Ancap is a meme/larping and not real

This whole ancap thing is larping right? Nobody takes it seriously right? imgur.com/a/4ns3R

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=6aW_D9AZgfs
youtube.com/watch?v=E-m6vc7lsmE
youtube.com/watch?v=jcUZrDX5P7A
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Ancap is retarded, but a very small govt system could work.

You two were born in big government worshiping education programs, you wouldn't understand.

being healthy is retarded, but having a little tumor could work.

You don't need roads when the free market enables everyone to have a VTOL.

I know, you burgers don't know tfw not free

Thats why russia hates commies more than we do

What?

anything anarchist is retarded

Reminder, anti-ANCAP threads are by commies

You'd be extremely surprised, OP. My best friend is pretty much a more radical Hoppe. He thinks we ought to live in an AnCap society, and the sole purpose of the government should be to physically remove niggers, spics, kikes, faggots, and commies, and do nothing else.

Healthy meaning "ancap", tumour meaning "small government"

Austrian intellectual

...

Some states have more freedoms than others, one of the benefits our founding fathers put in place which limited federal control and left it up to states on a lot of issues.

That said our government has been getting too big the last few decades.

Actual fascist are anti capitalists and they are pretty much authoritarian.

Don't underestimate the power of autism.

Damn, that does sound nice

How is ancap healthy?

Alright, my theory is that ancap is the ideal state that we should be striving for. However, people are flawed and tend to go full degenerate. Therefor, the progression of a state's government should be that in the worst case situation (IE, third world shithole) full authoritarian is the way to go. Once you manage to culturally indoctrinate the people into a bunch of chimps, than you transition to a democracy, as now the people should be generally intelligent enough to handle their own government. From there, you go to libertarian, and then eventually ancap. (though I doubt anyone will ever reach that point) Essentially, it's like raising kids; start out as a dictator and then slowly give them more freedom until they can handle themselves after you're gone.

It's nice until you try to find a spot to park the cunt.

Unlimited decadence, that's not even a question

But wouldn't the big corps eventually rule the world?

sounds like soviet communism

>ancap is the ideal state
In what universe.
You guys really just need to read Imperium and drop this (((liberalism)))), whether economic or social it has its basis in the Judaeo Masonic revolutions.

But that's okay because it's voluntary
t. ancap

>Implying that you can't use your McBrimstone missiles to destroy other peoples VTOL that are parked where you want to park.

If someone parks where you want to park then they are breaking the NAP, which warrants force against them

>imgur
hello there reddit

Yeah, except more free market. I don't think that we'd ever get there because any utopian state is bound to fail, but we should try and keep the level of government to a minimum. Right now, we probably need a bit more central authority, but I'd rather cut down as people improve. Essentially start top-right on the political compass and slowly work your way down.

this triggers the statist

It'd be a fuckfest over here with that many people trying to park in our whole 10ft of road width.

The old cunts you dump here from the mainland can't even park a fucking Fiat 500 without killing 3 cyclists and knocking my wing mirror off.

Those ancap retards say that nazis = left

It would suck ass to be wage slave to big corps that are not tied by laws. It's already pretty bad, but if the market were truly free, then it'd be far far worse

RAPTURE WHEN ?

That's the beauty of the VTOL. You don't need a road to park on, you can just chuck it where-ever you like.

Also, cycling is a communist plot to bring down the auto industry. Therefore killing cyclists is justified because they are breaking the NAP.

Take it from and islander:
That much seafront property is going to make it a real cunt to keep all the retired English out of the property market.

whats your point

ROADS. WE NEED TO PAY 30% OF OUR INCOME IN (((TAXES))) BECAUSE ROADS!

He means it's better to have a small tumor than a large tumor

>disrespects ancap
>violating the NAP

Heh, nothing personal, kiddo

In an ideal world, sure.

But with all the national threats around us, you're asking to get exploited. Thats just the symptom of technological progress, you lose freedom.

Sorry faggot people need heirarchy, either its explicity like a big government or implicit like a functioning traditional culture with social rules that are enforced. You degenerates want to destroy both and think that will work somehow.

