Praise KEK

Why do we rally behind a presidential candidate who wants to restrict freedom on the internet, fight against recreational marijuana, and crack down on pornography?

I guess its because he signs executive orders to fuck over faggots? Fuck Faggots.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it
dailycaller.com/2015/02/23/the-fccs-predictable-fiasco-of-internet-utility-regulation/
regblog.org/2014/03/05/05-tarbutton-fcc-ftc-merger/
wirelessweek.com/article/2017/02/flip-side-digging-trumps-ftc-pick-net-neutrality-privacy
congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/34/all-actions)
gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-12-02/pdf/2016-28006.pdf)
congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-163/senate-section/page/S1925)
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Rural and suburban retards always vote against their own interests

Can't wait for Net Neutrality to kill so this site is bye bye.

Because he's going to pack the Supreme Court with conservative justices which is ultimately the only way to keep the US from completely falling apart at the seams for at least the near future. You didn't vote for Trump because you actually thought he was going to be a good president, did you?

>played themselves

nigger culture, not even once

HAHA WE CAN'T RUN A CANDIDATE ANYONE WILL VOTE FOR SO WE'RE GOING TO FUCKING LIE TO YOU FOR ANOTHER 4 YEARS SO YOU JUST WON'T VOTE FOR HIM AGAIN

>believing leftist spin
>ever

After eight years of silence under President Dronestrike McWiretap, I have a hard time thinking this is an actual concern for the left.

>ecause he's going to pack the Supreme Court with conservative justices which is ultimately the only way to keep the US from completely falling apart

LOL people like John Roberts give a fuck about America? All they care about is lining the pockets of big corporations.

I fail to see what would be wrong with pornography restrictions...

...

>t. Michael Moore

>youaresilly.jpg
Not an argument. Later.

But rural and suburban people are wealthy and middle class whites who profit from low taxes.

>But rural and suburban people are wealthy and middle class whites who profit from low taxes.

Oh boy, you've never been to the rural middle of America, have you?

for the lulz

I know the solution under Trump.
>pic related

what do you define as porn and at what point does the cencorship of porn cross over into the cencorship of freedom of speech? Would feminists rioting topless be considered porn and a criminal offense? How could you define a family video at a nudist beach differently than softcore porn? Once you censor anything, there is a foothold to sensor everything, with enough time. We have to fight censorship of anything and everything.

>he has severely reduced restrictions on gun sales to the mentally ill
Source?

It is an argument, but let's see if he has a source for what he's saying.

A dem president combined with a liberal SCOTUS would have seen the US crushed under a wave of illegal immigration and subsequent amnesties that would make Barry O and with his defacto open border policies blush. The US would have been a one party state on it's way to Brazil tier demographics and unsustainable socialist policies within one term of Hillary.

Hillary would have been doing the same shit and just like Obama would have been called a saint for doing it or having her shady shit ignored because the media would be too busy sucking her dick,

I'm glad Trump won just because he's pissing everyone off just by existing,

>leftists are actually too stupid to know Google, Facebook and even the fucking NSA have been doing this shit for nearly a decade
kek

Pepe will be free

Not only that, also the context of this hysteria is that isp's have been doing since forever. They just nixed a rule before it ever got implemented.

Literally fake news.

>implying we're not serious about being nazis

Newfag leave!

Neither have you. We have all the money, you have all the niggers.

>implying drumpfkins have enough self-awareness to realize they played themselves

>drumpfkins

Was Net Neutrality ever truly a thing since there is now a lot of proof of behind the scenes spying as the selling of Internet information while they aren't supposed to. I guess in a way getting rid of the law is a good thing ONLY because it is no longer promising a lie.

>Removing net neutrality will kill Sup Forums
4chan did just fine prior to net neutrality being introduced.
>Internet privacy
because no website has ever sold my browsing history, ad profile, or site preferences before.
>Recreational drug use
We want this why? This is something the left wants.
>Crack down on pornography
If you honestly believe this you should check into a mental ward.

As usual you can't see passed your own kike nose so let me explain what these things also mean for you:
/leftypol/ goes bye bye as well. Marijuana use remains a crime, you useless go to jail and don't pass Go to collect your neetbux. Banning pornography, where would it stop? A nude feminist rioting? A family video at a nudist beach? Instructional videos on condoms? Instructional videos on being fag? You side loses far more in this situation than us losing our chat room.

all of those things have to go

But honestly though, how hard is it?

Why would advertisers be interested in us?

This

Why wont poor americans just get degrees and earn their place in society? I dont get it, are they just being lazy and leeching off?

It's really not hard at all.

>who wants to restrict freedom on the internet, fight against recreational marijuana, and crack down on pornography?
Shutting down ISIS online is good, weed is for niggers and porn is a Jewish plot

Hey, now, come on, that's unfair.

He called spics rapists, if that's not enough to earn our support, what is?

fug

The Supreme Court has already defined pornography as "you'll know it when you see it."

