HOW IS THIS EVEN ALLOWED?

How can we uncuck ourselves?

Other urls found in this thread:

tomwoods.com/ep-876-the-inequality-hucksters/
thedailybeast.
tomwoods.com/ep-462-we-found-a-major-flaw-in-the-egalitarian-argument/
tomwoods.com/thomas-piketty-refuted/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Half of the world's population are niggers and poo in loo's.

>See my careface?

>so jew
kek

If you earn more than 20k you're the top 3% of the world.

>so jew

but is this justified?
are 97% of the world really less productive than any first world worker?

100% of the world's Cheetos is owned by a single species, even though there are millions of other species on Earth.

How do we fix this?

>so jew

Ever considered performing a bit better?
No?
Whining on an imageboard it is then.

Why don't we leave 97% of the world alone and see if they turn themselves first world. The current system of meddling and wars doesn't seem to be working.

Thats capitalism. Ultra rich own most of the money, but few starve and anyone can afford a TV, car etc.

So jew

Sometimes I wonder what would happen if a Bilderberg meeting gets plane-ed. When all those concentrated power and money suddenly creates a vaccum.

you can ask yourself that after you donate your computer or any form of digital communication

your lifestyle and thinking is the product of the beneficiary end of this inequality.

Why is this a problem? I thought Sup Forums was pro-capitalism

First lets cut out anyone but Europe, East Asia, US and CANZUK. Wealth will probably even out a bit.

>allowed
It's allowed by the richest men in the world. How is this hard to understand?

If they made their money in business, then their wealth represents the lower end of the increased productivity they've added to the world through voluntary financial trade with people like you.

When you buy a smartphone, and pay for a data plan, you're signaling that it's worth it to hand over the hundreds of dollars to pay for those things because you prefer that level of increased efficiency over the alternative, which is spending 50 cents on letters and stamps.

Oy vey, we need communism goy! We will redistribyat the wealth. Just rememba ta give da chosen control of all ya financial institutions and govament.

Seems to me a lot of people need to pull themselves up by the bootstraps, walk in and demand an interview.

>Hey maybe such gigantic amounts of money and power should not be centrelized in so few people that are able to shape all our lives
>20 people junp forward to call everyone a communist who wants the slightest bit of regulation
I just want you to know that you are doing exactly t´what they want you to do

They are generally less knowledgeable concerning technology, thus they cannot operate even moderately advanced capital investments (ie machinery) that makes each worker in the first world more productive.

Not only that, but they live in mostly corrupt and undeveloped countries where the costs of doing business make paying such people a comparable wage are impossible, as costs of transport, time, and bribes eat into what could be paid to 3rd world workers.

Stop bullying minorities
>pic unrelated

>How can we uncuck ourselves?

The Cuckstian serves the Chosen so the first step is anti-theism and pro-Nordic culture. There are no gods and no strong man NEEDS imaginary friends outside his RACE.

Worship your White brothers, kill everyone who resists, take power and slaughter all the Yids, niggers and other filth.

There is no peaceful solution. Peace and cuckoldry serve only the insidious, debilitating plans of the Kike.

They create less wealth, so yes.

Retards

Theyre not rich as the worlds population. Their wealth is tied to the company or companies in terms of stocks. They cant access it like you access your bank account as selling a part of microsoft isnt feasible in practise.

The company is the source and holder of majority of the wealth. Not the person in question even if they are immensily rich by holding other assets.

Yes, they are.

nope, capitalism is anti-white

Rotschild literally owns almost all the worlds printed money

Why does it matter? If you live in the west your standard of living is likely higher than anyone in the history of mankind.

Maybe we vote an easily manipulated buffoon with a Jew for a stepson.

I live in eastern europe.

Because these super rich elites are the ones ruining the west.

Because WE were stolen of all our riches and culture by the white man 90,000 years ago.

The whites stole half of the world.

Every major empire goes through periods of obscene wealth disparity. It's a sign of a civilization in decline, when the elite can no longer see what their actions do to a society, that society falls. It's happened to every major empire on Earth, USA is no exception.

Interesting that pure capitalist goys say 'wealth is a zero sum game', when wages have stagnated in America for the middle and lower classes since the late 1970s. Nearly all of the wealth that has been made in the last 40 years has been funneled to the tippity top of the socioeconomic period. Everyone knows that tax cuts for the rich don't make the wealth 'trickle down', no economist takes trickle down economics seriously. The U.S. dollar is inflated 99 percent since the inception of the Federal Reserve in 1913. I'm sure it's (((nothing))) though.

>than any first world worker?
they're "investors" and "job creators"! Didn't you know what transactions at stock exchanges create jobs and add to the general wealth?!