Should we just get rid of fiat money, banks and jews? Wouldn't that solve most of our world problems?

Hoppe is the final redpill.

You might ascend to Hoppe's level eventually.

b-but muh (((roads)))

youtube.com/watch?v=6aW_D9AZgfs

Tbh democracy has always been about protecting the more wealthy people of the society.

youtube.com/watch?v=E-m6vc7lsmE

Ancap is no larp, it's the one and only system that will provide unrestricted liberty while maintaining a good society.

>inb4 muh natsoc
>(((socialism))) is cool shit, only whites are enslaved

>cycling is a communist plot to bring down the auto industry. Therefore killing cyclists is justified because they are breaking the NAP.
That's true cyclists are pieces of shit but what about horses

pretty good vid

Democracy lets the plebs band-together and demand free shit from the government.

Democracy is why feminists and SJWs have so much power, even though they're retarded and incompetent by themselves.

Someone needs to put the cyclist part on a memeball right fucking meow

t mobile cancer

I own a set of stables which I rent out.
You will find no bigger a set of cunts than horse riders.

Imagine an old penny-farthing bicycle, only it needs 2-4 hours of service every day, eats only a specific mix of expensive grass, leaves shit all over the roads and will become a raging spastic if you so much as try to overtake the bastards; killing itself, its rider and any pedestrians nearby in the process.

Get rid of all technology, mate. The nature of technology is that's it is developed and controlled by the elites. The common man never has access to the best tech due to its costly nature. We can't work around that. Worst of all, because there's competition, our elites use more and more social and technological coercion against us under the guise of protection against other baddies. This is why we don't even bat an eye anymore when the CIA spies on us all all times. We wouldn't want the Chinese to be able to exploit us, right?

No, there is no way of fighting this trend without fundamentally changing the world to one of peace, which is impossible without degrading the human spirit.

why don't you just consent to taxes

\Hey Leftypol finland poster. I know its you.
why are you trying to use us AnCaps to wage war on NatSoc types?

This is my first thread or post regarding ancap. You have me mistaken for someone else.

>you can consent to theft

taxation is theft

youtube.com/watch?v=jcUZrDX5P7A

but the government owns the country you live in and there's a fee

This strikes fear into the ancaps heart

same goes for isis

Notice how all of those "anarchists" are the first people who would perish in the absence of government...

Yes, that's the really ironic thing in all of this.

>You will find no bigger a set of cunts than horse riders.
I'm inclined to believe that it's true, my mother is a vet she always says that they're bad payers
>it needs 2-4 hours of service every day
Wtf I hate horses now I didn't think it needed that much time, we might as well eat them all

what is your arguments

Never trust anything that needs to be held in its place by an electric fence.
Not sure why I'm telling a Frenchman this, you learned that in Algeria.

i'm not trying to argue, i'm posting road memes because leftists are cucks

youtube hoppe libertarianism or read a book

I reallywant to find a center way, to get rid of BS leftist government corruption, but without pandering to right wing multinational big corps.

...

You can't.

There is no middle way. Power will always beget more power. Decentralized systems will always be subverted and assimilated by larger ones. The problem is not big government or big corporations, those are but symptoms of the technological industrial system we have created.

Unlimited decadence doesn't look like that, it looks like this.
The ethnoi must have a powerful institute to unite the ethnoi towards one transcendent ideal which they strive towards. Making utilitarian economic liberalism the ideal of your ethnoi will destroy your people in the long run, and more than likely ruin the planet. Libertarianism and Marxism are essentially indistinguishable from one another, they both have the same goal of destroying the "state" but both are racing towards that eschatological conclusion in barely different forms.
Both want a borderless, stateless, raceless, genderless, mass of utilitarian consumers to inherit the Earth as there final solution to human suffering.

...

yes, nobody takes them seriously because everyone with a brain realizes it's just some kids asperging out their fear of having to cooperate with other people. It's just like Ayn Rand and her bs objectivity movement. A childish fantasy that they will usually grow out of when they become adults. Except of course for the eternal mgtow basement dweller.

*blocks your path*

shorting stock markets and creating propaganda to slander and crash markets is ancap.

