There are no good arguments against free migration. Open borders would double the world's real GDP

There are no good arguments against free migration. Open borders would double the world's real GDP.

Other urls found in this thread:

pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.25.3.83
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Then open your house and car and your legs to migrants.

Then all the shitskins elect socialists and communists and we're Brazil+Mexico+Somalia in a year.

Native-born Americans already vote for socialists and fascists.

>DUDE MATERIALISM
>DUDE THE MARKETS
>DUDE ECONOMY LMAO
get out

>open your nation to third world migrants
>now excuse me while I return to my nice house in the suburbs with absolutely no migrants anywhere

Fuck off. Fucking amerifat trash hole.

Nope.

Whites in all age groups voted Trump majority.

Whites have voted majority republican in every election for the last half century.

Riiight, let me in then.

look, open borders creates the dangerous idea that everyone can have the good life ~ fuck that

Typical Jew short-term thinking to make a shekel.

I agree, we should nuke everything outside of europe, then we can have open borders.

Argument #1: Humans are tribal. They produce best & are most peaceful when in a known community

Argument #2: Natural resources will be protected no matter the politics. When invaders attempt to claim the resources of another, war happens. War does not advance society

Argument #3: The best governance is the one closest to you. EU figured this out recently. No borders = world government. World governments = no freedoms

Argument #4: The most dominant cultures would rule by force, then implement borders. It's human nature. It would be one big-fucking land grab by the largest coalition.

As it stands today, invasions happen with lesser frequency because of the social stigma applied to countries invading the borders of others.

>muh shekels
reminder to sage Jewish threads

>Open borders TO PROTESTANTS would double the world's real GDP.

fixed that for you OP.

>a source isn't necessary

>wtf I love when corporations make lots of money now

T. Leftists in the Trump era

t. 60% white

The very argument is you shittard's socialist programs.

name one country that has become successful a prosperous from having completely open unrestricted borders.

pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.25.3.83

and then burn in hell you fucking heretic

It literally doesn't matter how you feel about immigration or if democrats control the white house again.
We're running out of antibiotics and the free movement of people is asking to get hit by a plague

>There are no good arguments against free migration. Open borders would double the world's real GDP.

>live in shit place
>migrate to place that will give me free money
>place becomes shit place
>rinse, repeat

really activated my almonds

I'm not a leftist

I'm against socialist programs

The US had no immigration quotas before 1924.

>turn the US into super Sweden within the year

>Argument #2: Natural resources will be protected no matter the politics. When invaders attempt to claim the resources of another, war happens. War does not advance society
That is something you should be telling to Daddies Trump and Putin, not the third world.

>listing books that make a claim, confirms it to be 100% right

Not an argument. Construct an argument.

It did however have a whites only policy. Hope this helps you figure out what happened and why it works.

1924 is so far detached from the modern world.

1924 is not 2017

That's because the immigrants were 100% western European.

The average per capita GDP in the world is something like $12,000. Even if you double that, you're still at half what most Western countries enjoy.

Free migration will make everyone poor.