Prepare for another revolution lads, as when China and other countries experience financial crash and western economy goes to hell, the poor will set out to murder the rich. Peter Thiel has recently acquired a citizenship of New Zealand

How can anyone say that with a straight face?

>Why does it matter?

Because for the average American in 2017, wages haven't kept up with the standard of living for decades now. Where is all the money going? For the richest country on Earth, I know very few people that aren't basically living paycheck to paycheck in order to have all the 'normal' American things. Either the American Dream exists, or it doesn't, but the sentiment hasn't been true in a long time now. Most millenials will be lucky if they can ever buy a house or their own property.

The west isn't ruined. By what metric would you even say that?

The world destroyed the 3rd Reich. You reap what you sow.

capitalism is the biggest enemy to traditionalism.
it has destroyed our culture and replaced it with a degenerate materialsitic consumerist "culture", ,not to mention how rich capitalists have lobbied in governments for open borders

i agree

monarchism is the way to go

Millennials will be fine if they educate themselves to make their labor marketable. The people who gave lost in the market in past decades are uneducated shitters who expect to have high paying jobs with pensions with nothing more than a high school diploma. The world has changed, sure, but believing it's some vast conspiracy is retarded. Occam's razor, dude.

Monarchism has nothing to do with economy tho

>shitpublisher doesn't know the difference between wealth and net worth
Every time

>8 "men"

Couldn't say people huh, had to say men. They know who they're pandering to the fuckers.

Realising that 50% of the world's wealth being consolidated in the hands of 8 fucking people (most of whom are Jews) is a bit fucked up doesn't make you a communist

>people are stupid enough to embrace vapid consumerism
Wanting to dictate public morality makes you no better than an SJW. I embrace and accept peoples' personal agency, even when it leads to poor decision making.

>b-b-but muh minorities and their inferior IQ are the reason of inequality
>inequity doesn't exist, everyone has the same chances today

Fuck off, if you can't see the majority of people are being exploited and abused today and blame inequality on purely raccistic devaluations of whole ethnic groups as "uncapable of participating and thriving in the system" or "purposely destroying first world economies and culture" you fail to see the bigger picture.

All you end up doing is raising the bar, it won't change the number of people under it.

Let me explain what's happening here, since you're too stupid to understand.

In the United States there is a system called the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve is what is called a "Reserve Bank," which you might have heard of in introduction to Macroeconomics.

Okay, so every year the Federal Government passes what is called a "Spending Bill," which details where all of the funding from the Federal Government is going to be appropriated, and how much those appropriations will be. Follow me so far?

Well, when the Spending Bill passes, the Federal Government hands out that money as detailed in the bill. But wait, where did the money come from?
"Taxes," you, a fool, might answer.

But in fact, it comes from the Federal Reserve in the form of a loan, because taxes for the year haven't been collected yet. This loan covers the entire federal budget for the year, and comes with an interest rate of between 6 and 11%.

This budget, with interest, is then paid back over the course of the year using Federal Taxes.

So let's review. The Federal Reserve, which is privately owned, collects back about 108% of the entire federal budget every year. How much is 8% of the US federal budget? Well, last year it was $319,920,000,000.

That interest was scooped up by the Federal Reserve either as debt the US government now owes them, or in hard cash. That's profit. Every penny of it is now theirs.

Congratulations, now you know why no amount of taxation ever seems to solve "wealth inequality." It's because all taxes objectively serve to enrich this small clique of bankers, who howl with laughter each time some bonehead like Bernie Sanders talks about paying "your fair share." Every penny of it goes into their pockets.

>>Wanting to dictate public morality makes you no better than an SJW.
>implying i give a shit
>>embrace and accept peoples' personal agency
fuck them, a traitour is a traitour

I don't believe that headline it seems more made up then the homeless numbers spewed by the media in the 80d and 90s where the guy that did the "study" they based all these numbers off of admitted he made all the numbers up on what he "thought was about right" for the number of homeless people
I want to see their methodology and sources.
Pro tip they're full of shit because people have already shown these as full of shit
The bottom half of the world alone buys more value in peanuts just peanuts than what these "8 richest men" have in total value

tomwoods.com/ep-876-the-inequality-hucksters/

>ITT, socialists don't understand natural logarithms

How are you and your baltic friends nations? You belong to russia

>so jew

>it has destroyed our culture and replaced it with a degenerate materialsitic consumerist "culture",
Once again a leftist authoritarian collectivist blames the actions of government subsidization and protectionism on capitalism episode.

Protip just in your nation it started to degenerate the second you abandoned free market concepts in favor of government coddling from crib to grave.