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it

He called them rapists and still got a higher percentage of the hispanic vote than Romney.

And you think Hillary would've supported a free internet, lol, highly doubt it. So doesn't change much. People need to protest and let it be known.Trump would be more open to changing his opinion than Hillary. She must really hate internet freedom right now, it cost Hillary her dream.

>just get degrees

That's the problem. All these lazy cunts going into debt for meaningless degrees so they can "Follow their Passion."

Oh hey Andy, saw you trolling around here for headlines yesterday. Guess in the end you had to just make it up yourself, huh?

Kek

this
getting rich may be hard
but to not be poor you just need to fucking work

This
This times 950
Understand that he she controls? The scotus controls the long term future of the nation

>it's another Canuck using the rural and suburban retards argument episode
Nice proxy you braindead leaf cunt

The FCC having regulatory power over the behavior of ISPs was widely derided for years, and Trump's people at the FTC want to use competition, rather than regulation, to drive down costs and improve consumer outcomes.

dailycaller.com/2015/02/23/the-fccs-predictable-fiasco-of-internet-utility-regulation/
regblog.org/2014/03/05/05-tarbutton-fcc-ftc-merger/
wirelessweek.com/article/2017/02/flip-side-digging-trumps-ftc-pick-net-neutrality-privacy

>FCC stripped of regulatory powers over the internet
>as part of this, an Obama-era regulation banning ISPs selling customer data is rescinded
>[MSM chimpout here]
>power being given to the FTC instead
>FTC believes in competition rather than regulations at gunpoint to lower prices and increase performance
>ISPs pic related

The FTC plan is not up to their whimsical discretion like the FCC plan is. Obama sabataged shit in order to make it look horrible taking away his plan to censor the internet. This is one of those pitfalls left behind to make anyone repealing it look bad.

The FTC will create an actual ruleset; unlike the FCC where they can just decided behind closed doors what they do and don't want. This also eases shit on the private sector where uncertainty fucks shit up. This is another dynamic obama and the dems installed -- uncertainty. FCC can do whatever they want. FTC will have a set in stone rule set everyone can understand so there will be no uncertainty in the private sector.

Meanwhile, the dem plan to censor conservative and alternative news falls apart. That is the goal of this movement by the republicans.

tl;dr ITS FUCKING NOTHING

if they succesfully shut down Sup Forums..

I can't even imagine that scenario, they wouldn't dare

This place is too valuable to law enforcement for them to shut it down.

this is why we need Bernie, the rich should have to be educated in order to be rich, most college degree holders voted Clinton and this shows the system is rigged if educated people are low income earners

Trump could shut down Sup Forums and everyone on Sup Forums would cheer the decision. He advocated defending Israel, and Sup Forums went full JIDF. He could come out in favor of gun control and Sup Forums would spend the next few weeks raiding /k/.

There is literally nothing Trump can do that would make his fanboys turn on him. At worst, they claim he's playing 6,000,000-D Chess so being a fucking idiot is all part of the plan.

Jokes on them, every legitimate Sup Forums user is either using a VPN or is smart enough to use a VPN if so inclined.

The only ones who are going to get their data sold to marketers are liberal normies.

Why do shills always resort to every single legislation regarding the internet = "THEY GON SHUT DOWN Sup Forums"

>fight against recreational marijuana, and crack down on pornography?
Looks like you're new here

The rich are educated. The college educated people who voted for Clinton were all retards who got degrees to "follow their passion" instead of degrees that increased their value in the labor market.

Honestly, if Trump walked out onto 6th Avenue and shot someone, I would still vote for him

>President Dronestrike McWiretap
lol

Fucking this. There's a piece of legislation from the 80s that protects individual internet privacy. That has NEVER been repealed. All that will be sold is anonymous aggregated information for marketing purposes. This is a business decision. Stop believing leftists, when will you ever learn?

>Not only that, also the context of this hysteria is that isp's have been doing since forever. They just nixed a rule before it ever got implemented.
>Literally fake news.
>>leftists are actually too stupid to know Google, Facebook and even the fucking NSA have been doing this shit for nearly a decade

Exactly, Jesus christ people, calm the fuck down.

(But if you WANT to be paranoid, ask yourselves: do you really believe fucking Obama didn't have you on a list already?)

>this is why we need Bernie
Stay out of my country, commie.

They can't bother to figure out what we care about, so they automatically think we give a shit about this place, not realizing there are a dozen alternatives we'll flee to if this place were shut down.

so what's the source on this besides an image with the site name cropped out for "some reason"

Yes, we should redistribute wealth to (((highly-educated))) women's studies majors. Good thinking, leaf.

The college educated also voted for donald trump.

