Why do you support a system that puts capitalist Jews on top and working white men on the bottom?

Why do you support a system that puts capitalist Jews on top and working white men on the bottom?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/T7eF0YUYRWU?t=1m25s
steinschneider.com/biography/hanussen/page15.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Rosenberg
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stella_Kübler
intelnews.org/2016/03/29/01-1878/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Because without private property you'll only ever be on the bottom.

But I don't support communism

How will you acquire said property when the Jew has stacked the odds against you?

Because your does the same but puts non-Jews even lower.

You then support those on the top... why are you anti-white?

Cause you're a failed goy who spends his time on Sup Forums, while his daughter is twerking for jamal and trevon. Get to work goy.

because communism is also a system that puts jews on top and working people on the bottom. At least with capitalism you get to do what you want for the most part.

How so? Society would become truley democratic. Could you imagine what that would look like if we removed the Jews and replaced them with our own people?

By out jewing the jew.
It's called personal responsibility, lad.

I disagree- in capitalism the majority of workers do long hours for little return by way of money, whereas in a socialist system workers work less and have more time to do what they enjoy.

I don't, but I sure as heck don't support communism either.

Stacked as in "you will never be a billionaire", sure. but that doesn't mean I can't provide for my family.

I don't give a shit that some are very rich in an unfair system. In this system my weath is based on my merit, so when I'm able to provide a comfortable living, I know that I have enough merit for my needs. This is a huge boost in your self-esteem, something you would have knows if you weren't a salty 18 year old dropout who hates his boss and thinks its "stacked against him" because he was too lazy/stupid to have enough merit to be able to create a comfortable living.

You stacked it against yourself.

What about National Socialism?

communism was created for and by jews you retarded faggot.

By your same logic the Jew has earned his place in society? Do you therefore believe whites are inferior to Jews?

(Also, stop projecting please.)

yeah, like how the Soviet Union was run by native Russians?

Power corrupts, and giving a select few all the power makes it shit for everyone who doesn't have it. Right now you do have power because you can create your own path in life.

You have not answered the question.

Not a big fan. Too much centralized power and far too much focus on race. Distributism sounds pretty nice, though.

Thats funny, because the more socialist by country got, the higher my taxes went, the more hours I had to work to stay on the same level.

Socialism is only good for the sick or the lazy. And fuck the lazy.

Where did I say "give a select few all the power"? Do you not understand how democracy works?

If they got there by merit, sure. Too bad in case of Jews its mostly nepotism. Ban nepotism and you don't even need full blown Communism.

The Germans socialized many of their systems around WWII and took their country from hyperinflation and poverty to a glorious ethno-state and the eminent military power in Europe. Your country is an example of failed socialism- in a non democratic society run by Jews.

Nepotism is an inherent problem in capitalism. The majority of those on top have inherited their wealth- not by merit, but rather by holding stocks/lands that pay a continuous dividend, consolidating more and more wealth in their hands which working whites cannot use.

Do you not understand how communism works? A democratic society will NEVER voluntarily vote for communism. Only people who will be better off under Communism will vote for it, and that is a fraction of the country. The rest (who has a job or wants to have a career) wants a merit based system.

So to have Communism you need to abolish democracy. And to continue to shut down majority rule, you need an oppressive government. This is why EVERY country that tried communism has a powerfully centralised government and no fair elections. Having the latter would erase Communism the first chance they got.

your entire post is false, good job

>capitalist Jews
You're right, I should let a Commissiarat of Communist Jews execute my family because being paid a wage is the same thing as being stolen from and that means we should run our farm at a loss because asdgasdgsadg

Thank God we had that shining paragon of the working man Karl Marx to show us the way. Thank God we had a man willing to get up early every morning and live what he preached like a proletariat hero, working to provide for his family and better society. That's the kind of man you can trust to devise a fair and accurate picture of the economy.

>Thank God we had that shining paragon of the working man Karl Marx to show us the way. Thank God we had a man willing to get up early every morning and live what he preached like a proletariat hero, working to provide for his family and better society. That's the kind of man you can trust to devise a fair and accurate picture of the economy.

