swing so far to the extreme as to confer mutual monopoly of all personality and individuality. Marriage is not just an individualistic ideal; it is the evolving social partnership of a man and a woman, existing and functioning under the current mores, restricted by the taboos, and enforced by the laws and regulations of society.
83:8.9 (930.5) Twentieth-century marriages stand high in comparison with those of past ages, notwithstanding that the home institution is now undergoing a serious testing because of the problems so suddenly thrust upon the social organization by the precipitate augmentation of woman’s liberties, rights so long denied her in the tardy evolution of the mores of past generations.
Yeah, that's tough. Tone is pretty important with stuff like this, and that can't be transmitted over chat. I'd say keep focusing on the good you're doing in your life, and either she'll want to see you in person, or she won't, but then you're making gains towards being the kind of man who will attract the kind of women who has the qualities you want.
>meme trash philosophy
dont try ot make things work with ex's
thats incredibly blue-pilled
if it could work it would have