Bill Clinton sub-prime mortgage lending and deregulation credit default swaps, the subsequent crash of the housing market, and the tax payer bail out, is an example of Ancap. Your rulers practice ancap while keeping you mind, body and soul in bondage.

you're just too blue pilled for this board.

such a claim is illegitimate

land can only be acquired through homesteading or buying from someone with a legitimate claim

you just can't claim the hill over there is yours and shoot/rob/rape anyone who trespasses when you don't even have placed a sign

Kek true that even using that method it didn't worked out that well

*nice nipples faggot*

*tips fedora and continues to walk

what the fuck he gonna do beat the shit out of me?

I'm autistic i can do that better then him, he'll just run away and call an autist when he see me rekting my face.

>cooperate with other people
>by pointing a gun at them

You might have lost Indo-china but at least we got some decent films out of it and America blew its asshole out trying to get it back.

But seriously, Horses are fucking awful, unless you're friends with a carpenter you're going to have to buy wood shavings for its bedding, spend hours every day mucking it out, feeding it, moving it to different fields for grazing.

Then you've got to buy rugs, fly masks, grooming products, riding equipment.

The boots alone are going to set you back about £100 or more.

All this for an animal that'll rear up and cripple you if someone slams a car door too sharply.

Or it trips over and lames itself and you spend thousands in vet bills before someone takes it out back and puts a 12 gauge shell into its brain.

Im not quite sure how it works where you're from but I've never been held at gunpoint. But then again, im happily paying my taxes because im intelligent enough to realize we need a government structure to survive as a society. We're not a hunter-gatherer society anymore, we dont have the space to survive as one man nations. We need to cooperate to survive and that trumps idiotic dreams of total autonomy. It's easy: without a state, there is nothing protecting basic human rights. When there is no state, there will always be one developing. Show me a single example of more than 1000 people establising a stable anarchic society. You cant, because once you think you found one you realize there is a governmental structure in place that's just not called such.

>happily paying my taxes
>flag
I know.

>we need a government structure to survive as a society
If my property is protected by a company with nukes how will you impose your government on me?

>company with nukes
>not your government

im afraid you might missunderstand
>company with nukes
>said company is not your government

If they impose taxes and don't let me switch insurers me and the rest of the subscribers and the competing insurers cut off their funding and fight them. It wouldn't happen if the subscribers are actual ancaps.

and then it nukes you and you're dead

>nuking your own customers

you're not their customer anymore, but you will sure serve as a good example to the rest of their "customers" when they dont pay up

>I will nuke an area of 500.000 people because one guy didn't pay "voluntary" subscription.
You'd make a very stupid enforcement agency owner and would probably get killed.

It's called satire. Sometimes people fall for satire though

Also, please post the US history memeballs, they're fucking great (especially the oppose russia in afghanistan -> support rebels -> they become terrorists that oppose you -> etc memeball)

he implied that his company would use nukes in a conflict, not me

Retard. So Trump can just start threatening every US citizen with nukes and get away with it? Not to mention if they actually do it they'll get nuked by the other insurance companies.

...

Wrong, he implied that his company would OWN nukes for deterrence purposes.

You are either utterly misled or purposely misrepresenting other people's points.

...

you brought nukes into this, not me.

a company that has nukes will be huge because making nukes isnt quite that easy, cheap and done in your parents basement. Said company will have the ability to make other weapons aswell, it will and it will impose the interests of its owner on others. It will be a government, you just call it a company.

>you brought nukes into this, not me.
>and then it nukes you and you're dead
B-but why do you have n-nukes? Gtfo.

>isnt quite that easy, cheap
Warheads are a couple million. Make them in a free market and see that go down further. Are you seriously suggesting it's impossible to have a company raise that much?

not necessarily so.

several hundred defense companies could pay a minimal fee to subcontract nuclear defense to another corporation specialized in such matters while each one providing local defense independently.

Your assumption is that every one agency has to deliver all the protection possible independently and that agencies couldn't cooperate. Modern states do that when they form military alliances, if anything, private enterprise would have a bigger incentive to do so as the costs of nuclear deterrence are very high.

Minarchy is the ultimate choice.