Amazing

National-socialism ?

>Too much focus on race

What are you a nigger?

>Do you not understand how democracy works
Democracy is kind of shit though.

All the commie leaders knew this, that is why they are all for violent revolution. Cmon man, you should know this.

>What are you a nigger?
My adopted sister is.

All you are doing is proving this jew hate is just communist rhetoric

Lol, you got sibling proto cucked

The reason people do not vote for communism/socialism (in the current climate this is becoming more and more false) is their lack of understanding, and American anti-sentiment towards the USSR. Would you argue the Russian Revolution was not democratic?

Not an argument.

Denigration of character is a non-argument.

Yes.

Democracy is the keystone of the western world.

Addressed in

Well, she is only half black. But my experience with her has made me care more about the culture and attitudes of people rather than their race.

people are self-centered. That is why communism will never work. People vote what is best for them, right now. This is why communism, apart from small communities of same-minded people, will never work.

Any and all revolutions that aren't the results of a ballot are not democratic.

What stops me from influencing the public to make them vote for whatever interests me, but will be ultimately bad for the people? Democracy doesn't work because of populism.

I wasn't an argument.

I always judge people based on merit . But race is an undeniable factor in sociological norms and an indicator on how a person will think and behave. Race is more than skin deep, and I think you are smart enough to know that.

Also, I feel sorry for your 'sister'. Racemixed people have huge self identity problems and identity dysphoria. Race mixed people often only Identify with one half of their genealogy, in your 'sister's' case im guessing she acts and behaves more white?

>Argument
FASCINATING that you bring this up, I've been waiting five threads for one of you retarded leftist scumbags to provide me with a molecule of evidence that the Labour Theory of Value or Historical Materialism has any material foundation whatsoever.

This is important since without the former, the claim that Capital is an unethical exploitation is objectively false. Marx provided no such evidence, nor has any future economist. In fact all of the actual data suggests that Labor doesn't actually add any value to a product whatsoever. Two identical products, one produced by accident and one produced with intent, do not have any distinguishable difference in value. So the LtV is empirically bullshit, there is no truth to it whatsoever.

And THAT means that the foundation of Marx's ideology is a lie, but moreover, that from the beginning, it was MARX who did not present an argument. He simply postulated that being paid for doing a job was the same as being robbed, without any evidence at all, and idiots (like you) believed him.

And he did this because he was an evil parasitic lamprey, which brings me back to the original point: Since Communism isn't an argument, it may be dismissed without an argument. When you bring up your flat-earther tier nonsense ideology, and I say "Marx was Evil," that's more of an argument than Marx gave for his Creationist nonsense.

He also died in agony, just like every other Good Little Leftist, and he deserved every second of it. Good thing his daughters killed themselves too, or his disgusting thief-genes might have passed on.

Revolutions are funded and perpetrated by the people- if the majority in a society disagree, the revolution will fail.

People are only self-centered when they do not have a national identity. Association with one's race and nation removes the issue.

You've made an argument against capitalism. The rich fund politicians and produce advertisements. The rich are overwhelmingly Jewish.

>Two identical products, one produced by accident and one produced with intent,
Playing devils advocate here:
Some products just don't happen by accident. and mass-production is a direct result from labour, which increases profit and allows value to be made.

You can't make a car without labour, and a pile of steel and wires isn't worth as much as a functioning car.

Marx thinking that when you voluntarily trade time/labour for wage and as a result the guy paying you wages is better off because of you, you are being stolen from is absolutely retarded though.

That last sentence was a wreck but you get it.

I won't deny that race has a physical effect, and that culture develops along racial lines. And yeah, she definitely behaves more white. That being said, I don't think that would change even if she was 100% black. Behavior develops along cultural divides, and culture develops along racial lines, but I don't think that race alone determines how anyone will act.

>if the majority in a society disagree, the revolution will fail.
not when there is a violent revolution and the people with the guns call everyone who disagrees a fascist that should be shot.

Forced complaisance isn't democracy.

Your unnecessary hostility is quite amusing, and speaks to your lack of intelligence.

