What is a good argument in defense of the European colonialism of Africa?

what is a good argument in defense of the European colonialism of Africa?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=lPNrtjboISg
m.youtube.com/watch?v=xqyWMVc9Gus
myredditnudes.com/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Roads

Access to big black cocks.
Have to keep the European women satisfied.

also should white people feel bad for subjugating the natives when the natives had been enslaving and selling themselves into slavery far long before the europeans showed up?

The fact that they were and stil have the mental capacity of children and were savage creatures with disgusting rituals

Also

The fact that modern African cities have electricity.

Colonialism was the best thing that happened to Africa.

The only places people want to live in in Africa today are former colonies

Comparatively to countries that didn't, countries that adapted to Western Colonialism had a rise in the quality of life overall.

It was a net benefit for Africans, who later resented their elevates positions in life, and sought to destroy it because racism???

They had 50,000yrs to evolve into a strong civilization with at least a 20,000yr head start on whites, arabs, chinks and everyone else who moved north of the Sahara. They had plentiful natural resources and food but were still fucking around with stone tools and mudhuts by the time Europeans showed up.

Gibsmedat.

...

MIGHT
MAKES
RIGHT

WHITE
MAKES
RIGHT

OR ELSE

THE WHIP GOES 'CRACK'
AND THE BLACK'S BACKS GOES SNAP

Niggers can't take care of themselves.

They had a higher standard of living under colonialism (excluding the french and belgians possibly) than they ever did previously.

Free Rhodesia!

1. The fact that Europeans invented all the modern technology they are using and therefore have brought vast technological improvements in health, medicine, infrastructure, computer science, engineering, art, food, pretty much everything. 2. The fact that Africa is enormous, and it's absurd that only one ethnicity should be allowed to live on it. 3. The fact that the entire continent was barely populated before European colonization.

Simple

You give Africa technology, medical huts, clothing crafted by their materials, and roads.

The Africans break it down and still are in shit


Belgium was the best one, but the U.K. Having all those territories was pretty good

The wealthiest developing countries are those that were colonized in the past.

Then there are those who went on to do socialist reforms due to muh oppression. Like most of Southern Africa.
Oppression doesn't explain places like Chile, Hong Kong, etc.

IQ also matters. Africans are dumb as fuck.

This.

Africa is what a liberal calls "sacred land" yet it really is Shit in reality. Who would go there besides going to their western coast and South Africa? And what's important in Africa? The animals? I wouldn't be too shocked if the fucking animals were smarter then the braindead idiots in Africa today

You know why this happened, right, my friend? Because aborigenal Africans are three things :
>Extremely traditionalist
Just look at the surviving fetishists cults or at their ancestral hatred of other tribes (going to the point of ritualistic genocide), and you'll get what I mean.
>In an bountiful environment
A man who doesn't have to work won't work, and it's a common fact : we're just that much egotistical by nature.
>Simpler folks
And yes, I mean that in the way that they are inferior. People everywhere, from Asia to America, cultivated civilization, even some who had the same two above points. However, perhaps due to their lack of any Neanderthalian blood, or simply because of their environment itself, the negroes stopped all technological, cultural and philosophical development : their IQ is said to be lower than the smartest of gorillas in general, and even Kenyan kids don't recognize their own image in a mirror (mind you, the European gave mirrors to the inhabitants of the Americas, who were living in even poorer condition than some african country, and they still recognized their own image).

Colonialism is always a blessing for a literal untermensch. Just look at the States we abandonned and look at how much of shitholes they became.

A huge part of Africa is an empty desert and the parts that arnt empty desert are incredibly disunited. What is the point of pointing out that Africa is large?

Also isnt Russia on its own larger than Africa? Same for Brazil.

Wealth is what factored into nations conquering these places. Belgium was able to do well because they actually made the Africans do something, and Leopold was based.

Rhodesia was also a nation that had a working economy, but because of "Muh land!", it's now in shambles

The ongoing colonization by China. But each country has his history really.

African men can't fend for their families and thus their women want BAC (Big Anglo cock)

...

National sovereignty
Countries can do whatever they please.
Standard morality of the individual doesn't apply to the nation state.
Read The Prince to understand further

>The prince


Machiavelli is the most underrated guy in history that made a good mark

Thanks (not) for pushing gender onto the Africans, Anglojew.

>life expectancy falls to that
>Blame it on colonialism
>"Hows colonialism to blame?"
>"Because the Belgians cut off Africans hands!!!!"


Lel

>bring civilizaiton to literal animals in africa
>fight tooth and nail to drag them into the 20th century
>falls apart immediately after we leave, setting them back to nearly the stone age once more

gee i dont know, ever heard of the white man's burden?

before we came they was EATING EACH OTHER!!! and sure pedos are in white countries but fucking little kids was the norm in old africa

we put a stop to it...and imbreeding

we raised the human development index of those countries also.....over all it was a net benefit

the empire dindu nuffin....people who say otherwise are niggers who are ashamed of this picture

> A huge part of Africa is an empty desert

That does not mean most of those areas are uninhabitable. There's a lot of desert areas in America. The continent itself is still ridiculously enormous.

> and the parts that arnt empty desert are incredibly disunited.
I don't know what you mean by 'disunited'.

