Half of Sup Forums has been taken over by authoritarian bootlickers

>half of Sup Forums has been taken over by authoritarian bootlickers

I'm only going to say this once.

THE STATE EXISTS TO SERVE THE PEOPLE. NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND

MOLON LABE

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=7wyhinAQpgc
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

You are mentally retarded. sage

Taxation is theft!

Fascists are cucks

>being a lolbergtardian
>current fukn year

Top laff, grow up kid.

You are borderline mentally retarded. You use the word fascist. You dont know what the word fascist means. You use the word cuck because you steal alt-right memes and cannot come up with your own original memes.

You are really gay.

All authoritarian systems are slavery to the state and it is the duty of every free man to bring them down and return government to its rightful purpose of protecting the rights of citizens and NOTHING ELSE

I have no respect for anyone who willingly submits to a perversion of government.

>be a cuck
>cant solve your own problems
>vote for a big government to solve them for you
>somehow think you're different than leftists

These are the ways by which our president has been making changes.

Notice anything?

Anarcho syndicalist communes get eaten up by the first asshole with charisma and authority. Authoritarianism develops as a response.

The only means of defending against tyranny is if each citizen is in control of their own property, and is able to nourish it to the enrichment of his or her neighbor. When one gives over their private property to a collective, they have become servile scum who will eventually be controlled by a tyrant.

anarcho-syndicalism is gay. read homage to catalonia to get an idea of what happens to these types.

I see the news and I think of genocide. I see non-whires and I think of genocide, but some of them are my friends. When does the migration stop. How many have to die. I don't like these helicopter memes anymore. I just want the migration to stop. But they'll keep coming, and they'll keep voting for socialism, and taxes will get higher and higher. They all have to die. We either have a country or we don't. Kill them all.

What you think you have a better solution OP. They'll genocide you once they're the majority. It's us or them. Tell me you have a better solution. I bet you don't.

>The state exists

Triggered.

JK but seriously we went from 2/3 libertarian, 1/3 conservative, 0,X% NatSoc to 60% libertarian/conservative, 40% NatSoc. What a timeline.

This is true. Private property is an absolute right of man.

Its not authoritarian to want border control

When will you realize that libertarianism is ONLY possible with a homogenous population of shared values?

War is sometimes a necessity, but I'll be damned if I'm going to sacrifice my rights for it.

It's simple. We don't have to extend the natural rights of men to shitskins because they aren't men.

So you just want a privately run genocide instead of one operated by the government?

I was hoping you would tell me it wouldn't have to happen.

I suppose we could try to educate them into valuing rights more than free shit

If the newcomers were made to be ashamed to take welfare like white people are, they might become model citizens. But I don't know if it's possible.

PREACH

Or possibly we restrict voting to individuals who have paid into the system more than they have taken out during the last election cycle.

>moot nukes the board for racism and Hitler love
>meme a little for Ron Paul for wanting to end a pillar of jewish power, the fed, lolberg filth starts to crawl in
>now nu-Sup Forums crawls in here with their snakes and and
>posts trying to call us cucks
Go back to breitbart you fucking retards.

>p-please mein fuhrer Trump, let me lick your boots clean!

You make me sick. Nothing is worth compromising our rights.

how does a government function to protect citizens if citizens don't have any respect for government and laws?

Government uses force to administer justice to citizens who infringe on the rights of their fellow citizens. Respect is created by the effective and responsible execution of this duty.

As long as it is limited as much as possible to this function, citizens can live in peace, without fear of either their neighbors or the people they have put in power.

Rights don't exist. They aren't tangible. The purpose of society is not to uphold Murray Rothbard's thought experiment but to enrich and propagate it's people on a world of limited resources against all other adversarial societal organisms. You said it yourself:
>THE STATE EXISTS TO SERVE THE PEOPLE.

But immediately afterwards you say
>If the newcomers were made to be ashamed to take welfare like white people are, they might become model citizens. But I don't know if it's possible.
These are completely contradictory opinions. One espouses a sense of national unity and the other espouses radical individualism that completely dismisses any type of "people" belonging in a state. You then go on to say that >Nothing is worth compromising our rights.
Once again: Anything goes as long as we stay abide by old (((Murray))). I for one would love to strip Mexicans of their right to a fair trial. This cannot be a distinction when the basis of your worldview is individualist and espouses these "rights" to be universal. Because as you said implied in There might be a few good ones!


Ultimately the manifestation of the people's will Is the state. This is how a society enacts it will on the world for its common good. When it ceases to do so it is no longer legitimate and has to go. But to pretend that every state is evil when its pretty much shown that it is how this is how large groups of people organize and to pretend that abstract rights should be upheld when they are being used as a weapon against our actual, real, flesh and blood is just silly desu.

>mein fuhrer Trump,
It's Führer. And don't put that title in front of the Golden Goy, please.

but that still requires the recognition that the use of force on citizens is valid and just. which is impossible without respect first. people have trust in those they elected. and trust that they are able to organize respectable administrators of force. respect and trust has to come before an effective government

One day you'll come around

Hardly. Citizens must respect government as an institution, but they are under no obligation to respect those who run it.

What I mean by that is that blindly trusting that those in charge are doing a good job is exactly how the state strays from its purpose. We have created a system based around constant pruning of corrupting elements, and we must continue to be vigilant.

The majority of Sup Forums is not.

no it's not yoy autistic faggot.

theft implies ownership which is a right given to us by the state

Not even every ancap is for free borders.
If you want to get educated on borders from an average libertarian listen here (start at 21:28) youtube.com/watch?v=7wyhinAQpgc

b8

>the magical rights god will save me from when the state revokes them
>after all they are intrinsic and totally real and not granted by the state

>Wah wah bitch bitch the Gubbmint is being mean to me ;_;
>Now excuse me I'm going to whine about the federal debt while I ignore the white race dying out

I'd just love to see a libertarian living out on the open plains of asia in the 1300s start trying to lecture an army of Mongols about how they can't rape and kill him because he has "property" rights

b8

You cuckolds will never learn to stand up for yourselves, will you?

Alright I've determined that you're actually just a shit troll that wants to spout platitudes like
>muh boot licker
>just stand up for yourself (but not using a state apparatus you have to be by yourself!)

saging and leaving, senpai. Shit thread. Read a book you fucking nigger.

Sage for liberty

That is, of course, true. But for the state to serve the people well, it must have a firm grip on the land. A state must have an army, a police, and everything else that is required for it to intervene in situations where the safety or well-being of its own people is put in danger.