Would you say those who inherit massive patches of land and investment portfolios are "producing" for society? Would you say they have done anything to earn what they accrue?

You would ignore price gouging and the constant raising of prices (not to mention the extreme salaries of CEO's and other business leaders) and say "b-but the materials cost money!!" You ignore the capitalist's continuous raising of prices without raising wages in proportion.

Again- denigration of character is not an argument, and I will therefore disregard it.

I don't support Communism.

What have the supposed minority done to accrue weapons that the majority could not?

Then you therefore support the Jew.

You are proving Orwell right, you don't care for the poor, you just really hate the rich.

Put yourself in her shoes. Her family is white, she has adopted white values and white norms but no matter what she does she is still half black. Half of her identity is alien and at the root, unwanted. There is a reason why the blue birds fly with the blue birds, and the red birds with the redbirds. The purple birds may hang out with one or the other, but they will always be outcasts.

they decided to kill people that disagree with them.

Not everyone is a violent revolutionary.

Not an argument for the labour theory of value. You just hop over to emotional appeals to fairness and other such nonsense. The Labour Theory of Value is false, and if it is false then nothing you just said matters. Who cares about price gouging? What does that have to do with the LtV? What about rising prices? What about other peoples' salaries? What is the relevance? That's literally an appeal to jealousy, not an argument.

We are discussing the philosophic underpinnings of your entire criminal ideology and you have NOTHING to say in defense of it. If the LtV isn't true, then it isn't immoral or unethical for a CEO to pay himself 10 trillion dollars a second and a worker ten cents.

Are you telling me that you cannot argue in defense of one of the BASIC pillars of your gay ideology?

oh goy

>Why do you support a system that puts capitalist Jews on top and working white men on the bottom?
>posts soviet flag
Back to school faggot

So? Do you have a solution? (Also she's never expressed any sort of behavior to suggest she's confused or feels like an outcast but whatever).

How exactly would you like me to "argue" for the LTV? Would you say a good can be produced without laborers to produce it? How exactly is the LTV false in any way?

I mention salaries directly because that is the crux of socialism. The capitalist does not pay the worker for the value he creates with his labor.

> In fact all of the actual data suggests that Labor doesn't actually add any value to a product whatsoever.

Provide said data.

Every man is capable of violence- if the majority of people disagreed, they would have perpetrated violence to support the current system at the time.

>Australia

>Not understanding clickbait

Wew lad

The solution is not to racemix so your children don't grow up with a completely fucked up sense of identity. For your 'sister' it's already too late, that's a burden she'll carry forever. Why don't you ask her about it and see what she has to say about it?

>she's never expressed any sort of behavior to suggest she's confused or feels like an outcast but whatever

Ever seen those youtube videos of Lions or Tigers adopting a puppy or some shit like that? They raise that animal as if it was their own, the dog will adopt the mannerisms of the lions but it is still a fucking dog at the end of the day and nothing will change that.

Do you think a piece of literal shit sculpted into a aircraftcarrier that took 40000 hours to make, is worth more than a functioning car that took 5000 hours?
according to Marx, that piece of shit is 8 times more valuable. "The labor theory of value (LTV) is a theory of value that argues that the economic value of a good or service is determined by the total amount of socially necessary labor required to produce it, rather than by the use or pleasure its owner gets from it."

>Do you therefore believe whites are inferior to Jews?
yes, they got scammed, didn't they?
Multiple times too, failure to learn from mistakes is a proof of deficient intelligence.

Like how Germany revolted against Hitler right? When he had 30% support and took power.

>Democracy is the keystone of the western world.
is this a bait, or a genuine belief you hold?

>- if the majority of people disagreed, they would have perpetrated violence to support the current system at the time.
Nvm, I know for sure now that you're retarded.

There is no system. "Capitalism" is no more than a nominal description of the natural form of human exchange.

>not understanding click bait

>you just posted in a clickbait thread

> you just made against argument for capitalism

literally the same argument applies against communism, the rich powerful guys influence everyone elses decisions

Communism killed more white people than any other ideology.