>bullshit article
>Search for the vote it's talking about (congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/34/all-actions)
>Notice that the resolution hasn't passed yet.
>Find the report the vote is about (gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-12-02/pdf/2016-28006.pdf)
>Find the statement the vote is about in the report:

"Recognizing the fundamental importance of transparency to enable consumers to make informed purchasing decisions, we require carriers to provide privacy notices that clearly and accurately inform customers about what confidential information the carriers collect, how they use it, under what circumstances they share it, and the categories of entities with which they will share it. We also require that carriers inform their customers about customers’ rights to opt in to or opt out (as the case may be) of the use or sharing of their confidential information. We require that carriers present their privacy notice to customers at the point of sale, and that they make their privacy policies persistently available and easily accessible on their Web sites, applications, and the functional equivalents thereof. Finally, consistent with FTC best practices and with the requirements in the CPBR, we require carriers to give their customers advance notice of material changes to their privacy policies.) "

>Find the transcript of the discussion of the vote by clicking on "All Actions" in the congress.gov page about the vote and opening all links (example: congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-163/senate-section/page/S1925)
>Skim through the transcript to find out what the vote is really about (in this case, whether the FCC or FTC should govern privacy rules

TL;DR: its clickbait with lot of made up shit in the article

I expected better from Sup Forums

College educated whites did. Though 95% of blacks and 70% of hispanics vote Democrat, so there's no way he had a chance winning either of those groups, even limiting it to just the college educated among them.

>Nazis complain about freedom
>Nazis
Are these guys insane or what

Except for half that meme is things that Trump has no Constitutional authority to do. Anything that requires a law to be passed (budgets, rules, etc) cannot be done by Trump. This is why you cannot take ANY memes seriously, because ones like this are so factually inaccurate.... might as well start taking The Onion as gospel.

>aryan
>not blonde

Oh yeah that time Obama tried to enforce SOPA, yeah he dindu nuffin.

>nazis complain about freedom
But nazis are anti-free speech??

I'm sure FB and Google sell data but this thing about employers being able to check your browsing history is new to me.

>Being a nigger that you have to steal and pirate
>Being a degenerate that plays video games and watches movies and decide to steal them.

Thanks but no thanks.

Arabs are Aryan

OH NO
WE SCREWED UP FELLOW NAZIS

>people on fb crying over destroyed freedoms like people are forcing them to use an ISPs services
>implying ISPs won't offer a "privacy guarantee" in their contracts for people that pay extra per month
>implying I care if someone pays Cox to know that I'm a vorefag and want to be a little girl

bingo

>>people on fb crying over destroyed freedoms like people are forcing them to use an ISPs services
how could those people even be worried about internet privacy when they're already volunteered every little bit of information about themselves to a free networking service

I'm antisemitic and I support israel.

Is he still considered a candidate when he is the standing president faggot?

You forgot the part where she cites Huffpost as her source.

Why should I care about the browsing data of some burgers?

Its the way advertising on the internet works. If you wanted to buy an ad on Sup Forums you pay X amount of money for Y page views. If your ad is for the sale of chairs and all 200,000 pages were viewed by people who dont need a new chair, then your advertising was a waste of money. This bill helps companies target their advertising, so that if someone has been looking for a new chair your chair ad will play for them.

The first ISP that promises they won't sell their customers history will be the next big thing.

I'm okay with that.

Porn is not free speech.

Fuck the porn industry.

No. Because most people don't care about privacy. If that were true, it would have been a thing with cellphone carriers, with social networks, etc. It's not. People are largely indifferent.

Idiotic.

Conflating it with art was the worst decision

Oy vey it's literally another Shoah

I'm just a humble internet merchant and this anti-Semite here tries to slip me some zyklon b.

Yet people will still use Facebook and Google and shit on that ISP and let them sell on information about their browsing habits instead

>Praise KEK
They are attacking /pol directly. The media fears us. This is nothing a VPN cannot fix, and it is not that big a deal.

Heh.

Nothing personnel, kiddos.

It doesn't matter. We will take a hit if it means pissing off reddit.

holy fuck this

No one ever gets it, this is the worlds largest honeypot

because there is a lot of money in blackmail

>The FTC will create an actual ruleset; unlike the FCC where they can just decided behind closed doors what they do and don't want.
>FCC can do whatever they want. FTC will have a set in stone rule set everyone can understand so there will be no uncertainty in the private sector.
This sounds good, but how does FTC regulation differ from FCC in its transience? What stops the next president from altering FTC regulation, as it's also not law?

>lower prices and increase performance
That's not the be-all end-all of what we want the internet to do.

>Sure our rights are gonna get trampled on and big corporations rape our assholes. but who cares, Liberals gonna freak XD

What happened to Sup Forums?

I'm not sure what rights are being trampled here?

>why do we

stop right there kike

What happens if a democrat wins at literally any point in the future and this law is in effect. This can and will bite you faggots in the ass.

The market should be free. You burgers are all about freedom.

Lefties will never win again.

Weed and porn is degenerate