>a fantasy animation project

If you're in favor of taxing the super rich to offset the growing inequality, knock yourself out. A progressive capital gains tax perhaps?

It's pointless to complain about the effects of capitalism if you're not willing to intervene with policy.

>having different values means being a traitor
Watch that edge, kiddo.

Because capitalism with fiat money isn't capitalism you fucking dope. Not in the "real communism has never been tried" way, I mean in the way that it's impossible for a man to be a woman regardless what they tell you they "feel".
To hold a monopoly in capitalism is almost impossible unless you consistently make the right moves. eg if you borrow someone money you better make sure they aren't buying magic beans with it or you won't be getting your money back and especially not interest. But if you use fiat money you can encourage people to borrow the money and encourage them to buy magic beans with it. Why the fuck do you care if they can't pay it back? If anything it's better because they're in your pocket when they can't. The money you invested? Who cares, it's fiat money,backed by literally fucking nothing and you can print more.
Tell me you don't think it's actually still back by gold?

>mfw I've literally seen this be pushed more and more in the (((news)))

There's a reason the third position is feared and it's because it's everything (((they))) hate, mainly that it works.
People have been memed to believe there's only two positions "capitalism" (which I've at least half explained) and (((communism))). This claim is false.

That's not how it works.

thedailybeast. fuckyoudirect linking is for faggots com/articles/2014/01/14/the-insanely-profitable-federal-reserve.html

>traditionalism
>leftist
kys
>blames the actions of government subsidization and protectionism on capitalism episode.
please explain to me how corporations dindu nuffin.
also if you are against protectionism your literally a globalist
>government coddling from crib to grave.
i'm not advocating for a welfare state tho

being a materialist that cares more about wealth then the nation makes you one

But how is capitalism "anti white"?

Latvia? The fuck noncountry is that?

>not being a populist protectionist retard makes you a traitor
Confirmed for not understanding basic economics.

>populist
>implying

Because, in case you hadn't noticed, the people who are arguing for diversity and mass immigration are the CEOs of fortune 500 companies (i.e. rich capitalists)

They want cheaper labour and more people to sell their products and services to.

Every single capitalist is a globalist. How can you be a capitalist and be against immigration? Immigration is good for business.

>If you're in favor of taxing the super rich to offset the growing inequality, knock yourself out
No
Fuck these idiotic piketty cult members.
Even that hack Pickett admits that doing this doesn't benefit anyone and even harms the poor and only exist as an idea because people like him hate the fact that people have more and want to see them destroyed.

It is taking the handicapper general satire of these idiotic egalitarians and making it into real life.
Two relevant links

tomwoods.com/ep-462-we-found-a-major-flaw-in-the-egalitarian-argument/
tomwoods.com/thomas-piketty-refuted/
> kys
Capitalism is literally the only system of economic method of organization that is exclusively thought of and developed in western white nations and is what made Europe so dramatically wealthy and culturally advanced.

Of course over the last 200 years with all kinds of collectivist retards sprouting up these values have been being subverted and destroyed and unsurprisingly Europe and north America is degenerating back into more violent primitive culture behavior.
> please explain to me how corporations dindu nuffin.
Do some god damn research before holding such a god damn concrete reactionary position you ignorant cunt.
Good Lord holding an opinion is worthless compared to knowing what you're talking about.
People have been endlesslypointing out how government destroys voluntary exchange for protectionist policies of special interest since Adam fucking Smith in 1776 catch up you ignorant fucking faggoy.
> also if you are against protectionism your literally a globalist
Protectionism was designed under the British crown for the very reason of ending beneficial trade to everyone but the British crown and those who paid the most to be protected.
Co

Because capitalism has gotten to the point where it can stop pretending it cares at all about preserving it's host nation's culture, ethnicity and western values. People have been succesfully brainwashed and won't question foreign policies and events so long as the government has at least plausible explanations to take the political decisions it does.

>i'm not advocating for a welfare state tho
You're advocating a welfare state for uncompetitive people in your society by advocating protectionism you dumb shit.

Government handouts exist beyond payouts to nonworking people

>implying we should have Cheetohs at all
Those things are like nuggets of salt.

You could decrease the governments role in the economy (good luck getting that passed) to increase the prevalence of a free market so that you could then, through your own agency, challenge the monopolies held by the current elites ensuring that those on top are kept there by their own productivity and service to society.

>Immigration is good for business.
it's also against muh free market since it stops you from hiring whoever you want,
hence why libertarians arguing against immigration are hypocrites

In the USA, the richest and most powerful country in human history, there are counties with life expectancies similar to those in Sudan.

Refer to
>Once again a leftist authoritarian collectivist blames the actions of government subsidization and protectionism on capitalism episode.
Stop spewing this god damn Marxist based crap while saying you want to save Europe and read what actual capitalist supporters are saying about the current situation.