If for some reason there is a demand for that shit, yes. (Hence, socially necessary.)

the kind of dude that kills his parents because they gave him a bedtime and didn't agree. They were in the majority, they should have killed him for the current system of bedtime.

Communism IS the Jew everyone hates.

youtu.be/T7eF0YUYRWU?t=1m25s

But he didn't do that through violent revolution, user.... his party consolidated power in the Reichstag by walking out..

Because you support a system that puts capitalist Jews (same as socialist Jews) on the top and puts the white working man into the ground.

>demand
welcome to capitalism. Marx said nothing about demand.
The socially acceptable factor is about the labour, not the product.

You just BTFO yourself.

Capitalism needs to be put in its place, beneath the culture, beneath the race.

A nation gets the jews it deserves no matter what economic system it follows.

Care to explain in any way?


I'm OP.

There were no rich jews in National Socialist germany.

because capitalist jews pay better than communist jews.

Jews will still Jew, you might as well make them pay for their Jewing.

Social demand exists regardless of money.

Are you really this retarded?

see

As long it is understandable that the sculpting took that long, it is 8 times more worth than the car. Marx said so. But you don't agree. You think value is based on demand. Therefore you are a capitalist.

BTFO
T
F
O

I don't think it's worth my time to try and explain how mob rule isn't a valid ideology.
Or how voter fraud works.
How people can be kept docile by believing there's a majority against them and "maybe next election will turn out different"

So because there is a high demand for doctors, they should be payed more for their services? Or a skilled worker vs a non-skilled worker. So based on merit?

Just stop, user. You redpilled yourself.

> capitalist Jews

So your proposal is to change it for a system that puts another set of jews to rule over us?

Most of us don't?
>also implying that jews don't lord over communist systems

Why do you support a system created, promoted and applied by and for Jews? Which has exterminated millions of people?

Because he's been handed his life on a silver platter by his parents, or the government without realizing someone has to pay for that.
He wants a communist revolution but doesn't realize that people like me, an electrician who grew up in extreme poverty will be hanging him as he's the bourgeois.
I have right wing views, but I'd gladly join a communist revolution to disembowel starbucks commies on the street.
After all, I'm the proletariat (^:

>After all, I'm the proletariat (^:
Not if you are decent at your job. Then you are oppressive like the Kulaks.

Communists actually hate the lower classes more than the capitalists. Commies just need your bodies for the revolution and to make sure they stay in power.

Because whites can ascends, in communism everybody is the same shit, and jews take advantage on this.

WTF I LOVE BILLIONAIRE GLOBALISTS NOW!

Why do you support a system that puts internationalist Jews on top and working white men on the bottom surrounded by sandniggers and other vile creatures?

Dear reminder:
>Racism was invented the internationalist commies to confuse and demoralize foreign nations to accept internationalism. There was no homophobia, transphobia, racism, and such before Soviet subversion. Before commies it was perfectly acceptable for individuals to judge whoever they want for whatever reason.

>MUH JOOOS

Communists are just the shittier and sexually unattractive version of the nobility of the absolute monarchies, always demanding more privileges and despising the poor , the first ones at least had decent education so.

Because I know I can produce more than the shitskins and Im not afraid to compete against them for jobs. Jews will always Jew. Id rather have a fair playing field with other races.

If you're talking about the Soviet Union, Jews actually faced official harassment and street violence.

>Hanussen, a member of the race the nazis were pledged to exterminate
>hitler's personal rasputin, mentor, advisor
>taught hitler fiery-speech style, how to hypnotize the masses
>mentored, advised, financed the nazis
>advised and persuaded Germany's rich, powerful industrialists to support and vote for nazis
>secured financial funds for the party

would the nazis have been powerful, without the leadership of Hanussen?
steinschneider.com/biography/hanussen/page15.htm


was this man responsible for creating hitler?
is he ever mentioned in your history classes?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Rosenberg
Hanusen
Eva Brong
Gobels
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stella_Kübler


Revealed: Decorated Nazi commander became Mossad assasin
Otto Skorzeny became known as the most ruthless special-forces commander in the Third Reich
intelnews.org/2016/03/29/01-1878/

The Jews controlled the communist party of the ussr.