Which first world country has contributed the least to the world? I say Australia.
Which first world country has contributed the least to the world? I say Australia
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
You don't find irritating shitposts a valuable contribution? Crikey
Dumping some stats on this huehuehuehue.
...
fuck my internet
Country size by research paper contribution.
In contrast.....
...
>australia
>first world
You just haven't taken the final pill.
...
...
Mate. We have cochlear implants.
Emily Jean in Brazil
...
This fucking Brazilian Emmaposter
>Which first world country has contributed the least to the world? I say Australia.
Fuck off.
All Anglo-countries are top tier.
Most White/Euro countries are 2nd tier.
China is along in 3rd tier.
Ancient India/Persia is 4th tier.
That's it. All other countries literally contributed nothing that wasn't previously invented.
I say Canada. They only made maple syrup.
Why do people think that Africa is going to nonstop keep growing in population?
They're barely sustaining themselves now and that's with trillions in foreign aid.
As soon as that pulls they will finish dying properly.
Italian pride world wide!
This is now an Emma Stone thread.
Because they have massive agricultural resources to feed their population. They haven't been able to use them properly, but Bill Gates and co. keep developing GMOs that basically tend themselves and make agriculture braindead-easy, and then sending them to Africa.
Because models can't predict changes in behavior. All projections work under the assumption "if trends continue, then..."
how can she be so perfect
Ikr user? why even live? ;