> What is the point of pointing out that Africa is large?

it has to potential to contain more people. If you can fit basically every major country in the world inside Africa, this is kind of absurd distribution of land to give all of it to one ethnic group.

> Also isnt Russia on its own larger than Africa? Same for Brazil.

'Russia' is not a continent, unlike Africa, which is a whole continent unto itself and about 75% of Russia is in the coldest climate on earth after antarctica which is so cold it is virtually inunhabitable. And Asia, the continent (like Africa) is shared by both Russians and Asians.

I don't see it as something that needs defense.

It's natural. Europe is powerful and Africa is weak. Africa has resources that Europe wants, so unless Africans can stop Europeans from taking them, I don't really see the issue.

Don't you think they could have shared those without murdering and pillaging?

Oh good story about that

>Be me in class
>Teacher is talking about WMB
>Teacher is white, but obvious cuck
>Read the poem
>It's about civilizing the "Devils"

I was going to burst out laughing, but the reality is that these nations do need us. Without Britain being involved in South Africa and India, there wouldn't be any high grade technology in those places at all

>take a look at africa now

> It's natural. Europe is powerful and Africa is weak. Africa has resources that Europe wants, so unless Africans can stop Europeans from taking them, I don't really see the issue.

That's not a 'moral' argument genius, you are just pointing out that stronger groups can take over weaker groups. No shit. Just because you CAN do something does not supply a moral argument.

>Machiavelli
>Underrated
Wut

but there were nigers needed to be killed.

Underrated post

I wonder if the colonists even really thought of the niggers as the rightful owners of africa instead of just part of the wildlife akin to the lions and apes. The land must have seemed pretty much uninhabited to the colonists, the native niggers were tribal, very sparsely populated and so primitive that they had yet to develop the fucking wheel. I imagine they were seen more as part of the fauna than as actual people.

They are dumb-animals.

Might makes right, and we needed the resources (which they weren't smart enough to use anyways).

Holy shit I have cancer after reading that

I agree with Pierre, Machiavelli is more overrated if anything

No you dont get that shit for free

There is none.
African colonies were a burden on European budget. The spendings in keeping the colonies were far bigger than the profit.

Only (((bankers))) and a few (((merchants))) benefited with colonial Africa. That's why the German conservatives were against colonisation.

just out of curiosity does the HIV epidemic play any role in the sharp decline seen on this graph?

>Machiavelli
>underrated

Nigger wut?

Sanitation, civilization, less mud huts, electricity, South Africa before Mandela, the present state of Zimbabwe vs colonial Zimbabwe, anywhere else presently vs colonial, and any city in Africa.

they were even more retarded than now, monkey tiers

Hobbes explain it far better than Machiavelli.

Right of conquest: the powerful have the absolute right to reduce the weak to servitude.

This is unarguable. Force is the foundation of all order. Force may be limited or withheld, but the order imposed by law is always and only ultimately backed by force.

If you would resist or combat power, force is the only valid and effective tool. Everything else is shades of threat. Peaceful protest suggests the possibility of later violent resistance: it demonstrates commitment and willingness to act. If the issues are central enough and the people involved don't get their way, the suggestion inherent in a peaceful protest is that violence may result.

Ergo, people should not dick around with debate and argument. Enemies exist only for one purpose: to be slain.

European colonialism is the same as every other form of conquest: if you can lay a people at your feet, then do it. It is the right of the powerful. Shame, complaint, and whining are just the ineffective weapons of the weak. If one wants to overcome a conquest, one must do so by violence, or else accept enslavement.

Incorrect. Morality is irrelevant. Only force is valid.

the state africa is in nao

Niggers got some semblance of civilization from the shit they stole from whitey in South Africa. Niggers get to live in civilized parts of the world occasionally fucking some obese white skank. There is nothing good for Europeans though, they got cucked and left now they're the ones getting colonized.

is actually better than it would have been. Unless you're meaning for the Europeans, in which case Africa is now nothing but a cesspool of death and savages.

>what is western law

>is actually better than it would have been
would have been without colonialism or
would have been with colonialism still in place? (because what I meant was: most places in africa were better with whites in power and went down the drain when they left)

>Also isnt Russia on its own larger than Africa?

Russia - 6.6million sq miles
Africa - 11.7million sq miles
Russia is half the size of Africa

You need to watch this
youtube.com/watch?v=lPNrtjboISg

m.youtube.com/watch?v=xqyWMVc9Gus

This is what we were doing in África, this is civilization.

> Incorrect. Morality is irrelevant. Only force is valid.

If you want to live in a civilized society you need moral guidelines.

It is a fact that african independence leaders have homes in europe.
Also their kids study in europe.
Indpendence t was a cover up for the cover up for USSR to take africa with Cuba

GET IN HERE AUTISTS

Look at the refugee crisis. Left to their own devices, the natives would still rather migrate enmasse to Europe. Colonization simply saves them the trouble by turning their continent into Europe.

Top kek they're really this desperate for slavery reparations even though slavery was the niggers fault to begin with.

it abolished slavery which was still practiced by Africans and by Ottomans/arabs

Can any Brit or French user show pics/vídeos of their colonies? We had huge cities there on the 70's.

free or cheap labor. easy african pussy. lots of resources.