Protip
They hate it and have hated it since the late 1700s

How the fuck does immigration stop you from hiring whoever you want?

It expands the labour pool and gives companies MORE choice over who they hire.

protectionism existed before the welfare state m8.

>Capitalism is literally the only system of economic method of organization that is exclusively thought of and developed in western white nations and is what made Europe so dramatically wealthy and culturally advanced.
>Of course over the last 200 years with all kinds of collectivist retards sprouting up these values have been being subverted and destroyed and unsurprisingly Europe and north America is degenerating back into more violent primitive culture behavior.
>> please explain to me how corporations dindu nuffin.
>Do some god damn research before holding such a god damn concrete reactionary position you ignorant cunt.
>Good Lord holding an opinion is worthless compared to knowing what you're talking about.
>People have been endlesslypointing out how government destroys voluntary exchange for protectionist policies of special interest since Adam fucking Smith in 1776 catch up you ignorant fucking faggoy.
>> also if you are against protectionism your literally a globalist
>Protectionism was designed under the British crown for the very reason of ending beneficial trade to everyone but the British crown and those who paid the most to be protected.
>Co
For

thats my point

>protectionism existed before the welfare state m8
You're clearly not capable of being in this discussion if that's all you got user.

Protectionism is a form of government welfare Christ.
Government ensuring that you're the only one who can operate in a given market is about the biggest gibs I could think of

>not real capitalism

Work Harder. Its your choice to be poor. In life you get as much as you work for.

How can you be this dumb? Ask yourself "cui bono".

The ONLY argument in favour of immigration is that it grows the economy. If you're a business owner you'll be voting for more immigration as well.

Nice meme my friend.

I've barely worked in my entire life yet I've inherited more than the average wagecuck will ever earn in their lifetime.

>making comparative statements about wealth
>not a populist

I'm a small business owner who employs legal Mexican immigrants and citizens. I'm in favor of immigration. They're better in almost every way than citizens with the exception of language.

that's just because your ancestors worked hard in one way or the other

That's a false dichotomy as always. Cost of living isn't the same everywhere. Being a billionaire in sv and being a thousandaire in uganda are basically the same thing.

For controlled inmigration that is, what is the point of letting immigrants without educational backgrounds like the millions of refugees in Europe?

I think we can agree that doesn't benefit the market at all, if anything it only devaluates the lowest income part time jobs.

The current people pushing for these anticapitalist policies are just that user anticapitalist.
It be like calling Pinochet pro socialism it simply is calling a spade a spade user.

Mercantilism simply put isn't capitalism

Yeah but let's not pretend I had anything to do with it.

The whole argument that people "choose" to be rich is bullshit. It's pure luck most of the time.

7 out of 8 men are jewish and own half the world's wealth

Stop being anti-semitic by arguing against inequality.

Completely agree. If I were a business owner I'd be shilling hard for immigration as well.

>doing this doesn't benefit anyone
It doesn't benefit those who receive some small redistributive effect? How's that, exactly?

Capitalism has never had as its goal the protection of any culture, with the exception perhaps if capitalism as a concept.

so your parents got rich by luck as well? i'm not denying "luck" plays part in some investments or business but don't be a retard and say it's all luck.

i've never been against people inheriting fortunes, it was obviously their parents' wish that their fruit is passed down, saying anything else or even worse proposing "inheritance taxes" is pure bullshit

>The ONLY argument in favour of immigration is that it grows the economy
That isn't the only argument user.

Remember there was a period in European history not long ago where you didn't even have the concept of passports and this period wasn't done under any kind of idea based around economic activity it was done because it was seen as stupid.

The issue with immigration today is that government welfare is literally a subsidy for shitty unproductive people and where you subsidize something you get more of it.
Which is why immigration today is destructive for the first time in western history precisely because this is the first time in western history immigration isn't based on people looking for work it is based on people looking for give.

>Government handouts exist beyond payouts to nonworking people
Or as a subsidizing mechanism for societal and market goods like education? You couldn't possibly argue that NO redistribution isn't effective at positively influencing markets or societal wellbeing.

Yeah I'd say luck is a huge part of it.

If you believe that being rich is simply down to hard work then why aren't you rich? Are you lazy or stupid?

97% might earn less than 20k, but you have to take into consideration the cost of everything. If you look at poor countries everything is less expensive, which means that they might be having less struggle than someone with 20k in Canada or Europe.

It's obviously a combination of both. Few people are born with the means, but even fewer of those will succeed without hard work.

>Are you lazy or stupid?
not exceptionally either, just average. i think it's sad you attribute your wealth to luck.